While many Americans may pronounce the 2015 SCOTUS Decision ‘OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, (No. 14–556)’ as the law, and must be obeyed immediately, our US history will show many instances of SCOTUS’s ‘wrong’ rulings.
The OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES decision is certainly one example as another one of these ‘wrong’ SCOTUS verdicts.
Over the years, many Americans have chosen to oppose other earlier and unacceptable SCOTUS ‘Decisions’; based on ‘wrong’ SCOTUS findings:
1. Scott v. Sandford (1857) (60 U.S. 393) SCOTUS ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens of the United States. African Americans did not have the right to sue in federal court. SCOTUS ruled that the federal government could not prohibit slavery in the territories. Later, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution provided that anyone born or naturalized in the United States is a citizen of the nation and of his or her state. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/60/393
At this point, may I suggest that this must have included ‘legally’ born, and not for those born ‘illegally. As an analogy, when a criminal robs a bank, it is crime. It is an ‘illegal’ act. Just getting away does not allow the robber to keep the money.
2. ROE v. WADE, (1973) No. 70-18 SCOTUS declared a pregnant woman is entitled to have an Abortion until the end of the first trimester of pregnancy without any interference by the state. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/roe_v._wade_1973
3. Texas v. Johnson (1989) (No. 88-155) As far as I am concerned in this case, SCOTUS is and was ‘wrong’. In this ‘Decision’ SCOTUS ruled that Johnson’s burning of the American flag was a 1st Amendment ‘Freedom of Speech’ ‘Right. Near 600,000 have died while serving in the US Military for defending (y)our American flag. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/491/397
One of my first classes in Army’s Basic Training at Ft. Bragg, NC, we were taught and/or reaffirmed was to always uphold our USA, our Constitution, and our American flag.
The incident of Kim Davis being jailed as she refused to honor our Judiciary’s conclusions with the SCOTUS ruling was and is ‘wrong’ as a majority members of SCOTUS have overruled our Constitutional 1st Amendment’s ‘Freedom of Religion’.
It appears a majority of SCOTUS Justices have disregarded our Constitutional ‘freedoms’ as determined by our founding Fathers based on Judeo-Christian values. Our historical ‘Federalist Papers’ will substantiate these findings as facts. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html
In SCOTUS’s majority decision rejecting ‘God’s Law’, our Holy Bible, as addressed by many of our Founding Fathers, it could well be compared to Rev. Martin Luther King’s decision on ‘Civil Rights’.
Many other instances in US History will disclose that many Americans have been rejected on other Constitutional ‘Rights’; members within (y)our majority and minority communities across the USA.
Today is a sad day for a SCOTUS majority of Justices to disallow our US Constitutional freedoms, including our 1st Amendment’s ‘Freedom of Religion’, and based on Judeo-Christian values to be disallowed as the ‘law’ of (y)our precious nation.
Capitol Hill Republicans’ ‘LACK-OF-LEADERSHIP’ joined Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid and the LEFT-WING DEMOCRAT PARTY on their issues and destroying our GOP and its’ CONSERVATIVE VALUES.
Remember the McCain/Feingold Law? Remember how Sen. John McCain CROSSED THE AISLE in leading Capitol Hill Republicans into giving the Democrat Party’s their favorite DONORS, all Labor Unions with almost unlimited donations, yet denied businesses from donation anything. SCOTUS finally declared that UNCONSTITUTIONAL as unfair.http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20100125.html
Now, it is September, 2014 and it is all over again; a violation of our 1st Amendment and our RIGHTS to give political donations as we choose.
SCOTUS, in ‘McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission’, “The court's five conservative justices all agreed that the so-called aggregate limit on the amount of money a donor can give to candidates, political action committees, and political parties is unconstitutional.” http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/03/supreme-court-mccutcheon-citizens-united
18 Republicans voted ‘RIGHT’ and against Harry Reid’s LEGISLATION: Barrasso (R-WY), Chambliss (R-GA), Coburn (R-OK), Crapo (R-ID), Cruz (R-TX), Enzi (R-WY), Inhofe (R-OK), Isakson (R-GA), Johnson (R-WI), Lee (R-UT), Paul (R-KY), Portman (R-OH), Risch (R-ID), Roberts (R-KS), Scott (R-SC), Shelby (R-AL), Thune (R-SD), and Toomey (R-PA).
25 Republicans voted ‘WRONG’ in support of Harry Reid’s LEGISLATION:Alexander (R-TN), Ayotte (R-NH), Boozman (R-AR), Burr (R-NC), Coats (R-IN), Cochran (R-MS), Collins (R-ME), Corker (R-TN), Cornyn (R-TX), Fischer (R-NE), Flake (R-AZ), Graham (R-SC), Grassley (R-IA), Hatch (R-UT), Heller (R-NV), Hoeven (R-ND), Johanns (R-NE), Kirk (R-IL), McCain (R-AZ), McConnell (R-KY), Moran (R-KS), Rubio (R-FL), Sessions (R-AL), Vitter (R-LA), and Wicker (R-MS).
AMERICA, PLEASE LISTEN! Congress should regulate political contributions only when there is POLITICAL CORRUPTION directly involved. Otherwise, all should and must accept the SCOTUS decision. Not so for Democrats who choose to destroy Conservative Republicans.
The PEOPLE, and not any Congress, should decide how you and I should spend their money in elections. You can BETCHA Congress will continue to be funded by others whom fund these LEFT-WING laws. You can BETCHA Congress will continue in allowing MEGA-DONORS like George Soris.
What a ‘REPULSIVE LOSS’ for ALL REPUBLICANS for our Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell to lead Republicans down a polluted road. How can so many RINO Republicans be so misled, uninformed, or just plain politically stupid as they support the Democrat Party and this legislation; all in violation of the Supreme Court on the United States decision.
We finally obtained a ‘LEVEL-FIELD’; only for Senate Republicans to join Democrats’ legislation and throw our RIGHTS away.
In another effort for President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to ‘cram tax-paid Abortion and Birth Control at taxpayers’ expense down (y)our throat’, Sen. Harry Reid and the Democrat Party majority Senate came up short of 60 votes for advancing to a vote in an effort to overthrow, by new legislation, the Hobby Lobby SCOTUS decision.
Based on theSupreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Hobby Lobby decision, all Americans now have a ‘RIGHT’ in practice by choosing ‘Pro-Life’ and follow God’s law, while preventing government from forcing you and me from paying ‘Abortion and Birth Control at taxpayers’ expense’. Life is expressed in our Holy Bible as applied in our Declaration of Independence and US Constitution.
Sen. Harry Reid and Senate Democrats identify S. 2578 as ‘Protect Women's Health From Corporate Interference Act of 2014’. May I rewrite their title as ‘Abortion and Birth Control at taxpayers’ Expense’ as more descriptive?
Hobby Lobby again wins on this issue, even with 3 Senate Republicans who voted with Sen. Harry Reid and all Senate Democrats; with the exception ofBrian Schatz (D-HI) who did not vote.
All 52 voting Democrats, 2 Socialist voting Independents and 3 ‘left-wing’ RINO Republicans voted with the ‘anti-Christian’ voting Democrats. Do not be fooled. Sen. Reid voted ‘NAY’ as under Senate Rules, his ‘NAY’ vote in a losing balloting would allow him to re-introduce this legislation later.
With the exceptions of Senators Susan Collins (R-ME), Mark Kirk (R-IL), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), all other Senate Republicans voted in support of SCOTUS’s 5 to 4 decision allowing those with Christian values in support to ‘Pro-Life’ choice values and to permit all taxpayers from being ‘forced to pay’ for abortions and/or birth control.
As regard to these 3 Republican Party Senators;Collins, Kirk , and Murkowski who voted ‘against’ our Declaration of Independence as referenced in Holy Bible teachings, our GOP leadership under Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House John Boehner will continue their support of these 3 Capitol Hill legislators, just because they have an ‘R’ beside their names. These 3 Republican Senators continue to vote against our GOP Platform as ‘non-believing’ lawmakers; all of their support will be used with precious Republican Party money.
Conservative Republicans across America must rise up against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Speaker of the House John Boehner, and other RINO Republicans as we demand full support of our GOP Platform and all Republicans who vote in support all other ‘Conservative Social issues and values’, or lose their support of GOP money and other RNC resources.
While I fully support our US Constitution including the First Amendment, God-loving Americans who fully support our US Constitution that is based on Christian values and freedoms needs a very ‘solid case’ in the Federal Judiciary that will open the facts that many in our ‘main-stream’ Medias are hiding behind the First Amendment; rather than reporting these TRUTHS.
Most ‘main-stream’ Medias are not providing Americans and the world the ‘TRUTH, the WHOLE TRUTH, and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH’ on the issues of the day. Therefore, these left-wing reporters and their organizations are not or should not be protected under (y)our First Amendment ‘rights’.
