ALLOWING DACA, CHAIN AND LOTTERY MIGRATION WILL DESTROY THE GOP AND TRUMPS PRESIDENCY FOR EVER !
DACA RECIPIENTS DRAPED IN MEXICAN FLAGS BURN THE AMERICAN FLAG YET WANT AMNESTY???
Mark Levin has published an 8-minute clip from his LevinTV show tonight, which he says will be available for free, where he discusses the FBI missing texts, the Obama/Clinton/Russia collusion and how the silent coup against Trump is escalating.
Levin discusses how he’s never seen anything like this happen before and at the end of the video he puts it plainly, saying that if we don’t get to the bottom of this, we’re going to be in a hell of a lot of trouble.
Watch:
It’s worth pointing out that Erick Erickson echoes a similar sentiment to what Levin is saying here in a post he wrote this morning:
But the reality is this: if FBI agents collaborated to fabricate or exaggerate allegations about Donald Trump and/or tried to bring down his Presidency through partisan motivations, it is game over on the republic. If the civil institutions we have put in place to ensure law and order apart from politics are infiltrated by politics, there really is no turning back.
This is exactly why Levin says we must get to the bottom of this. The future of the country depends on it. We don’t want to become a banana republic.
It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you
In a meeting with one of the closest associates of Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, former Secretary of State, John Kerry advises the Palestinian leader to make personal attacks on President Trump and not yield to any of his demands which don’t represent the American people.
http://barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/1516856161720-300x279.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 607px) 100vw, 607px" width="607" height="564" />
http://barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/john-kerry-is-getting-slammed-for-using-the-a-word-with-israel-300x225.jpg 300w, http://barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/john-kerry-is-getting-slammed-for-using-the-a-word-with-israel-768x576.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" width="800" height="600" />
http://barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/President_Abbas_Meets_With_Secretary_Kerry_in_West_Bank_11752494013-690x458-300x199.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 690px) 100vw, 690px" width="690" height="458" />
http://barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/220state20solution20Kerry-300x169.jpg 300w, http://barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/220state20solution20Kerry-768x432.jpg 768w, http://barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/220state20solution20Kerry.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" width="800" height="450" />
We have seen this all over the country, and in every case, the school officials insist that the school is simply teaching the tenets of Islam, not proselytizing for them. But it is noteworthy that public schools never seem to teach, say, that “Jesus is the Son of God and Savior of the world” without qualification. Whenever public schools teach about Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc., they are careful not to teach what adherents believe as established fact. But when it comes to Islam, its tenets are being taught as established fact in public schools all over the country. There should be a federal investigation of this phenomenon, but of course, there probably will not be.
“Mom Says NJ School Assignment Recruited for Islam,” by Nick Rummell, Courthouse News Service, January 24, 2018:
NEWARK, N.J. (CN) – A New Jersey middle school that caught flak last year for requiring students to watch videos on Islam was hit Tuesday with a federal complaint.
Represented by the Thomas More Law Center, parent Libby Hilsenrath says a teacher assigned her 12-year-old’s seventh-grade class at Chatham Middle School to watch two videos at home with proselytizing messages.
The first video, “Intro to Islam,” is set to a musical version of a poem that describes “Christians and Jews as ‘infidels’ and prais[es] Muhammad in gruesome detail for slaughtering them,” according to the complaint.
Calling it a “conversion video,” Hilsenrath says the 5-minute assignment was “replete with biased, chastising statements encouraging the students … to follow the Quran and become Muslim.”
“Muhammad (Peace be upon him) is the last & final Messenger of God,” one such unqualified message in the video states.
In addition to presenting the religious teachings of Islam as facts, Hilsenrath says the video includes a link where students can download “Qaseedah Burdah,” the song with references to killing infidels.
Hilsenrath notes that the second video, an explanation of the five pillars of Islam, is a cartoon where a Muslim child explains the tenants of Islam to his non-Muslim friend, then ends with both boys walking off to “learn how to pray.”
“Due to the fact that these doctrinal messages calling for conversion to Islam were included in video format with vivid images and text, they possess greater communicative impact and are more likely to be accepted by the students viewing them than information that is spoken in a classroom or even written in a book,” the complaint states.
A worksheet component of the assignment meanwhile focused on the shahada, what Hilsenrath calls “the Islamic conversion creed and prayer.”
