Forum

The Neo-Confederates are shifting into extreme mode to thwart Trump, seize power, and thereby creating chaos, which could lead to a 'real insurrection' by deploying their offensive of Ballot Cleansing.

Many lawyers warn Ballot Cleansing, by removing Trump from state votes, as suggested by "radical lefties," will lead the U.S. down a perilous path—one of the most treacherous in its history. Radical liberals are twisting the 14th Amendment, torturing it to prevent Conservative candidates for Congress through a theory of perverted law called "ballot cleaning."

This hostile action of Ballot Cleaning will bring serious repercussions to U.S. politics and could lead to outright hostility in our streets. Chaos will rule, and the Democrats will be leading the charge!

There is a growing sentiment among certain voters in Illinois and Massachusetts to have President Donald Trump cleansed from the primary ballots in those states for the 2024 election. In the past, certain states such as Maine and Colorado made efforts to disqualify the president from the race but failed!

Last month, many prominent legal scholars in the United States expressed concern over the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to cleanse Trump from the 2024 race and have sited such action could have severe consequences.

Politicians are attempting to utilize Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to devise a legally distorted plan. One provision of the amendment states that individuals who have engaged in acts of rebellion after pledging to uphold the US Constitution should be disqualified from running for public office. This change was enacted as law in 1868. Now, some individuals argue the events on January 6 were a significant incident and believe that President Trump must face legal consequences.

Many constitutional attorneys argue the events of January 6 were distinct from the US Civil War (1861–1865) and should not be labeled as an "insurrection." It was not a rebellion, but rather a protest that turned violent. The law from the Civil War should not be utilized in this situation.

Citizens often become frustrated when faced with chaos, and sometimes they direct their anger towards a particular candidate, resulting in the other side gaining an advantage, even if the chaos itself may not be entirely genuine. There are individuals who strongly oppose Trump and are willing to go to extreme lengths to hinder his progress.

However, it is likely Dems and their Proxy Army could resort to violence and inadvertently elevate Trump's status and generate a strong counter-reaction. The Colorado court's decision appears to contradict the principles of the First Amendment. It could potentially initiate a series of events where states of different political affiliations engage in reciprocal disqualifications.

Democrats are criticizing Republicans, including former President Trump, who express doubts about the fairness of the upcoming 2020 elections. There are valid reasons for concern. According to certain left lawmakers, there is a call to dismiss up to 126 Republican lawmakers due to allegations of involvement in the events of the insurrection. It is concerning that a significant number of individuals have shown support for them.

US Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. (D-NJ) recently urged House leaders to take action against members whom he believes are supporting efforts to invalidate the 2020 presidential election led by Donald Trump. It's clear: individuals in Congress who advocate for dismantling the US government should not hold office. "These lawsuits attempt to undermine public trust in our democratic system by challenging the undeniable outcome of the 2020 presidential election and directly challenge the principles and values enshrined in the Constitution, which every Member pledges to uphold and protect," Pascrell stated, referencing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

A bill similar to this was proposed by Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), with support from 63 other Democrats, including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Jamaal Bowman, Ritchie Torres, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib.

In the past, there have been instances where certain individuals within the Democratic party openly expressed doubt about election results and even attempted to prevent their certification, highlighting the application of varying standards.

Example: Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who was in office at the time, strongly opposed President George W. Bush's re-election in 2004.

Example: Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) were among those who commended her efforts.

Example: According to a lawyer's statement on January 5, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) made efforts to prevent the certification of the election results in 2016.

Final Word: Ballot Cleaning, if not challenged and overturned, could result in a complete and utter desecration of democracy and the voting process in America. Democrats and Republicans could so torture the 14th Amendment, twisting it into a vile mess, making it impossible for any candidate to qualify for the ballot, thereby rendering the US Constitution null and void. (Perhaps this is the desired outcome for the Democrats, and it is nothing more than the 'End Game.')

What do you think…..or is this ‘unthinkable’