‘Main-stream’ Medias’ Reporters and their anti-Constitutional organizations should not be protected under their untruthful reporting of the issues.
Most of these ‘main-stream’ Medias are fabricating their own ‘radical’ views when in fact these individuals and organizations know the differences.
On June 10, South Carolinians will choose between which GOP candidates to the US Senate will represent South Carolinians’ values.
SC has one US Senator in Tim Scottwho represents South Carolinians’ values. A second choice is up for (re)election.
If you oppose President Obama, abortion, ObamaCare and his job-killing economy, you may choose and oppose Lindsey Graham as Sen. Graham is one of Capitol Hill’s biggest GOP supporters.
If you oppose President Obama’s stand on ‘abortion’,you may want to defeat Lindsey Graham, as Sen. Graham is the ‘only GOP Senator’ on the Senate Judiciary Committee who supported President Obama’s SCOTUSs’ nominees Sonia Sotomayor in 2009 and Elena Kagan in 2010; both nominees were known supporters of ‘abortion’.
On both occasions, had GOP Sen. Graham voted ‘NAY’with all other GOP members on the Senate Judiciary Committee, both of Obama’s radical and left-wing SCOTUS nominees would have died in the Judiciary Committee as Senate rules require a total majority of votes with at least one vote from both political parties.Sen. Graham provided President Obama that one vote from the Republican Party side in the Judiciary Committee.
SC deserves a US Senate candidate who will represent South Carolinians’ values.
June 26, 2013 is a sad day in America as,in a 5 to 4 decision majority, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) eliminated ‘Christian’ basic values as taught in (y)our Holy Bible.
Voting for the majority and opposing our Constitutional ‘Christian’ basic values areJusticesAnthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.
Voting for the minority and supporting our Constitutional ‘Christian’ basic values are
Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.
President Reagan often referenced, America as “a shining city on a hill” and its promise, as well as its people's, was boundless. What is and has happened to America? Who is responsible for the ‘wrongs’ as our commenced and expounded government over the more recent 50 years or so in America?
To reference SCOTUS’s decision to ‘wreck’ their views and contradictory to (y)our Holy Bible:
Leviticus 18:22 (KJV) 22Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 (KJV) 13If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
Romans 1:26-27 (KJV) 26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Romans 2:6-9 (KJV)
6Who will render to every man according to his deeds:
7To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:
8But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,
9Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;
Isaiah 5:20 (KJV) Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
To reference SCOTUS’s decision to ‘wreck’ their views and contradictory of our Founding Fathers:
Additionally, May I suggest everyone to study the Federalist Papers http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/ for review the association between our founding fathers’ Christian values and the teachings within our Holy Bible!
Our great nation is and was founded by our Founding Fathers based on Christian values. There are many words, letters, and books to substantiate these conclusions.
In summary:There is lots of good, solid, and educational information as to what our Founding Fathers lived in, believed in, and intended for America and our Constitution.
ARonald Reagan said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
Unfortunately, (y)our USA is being detached from our Constitution, its’ values, and our Holy Bible teachings. This separation is being led to ruin by Liberal Legislators, irreverent SCOTUS Justices, and unbelieving ‘main-stream’ Medias.
Here we thought you were interested in reporting news Charlie. We've contacted your publisher/editor and informed them of your rude discourtesy at receiving press releases.
Dear Ogden Standard Examiner Editor-In-Chief:
We have received the following email from Charlie Pomerleau and would like to report it as a discourtesy, not simply to the Campaign, but to the subscribers and readers of the Ogden Standard Examiner.
Mr. Pomerleau has been a reporter for political events like "Occupy" and other political active events here in Utah, and it is frankly surprising to us here at the Campaign to find such a bias in the reporting atmosphere at the Ogden Standard Examiner.
Our Press Releases are a matter of public notices as Mr. Judy is a registered candidate in the Federal Election Commission record, and he has also taken Barack Obama clear to the United States Supreme Court case no Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and this is not simply the assertion of Mr. Judy, but the conviction of thousands of hours of law enforcement personal, that Mr. Pomerleau has referred as a "rant".
We would like an apology from Mr. Pomerleau, or we will consider publicly protesting the Ogden Standard Examiner in front of the community as endorsing and fully representative of Mr. Pomerleau's comments, and position on "the news" that's reported.
If this is the position of the Ogden Standard Examiner, we would not expect any reply. In the National News it is worth a mention that the Ogden Standard Examiner is "receiving" the news from reporters afar.
Oh look, story number 5 an actual Standard Examiner reporter, and we also notice 6 simply to highlight preceptable 'rants' as actually report able assuming at least a kernel of truth in Mr. Pomerleau's professional insult. Thank goodness for Becky Wright's concern over Utah's past time Mardi Gras, "barely registers in the history books". In real time comparison a Ogden Utah Candidate for U.S. President in the Democratic Party, has the man in the White House on record as ineligible with the results of a full law enforcement investigation included.
In fact as we scan popular stories from the Ogden Standard Examiner we see barely a glimpse of Obama criticism. Even for a Republican State reporting unbiased news that seems a little strange.
While the watch-dog for the Public may be concerned with an actual authority to report Obama's fraud and forgery presented to the public out of the White House Press Room, his fabricated selective service card, his total non-transparency on college transcripts and registration profile we assume based on his foreign student gifts from the U.S., his law licence being stripped based on his failure to report going under any other name, and his social security card number not even passing e-verify, (also a big problem for other illegals using forged birth certificates, we have to wonder why exactly the law requires any age restriction on a drivers licence, or entry into a bar, for all must similarly be dismissed to allow the same rules Obama is playing by under the Constitution), ultimately a simple report to the The People, might be a place to start.
As we assume frankly the Ogden Standard Examiner is remiss to report anything remotely 'national' that doesn't come from Washington DC, we simply can think of no better excoriation than to public transfer this report to every possible colleague of Mr. Pomerleau, as the definitive definition of a lame reporter using his own rant's to define the public news.
While it might be an easier story to sell of a disgruntled political loser whose crying because the media won't report a case in the United States Supreme Court against the occupant of the White House, ... wait a minute... disgruntled political losers don't get to the United States Supreme Court. Call up any attorney and ask them what it cost to take a case from ground zero to the United States Supreme Court, then do a detailed analysis of every republican candidate's expenses from the time they entered the presidential race to the time they ended it.
Now consider the time necessary to create some 180 Commercials and a 500 page blog that you don't get paid for, all while maintaining your bills and you might come up with a simple dedication to the public trust, our Country and Constitution, that has motivated Cody Robert Judy. If that kind of dedication, tenaciousness, and courage against all odds is simply deserving of no more than a dismissive rant, it seems the real friends to the Country and the Constitution must be parked in some unreported battle giving their life's in a raging war also. God forbid that's your son or daughter.
Mr. Judy said, " You know I myself did not expect to still be in the Presidential Race in September of 2012 when we entered a week before Republican Gov. Rick Perry which I believe was Aug 13,2011. Its been an unbelievable test of grit working through the Courts on this very important issue of Obama's eligibility. The whole State of Kansas is seriously considering taking Obama off the ballot, it just seems the general population is just catching on but we started this defensive fight the first round in the New Hampshire Primary and then worked into Georgia both states going to the Supreme Courts. Ultimately we do believe the U.S. Constitution is the hallmark of the United States Supreme Court it just takes time to get there, but we did it and did so before the general election. I'm so unbelievably proud of every person and contributor that helped us get here. It wasn't done with big PACs or corporations, this is politics at the Mom and Pop stage and I can think of no better claim or compliment for America in general."
Charlie- We'd like to report three things to you 1) Your fired. 2) This blog has sold over 50,000 newspapers , http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/09/could-sept-24th-in-scotus-be-obamas-d.html , not bad for a city like Ogden, Utah. 3) of course we've reported it to far more. We look forward to Washington DC reporting the news to you after Sept. 24th, 2012, at which time you'll look even more ridiculous then you already do for not informing the General Public of the story handed to you. . Of course, that's a bet we know your willing to take and its one we've put far more time and money in than you, so you shouldn't have to worry about your losses?
While we're no fan of Mitt Romney and have highlighted his lack of courage for the eligibility issue we consider to be a national security issue and a direct link to our slagged economy, with friends like this we don't think Mitt Romney needs enemies.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Staff Report
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:01:39 -0600 From: cpomerleau@standard.net To: codyjudy@hotmail.com Subject: Re: The Dark Days of America's Scammers in Presidential Politics
Please unsubscribe me from your rants. I don't care to receive your material.