“Clearly, seventh graders were given a sugarcoated, false depiction of Islam,” the Thomas More Law Center said in a statement. “They were not informed of the kidnappings, beheadings, slave-trading, massacres, and persecution of non-Muslims, nor of the repression of women — all done in the name of Islam.”
Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the law center, issued a statement as well. “After watching this video, I can’t imagine any reasonable person saying this is not Islamic indoctrination,” he said.
Questioning why the curriculum for the Middle East and North Africa unit left out other religions, the complaint notes that “there are approximately 16 million Christians in the Middle East and approximately 6.4 million Jews living in the Middle East.”
Likewise the religious beliefs of Christianity are not covered in the unit on Latin America, a region that is 88 percent Christian, and Eastern religions are not covered in the unit on Southeast Asia, according to the complaint.
“Defendants assailed the First Amendment … by forcing children to endure the promotion of Islam in their public schools, including an explicit and direct call to the children for conversion to the religion of Islam,” the complaint states.
Hilsenrath says she and another parent emailed their concerns to school officials in early 2017. Fox News invited them to appear on Tucker Carlson’s show that February. The pair joined many other parents at a packed March 2017 open meeting of the Chatham school board.
School officials defended the curriculum at the meeting, saying it met the state requirements and that it was untrue that Islam was the only religion taught to seventh graders.
But Hilsenrath says the school’s conduct betrays hostility toward Christians. When confronted about the curriculum in January 2017, according to the complaint, Chatham’s social studies department chair sent an email where he linked to what he called a “priceless” clip from TV’s “The West Wing.” In the scene, the president character mocks a fundamentalist Christian about various tenants of the Old Testament, such as its endorsement of slavery….
( This what the Socialist Democrats want for our women)
Principles for a FREE SOCIETY
William Finley
Are we diverse enough yet?
“Interview with a German journalist: ‘Like many other women in Germany, I no longer feel safe,’” Voice of Europe, January 24, 2018:
We interviewed German journalist and model Anabel Schunke. She studied political science and history and is one of Germany’s most well-known criticasters of the country’s migration policy. This interview is part one of two. Anabel is active on Twitter and Facebook
How did the admission of so many migrants change your country?
Germany is no longer the same country compared with before 2015. There’s now only one topic: The migration crisis. Of course this is also connected with the discussion about Islam and its “excesses” that we have been experiencing for years in this country through Muslim migrants and those that will come in the future.
This leads to a fatal consequence: We are no longer talking about topics appropriate for a civilised Western society. For example, I’m watching the news and see a report on China and the latest technical and digital innovations which they want to compete with Silicon Valley, and so on.
Meanwhile, in Germany we are discussing wearing headscarves, banning pork in canteens, and Islamic studies in schools. We are clearly missing out on the connection to the top of the world and let us drag ourselves from the migration of mostly deeply backward Islamic countries into the abyss. This should not be allowed by a country whose resources are education, German diligence, recognition abroad and the technical innovations of companies like Siemens.
For Germany, migration is an absolute “backward business”. It divides the country; it shifts the social discourse of the future into the medieval past. The question is no longer: How do we want to live here as Germans in the future and defend our position in the world, but how can we make it as comfortable as possible for Muslims in the name of tolerance? Not to mention the daily attacks, the increase of violent and sexual offenses.
According to German media there were fewer women on the streets of Hamburg during NYE. Is that an effect of migrant (sex) crimes?
Of course, that is an immediate effect of the massive increase in sexual offenses against German women. You know, after each terrorist attack, a mantra is repeated that we will not let our way of life be taken away from us, that we should not be afraid.
The truth is that the majority of the population does not want to admit that they are afraid and that they don’t do certain things out of fear. The fear of being called a racist is still greater than admitting that you are avoiding these people and certain events.
It’s the same with terror and the massive sexual assaults since 2015 by migrants. You read the news and, especially for us women, the many reports about violent and sexual offenses have a certain influence. More and more women have unpleasant experiences with male migrants. You have to imagine that, according to statistics, of the over 1.5 million migrants 80% are men. During a walk in the city, it doesn’t matter where or when, you will encounter them.
The effects of immigration are now shaping many cityscapes. Almost every woman now experiences how different the looks at them are and the feelings that result from it. It’s like being a piece of cattle.
