BREAKING: Chief Justice Roberts statement:
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) March 18, 2025
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."
You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
Replies
Judicial Review An Illegitimate Power
Judicial Review is the illegitimate power to overturn the Executive and Legislative Branch... Our founding father's never intended the Judiciary to have such power. Hamilton wrote in Federalist No. 78 that the Judiciary would be the weakest branch of Government... kept in check by the other branches.
Federalist No. 78 describes the Judicial Branch as inherently weak... deliberately limited in its ability to control either the money or the military of the country. The only Constitutional power of the judicial branch is the power of judgment: The Executive not only dispenses justice he holds the sword of the community. The Courts must look to the Executive to enforce the law as they have no Constitutional power or physical means to execute their judgment. Judicial review is not mentioned in the Constitution and the power of 'judgment' extends only to the INDIVIDUAL CASE at hand. Judgments were never to apply as new law...
However, the U.S. Supreme Court usurped the powers of the Executive and Legislative branch... by creating the concept of Judicial Review, when it struck down an act of Congress in the 1803 case Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 2 L. Ed. The Judiciary has overextended its Constitutional authority, ever since, thru the exercise of Judicial Review. It is now imperative that the People and States correct hundreds of years of Judicial abuse by... unelected judges.
See The Federalist Papers Essay 78 Summary and Analysis ...
https://www.gradesaver.com/the-federalist-papers/study-guide/...
Among those who have desired to curtail the Supreme Court's power... to invalidate acts of Congress, or to limit the legitimate powers of the Executive were: Presidents Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Franklin D. Roosevelt. The issue is still a live one, as is evident from the heated debates of recent years. Hamilton opposed vesting the supreme power of judicial review in the Judiciary. He understood such power would corrupt the Judicial System resulting in rule by Judicial Fiat.
The Constitutional means to deal with a Rouge President is through negotiation or IMPEACHMENT... not with Court Orders... which are not enforceable on the Executive. If the Court finds, in judgment, that the President or Legislative Branches are out of line... it is up to the Legislative and Executive to correct their conduct... doing nothing with regard to the judgment of the Court... is to refute its validity and to affirm the Legislation or Executive action, taken under judgment. We must not allow unelected judges to rule our nation under the color of law. Rule by judicial fiat must end.
Good info, Col.
Yep.
And who appoints the judges on the appellate review board?
Nowhere in the Constitution are judges granted lifetime appointments... They serve during terms of GOOD BEHAVIOR... at the president's will. The President can use his Executive power to withdraw a judge's appointment under Article 2, Section 1, and Section 3 the 'Take Care' clause... to ensue that the laws be faithfully executed. Of course, the legal profession will not agree... with the simple rendering of the Constitution and the common application of executive prerogatives and powers
Correct but the crooked Demonrats ignore and protect the judge clowns.
U.S. federal system, appellate judges (such as those on the U.S. Courts of Appeals) are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.
Presidents COMMISSION ALL OFFICERS OF THE UNITED STATES... including Judges. Article 2, Section 3 of the US Constitution.
The president's commission empowers an individual to act as an agent of the government... Removing the president's commission removes the authority of the defrocked individual to act... perform official government duties.
The President's commissioning authority is a unilateral power of the President... it toesn't require Congress or any other government agency for the President to approve or remove Presidential commissiions.
Judges without a valid Presidential commission have no authority to act as a federal judge.
Col., Why do you think Trump is not taking these actions to stop the madness? Waiting until more wake up??
Why? The MSM has not gone ballistic over Pres. Trump using his powers to remove the COMMISSION of federal judges. Without their commission, they have no lawful authority to hold any office.
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
of 11 Next