A United Nations draft report by the special rapporteur on violence against women affirmed what many critics have long warned: that there is a “concerted international push (to) erase” women and girls, and that gender dysphoria is “socially contagious.”

The report, titled “Sex-based violence against women and girls: new frontiers and emerging issues: Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls,” was compiled by Reem Alsalem of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and warns that transgender ideology has become a threat to women.

Alsalem’s report is stunning considering that it comes from a United Nations office. For example, she warns that transgender ideology is resulting in the “erasure” of women:

Recently, there has been a concerted international push to delink the definition of men and women from their biological sex and erase the legal category of “women.” Such efforts have undermined the practical achievement of equality between men and women. Women are therefore being denied their rightful recognition as a distinct category in law and society. It is a form of “coercive inclusion” that relies on the expectation that women will be kind enough to sacrifice their own recognition and protection for the sake of others.

That, in so many words, is precisely what those of us critical of transgender ideology have been saying for years. Indeed, she goes on to condemn the purging of female-specific terms from language, pinpointing the terminology I have been writing about in this space for a decade:

The suppression of women in language and law occurs in several forms: by replacing sex-specific language with neutral language; by reinterpreting sex-specific language to refer to gender identity rather than sex; and by referring to females in dehumanizing, biologically reductive terms such as “birthing persons,” “menstruaters/bleeders” or “vagina havers” with “front holes.” Such a framing is accompanied by describing the distinction between male and female itself as “biological essentialism” and “an intrinsic expression of patriarchal structures,” rather than the material reality onto which oppressive gender norms and stereotypes are imposed.

Consider: That paragraph was not written by a conservative commentator or gender-critical feminist. It was penned by the head of a United Nations office. In fact, Alsalem also uses phrases that indicate an unwillingness to recognize “transgender identities” themselves as valid; she refers, at one point, to the “effort to provide recognition for males who identify as women or girls,” deliberately avoiding the approved ideological language of “transgender women” or “transgender girls.” Several pages later, after condemning governments for not collecting sex-specific data, she also takes a shot at the pornography industry, condemning the “system of pornography, which presents violent and dehumanizing depictions of women.”

read more:

https://thebridgehead.ca/2025/07/28/bombshell-un-report-calls-for-ban-on-sex-changes-for-children-declares-transgenderism-a-threat-to-women/

Full report: https://ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session59/advance-version/a-hrc-59-47-aev.pdf

UN Report.pdf