In addition, there are actual attacks. Of course, there have always been rapes in every country, but the quality and quantity of the attacks have changed completely. It makes no difference to the victim whether she is raped at home by an acquaintance or in public in broad daylight by a migrant stranger, but for society and women’s overall thinking in this country, it has its effects.
There are no more “safe spaces”. It can happen to you anytime, anywhere, even if you celebrate New Year’s Eve in a large group. The risk of becoming a victim of a sexual offense has become too big and many women have simply withdrawn from public space in order to avoid these risky situations….
It is cruel to see how women keep silent and are unnoticed by the majority of society, while much of the media attention disappears as well. It is in a weakened form what happened in many Islamic countries after the revitalization of conservative Islam.
The woman becomes invisible. Cologne was the point at which I became really aware of what this particular kind of immigration means, especially for us women, but also for society as a whole. I mean, apart from sexual assaults on women, there was a situation in which the state totally lost control in Cologne for hours…
The left’s attacks against President Trump and his administration are going international.
Former Secretary of State John Kerry is spreading the left’s resist President Trump message overseas to Palestinian leaders.
Kerry relayed his response to Trump’s pro-Israel stance to the Palestinian Authority saying, “hold on and be strong,” and to “not yield.”
The Daily Caller reports:
Maariv, a local Israeli outlet, reported that Kerry has been using an intermediary named Hussein Agha to relay derisive, anti-Trump messages to the leaders of the Palestinian authority. According to The Jerusalem Post, Kerry asked the Palestinians to “not yield” to Trump’s demands and to “hold on and be strong” in the wake of Trump’s pro-Israel moves in the region. Maariv based their report on an anonymous account from a “senior Palestinian authority official.”
Kerry also alluded he might run for president against President Trump in 2020.
Undermining President Trump on the international stage speaks volumes about Kerry’s character and his willingness to say anything to garner media attention.
Exclusive: Attorney General Jeff Sessions sounds off on the shocking not guilty verdict in the Kate Steinle murder trial. Plus, Sessions comments on Mike Flynn's plea. #Tucker
The Justice Department on Wednesday threatened to subpoena 23 jurisdictions if they don’t turn over information about their "sanctuary" policies -- triggering a backlash from mayors across the country who pulled out of a White House meeting.
In letters to New York City, Chicago, San Francisco and other jurisdictions, the Justice Department demanded records relating to whether these localities are "unlawfully restricting information sharing by law enforcement officers with federal immigration authorities."
“I continue to urge all jurisdictions under review to reconsider policies that place the safety of their communities and their residents at risk,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement. “Protecting criminal aliens from federal immigration authorities defies common sense and undermines the rule of law.”
The letter drew a fiery response from several Democratic mayors -- including New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio -- who said they would boycott a planned working session with the president at the White House on Wednesday.
New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu, who serves as the president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, also said he would boycott the meeting.
"Unfortunately, the Trump administration’s decision to threaten mayors and demonize immigrants yet again – and use cities as political props in the process – has made this meeting untenable," Landrieu said.
“Protecting criminal aliens from federal immigration authorities defies common sense and undermines the rule of law," said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. (Associated Press)
The White House said it was "disappointed" in the mayors who chose to skip the meeting, but still held the event.
"We are disappointed that a number of mayors have chosen to make a political stunt instead of participating in an important discussion with the President and his administration," said White House Deputy Press Secretary Lindsay Walters.
"President Trump might be able to tweet whatever comes to mind, but he can't grant himself new authority because he feels like it," San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in November, after the city filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the president's executive order defunding sanctuary cities. (Associated Press)
Speaking to the mayors on Wednesday afternoon, Trump praised the actions of the DOJ.
“As you know the Department of Justice today announced a critical legal step to hold accountable sanctuary cities that violate federal law and free criminal aliens back into our communities,” he said. “We can't have that. Can't have it. It’d be very easy to go the other way but we can't have it. We want a safe country.”
The letters from the Justice Department state that jurisdictions that fail to respond will be subject to a DOJ subpoena.
“Sanctuary cities” is a phrase typically used to describe jurisdictions that restrict local law enforcement from sharing information with the federal government about the immigration status of those in custody.
“We have seen too many examples of the threat to public safety represented by jurisdictions that actively thwart the federal government’s immigration enforcement—enough is enough,” Sessions said.
The DOJ letter requests documents “reflecting any orders, directives, instructions, or guidance to your law enforcement employees” about how to “communicate with the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and/or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.”
