Progressives Baffled With Gen Z—Are You?

31003214052?profile=RESIZE_400xIn the day of loud and stormy protests, burning the core out of the cities, and aggressive militants vandalizing the streets, now the social temperature is changing, leaving the Gen Z generation looking sane and responsible! But how can this be when universities, professors, and political pundits in unison claim ‘Orange Man Bad’? What happened?

First of all, let's define some terms. Generation Z, often abbreviated as Gen Z or Zoomers, is the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials. They are generally defined as individuals born between 1997 and 2012. This range can vary slightly by source, some extend it to 1996–2010 or simply "1997 onward," having their formative years in the digital age, post-9/11, amid the 2008 financial crisis, and during the rise of social media.

Look at it this way. In the shadow of a second Trump presidency, the American left finds itself grappling with an unexpected silence: the absence of youthful fury in the streets.

Where once college campuses buzzed with chants of anti-MAGA and the conservative tide, today's young adults, Gen Z and elder millennials, appear disengaged, opting for TikTok scrolls over town hall takeovers.

This baffling retreat has academics and activists alike sounding alarms, with Dartmouth professor Brendan Nyhan's recent New York Times essay crystallizing the unease.

"The opposition to Mr. Trump’s authoritarian speed run requires new strategies," Nyhan warned, highlighting a generational chasm that threatens the soul of progressive resistance.

Nyhan's piece, published amid the chill of November 2025, paints a stark picture. Despite Trump's return to the White House, armed with promises of mass deportations, tariff wars, and vows to "drain the swamp" anew, the scale of anti-Trump demonstrations pales against his first term's pink-hatted Women's Marches or the Black Lives Matter surges.

The "No Kings" rallies in October, a nationwide cry against perceived executive overreach, drew an impressive five million people. Yet, turnout data from YouGov reveals a demographic desert: just 8% of 18- to 29-year-olds joined, compared to 13% of those over 65. Ancient boomers, it seems, are shouldering the protest placards while Zoomers sip lattes at home.

This isn't mere apathy; it's a sharp reversal from 2020's George Floyd uprisings, where youth comprised 13% of protesters, fueling a movement that reshaped corporate boardrooms and police budgets.

What changed? Nyhan attributes it to a cocktail of burnout and betrayal. The racial justice wave crashed into backlash and unfulfilled reforms; campus Gaza solidarity actions sparked donor revolts without halting the conflict; and climate strikes, once a Gen Z hallmark, faded as Biden's Green New Deal dreams evaporated under electoral pragmatism.

Nyhan writes that young people, demobilized and demoralized, perceive street theater as a futile endeavor, particularly with Trump entrenched in power and mocking accountability from Mar-a-Lago.

The left's bafflement runs deeper, laced with existential worry. For decades, youth rebellion has been the progressive engine:

  • Vietnam draft dodgers,
  • Anti-apartheid divestments,
  • Occupy Wall Street's
  • George Floyd protestors

Now old people with walkers, the geriatric parade, a conga line of AARP-card-carrying white-haired seniors clashing with MAGA's brash energy.

Nyhan portrays the Democrat Party as a "decadent gerontocracy," with its elite more comfortable in Hamptons soirées than in muddy marches.

Polls echo this: A 2025 Pew survey shows only 42% of under-30s trust Democrats to fight authoritarianism, down from 58% in 2020, while 22% now view Trump as a "disruptive force for good," a siren song of anti-establishment allure that conservatives wield like catnip.

This generational ghosting alarms the left not just for optics, but for strategy. Protests once amplified marginal voices, pressuring media cycles and policy pivots. Now, with algorithms favoring outrage over organizing, young conservatives thrive on X and Rumble, building parallel ecosystems that dwarf liberal Discord servers.

The worry? A feedback loop where disaffected youth drift rightward, seduced by podcasters promising economic populism over identity politics. As Nyhan urges, the left must innovate digital campaigns that blend memes with mutual aid, policy wins that outpace performative piety, and coalitions that court the working-class Gen Z'er eyeing gig-economy woes over abstract norms.

However, this paradox is yet to be defined by the progressive cabal.

But the members of the Patriot Command Center see it differently.

Here is what’s happening:

  1. Trump's economy works, and Gen Z sees it.
  2. Colleges and universities are safer and more academic, and Gen Z sees it.
  3. Communities are safer because lawbreakers are being rounded up, and Gen Z sees it.
  4. Illegal aliens are no longer stealing Gen Z’s jobs and future, and Gen Z sees it.
  5. Younger people love a radical troublemaker; this is Trump, and Gen Z sees it.
  6. A president who gets things done, and Gen Z sees it.
  7. Gen Z is having a quiet revival and a return to biblical principles.

Final Word: Do you see it?

Give your opinion in the comment section below.

13642435074?profile=RESIZE_400x

 

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –