Forum

If you believe the only reason the Liberals in the Democrat Party are demanding open borders and the free flow of undocumented aliens into America is to get more voters, then you will be shocked to learn there is more to this saga than what you have been told!

It’s not what you think!

Ask yourself this question: Why are there so many elderly liberal Democrat leaders who either hold office or are power brokers? Where is the younger generation?

EXPOSED! The Democrat Party faces an undeniable demographic danger: an aging leadership with few young replacements in sight. This predicament is not simply a matter of a political cycle or generational shift but a reflection of the ideological trajectory the party has taken over the decades. In its pursuit of liberal social progressivism, the Democrat Party has distanced itself from traditional family structures—historically the bedrock of generational continuity—leading to an absence of a younger demographic to sustain its ranks.

The enormous progressive liberal base has abandoned the traditional family structure for alternative lifestyles, but in doing so, they have also abandoned their natural future by shunning the overwhelming segment of society that is the heterosexual family-driven base.

Liberal progressives labeled heterosexuals as breeders and birthers and ridiculed men by falsely labeling them as toxic males or sexual supremacists. They misled heterosexual females into believing that they must have an abortion to protect their rights! Furthermore, the frantic alternative cult is actively working to stifle heterosexual desires in children by circumventing parental consent and sexually altering them in the name of freedom and rights, leaving behind a legacy of sexually altered children who are incapable of reproducing!

The Democrat dogma is nothing more than the ‘War On Babies’ but now that war has given birth to a dilemma of epic proportion with no solution in sight!

All this equals one thing. The terminating either by choice or alternative lifestyle from creating a future generation to inherit the liberal progressive Democrat platform, thus a vacuum of young people is growing exponentially!

Look at it this way. For decades, Democrats have embraced policies and cultural narratives that de-emphasize and criticize the traditional nuclear family. The party has championed alternative lifestyles, gender fluidity, sexual change in children, and confusing the definition of ‘what is a woman’ or ‘men can have babies’ and LGBTQ+ rights while simultaneously promoting ideas that quash traditional family values. The sharp cultural shift away from heterosexual, procreative relationships have direct implications for population growth and generational sustainability.

The support for abortion rights, for example, has been a pillar of the Democratic platform. While framed as a matter of women’s autonomy and health, the cumulative effect of decades of legalized and widely accessible abortion has drastically reduced birth rates within Democratic strongholds.

Similarly, the rise of LGBTQ+ advocacy has led to fewer procreative unions. As same-sex couples cannot naturally reproduce within their relationships, the absence of traditional heterosexual family structures diminishes the organic generational replenishment of Democrat voters.

Democratic rhetoric has increasingly alienated those who adhere to traditional gender roles and heterosexual relationships. The party has embraced narratives that portray men as 'toxic males', especially conservative masculinity, once admired as those who fought in the wars and protected the family were ridiculed as noxious and outdated. By vilifying the concept of the nuclear family and labeling traditional gender norms as oppressive, the party has further distanced itself from those who historically replenished voter bases through natural generational succession.

To avoid upsetting the sizable alternative lifestyle base, the secret solution to the Democrat dilemma was carefully designed and planned behind closed doors.

By recognizing the looming generational shortfall, liberal progressive Democrats have sought substitute means to replenish their voter base. Rather than embracing the importance of heterosexual family values, the party has turned to mass heterosexual human importation as their solution. The influx of aliens—most of whom come from traditional, Catholic, family-oriented cultures—presents a convenient opportunity to replace the diminishing younger demographic within the party.

By framing immigration as a humanitarian effort, liberal Democrats can simultaneously position themselves as the champions of the oppressed while ensuring a steady influx of younger individuals who can integrate into their voter base. The strategy is multi-layered:

1. Demographic Replenishment—Migrant families bring with them a culture of strong family structures and high birth rates, ensuring a natural increase in younger voters and liberal leaders for the future.
2. Economic and Political Leverage—Migrants often arrive in need of assistance, making them more likely to support the party that offers social programs and economic benefits. Additionally, if granted legal voting rights, they solidify a loyal voter bloc.
3. Redefine Immigration: The benefit of the replenishing of the liberal base is overwhelming, and thus the term ‘No Man Is Illegal’ is code talk for all heterosexual men and their families who are willing to become progressive Democrats are welcome. 
4. Timing is Crucial: Democrat liberals cannot afford to wait years for the legal immigration process to unfold; they require an immediate infusion of younger people. Thus, the laws must be ignored, the constitution set aside, and law enforcement must be told to ‘stand down,’ also known as ‘Defund ICE’ and ‘Defund the Police’. Therefore, they must adopt the Democrat doctrine of 'Let Them In,' which includes open borders and unaccounted-for masses, as the norm. If it is not, then the Democrat Party will slowly die in rest homes.

But there is a problem. Maintaining a balance between two divergent bases is a challenging task. They must maintain their core progressive, sexually diverse base while simultaneously integrating the more traditional, heterosexual immigrant communities.

The challenge lies in presenting immigration as a means of social justice rather than a demographic necessity. To appease their existing base, they emphasize the moral duty of welcoming migrant aliens while subtly relying on the fact that these illegal aliens naturally embody the very family structures they have otherwise sidelined domestically.

The Democrat Party’s strategy of mass heterosexual human importation to replenish its younger ranks is an attempt to offset the demographic consequences of decades of progressive social policies. However, the long-term sustainability of this approach remains in question.

Can the liberal Democrats successfully integrate two fundamentally different cultural ideologies—one that embraces gender fluidity and individualistic autonomy, and another that upholds traditional family values?

Democrats may be in a moral bind if they keep pushing against traditional family structures while relying on them in immigrant communities. This could cause their coalition to fall apart in the future, and the party will be split over sexual preferences instead of political issues.

Final Word: By embracing a segment of sociality that does not bear children, this is nothing more than long-term euthanasia. This is one of the main reasons Trump is hated to such a depth: it is because he endorses a strong family structure, heterosexuality, and plain old-fashioned ‘baby making’.

WOW! You did it! We are front page top headline!!! https://canadafreepress.com/article/exposed-why-liberals-love-illegals