If these jurisdictions can't prove they are complying with federal law, senior DOJ officials told Fox News, federal funding could be withheld and the DOJ may demand the return of 2016 federal funding some of the cities have already received.
“We’ve given them federal dollars – your taxpayer dollars – to cooperate with federal law enforcement,” Sarah Isgur Flores, a spokeswoman for the DOJ, said Wednesday on "Fox & Friends." “They didn’t have to take that money, but they did. And when they took it, they said they would comply with federal law. So what we’re saying is if we find out you’re not complying with federal law, we’re taking the tax dollars back.”
The administration, though, has faced setbacks over trying to withhold federal funds for sanctuary cities. A federal judge in Chicago ruled against Sessions in September; a judge in San Francisco also blocked President Trump’s executive order that denied federal funding to these cities.
"President Trump might be able to tweet whatever comes to mind, but he can't grant himself new authority because he feels like it," San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in November, after the city filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the president's executive order.
The jurisdictions that received letters on Wednesday, according to the Justice Department: Chicago; Cook County, Ill; New York City; the state of California; Albany, N.Y.; Berkeley, Calif.; Bernalillo County, N.M.; Burlington, Vt.; the city and county of Denver, Colo.; Fremont, Calif.; Jackson, Miss.; King County, Wash.; Lawrence, Mass.; City of Los Angeles, Calif.; Louisville, Ky.; Monterey County, Calif.; Sacramento County, Calif.; the city and county of San Francisco; Sonoma County, Calif.; Watsonville, Calif.; West Palm Beach, Fla.; the state of Illinois and the state of Oregon.
All 23 of these jurisdictions were previously contacted by the Justice Department, which raised concerns about its laws, policies and practices.
by Emily Amber:
Rep. Trey Gowdy is currently working hard for the freedom and security of every single American. Gowdy wants to take down the shadow government — once and for all.
During an interview on Fox News, Gowdy had some choice questions for the intelligence community. He wanted to know who’s been accessing the private information of citizens, and who has the ability to unmask them. Gowdy pledged not to vote to reauthorize ANY kind of surveillance program until he gets real, sustainable answers about the shadow government, via Real Clear Politics.
It’s high time we got some answers as to what’s really going on behind the scenes. You have to give Gowdy props for stepping up, and doing what so many others are afraid to do — stand up to Obama’s deep state spies. We’ve known for a while now that they were watching President Trump and his associates. The question remains: where are they lurking now?
We have a hunch. Now that the election is over, the spies didn’t go back into their holes to find peace and quiet. These shady criminals are still watching, and they’re still listening. As Americans, we deserve to have a sense of safety and security. The Obama administration robbed us of that freedom.
Once everyone learned about how much power the intelligence community had, we all became concerned. The government has proven that they can, and will, listen to ANY call, at ANY time — and they’ll unmask your name without thinking twice.
It’s not acceptable behavior, and we shouldn’t have to deal with it. Gowdy let everyone know that the patriots of this country are on to them. These criminals will be stopped, and SOON.
How much more information does the shadow government have squirreled away, ready to use at a moment’s notice? It really causes alarm, especially when you consider how much information we store online and on our mobile devices.
When Gowdy spoke with Fox News, support for him rippled throughout the network, and onto the airwaves. Gowdy said, “We are not going to reauthorize these surveillance programs if the American people are not satisfied their security is going to be safeguarded.”
Gowdy went on to say, “I want to know who is making that request, what is the evidentiary basis of that request, and if it’s late in your tenure, like the day before you leave office, that should send off alarms and sirens as to why that person did it.” This speech was his way of calling out Obama without saying it directly — we ALL knew who he was talking about.
It’s about time we have someone stand up for our right to privacy. We have such limited privacy as it stands now. Why should the former administration (and its spies) be able to listen to our conversations? Now we know the intelligence community WILL be held accountable if this happens again. We can all sleep a little easier.
Share this Everywhere and Make this Viral..
Corey Bracken, 38, was eating his lunch in his van outside a convenience store when officers demanded that he exit his vehicle. Bracken, a disabled veteran, was tased after reaching for his cane AND showing the police his disabled placard.
No charges have been filed against Bracken.