Mitt Romney's Clandestine Form of Politicking for The Constitution
Please help spread this . Cairo Embassy attacked, 4 dead including U.S. Amb Chris Stevens,1.5 Billion to Muslim Brohood,Obama apologizes on 11th Ann of 911 to Muslims makes wonder why people wouldn't want to double their odds at getting Obama out in the U.S. Supreme Court and helpn out a little because Obama's seeing the writing on the wall. He's beating Mitt Romney. Please help support the SCOTUS Effort everyone! We might not get another shot at this.
In light of this we call on all Media Sources to quit hiding from the American Public the enormously important case of Obama's ineligibility for the Office of President coming up for conference in the United States Supreme Court Sept 24th,2012 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 ., that Americans might be free to choose to support with an intelligence of what is going on ,rather then being told what or whom to support. We see the "cloak" of this case as a covert action to undermine America's Constitution with our entire political and journalistic system at the stake as we know it and call for the removal of "The Iron Curtain".
Cody Robert Judy's message to the media, " If you have nothing to fear, why don't you dare to share?"
We would like to express our sincere and heartfelt sorrow for the families of those who were slain and pray for those families in whom this tragedy has come to bear such enormous impact. May God bless them in this time of grief and loss of family members.
While Gov. Romney and Obama share jabs at the timing of each other's remarks, we share an added emphasis in the tragedy on exactly what American sovereignty means. We share an added emphasis on exactly what makes America different from the rest of the world. Gov. Mitt Romney strongly endorsed American values and our Constitution in his platitude. We would challenge Gov. Romney's statement as nothing more then lip service or a clandestine form of watered down politicking simply because he hasn't taking a stand against the greatest threat to our national security in Obama's ineligibility and the facts that through the office of the Presidency our enemies can gain more leverage against America then any terror action across the globe.
Not only have our enemies been embolden by the apologetic tone of the Obama usurpation administration, but we Americans are all mocked and chided at having a Usurper in the White House by our allies as well by our enemies and are seen as nothing more than hypocritical at our best and worst. With Mitt Romney covering up for Obama's ineligibility, Obama gains the platitudes of anti-american disdain of which our enemies soak and distribute as gasoline to be ignited against our Constitution and Country.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
Help Tear Down the Iron Curtain of the Media w Cody Robert Judy
You know many more people are tuning into the Presidential Race after the conventions now and I have a very special date coming up. That date, TWO WEEKS from now, is Sept. 24th,2012 in The United States Supreme Court, case Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and I need your help because there’s an IRON CURTAIN in the Media that I need your help with in TEARING DOWN! Remember Ronald Reagan saying that? Well guess what its’ here in America now.
As a facebook friend of mine 100 to 1 your conservative and will probably vote for Mitt Romney in the general election, however, I want to ask you if you’d like to double your odds at getting Barack Obama out of the White House before that; for $25.
You know as well as I do Mitt’s behind in 2 major, of the most reliable, polls right now, and there’s at least a 50% chance he won’t win anyway, so why not DOUBLES YOUR ODDS? Talk about a good deal for $25 dollars. Please,..let me explain.
One normal $50 dollar commercial for any company only cost a Presidential Candidate about $25 dollars and is estimated VERY conservatively to reach over one thousand people. I have about 4,500 facebook friends. If each gives $25 dollars we can reach conservatively four and a half million people and tune them into what’s happening in the United States Supreme Court in two weeks; but that’s not all.
With 4,500 commercials we gain major credibility ground with the networks that must air our commercials or can face big law suits for denying the Federal Guideline Standards of Advertisement for Presidential Candidates. That’s a law suit any attorney would delight to get their hands on because of the huge fine. We also gain credibility in the face of the Court which has never been done at this level!
Now $25 dollars is just between you and me, your name does not have to be reported to the FEC unless your contributions exceeds $200, so Mitt Romney is never going to know and you could still vote for him in Nov if you choose. Be my guest if you can contribute more than $200! (smile)
As you know Mitt’s taking on Obama on just the economy, but I’ll bet within the next two months you see gas prices going down, as well as employment numbers reported to the media and by the media by you- know-who. I’ll bet $25 that you might see it reported as 7.9% the first of November and guess what? Mitt Romney loses the economy battle as hope has suddenly and miraculously sprung back into the economy, we have to face it, that’s the way a major portion of our fellow Americans think.
That’s exactly what happened in reverse to John McCain in 2008 to help Obama out; thanks in large part to Saudi Arabia’s kings Obama bowed himself so low to. Don’t you think there was not a reason Obama bowed so low. Of course a U.S. President should never be beholden to a foreign power.
So, we Birthers have one more shot at this in the U.S. Supreme Court that is liberal of course, but guess what? I’m running as a Democrat in the same party objecting to campaign damage because Obama won the nomination and isn’t ‘playing by the same rules’ as Mrs. Obama quoted they think America should, and ‘it’s just not fair’. It’s a no brainer and my case has Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse investigation set in it and has from the onset from the lower Superior Court in Georgia. This has never happened in BIRTHER HISTORY exactly!
How about holding the Obama’s to the same standard they profess? Wouldn’t that be a treat for $25?
Doubling your odds to get Obama out, preserving your vote for Mitt Romney, and being able to tell God in your prayers tonight you have done all you could do. That’s pretty good deal, and I believe you could hold yourself blameless before God if you could do that.
You see I am a Christian and I don’t mind telling you in my opinion God will do most of the work. He only wants us to just show a little faith in him. Think of coming an inch while God has come a whole mile.
Well most of the work is done. Our case is in the U.S. Supreme Court now; the Campaign has been built from scratch, we just need a little publicity. That’s the inch I think God just wants to see from you, and I believe we can be successful together. I just can’t do it alone.
Here’s a little rhyme for you to think about: “It may come down to one single Justice and I believe God can handle one heart if you will just show him your little $25 part. WE can build this truck together!
Well I believe our Constitution was inspired by our Creator, and I know our Founders and Framers did to. You might not agree with their religious principles or mine, but we both neither can deny the freedom and liberty our Constitution has given to us our whole lifes.
George Washington is my favorite U.S. President, can’t say as I’ve met him, but I’ve sure felt his spirit as a hand on my shoulder throughout the 12 courts over the last 4 years I’ve been through to get to this moment in the United States Supreme Court against Obama’s eligibility. Can you pitch in a little?
A commercial is intelligence and knowledge for the general public and in 1796 Pres. Washington said, “it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened”, “A primary object for our youth should be education of our youth in the science of government. In a Republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important?”, and he said it was our duty, communicating it to those who are to be the future guardians of the liberties of our country.
If you see any other Presidential candidates around with Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court before the General Election I recommend you contribute $25, otherwise my friend, I hope you’ll log on now and get that $25 to me in my goal to reach 4,500 commercials in two weeks. Together we can build this truck!
Can you please help me out and log on to my web site now and contribute that $25? Thank you so much.
Obama 2016 - The 'ACTION' of 'INACTION' Obama Voting Present
As an Illinois Senator Obama voted 'present' effectively side-stepping a "Ayes" or "Nays" vote some one hundred and thirty times in order to stay in the good graces of his constituents and his future political career which was, make no mistake, orchestrated.
Obama is also M.I.A as a constitutionally qualified president. Obama is not a natural born citizen which has been been interpreted by the Congress as a legislative mandate over 225 years, born in the United States to Citizen parents on the record by literally examining the fact that its never been over turned in our history while its been attempted over 24 times.
One thing most people agree on is that the purpose of the 'natural born citizen' clause is to protect the nation from foreign influence. Americans hold the work of the Founding Fathers in such reverence that they've added to it only 17 times since 1791.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a Judiciary committee member, sees merit in the restriction and said in 2004, "I don't think it is unfair to say the president of the United States should be a native-born citizen," she said at the hearing. "Your allegiance is driven by your birth."
Republican U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch-R from Utah said in October 2004,"The restriction on the foreign-born "has become an anachronism that is decidedly un-American."
Maria Shriver Kennedy at one time supported her husband Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger pushing for a constitutional amendment that would allow the Austrian-born 2004 California governor to run for the White House as soon as 2008.
As we see UT. R. Sen Orrin Hatch's proposed amendment failed in 2004, Maria (Kennedy) Shriver filed divorce to Schwarzenegger in 2011 for infidelity but as of July 2012 the divorce isn't final, and another 2008 candidate who isn't a natural born citizen duped Americans running and successfully usurped the White House in 2008.
If you haven't seen the conservative documentary of the decade stunning Hollywood Obama's present from Rocky Mountain Pictures, "Obama 2016", you need to go see it. I took my mother this last Friday even as the hour and twenty-nine minute documentary was expanding from its modest handful of movie screens to 1,900 screens nation wide earning another $5.1 million of its now 18.3 million.
Its an interesting side-note that Michael Moore producer of No. 1-ranked "Fahrenheit 9/ 11," which topped $119 million leading documentaries all time, this last week told Democrats to get used to the words "President Romney".
