JOY BEHAR: Trump supporters “have issues.”
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 6, 2024
ANA NAVARRO: “I think Tim Walz’s brother is dumb as hell.” pic.twitter.com/hlrwHkQOcw
You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
JOY BEHAR: Trump supporters “have issues.”
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 6, 2024
ANA NAVARRO: “I think Tim Walz’s brother is dumb as hell.” pic.twitter.com/hlrwHkQOcw
You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
Replies
Wow!!! A bunch of great comments here.
Yeah we've got Issue's!! We be tired of all the B.
S.
What else would one expect from such a mental midget?
SCREW YOURSELF YOU BRAIN DEAD, CORRUPT, STUPID, MARXIST, COMMIE, SLUT!
too funny
Everyone on The View is brain-dead, stupid, progressive socialist. They need to be put on a boat and sent to North Korea.
All of you on the view have issues its called being brain dead
We DO have issues. With:
Lying. Stealing. Killing. Perverting. Destroying.
Everything the political 'class' does, says and hides. And that covers everything.
That is a good place to begin. Oaths first. Violations against oaths are violations against God. And us. And Law. And Justice. Those Oaths are to be on a Holy Bible.
Let's just take a good look at ..... it. Shall we...?
The Constitution requires that all members of Congress must take an oath of office to support the Constitution before assuming office. In order to comply with the Constitution, Congress has enacted federal laws to execute and enforce this constitutional requirement.
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration ... of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
So, Let's see if we can do the math:
1. Violate the Constitution, yes, they do.
2. 5 U.S.C.3331 Do it. [Take Oath]
3. 5 U.S.C. 3333. Say they did it. Sign LAWFUL AFFIDAVIT that they Took Oath]'
3.b. Lying on an Affidavit = Up to 4 years in state prison and pay thousands of dollars in fines.
4. 5 U.S.C. 7311 Did it against us. [Advocated for Treason = Altering government through any means except Amendment. [Yes, they have.]
5. 5.U.S.C. 1918 Penalties, yes. [Oh yes...Removal, Penalties or Fines]
6. E.O. 10450 Advocate against our Government, against E.O. 10450, Alters government via any means except lawful means [Amendment] [via argument before the public or before Tribunal]
7. U.S.C. 7311. Full Circle. Criminal Violation. [Yes, Yes, Yes....]
TREASON definition:
1. Levying War against the States
2. Adhering to the Enemies of the States
3. Giving Enemies Aid and Comfort.
SCOTUS in Cramer v United States: Majority Opinion
"Aid and Comfort" is the definitive action taken in Treason cases.
There, we have it all. Yes, they have. Yes, they are.
Say it!