( Don't tell we don't have a problem with law enforce !! Some were they have this idea they are God and can do what ever they want to you and there is no accountable just like the Socialist Democrats they protect there only screw the citizen there have been repeated problems with law ,enforcement officers abuse after abuse i believe in the rule of law but not this kind of behavior then they wonder why they are loosing support! THERE HAS BEEN SO MUCH abuse by Oswego Illinois POLICE AND THE SHERIFF
i can not support them i have lost all respect for law enforce top to bottom! )
William Finley
By Cherylynn Costner
Whereas most of the time when you visit The Trump Times, you get to read and move onto the next posted article, this time I am sharing a special request that YOU write as well by cutting and pasting the content below and forwarding it to 20 friends and asking them to do the same.
https://www.thetrumptimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/judge.jpg 749w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="169" />
According to Judge Jeanine Pirro has Fans, President Trump is asking everyone to forward this email to a minimum of 20 people, and to ask that each of them to be asked to do likewise. In three days, most people in the United States will have the message.
This is clearly an amazing idea that must be passed around. Stand by for the pushback from THE SWAMP
THE TRUMP RULE: Let’s see if Congress understands what people pressure is all about.
Salary of retired US Presidents .. . . . . $180,000 FOR LIFE.
Salary of House/Senate members .. . . $174,000 FOR LIFE
This is stupid
Salary of Speaker of the House – $223,500 FOR LIFE.
This is really stupid
Salary of Majority / Minority Leaders – $193,400 FOR LIFE.
Average Salary of a teacher – $40,065
Average Salary of a deployed Soldier – $38,000
Here’s where the cuts should be made!
Congressional Reform Act of 2017
1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay once they’re out of office.
2. Congress (past, present, & future) participates in Social Security.
All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void effective 7/1/17. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women.
Congress made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and go back to work.
TRUMP, in a recent interview with CNBC, offers one of the best quotes about the debt ceiling: “I could end the deficit in five minutes,” he told CNBC. “You just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election”.
The 26th Amendment ( granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds ) took only three months and eight days to be ratified! Why? Simple! The people demanded it. That was in 1971 – before computers, e-mail, cell phones, etc.
Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took one (1) year or less to become the law of the land – all because of public pressure.
Trump is asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn, ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one idea that really should be passed around. If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people, then it will only take three days for most people in the U.S. to receive the message. It’s time! Please forward if you favor these changes.
https://www.thetrumptimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Drain.jpg 496w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" width="300" height="151" />
Thanks for playing ball with us. This is the kind of “Chain Migration” we want to see happen, going into the inboxes of all Americans. Drain the Swamp and Make America Great Again!!!
Help President Trump to Drain the Swamp by joining the America First Coalition Boots on the Ground movement. We all pulled together in 2016 to elect Donald Trump as our President, he needs our help again. Join here today!
|  |
|
|---|
|
PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!
“So, if we have people who were brought here ‘through no fault of their own,’ are amazingly smart and industrious, and all serve in the military and kill Al Qaeda terrorists with their bare hands, should they be deported?”
“No? Great! Now it’s time for completely open borders.”
That essentially describes the attitude of the political class at this point.
It’s one thing to put out BS polling as a propaganda tool; it’s quite another to actually believe it yourself and implement political strategy accordingly. That is the mistake Democrats have made by obsessing over superficial polling suggesting that Americans, including conservative Republicans, are clamoring for amnesty.
The reality of the polling tells quite a different story.
The immigration polling dynamic is very similar to the dynamic of the gun issue. Democrats have touted polls showing support for expanded background checks as high as 90 percent. “Do you want criminals to get guns or not?” a pollster would ask.
But even honest Democrat strategists will admit that the reality of the gun issue is just the opposite — the issue as a whole, especially when you weigh the intensity of the sides, is a major loser for Democrats. In general, people want more pro-gun legislation, not less. Just ask Bill Clinton and Al Gore.
The same dynamic applies to immigration. Isolating a largely abstract and mythical population of illegals and encapsulating it into a poll doesn’t reflect where people’s hearts and priorities are on this issue. But the answers to very straightforward polling questions of whether we have too much or too little immigration, whether immigrants should assimilate, whether immigrants should get welfare, whether immigrants should learn English, and whether immigration should be merit-based as opposed to family-based, are indeed very reflective of where the national mood is on immigration. And deep down, Democrats know this.