The foreboding feeling you feel walking out of Obama 2016 with the audience is worth the price of the ticket. To tell you the truth I personally was relieved to be able to sit quite next to my mom and let someone else do the talking as there have been many a family argument over the work I've been engaged in since 2008 suing McCain and Obama in 2008 on the eligibility issue as a candidate for President and continuing the stand in 2012 as a Democrat Presidential Candidate.
While I don't say this in justification of failure in the home,there's probably more then a truth or two about my last two marriages ending because of taking a stand for the Constitution in political races that ended unsuccessfully with the finances of my family in a crisis - the reality of underfunded campaigns for any candidate.
The truth of any political race is there is only one winner, and no matter how many people vote for the second place finisher, all the funds, all the votes, all the hoopla for the campaign doesn't make that campaign any better than the least voted candidate with the most under-voted campaign- it's still a loss and a calculable failure.
This brings me to the crux of this blog that is actually a question for everyone to ask themselves.
If Mitt Romney is unwilling to fight Obama on the grounds of the Constitutional demands of qualification for the Office of the President, allowing the usurpation, allowing the history to go down without justice to the fraud and forgery Obama has been apart of with the cover-up, spewing out false identification documents according to law enforcement investigations documented in my case Judy v. Obama now set for conference in the United States Supreme Court Sept. 24th, 2012, allowing Obama to build his presidential library and dis-honoring American culture with shocking racism sending blacks back to a time before color television, then how do you suppose Romney is going to preserve, protect and defend America's Constitution any more then Obama has?
And if Romney is not going to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution any better the Obama, what makes your vote for Romney worth the disgrace to God for setting America aside as a peculiar nation of a distinct Republic for which we Americans stand?
While I would not base my vote on any man or women's religious preference, there are some who do. In my opinion one of the finest distinctions in America is the freedom of conscience in America, let them worship who, what, or how they may, for that is the ultimate test of your own religious freedom here in America.
Saying you wouldn't vote for a "Mormon" is just as easily said about any other religion that is a minority at any given point and is not representative of the United State's Congress Standards outlined in the Constitution, which are chosen by We The People as our Representatives and Senators.
God knows they let us down as the electorate reported the election in 2008 and their popularity has shown this sinking to an all time low, however the legislative mandate has stood the test of time not to allow any but a "Natural Born Citizen", or a "Citizen" before the ratification of the Constitution, to become President.
With that said and understanding Obama was not born before the Constitution was ratified, a "Natural Born Citizen" is born in the United States to at the very least parents who are "Citizens", or "Natural Born Citizens" themselves.
I believe Dr. Pastor James David Manning makes a credible argument for justice in the following video, as Obama did in legislative session 130 times,by simply voting present when it comes to the President by writing my name in on your ballot "Cody Judy", if the Democrats and Republicans and United States Supreme court refuses to demand justice for the honor of black people, white people, yellow people and any color of people in America.
You absolutely do not need to disgrace yourself before your God, or higher power, by voting for a lesser of two evils, and I do believe that in this case "inaction" or something that appears futile,ultimately can be seen as 'action' to protect the way that God or your higher power, thinks about you if you think that is relevant and important to you.
Talking to Iowans Obama this week said something to the affect "that their is always a choice and Americans were gonna have to make one", and Pastor Manning makes it a credible argument here, which has in large part not been articulated by any religious figure in America, that voting for the lesser of two evils is not voting for principle that makes a bit of sense.
So, I'll say you don't have to "not vote" for anyone, you can always write-in my name Cody Judy understanding no other qualified candidate on the ballot has stood up for and taken a stand against Obama's Eligibility other than me, as actually your present to Obama.
Perhaps Obama would win, but perhaps he will win anyway, and perhaps you will look better to your God in not choosing the lesser of two evils, and simply just choosing someone who took a stand and took it to the U.S. Supreme Court. They may be the highest court we can see in America, but I believe there is one above them in the heavens; that in Gods hands.
If Obama were to win in America in 2012 perhaps it will be the lesson needed to the majority who put him there, from God, to make of you Patriots of Freedom and Liberty like nothing else would. I know being enslaved myself 8 years as a prisoner of a usurped Constitution by the majority in Utah and the deaf ear of the United States Supreme Court for evidence held by the Presidency of the Mormon or LDS Church, that I became a Patriot of our Constitution like I had never been before.
Then by God your prayers would reach into the heavens and I think that while God might be slow to hear you he would, by the bloodiest revolution America has ever pondered, set your free again, and by that you wouldn't forget it for 1000 years.
In God's mind, perhaps the greatest lesson to the greatest amount of people, is the best lesson anyway and by that standard I sure wouldn't put it past him, in my own religious sentiment.
So, minus the words that voting for a "Mormon" is a no can do, and perhaps inserting the understanding that voting for a President who has taken a stand against Obama's eligibility consistently since 2008 is a must, here is Dr. James David Manning's articulate report on that matter that rings truth in the matter of apposing a political loss for Obama because he still gets the pension and the presidential library, and the obamanation of history I am apposed to as my founding fathers in America were also.
Cody Robert Judy's U.S. Supreme Court Case Boosted for Conference
In David Weldon v. Obama http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5.htm you'll notice it was docketed July 2nd, and now was scheduled for distribution of conference Aug 8th for Sept. 24th. That is 36 days in between the time it was docketed and the time a docket report was made Aug 8th of the distribution for conference.
Now, according to Van Irions- Liberty Legal "Some have suggested that the Court’s failure to order the President to respond to LLF’s petition is a sign that the Court has already decided that it will deny our petition. Normally it is true that if the Court is interested in a case it will order the opposing side to file a response to the petition.However, because of the importance of this case it could be that the Court has decided to accept the case without needing to review a response from Mr. Obama. It is also possible that the Court has recognized that ordering a response could delay the case beyond the November election.
As we learned last June, it is very difficult to determine what the Supreme Court will do in any given situation. We are glad to know that we will have an answer before the end of next month."
Van Irions also has promised to file an Emergency Motion that the case be heard before the Nov. Election, but no record indicates it has been done. I filed my Emergency Motion and it was docketed as "Petitioner's Supplemental Brief" on the docket.
Of course I'm wondering what might be up. Logically, the court might have received more cases so that the ratio of time of docket to time of setting for conference is not kept. I thought I shouldn't be more then 14 days behind their case, but I'm also wondering if what Van Irions is saying is correct- and the Court was indeed forwarded my Emergency Brief and has looked at my case.
Understanding that Obama's lawyer also received my Emergency Brief and refused to answer, and because my Emergency Brief outlined time to respond and time to argue, that the Court would consider Obama's Team in default to ANY RESPONSE OR ORAL ARGUMENT, and thus simply rule on the merits of my case THAT they are free to make a decision on now anytime. I wonder if we could be actually that close and not even realize it?
This morning I called the United States Supreme Court Court case analyst assigned to me and inquired of the discrepancy and it was immediately rectified, in away that surprised me.
Not only was my case set for conference but it was set for the very first date available for conference after Summer Recess which was Sept 24th, 2012 and is the same day that Weldon v. Obama was set.
Now the interesting thing about this is the Court will consider all the Georgia Cases appealed at the same time. What they will find however is the normal dismissal for standing and cause of action upon which relief can be granted that thus far has been the BIGGEST factor in dismissing the cases does not exist in my case.
The other factor that must be considered now also is the IF Obama is made the Democratic Party nominee in the Sept 6th at the Democratic Party National Convention, Mitt Romney could conceivably contend Obama is NOT QUALIFIED as a Natural Born Citizen, and it would send the Democratic Party back to a state prior to the National Convention in which delegates would perhaps have to re-think their nomination or ultimately sacrifice the election to Mitt Romney entirely.
I am very pleased to have actually been boosted at least 2 weeks from my docketing date and to receive the Sept. 24th, 2012 conference date as of today, August 30th, 2012.
Please enjoy the latest commercials that the Campaign has put out.
1 Min Spot The Trial of Leadership- Obama's not a Natural Born Citizen
PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE REPUBLIC- The Trial of Leadership
Hello and Good Day from The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign. We hope you are having a good day and we are looking forward to a great Convention. A couple of things to share:
Today we release the 3rd Commercial in as many days. Yes, we are working hard because we believe that Cody's Law Suit in the United States Supreme Court is going to be a factor in the upcoming election.
This 60 Second Commercial brings something very important that both the Mitt Romney Campaign and the Barack Obama Campaign seem to be purposely glossing over. The Constitution is certainly not only about "Obama's Eligibility as disability to the Natural Born Citizen demand for President", however we must all pause briefly and understand just how big of a part that clause is when it comes to our individual rights.
