Forum

Israel is a dynamic nation not only as a world leader but also has biblical standing. Therefore, the one who blesses Israel will be blessed, and the reverse is true. This leads to the obvious question of who is going to bless Israel in the United States and Canada.

The issue at hand is the coming election in Canada. As Canadians head to the polls on Monday, April 28, 2025, understanding where each federal party leader stands on Israel has never been more critical. It’s clear that party leaders’ stances on Israel and on antisemitism more broadly vary widely. From strong and consistent support to selective criticism and outright hostility, their words and actions reveal much about their true priorities when it comes to human rights, international affairs, and the fight against rising antisemitism.

Voters worried about these issues should consider candidates' actions and omissions as well as their words. With antisemitism rising and tensions escalating in the Middle East, voters deserve clarity. This breakdown looks exclusively at the public positions, statements, policies, and actions of Canada's major party leaders regarding Israel and antisemitism. It does not weigh in on their economic, social, or other policy platforms.

Let’s not forget Canada is part of the Commonwealth of Nations.  The Commonwealth of Nations, formerly known as the British Commonwealth, is an organization of 56 countries, many of which were formerly part of the British Empire.  Canada became a Commonwealth member in 1931 and is now a leader in industry and policy.

The coming election could very well set a standard for the other 55 nations!

What the party leaders in Canada's 2025 federal election think about Israel. What Their Words and Actions Show About How They Really Feel.

Pierre Poilievre—Conservative Party Leader 

Strong Support for Israel: Pierre Poilievre has been a consistent and vocal supporter of Israel’s right to defend itself against terrorism. He has pledged to oppose anti-Israel resolutions at the United Nations and has vowed to cut Canadian funding to groups like UNRWA that promote hatred or antisemitism.

Tackling Antisemitism: Poilievre has promised to take a hard line against antisemitism, particularly on university campuses. He has stated he would withdraw federal funding from institutions that tolerate hate speech disguised as activism.

Real Commitment: Beyond political rhetoric, Poilievre’s personal visits and engagements with Israel underscore a genuine, longstanding support for the country and the Jewish community worldwide. 

Mark Carney—Liberal Party Leader

Criticism of Israel’s Actions: Carney has frequently criticized Israel’s military actions, particularly in Gaza, often without adequate acknowledgment of Israel’s security challenges or the threat posed by Hamas.

Hypocrisy on Human Rights: Carney’s response to global human rights issues raises serious concerns. Despite atrocities committed by the newly empowered radical Islamic regime in post-Assad Syria — including massacres of Christians and Alawites — Carney has remained largely silent. In fact, he has advocated for easing sanctions against Syria, exposing a troubling inconsistency in his stated commitment to human rights.

Lack of Action on Antisemitism: Despite the documented rise of antisemitism in Canada, Carney has not made combating it a prominent issue in his campaign. His frequent criticisms of Israel have, at times, overshadowed the urgent need to address the increasing threats faced by Jewish Canadians.

Yves-François Blanchet—Bloc Québécois Leader

Largely Silent on Israel: Blanchet rarely addresses foreign policy and typically defaults to general calls for “human rights” without specificity.

Passive Tolerance for Anti-Israel Rhetoric: While not openly hostile toward Israel, Blanchet’s silence amid escalating antisemitic protests and rhetoric suggests indifference at best — and quiet tolerance at worst.

Jagmeet Singh—New Democratic Party Leader

One-Sided Criticism of Israel: Singh consistently criticizes Israel’s defensive actions without adequately condemning the provocations and violence initiated by Hamas. His comments often lack the balance necessary for genuine human rights advocacy.

Selective Approach to Human Rights: While Singh is vocal about Palestinian rights, he is notably silent about the persecution of religious minorities under the new Sunni-led regime in Syria — revealing a selective and politically motivated approach to human rights.

Supports Arms Embargo on Israel: Singh has called for suspending arms sales to Israel — spelling out the Middle East’s only democracy — while making no comparable demands on nations with far worse human rights records.

Defends Anti-Israel Protests: Singh has defended anti-Israel campus protests despite the frequent antisemitic hate speech, harassment of Jewish students, and calls for Israel’s destruction that have characterized many of them. His broad defense of "free speech" here appears to ignore the alarming surge in antisemitic rhetoric.

Diluted Response to Antisemitism: Although Singh speaks against antisemitism, he typically buries it in generic statements against “all forms of hate,” minimizing the unique threat facing Jewish Canadians today.

Elizabeth May—Green Party Leader

One-Sided Criticism of Israel: Elizabeth May has consistently condemned Israeli military actions while showing far less concern for atrocities committed by Syria’s radical regime. This selective outrage suggests a politically expedient, rather than principled, approach to human rights.

Supports Arms Embargo on Israel: Under May’s leadership, the Green Party advocates an arms embargo against Israel — a harsh move not matched by equivalent calls against regimes known for mass atrocities.

Promotes Anti-Israel Activism: May has been involved in protests and campaigns that frequently transcend from criticism of Israeli policy to outright hostility toward Israel's existence. Many of these demonstrations have included extremist rhetoric and antisemitism, yet May has failed to clearly distance herself from these hateful elements.

Generic Condemnation of Hate: While she speaks out against hate generally, May rarely singles out antisemitism as a distinct and growing issue — leaving Jewish Canadians feeling unseen and unsupported.

Maxime Bernier—People’s Party of Canada Leader

"Canada First" Approach: Bernier advocates for Canada to avoid involvement in foreign conflicts unless there is a clear strategic interest. He has urged Canadians to stay out of the Israel-Hamas conflict entirely.

Criticism of Domestic Protests: He has condemned pro-Hamas demonstrations in Canada, particularly those celebrating violence, and has called for greater focus on Canadian domestic concerns rather than taking sides in foreign wars.

In this chart, "embargo" refers specifically to a proposed ban or suspension on the sale and export of military equipment, weapons, and defense technology from Canada to Israel.

When leaders like Jagmeet Singh and Elizabeth May are listed as "Supports Embargo," it means they have called for Canada to stop selling or transferring arms to Israel, typically as a way to pressure Israel over its military actions in Gaza or elsewhere.

Those marked "Opposes Embargo" (like Pierre Poilievre and Maxime Bernier) believe that Canada should continue arms sales to Israel and not single out Israel in a way that could weaken its security or defense capabilities.

Those marked "Neutral" or "Silent" either haven't taken a clear position or have avoided making strong statements for or against an embargo.

Final Word: Canadians must weigh their Israeli relationship and the notion they will be blessed if they make the best choice.   Backing the nation that G*d backs is a good start.