A very thorough and comprehensive poll from Harvard-Harris shows that Americans want a dramatic cut in legal immigration and a transition to merit-based immigration. Here is a list of some of the questions and results:
Question: “Do you think immigration priority for those coming to the U.S. should be based on a person’s ability to contribute to America as measured by their education and skills or based on a person having relatives in the U.S.?”
Results: The merit side won by a margin of 79 percent to 21 percent. Support for merit-based priorities was 72 percent among Hispanics and 85 percent among blacks. Seventy-two percent of self-described Democrats and 65 percent of self-described liberals agreed. Yet you will never see news stories or even Republican politicians touting the fact that even liberal Democrats support merit-based over chain migration.
Question: In your opinion, about how many legal immigrants should be admitted to the U.S. each year?
This is as non-leading and non-push-polling as a polling question can get. No preconceived notions of “no fault of their own” or “brought to America by parents.” This is a straight-up question of numbers. Only 19 percent chose options ranging from 1 million to over 1 million. Our official level of immigration every year is about 1.1 million, but between other de facto permanent programs, as many as 1.8 million immigrants were likely admitted in 2016. The American people clearly reject it and would never support it if the numbers were advertised. Eighteen percent chose the 500,000-1 million option, 19 percent chose 250,000-499,999, and 35 percent (including 48 percent of blacks) – by far the largest share – chose 100,000-250,000.
This means that a clear majority want less than half the current intake, if not one third of the current intake, a result that would not even be achieved through passage of the RAISE Act. In total, 81 percent desire less immigration than our average recent intake, and less than 12 percent want the level of immigration from our most recent year. That is not much more than the 9 percent on the other extreme who said they want absolutely no immigration whatsoever.
Talk about the silent majority! Most of the numbers were pretty uniform across all demographics, too.
Other findings of the poll: 61 percent feel that border security is inadequate; 68 percent (including 62 percent of Democrats) oppose the diversity visa lottery; and only 22 percent want open-border policies.
Yet the media will just latch onto the one question about giving work permits or a path to citizenship to “those brought here by their parents,” to which 78 percent answered in the affirmative. The problem with this question is that it gives no context as to who these people are, which priorities should come first, and whether they should get welfare.
What if voters were told that most people in this group have only a high school diploma, don’t know English very well (unlike the ones the media puts on camera), and would likely be on welfare and rely heavily on refundable tax credits?
What if voters were told that young illegal immigrants were even more likely to commit crimes, particularly gruesome ones, than older ones and that in Arizona they were 884 times more likely to be convicted of a crime?
What if they were told that 535 DACA recipients who were ordered deported for serious crimes are still roaming our communities and that this is not even a discussion in the negotiations?
What if they were told that DACA is what spawned the Central American wave of border crossings, as confirmed by the El Paso Intelligence Center, the Congressional Research Service, the Washington Post, and the Migration Policy Institute, that the new promise to ratify DACA is rejuvenating the border surge, and that up to 30 percent of unaccompanied minors (or purported minors) detained by immigration authorities as a result of DACA have ties to MS-13 gangs?
What if voters were asked whether we should grant amnesty before fixing immigration and security for Americans and risk more illegal immigration or if we should first prioritize security and legal reforms?
What if they were told that as soon as these people have children, they will immediately be eligible for welfare and already get refundable tax credits?
Clearly, the electorate is a lot more outraged at our stolen sovereignty and at America becoming a dumping ground for the world’s criminals than they are about the urgency for a limited amnesty for the “best and the brightest.”
So what does this all mean?
If Republicans would embrace sovereignty and security and run on lowering immigration, making it merit-based, deporting all criminal aliens, ending welfare for immigrants, and stopping automatic citizenship for future children of illegal aliens, they would be leading this election season in a heartbeat. And even if one believes there is a clamor and intensity for amnesty, the Goodlatte bill incorporates both elements – so they can have their cake and eat it too.