We have seen Obama sign Executive Orders like we have never seen before, and for the most part, we believe Mitt Romney is right behind him in making comments like, " Yeah, I'd sign that one too, and I'll just promise never to use it". Our Nation has run at times at a stand still, and often wise men have inclined that 'standing still' was better than progressing over a cliff, or sliding back into an abyss.
Indeed Conservatives actually like it slow because more trouble is avoided in far more instances at being slow then in rushing off in a knee jerk reaction, such as we saw Congress do with the Patriot Act which opened the door wide open for the Government to spy and search and detain on Americans without a warrant from the Judicial Branch. Now Obama can just kill you if he wants too.
You see as those precious liberties are infringed we see the rise of intensity toward Tyranny. Perhaps you think Mitt Romney would never use those powers, or Obama would never detain Americans without cause or charges, but these intense deprivations and dilapidation's of the Constitution have English Writers memorializing our Constitution as something that has indeed passed away.
There is no greater force within our Constitution than the trust the People have given the American President, and that is why the demands of a natural born citizen, (born in the United States to Citizen Parents) was detailed so wisely into the Constitution. What was to make us different from England or any other Democracy but our Republic. Its the Republic , the Constitutional Republic for which we stand. Remember that 'Pledge of Allegiance"? How long has it been since you recited it?
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all." Did you know that "under God" was added in 1954? What about that liberty and justice for all? Has it become just to hard, or burdensome to protect the individuals rights?
Boy, wait till you need them, and believe me you will want them someday, and could really say they wouldn't want them for their children or grandchildren? Speaking of this I just have to say how much I enjoyed Ann Romney's speech at the Republican Convention. I know I'm running as a Democrat, but I'll tell you she is one elegant, classy, intelligent, heart warming women and certainly is the love of Mitt Romney's life.
I was just thrilled to hear her story and romance and courage echoing throughout America of what is possible. They have had a great life and it is really nice to see that love that is out there. As she spoke of wanting that for her children, and grandchildren, I just had to bite my lip and wonder if she realized how important our Constitution was and how important it was to uphold on the eligibility of the Office of the President?
How could she not understand that? She spoke of the security that is wanted for women who are single and how women were the ones that really did the hardest work at home holding the family together. I wondered, "What responsibility do women have for Obama's eligibility?"
.
I wondered at a flash forward horror show that Ann Romney might see if our Constitution is not upheld specifically on Obama's Eligibility? What would happen to our children and grandchildren if the umbrella under which we find ourselves under God, is folded up and our Nation plummets into the ravages of dictatorship, tyranny, chaos, not on some foreign battle field, but in our own backyards?
For one reason or anther Mitt Romney just doesn't get it. It doesn't matter why, he just doesn't get it, but I do and I understand the danger that compromising our Constitution places us all in, both economically and militarily. That's why I had to run for President. No one else was seeing this and I just couldn't understand why.
Well, Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276 is in the United States Supreme Court now, and it will have its day in Court. I pray not for Obama's reputation not to be smeared or stained, I pray for our children and our grandchildren and their lives. How they will know the freedom and liberty in America if we don't take a stand? Wherever you are, whoever you are, I pray earnestly that your heart feels the same as mine and that you will forward this to someone your heart cares for in the great concern of this election.
New 60 Second Spot- The Trial of Leadership- Obama's not a Natural Born Citizen
The trial of leadership begins with the defense of the Constitution in America because without the Constitution individual rights are compromised. Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign 60 Sec. Spot.
Cody's in 2nd place now on the poll being conducted over at Birther Headlines, so check that out and if you haven't voted, please have some fun and vote in a fun poll.
Sincerely,
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
BIRTHERISM IS AMERICAN EXCEPTUALISM-Mitt Romney apologizes for America.
Yesterday Barack Obama's Camp flew a Banner over Mitt Romney's gathering that said, "America is better then Birtherism", though misspelled the Romney Camp refused to take the Constitution on its demand for a natural born citizen for the office of the President seriously, and instead of sounding a resolute, "Democrats better have a qualified candidate if I'm made the nominee", Romney couched and didn't have the courage for the Constitution that is requisite with someone's character to hold the office.
This basically was an apology for America, which Mitt was on record of accusing Barack Obama for doing; apologizing for America's Constitution? What kind of a leader would do such a thing about our Constitution?
Citizens wonder what kind of character it takes to be President? Well, this was a perfect example of the kind of character that would not be a good example ,or leader, or voice, or defender for the preservation, protection, and defense of the Constitution as the oath requires.
If Mitt Romney can not stand against Barack Obama in simply demanding our Constitution be upheld for the office of which he is running outlined by the Constitution, that is taking a stand for American Exceptualism, how would he ever be able to protect America's national security against enemies foreign?
Cody Robert Judy has taken a stand for America and her Constitution against Barack Obama's slander at American exceptualism of which Birtherism is so intertwined and is on record with the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case no. 12-5276 for the defense of our Constitution. This is the kind of character we need for our President and Cody is running for President in the Democratic Party looking for the nomination of his party in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Enjoy the latest 2 Commercials- BIRTHERISM AMERICAN EXCEPTUALISM
Mitt Romney has declined on the Constitution to represent the qualifications of the President. Barack Obama doesn't like the Constitution because he's not a natural born citizen as is represented in SCOTUS Judy v. Obama 12-5276 from the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.
The Founders of America invested their life's and fortunes in America. Mitt Romney has invested in the Cayman Islands. Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign points out that American Banks are Federally Insured, so if you believe in America invest in America. Taking savings outside the U.S.- is that a Republican trickle down economics principle?
Also, as Mitt Romney's rally was sabotaged by Obama's fly-over, please not Cody Robert Judy isn't the only campaign with spelling errors. Obama's team with a fly over that said, "America is better then Birtherism" was a laughing stock of the crowd as most realized it should have been a "than".
Rather then dig in on the long form birth certificate fabrication Mitt Romney again sides with Obama making the sign that Obama put up true in Romney's eyes, and again just another example of Mitt Romney NOT believing in America or her Constitution that an American President swears to uphold.
Democratic National Convention Delegates Consider Tea Party as Tipper in Presidential Candidates
Its easy to see that in the Presidential Race of 2012 its a close call with Obama and Romney especially if The Tea Party-Birthers-& Independents abandon Obama based on the Economy drudging and lack luster. There is one scenario the Democrats have to play which may bring the Tea Party, Birthers, and Independents back out of the Romney camp and onto the Democratic Party ticket for a win of the White House in 2012.
Cody Robert Judy though relatively unknown by the national media is very well known in the Tea Party , Birther, and Independent circles and is running as a Presidential Candidate on the Democratic Party ticket and could conceivably wrestle the nomination away from Obama especially given he has an eligibility challenge on Obama in the United States Supreme Court.
Its no secret any more that Mitt Romney is courting the Tea Party, Independents and Birthers with the shot over the bow he made this last week in a comment that "no one had asked him for his birth certificate".
The comment drew a huge response from the crowd and was necessarily a defining sentence at what Mitt Romney is prepared to do to win the Presidency. In a close down-to-the-wire call Mitt Romney very conceivable as the Republican Nominee after his nomination at the Republican National Convention could challenge Obama's eligibility after the Democratic Party National Convention, if Obama were to be made the nominee.
The United States Supreme Court precedent case Minor v. Happersett has concluded that a 'natural born citizen' was a person born in the United States to Citizen parents. Obama's declared father was not a citizen of the United States at any time, and because Obama's long form birth certificate has been proven a forgery by a law enforcement agency investigation, doubts have surfaced on whether Obama was even born in the United States.
Why go to the trouble of forging a birth certificate,draft registration, and using a social security card that doesn't pass e-verify if everything is legit with your identity? This is obviously an Achilles problem for Obama under the Constitution's demands for a natural born citizen.
In addition Obama's law licence earned from a degree at Harvard was suspended permanently for his failure to disclose that he had indeed gone under the name of Barry Soetoro. Over 2200 hours of investigation from the Cold Case Posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio has shown further evidence of identity tampering from other government agencies further eroding the trust America has in her own government.
Cody has the whole law enforcement investigation forwarded to the Untied States Supreme Court. With the election in November, and possible challenge coming from Mitt Romney should he come up just short of enough electorate votes, Obama's eligibility question could throw the whole election into the Untied States Supreme Court anyway at an even more precarious time.
Cody Robert Judy's Case in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276 could be the answer before the critical General Election whereby millions of Democratic Party votes would not be dis-enfranchised, and moreover could spell out a win for the Democratic Party in the White House much more friendly than a Mitt Romney win.
The time has come for the Democratic National Delegates to consider the possibilities if the United States Supreme Court refuses to answer the urgent request of Cody to hear his Emergency Appeal for its decision before the Democratic Party National Convention Sept 5th, 2012 in Charlotte,North Carolina.
The quandary has inspired Cody to write,produce, and perform the song "The Birther Train- Money Can't Buy You Love'.
Its dual purpose was both a warning to the Democratic Party Delegates that Obama's Campaign, though well funded, may not be the ticket for 'love' or the win in 2012, and simultaneously act as a declaration to Mitt Romney, that though he has millions of dollars stashed off shore refusing to invest it in America, that balking on actually defending the Constitution as the President's oath declares is both a harbinger and a definition of his character that ultimately will not win him any 'love' from the voters in the general election.
Cody Robert Judy has consistently asserted in his political platform and decade long political activism running for office in elections '02,'04,'08,'10 and now 2012, that America can handle and face the truth and understand that the Economy can recover if America will turn back to its founding principles espoused in the Constitution.
Cody said today, " Its time America woke up and realized that Mitt Romney has been around for a long time and if he has some 'magic key' for the economy has indeed refused to give it unless he was 'President'? That sounds more like a hostage or ransomed price to pay. I didn't tell America that I would take a stand for the Constitution against any usurper if they would elect me. I just did it because it was right and I did it before being elected as a gift that necessarily would not have or hasn't had any immediate reward. I may never get paid for it, but living in America and having the opportunities I have has helped me understand that freedom isn't free and is something to be grateful for. The gift of our Constitution under the banner of our Creator came at great financial sacrifice and the ultimate price of many lives."
Perhaps its time America realized that deeds for the Constitution aren't cheap, and though Mitt Romney is very wealthy and blessed in the standard of the dollar, he has performed very poorly in the defense of the Constitution as a candidate for President in 2008 and 2012 in defending the qualifications of the President declared in the Constitution, that represents a breach in the national security of our nation, and necessarily the key to Obama's actions on the economy thus far. Mitt Romney let's face it has been an Obama supporter for many years.
Now you know the story, enjoy the Original Music Video written,produced, and performed by The Cody Robert Judy Band.
Democratic Party National Convention in Charlotte , NC Aboard the Birther Train Money Can't Buy You Love
Money Can’t Buy You Love Vs.1 You say its just a cover-up While you were sleeping I had woken up Now your wondering at the site you see Baby there’s no way your going to blame me Worry’n about the dough failing to hear my whistle blow Don’t you know you reap what you sew?
Vs.2 While I begged for your attention You know God gave me his redemption You know I love you it’s just how I feel But your still passing on me as a good deal The tide comes in there’s an ebb and a flow You bought his lie now there’s nowhere to go… there’s just no where to go
Vs.3 If you swim deep the heart won’t hide The love for you I’m feeling inside You know his love for you was always shallow He shared nothing deep his shell always hollow Now your seeing I’m the man – he’s just a ribbon boy And I can see your about to grow up out of that toy… your about to grow up out of that toy.
Chorus: MONEY CANT BUY YOU LOVE- MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE- MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE Speaking- Money can’t buy you love - Money can’t buy you love. End Chorus: Money can’t buy you love, Money can’t buy you love The lust just turns to rust; the lust just turns to rust And now you’ve got no trust, now you’ve got no trust Money can’t buy your love, Money can’t buy your love The Birther Train- Money Can’t Buy You Love is an exclusive CRJ campaign video that describes the cover-up of the Constitution by the Republican Candidate Mitt Romney. America has one campaign in the Democratic Party that puts the Constitution, America’s sovereignty, and our national security on the big train of the platform. Cody Robert Judy’s taking a stand and showing that through the principles of our Constitution our Economy can get back on track. Visit Cody’s Camp at www.codyjudy.us and enjoy the show where you as a Citizen of America have the courage to go.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Of course Romney and Ryan would like you to believe they represent 'mainstream' America, but with the Nation at about a 50% divorce rate how do politicians who have never been divorced expect you to look at them and know what your talking about?
The same philosophy is touted by Mitt Romney in the jobs arena. He says because he was a successful businessman he can produce jobs. So how does being married to one women help him with the 50% divorce rate in America? The truth is it doesn't, and actually Mitt Romney hasn't been in the same condition financially that the shrinking middle class, the unemployed, and the poor are facing, well, let's face it, he never has been in the middle class or the poor class.
Millions of Americans are suffering from greater stress because of the financial melt down of politicians who because they haven't supported the Constitution have increasingly made America either the policeman of the world propping up governments that are questionably a real threat, or busy making a nanny-state. It works for awhile, but the buck just keeps getting pushed back to another generation.
The stress at home has never been greater in this generation with kids moving back in with parents,and parents increasingly at odds with children who've got used to 'having it all, all at once".
The truth is there are a lot of good solutions coming from Cody Robert Judy, both in the social arena as he has been through divorce as a child and adult as well as the small business end that is desperately needed to fuel America's economy back into working order.
What most people don't understand is just how valuable of a blue print our Constitution is and how its principles when followed could have kept us out of the trouble we are in.
The other thing people say is that Washington DC is so far gone that it just can't get back on track. Well, that may be true as far as the impact a single Representative or Senator might have, but when it comes to the President a lot can happen if someone is in office actually holds to the Constitution and governs with its principles in mind.
That's why Cody Robert Judy took a stand for the Constitution drawing a line in the sand with Barack Obama's eligibility requirements not being fulfilled as a natural born citizen and now has a case in the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case No. 12-5276.
Cody is asking the United States Supreme Court to actually hold up its own precedent and the Constitution in the 'natural born citizen' clause. If the court is unwilling to protect the Constitution in the office of the President from foreign influence the other principles of the Constitution might as well be chucked also, as is characteristic of what is happening in so many executive orders being signed and congressional acts being passed like the NDA, which allows Americans to be held without charges and incarcerated and of course the Patriot Act.
With Washington DC Politicians increasingly out of the loop of main stream America, the time has come to set Washington DC straight and clean both houses up and Cody is hoping that can begin in his United States Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 12-5276. If it happens both the Democrats and Republicans who have been playing games with the Constitution and their oaths will be put on notice.
Let's hope the United States Supreme Court Justices still feel that interpreting the Constitution as a check and balance at protecting the integrity of our offices, the demands for qualifications made, and of course their own jobs is important.
Enjoy the latest campaign commercial
ROMNEY/RYAN - How Conservative Does One Wife Make You?
The idea of saying your conservative because you've been married to one person is about what Romney and Ryan want you to choke down, especially given they completely turn their back on the Constitution in Obama's eligibility, and the fraud and forgery coming out of the White House as identification documents.
The Cabalistic Globalization that exist between Romney and Ryan pursuits is punctuated with the fraud and forgery of Obama's ineligibility, lack of integrity towards the Constitution, and America's National Security says Cody Robert Judy, " If you think differently you need to take your blinders off."
Emergency Notification to Chief Justice John Roberts- Will he take a stand for the Constitution?
The ink hasn't yet dried on the opinions of the Justices in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Cases that Chief Justice John Roberts sided on as Constitutional because of the 'legal taxing abilities of Congress' and the Chief Justice has upon his desk an EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION regarding the eligibility of Barack Obama in the competitive race for the Democratic Nomination being held September 5th, 2012 in Charlotte North Carolina.
Cody Robert Judy has pleaded his case through the Judicial Branch in Georgia all the way up to the United States Supreme Court asserting that Obama is not a natural born citizen, and if made the National Democratic Party Nominee may face an Eligibility Challenge from the Republican National Nominee in a tight race that could debilitate the Democratic Parties chances to recover before the General Election in November.
In the Emergency Notification that demands Chief Justice Roberts attention during the Summer Recess of the Court, Petitioner and Registered Democratic Party Candidate for President Mr. Judy asserts that the Court's recess during Summer is in conflict with the Democratic National Convention being held September 5th, 2012, and that unless the Court decides the case in August in a Special Session, the Court may well prejudice itself out of Redressability, as well as open the door for it to be decided in the General Election that could cause much more wide spread discontent, as well as prejudicing himself as the petitioner.
The Emergency Notification to Justice Roberts was sent July 30th,2012 and indeed places the eligibility of Barack Obama as a 'natural born citizen in sharp contrast with the eligibility demands of the United States Constitution.
To date the United States Supreme Court has never heard the case of Barack Obama's eligibility dismissing half a dozen other petitions seeking the Court's supervisory powers due to conflicts in Standing and Jurisdiction.
Cody Robert Judy asserts his case is the first case to come to the Supreme Court of the United States in living action during the race, before a Democratic Party National Nominee was chosen, by another Candidate running for President in the same party.
Cody's case is the first of its kind to also submit evidence to the lower Courts that has reached now the U.S. Supreme Court from a law enforcement investigation. Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse released evidence on March 1st, 2012 that included 2200 hours that reasonably questioned and now has concluded that Barack Obama's released long form Birth Certificate is definitely a forgery as well as problems with his Draft Registration.