When will Republicans stop listening to their phony consultants, who have done them a disservice on this issue for decades? Common sense is the best poll of all. (For more from the author of “Poll: Majority of Voters Want Less Than Half Our Current Immigration” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2018/01/poll-majority-voters-want-less-half-current-immigration/
William M. Finley Blogger for the coalition for Trump
Dr. Gary Katz 1stLiaison Officer at USMC and IDFMr. Finley has successfully surpassed [by a very wide margin] the now decaying and irrelevant trash NYT. Congratulations, Bill! By the way, I frequently pass along some of Mr. Finley's posts and many of his accurate and pithy introductions and analytical commentary to a group of Prime Ministers, military officials, and people of integrity...from all walks of life. With respect & Appreciation, Dr. Gary Katz
SHIFF CLAIMS AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION( Your going to fine out how stupid we are on Nov.8th 2018 We are smart enough to remove the Socialist Democratic Party THE OF TREASON AND CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND OUR ELECTED PRESIDENT from our GOVERNMENT!!!!! Principles ,for a FREE SOCIETY William Finley 1/23/2018  SCHIFF: "Well, because the American people unfortunately don't have the underlying materials and therefore they can't see how distorted and misleading this document is. The Republicans are not saying make the underlying materials available to the public. They just want to make this spin available to the public. I think that spin, which is a attack on the FBI, is just designed to attack the FBI and Bob Mueller to circle the wagons for the White House. And that's a terrible disservice to the people, hard working people at the bureau, but more than that, it's a disservice to the country."
So they don't know how distorted these talking points are. But as part of the narrative they want to push out. Interestingly enough, they've made common cause once again with Russian bots because Russian bots are pushing their narrative out there. It's in a redux of the campaign. We have assange and Wikileaks and Russian trolls and bots saying, you know, hash tag whatever the GOP narrative is. That ought to tell you a lot about what's driving this. " |
“This is much larger than just texts between two FBI agents.”
A high-ranking FBI official confirms a number of the missing 50,000 FBI text messages — as well as other text and email messages among FBI brass — reportedly discussed initiating physical harm to President Donald Trump.
The FBI official urged the U.S. Department of Homeland Security — which oversees the U.S. Secret Service — to launch an investigation of the Justice Department, the FBI and all text messages missing and otherwise that threatened the President.
“This is dangerous territory and all FBI text messages and personal phones should be examined,” the official said. “It would reveal some frightening conversations.”
Did FBI brass discuss the assassination of President Donald Trump? If not, what was the nature of the threats against the president from inside the alleged premiere law enforcement agency in the United States?
“(Director) Wray wants a lid on this,” the FBI official said. “Many know there was talk of harming Trump politically but there is a group here (in D.C. HQ) that understands it goes deeper. We need a special counsel or Homeland Security. Somebody has to clean this up outside of DOJ. It is unacceptable.
“This is much larger than just texts between two FBI agents.”
The FBI official called on President Trump to do what is necessary to weed out corruption in the FBI.
“Text messages just don’t disappear,” the FBI official said. “Not here. Someone outside DOJ has to look at all emails and texts. These (FBI bosses) are bad people. You’ve only scratched the surface.”
The high-ranking FBI official called on lawmakers and the Inspector General to focus on the text and email messages of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. The official referred to McCabe’s official and personal correspondences “an anti-Trump treasure trove.”
As reported in March 2017 by True Pundit, McCabe openly threatened President Trump and then-National Security Adviser Gen. Mike Flynn, saying first we “Fuck Flynn and then we Fuck Trump” to several high-ranking FBI bosses who cheered his comment.
From that True Pundit Exclusive:
McCabe, the second highest ranking FBI official, emphatically declared at the invite-only gathering with raised voice: “Fuck Flynn and then we Fuck Trump,” according to direct sources. Many of his top lieutenants applauded and cheered such rhetoric. A scattered few did not.
This was one of several such meetings held in seclusion among key FBI leaders since Trump was elected president, FBI sources confirm. At the congregation where McCabe went off the political rails and vowed to destroy Flynn and Trump, there were as many as 16 top FBI officials, inside intelligence sources said. No lower-level agents or support personnel were present.
If you are among the millions of Americans who have pondered in recent months whether the Obama-era “Deep State” intelligence apparatus and FBI are working for or against Trump, this is the first definitive proof that the country’s once-premiere law enforcement agency has gone rogue.
The non-elected hierarchy that steer the FBI have declared war on President Trump and his White House inner circle. Make no mistake.
Flynn has since been indicted and plead guilty to a charge of lying to the FBI from an investigation supervised by McCabe after a FBI interview conducted by Peter Strzok, one of the agents busted sending anti-Trump texts. And Trump remains under investigation by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, a figure linked to several conflicts of interest in the case including prior deals with McCabe.
As reported yesterday in True Pundit, members of the FBI and Justice Department’s top brass at their Washington D.C.headquarters and other field offices are now using burner phones to stay under the radar of federal investigators and lawmakers, according to FBI insiders.
The shocking revelations come on the heels of news that the FBI deleted thousands of text messages between anti-Trump FBI agents before investigators could review their content.
While that is disturbing on one level, FBI and DOJ hierarchy employing the telecom habits of drug cartel bosses reaches a new low for the once-heralded federal law enforcement agency and the DOJ. And breaks federal laws as well.
The FBI “failed to preserve” five months worth of text messages exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the two FBI employees who made pro-Clinton and anti-Trump comments while working on the Clinton email and the Russia collusion investigations.
And now more text messages are missing from more FBI agents, according to the Justice Department.
That means 50,000 text messages.
Fifty.
Thousand.
Per The Hill yesterday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday announced the Justice Department will investigate missing text messages sent between two FBI agents critical of President Trump, joining the chorus of Republican lawmakers who are eager to recover the exchange.
GOP officials have seized on the messages as evidence of FBI bias against Trump in the probes into Russian election meddling and Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server as secretary of State.
“We will leave no stone unturned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source,” Sessions said in a statement.
( Just keep running your mouth! You are going to get a surprise Nov. 8th. 2018
The American People no longer support you or the Socialist Democratic Party and your untruthfulness, your criminal BEHAVIOR, YOUR CONSPIRACY, YOUR REASON, against our elected President and the will of the AMERICAN PEOPLE and your Socialism!
Principles for a FREE SOCIETY
William Finley
,
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Sen. Chuck Schumer took to MSNBC and told hostess Rachel Maddow that the tea party, the precursor to President Donald Trump, has always been anti-immigration.
This, of course, is a blatant lie. And it does nothing to advance the supposed diplomatic approach Republicans and Democrats are committed to achieving on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, for the good of the country, no less.
But it does clear up why Schumer would pull back on a reported $25 billion deal with Trump to reopen government in exchange for long-promised wall funding: He never intended to deal in the first place.
He only said as much to save face from his blink on DACA and his white flag toss to Republicans that led to the reopening of government on Friday.
With Schumer, telling tall tales seems to be one and the same as proper politicking.
William M. Finley Blogger for the coalition for Trump
Dr. Gary Katz 1stLiaison Officer at USMC and IDFMr. Finley has successfully surpassed [by a very wide margin] the now decaying and irrelevant trash NYT. Congratulations, Bill! By the way, I frequently pass along some of Mr. Finley's posts and many of his accurate and pithy introductions and analytical commentary to a group of Prime Ministers, military officials, and people of integrity...from all walks of life. With respect & Appreciation, Dr. Gary Katz
It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you
I guess they want you to think they actually have a case, when, in fact, ALL of these nuisance lawsuits re: federal terror watch lists filed by CAIR in the past have been thrown out of court. This is the 4th video of its kind that CAIR has gotten media coverage of in just the past week.Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkP2KO_gbOA
Earlier videos:
The Dallas-Fort Worth chapter of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has welcomed the resignation of two McKinney ISD middle school teachers who posted anti-Islam and hateful tweets on their social media. 
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3FE8NZsiPI
The West Edmonton Mall sex assault trial starts today, and I’m in the courtroom bringing you the details you won’t hear in the mainstream media.
Soleiman Hajj Soleiman was one of Justin Trudeau’s first wave of 50,000 Syrian refugees.
He’s a father of six, currently facing trial for 12 charges— six counts of sexual assault and another six counts of sexual interference against six minor girls all under the age of 16.
The charges stem from a series of gropings that occurred at West Edmonton Mall World Waterpark February 4th 2017.
There’s a publication ban covering the six minor victims but watch as I share what I can tell you so far from day one of this five-day trial.
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMgoxNO2Ejk
We heard from the first victim today, who was 14 at the time of the offences against her. In her video taped statement given the day after the incident, she looks every bit a 14 year old child.
I can also tell you the prosecutor, the Zebra Child Protection Centre and the Edmonton City Police are doing everything they can to ease the trauma of testimony on the victims including bringing in a therapy dog to aid them as they testify.
I’ll be here for most of the rest of this 5-day trial bringing you updates every day.
As The Rebel reported previously: Canadian Media Cover Up Syrian Refugee Sex Assault on 6 Young Girls at Waterpark!
I will NOT be attending today’s meeting at the White House after @realDonaldTrump’s Department