Judy's complaint surrounds the Eligibility of Barack Obama placed on the Primary Ballot by the Democratic Chairmen's of each State, but is ultimately certified by the Secretary of State(s) whose duty is more to the tax payers who pay for Primaries and the Constitution of which Secretary-Of-States swear an oath to, then to the Democratic Party Chairmen's who have prejudiced his name as a choice for voters in the Primaries.
"If the Democratic Party were to nominate Barack Obama as the National Nominee, and the election were close, the Republican National Party Nominee would have every Constitutional Right to challenge Obama's eligibility after September 5th,2012", Judy said, "Its much better if we deal with it prior to the General Election and the Nominations of both major parties, and that's the reason I've pulled the Emergency handle of the United States Supreme Court which should be used only in rare instances."
The Republican Party's National Convention held in Tampa, Florida precedes the Democratic Parties this year, and is scheduled for August 27th - 30th 2012.
Remember our Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276
In a newly released video The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign reflects the principles and standards of our framers and founders that have been ingrained in us. This certainly presents a genuine reflecting pool for Americans to all ponder.
From one who earned a reputation as a great communicator , Ronald Reagan said, "Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again."
It is very easy to see that in no point in our modern history has our Constitution come under such a heavy domestic threat from the very people who have enjoyed the freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Getting close to politicians, the press in many cases now days, must often acquiescetheir stories for Government approval for the politically correct establishment of the State. While
'being in' is certainly "no sin", the price is often compromising professional journalism.
No where in our American history have we seen this placed upon the sacrificial table more then Obama's fraudulent identification transparency by the press. Indeed it may well be said in our future that "The Press" lost itself in the dis-ease of the "State" and they along with the United States Supreme Court Justices become relics to the principle they once served that was surrendered by their own hands.
Remember Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama United States Supreme Court 12-5276
Cody Robert Judy reflects on his childhood and compares the demolition of his fathers house to the demolition of the United States Constitution. "Yet", he reflects, " The founding fathers built on straight and sound principles and those have been ingrained in me". The Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court Case challenges the crooked and twisted path of Obama's fraudulent identification transparency.
Cody Robert Judy continues to raise the voice of warning and fight with courage the onslaught of negativity that comes from the very people he is fighting to protect: Those who actually depend upon the Constitution but "think" they don't or that it will never change.
Asked upon where he draws the strength to continue Cody has no problem acknowledging the Creator whose blessings of love flow from Heaven like the sweetest nectar one could imagine.
"I've endeared things that I thought I couldn't endure", Cody said, " I remember the onslaught of abuse I received from those in power and control who kept me locked down 23 hours a day in a space as big as your everyday bathroom for nearly 4 years of my 8 years of incarceration because of the length of my hair. It didn't make the least bit of common sense but they did it every day just waiting for me to crack."
"The guards would come and mock me and tell me it was NEVER going to change; that the Supreme Court would never rule in my favor. That things were set and that's just the way it was. There were men who didn't cut their hair because of religious reasons who also had suffered this miserable cruel and unusual treatment, but I didn't sue them because of that. I sued them because it wasn't a sanitary or health care problem as they insisted, because the women inmates had a code that was one sentence long, "Women inmates can grow their hair as long as they want", it was a discrimination of gender. Something the Supreme Court agreed on".
"Most people could understand that, but somehow someway the ones who got into powerful positions had lost their common sense. They had gone crazy and were the loons. That's a scary situation to be in and we are very close to that when it comes to the respect of our Constitution, and the understanding of exactly what freedom and liberty creates verses the lock down of an enslaved population."
"What Ronald Reagan said is very true, 'Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again." Much of the press ignores the actions of Obama releasing compromised identification papers, and a host of other willful malfeasance and called it legit, and instead want to focus on my incarceration which is over on an offense of words made in a religious meeting some 20 years ago. That doesn't make any sense."
"I've told people I paid society what they wanted completely and our United States Constitution declares that we will NOT discriminate in the political arena denying people the right to vote, and in such the right to run for office, based on race, color, or previous conditions of servitude. In truth this is a great lesson on forgiveness we are pressed to understand. You don't keep asking for freight money on something that has been paid for, while some one who hasn't paid any freight, like Obama, is loading the ship up heavy and walking away with it."
"This case in the United States Supreme Court is not about me and my wrong doing, its about Obama's not telling the truth on his "Declaration of Candidacy" and the fall out from that one lie that continues to rack up points on being the biggest fraud and forgery in our history! For all intensive purposes the Utah Media is Republican.. the majority of Politicians in Utah are Republican, and this "was the place" that had no problem doing to me what they did which is consistent with the national Republican Party sweeping their own complacency under the rug of the biggest fraud and forgery case in American history. How can they deny that?"
"Now asking me how they should feel about it, is not something I care to comment about. Maybe it is something you should ask them about, because it doesn't make any sense to me? That to me is bizarre, loony, crazy, and just plain weird as it relates to the sound conservative principles of the Founders and Framers of the United States of America?"
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
UNCOVERING OBAMA'S PRIMA-DONNA Orly Taitz- Why do they love to hate her?
Wonder why the California attorney Orly Taitz who has been coined "The Birther Queen" and has been featured as spear-heading the Birther Movement at times by most of the main stream media, has asked to be removed from the email list of Cody Robert Judy who is a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party who was recently given a case number in the United States Supreme Court in Judy v.Obama case no. 12-1576 that actually started out in the Georgia Ballot Challenge with Orly Taitz representing?
Call it a suspicious twist of irony, that the attorney claiming on her web site to be "The Worlds Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site" find no interest in a case she actually started that has now reached the United States Supreme Court.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign received the following email from Mrs. Taitz email address stating as follows:
When Cody was asked about this he said it came as no surprise. "Orly Taitz has been a spear-head of distraction to the Birther Movement. She's been a poster child for the main stream media featured in interview after interview. Let's just say they 'love' to hate her and the distraction has been no friend to the cause that the 14th Amendment did not replace the qualifications embedded in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of our Constitution demanding a natural born citizen."
"Clearly the 14th Amendment specifies "Citizen" just as the requirements of a U.S. Representative and a U.S. Senator does in the Constitution, and no where in the 14th Amendment is the words "natural born citizen" or a correction of the qualification demands of our President."
" One finds it personally revealing Orly would want off an email list that puts out maybe 1 or 2 press releases a week at most, and is so relevant to what her own web site is grandly claiming to be "The Worlds Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site", that she finds no interest in whatsoever now.
Cody continued, " I think in the Birther movement it is really about time to take a closer look at what is happening in the 'left field' as a distraction and ask ourselves why the main stream media will only invite Orly Taitz on their programs because I can't recall the main stream media interviewing any other attorney, or petitioner for that matter, representing the eligibility or birther movement quite so much as Orly Taitz."
"One must ask,'Why do they love to hate her?"
"Where Mrs. Taitz has worked tirelessly is at being a distraction with a Russian dialect that made the Birther argument foreign to mainstream America. The facts are when Mrs. Taitz got close to what you would say was a goal of the Birther Movement, she actually moved away from the pursuit. My case in working with her was an excellent example."
"I started with her as a representative of my own Candidacy for President in the New Hampshire Primary Ballot Challenge which went clear to the New Hampshire Supreme Court early in the Presidential Race. One must ask, "Why an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was not undertaken right there?". An appeal from a State Supreme Court is the quickest way to the United States Supreme Court"
"Then we went down to Georgia and in that Ballot Challenge we did get something that the Birther Movement hadn't every received before. An actual opinion from an Administrative Court Judge that specified the 14th Amendment had actually wiped out Article II, Section I, Clause 5's demands for a 'natural born citizen' in so many words. On appeal to the Judicial Branch Superior Court Orly was stopped in her tracks from representing me, and I was forced to pick up the pieces in Farrar-Judy v. Obama. Surprisingly, Orly refused any assistance whatsoever to questions I had sent her in emails regarding procedure and general advice. It was clearly a blow to the case, and my thoughts of her as genuinely interested in the eligibility issue."
"One must recall now the Federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama, that 'standing' and thus 'jurisdiction' was only attained by a Candidate for President who had actual competitive standing, with the eligibility challenge of the contested candidate, in this case Obama. By the time that case reached the 9th Circuit in 2011, the 2008 election in contest was over and the 'political doctrine question' was in the ground as a pounded stake that could not be dis-lodged"
Cody Robert Judy offered the Birther Movement one other thing other then his challenge to Obama's eligibility. He offers the Birther Movement in the purest form a Constitutional Stand on the eligibility challenge of Obama because he sued John McCain in 2008 on his eligibility issue being born outside the U.S. Judy v. McCain
The main stream media has been quick to point out that many of these other candidates for President seem to be racially motivated mainly because of their pass for McCain in 2008.
While challenges to Obama's eligibility have widened in the 2012 race, what the main stream media will not let anyone forget including flirting presidential candidate Donald Trump was that a challenge to Obama from the any political party is racist if their was no challenge to McCain by the same party.
"The Political Doctrine Question encourages courts to decline to rule in certain categories of controversial cases. The theory portends, a court acknowledges that the Constitution might have been violated but declines to act in a see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, do-no-evil crouch. It is often described as a type of Judicial restraint, although it can be considered a form of judicial activism against Plaintiffs whose rights have been violated and find their cases dismissed."
Standing requirements
There are three standing requirements:
Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.
"At that time I wrote that blog entry, I actually encouraged people to contribute to Orly's legal fees in her representation because Georgia's Trial was coming up on January 26th,2012. I can no longer in full faith and credit recommend this to supporters and it has nothing to do with my personal feelings as I have never met Mrs. Taitz, but has to do with the facts she's representing and supporting now."
WHAT HAPPENED IN GEORGIA STAYS IN GEORGIA
"While I was no longer represented in Georgia by an attorney because Orly had been denied her pro hac vice Motion, David Farrar and I agreed to hang together through the battle in the Superior Court which had been paid for. David didn't no to much about the law and so I drafted the motions and responses in the proceeding and it was here that I was able to on March 2nd, 2012 interject a little nitro into the case by including Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse results as evidence after his March 1st, 2012 press release."
"I felt such gratitude that Sheriff Joe Arpaio's constituency had cared enough to petition their Sheriff to open an investigation on Obama's eligibility and I felt with the 2200 hours of professional investigation that his Cold Case Posse had undertaken, that a step up had been managed from say the private professional investigation field that had been submitted as evidence, and perhaps the Courts would respect even more this legal submission of evidence."
"That was not to be the case in the Judicial Superior Court and it was at this time that Orly had woo'ed the Plaintiff David Farrar away from including me in the case as a Candidate for President, in favor of his sole citizen representation he represented in the presentation to the Georgia Supreme Court, which made no legal sense at all. As the case begin there was also another Democratic Party Presidential Candidate named Leah Lax and an independent candidate Lori Roth who also received the endorsement of the California Republican 5th place finisher for the U.S. Senate republican nomination candidate Orly Taitz."
"The problem with that as far as the eligibility question was concerned in the Farrar-Judy v. Obama case was that legally all the other plaintiffs in the case like Lax and Roth were given a chance to continue the case in the Georgia Superior Court and failed to respond and thus were eliminated from the case as litigants officially in a Dis-Joinder Motion."
"Remember Orly chose as a favored route David Farrar as a Citizen over me, a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party positioned perfectly to contend Obama's eligibility with standing and before the Democratic Party National Convention where the 'political doctrine question' would have little effect, in direct contradiction of the Federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in which she had been Representative Counsel on. How is that not assumed to be 'failing the Birther Movement' when the goal is in site?"
"Orly Taitz ditched me, the only remaining candidate for President she had when she chose to represent David Farrar without me in the Georgia Supreme Court and told me in a phone conversation I could do it on my own. Talk about stopping just before you score and then looking up and wondering why everyone's calling you 'the best player for the opposing team'? "
That alone should have stopped any and all contributions to Orly Taitz in the illogical legal sense she was representing. She was in direct contrast to the Federal Court of Appeals Decision and Opinion that she had worked for in Keyes-Barnett v. Obama and was in the site of all the world flipping off the Judges in their opinion of 'standing' and 'the political doctrine question' with her actions at the same time her hand was extended for more contributions in State Ballot Challenges.
If your a contributor challenge yourself to make sense of that other then to say, "She's being paid to be a distraction to the Birther Movement and make the whole Constitutional issue seem like foreign food", and she's been well equipped to do just that.
With her own actions speaking louder than words Orly's case in Farrar v. Obama was dismissed in the Georgia Supreme Court and she has positioned herself in an appeal to a single Justice Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Supreme Court 12A-25 without a presidential candidate which was also dismissed.
Orly Taitz - You have been dismissed and your title of Birther Queen has been revoked for anti-birther obama's-prima donna - 1
1-The term "prima donna" has come into common usage in any field denoting someone who behaves in a demanding, often temperamental fashion, revealing an inflated view of themselves, their talent, and their importance.Due to this association, the contemporary meaning of the word has taken on this negative connotation.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Many people have asked me why I took Obama to Court on his eligibility. The demands of the United States Constitution for the Office of President in the United States Constitution demand a ‘natural born citizen’. Determined by the laws of nature and held in the United States Supreme Court as precedent, that means simply,” Born in the United States to citizen parents”.
The two prong test essentially eliminates “foreign” influence in the Commander-In-Chief’s position. This has been a thorn in the side of the enemies of the United States since the signing of the Constitution.
Some would say Obama’s managed okay and he hasn’t done anything wrong. Many others would look at his record and recognize in his first term a dangerous shadow and foreboding which confronts our national security both economically and militarily if Obama is allowed to propagate the simply lie he told when he witnessed on his “Declaration of Candidacy” that he was a ‘natural born citizen’.
Through the broad and warm smile of Obama’s polished white teeth is one who makes a lie, laughs, and mocks the truth. In this he defies God, and places promises of his own safety and comforts over and above others and in this the regard for the innocent is completely lost.
Perhaps Obama himself doesn’t recognize in his own denial the venom perpetrated upon his own children in such, but his own family is a victim of it; and if he’s willing to do such to his own, how much easier is it to do to yours? It certainly appears the philosophy of Obama lies is in the paradox that if you tell the lie long enough that it will become the truth to you.
I suppose the truth in my suing Obama remains that his lie came home to personally affect me, my campaign for President in 2008 and 2012, and everyone in the United States. Obama’s lie doesn’t simply affect a small pool of people around him, but traverses the entire Untied States, and affects our history, our current state, and our future generations.
That kind of a circle is something that even most elected politicians haven’t seen the gravity in ignoring nor heeded the flashing red lights and warning signs they have felt in the pit of their stomach. They have even become callused to the evidence of law enforcement investigations such as Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse who’s spent literally thousands of hours dissecting the government docs Obama has chosen to represent himself with.
Many also have been lulled into a sullied passivism that the enemies of the United States are incapable, incompetent, or have long been vanquished. Many in the United States have even begin holding a grudge against the United State’s goodness in favor of progressivism they hold as a mark of their own bad lot in life compared with their neighbors. The sin of coveting thy neighbor’s property is seen as the justification of spreading the wealth by force and confiscation in giving the government more and more power over the independent lives of the individual.
When you consider that in combination with the same kind of pressure from those outside the United States who also envy and seek to climb up the economic ladder by pulling someone down, you understand that the United States formidably has many enemies. These are hidden in disguise but I assure you that when the dastardly plan to wreck the United States both economically and militarily doesn’t go according to plan, those enemies will come out of hiding and there will be no further doubt in your mind.
I have no doubt that if the whole world combines against the United States solid principles of freedom and liberty which has come to be represented in our history and mark in the world, that though we may pay a heavy price for it, the union will stand. We are not built on a lie. The bedrock of the United States is as solid of truth in the eye of divine power as God is God that led the Israelites out of the bondage of Pharos’s Egypt into the bastion of freedom and liberty.
Though we may walk in the shadow of death, and hell may rage all around us, we shall fear no evil in the hand of our God-Creator clearly represented in arms of Lady Liberty statuette torch and tablets evoking the law that has come to be called the United States Constitution and our independence of July 4th,1776.
The very first thing I took courage in was seeing “76” in the last two digits of my case number in Judy v. Obama 12-1576 and the representation to me that I was TAKING A STAND for our independence mirroring the title of my book Taking A Stand- The Conservative Independent Voice.
As soon as Obama made the decision to become part of something illegal and contrary to our law in the United States Constitution that was as personal as his simple “Declaration of Candidacy”, he made the choice of what side of the line he was standing on. Every opportunity has been given to him to resign his post as a ‘disability’ but he has remained boldly cowardice in his own knowledge that he is not a natural born citizen, representing himself falsely.
I can speak with all of my faults and frailties weaknesses and imperfections solemnly, that at least I am qualified to be President of the United States of America. I represent myself in truth and there is no lie in my foundation, nor will it crack or crumble for it is eternal and made strong by the fires of Celestial Heavens where corruption and dilapidation have no hold on the vision of our future of real truth and light and where though hell may rage with the gnashing of teeth it hath no power but to bruise my heel.
Please permit my eternal gratitude to God and the instruments of the eternal promise proclaimated by our Founders, Framers, Sons of the Republic, and our first President George Washington, that this Union of the United States of America shall stand so help us God.
My sincere condolences go out to those injured and the families of those whom were lost in the tragic shooting in Colorado. May God bless them in their recovery and grief. Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
