Forum

Let me ask you an honest question: did Texas just have a freak storm, or was there a programming error in the global weather machine? Before you roll your eyes and say, ‘conspiracy theory,’ ask yourself why several members of Congress are asking to turn off the global weather machine if it doesn’t exist.

Texas history will now remember July 4, 2025, as a day of profound tragedy and swirling controversy. As record-shattering rains turned the Texas Hill Country into an inland sea, killing at least 50 people and leaving dozens missing, questions erupted online and in Congress: Was this simply an unprecedented natural disaster, or did something more sinister play a role?

Texas was slammed by a storm unlike any other. According to meteorologists, the storm on July 4th was extraordinary. Over 10–15 inches of rain fell within hours, with some parts of Kerrville and the Guadalupe River basin receiving four months’ worth of rainfall in less than half a day. Witnesses described water surging over riverbanks in minutes, swallowing cars, homes, and entire summer camps.

A time-lapse radar sequence circulating widely on social media shows the thunderstorms nearly stationary over the region for 18 hours, an unusual behavior even in flood-prone Central Texas. This anomalous stalling is part of what has fueled speculation that weather modification, or “weather weapons,” might have been involved. Was this a unique occurrence, or was the global weather system malfunctioning?

Our prayers go out to the families that lost their loved ones, homes, and small towns, but was this disaster avoidable?

Enter the Global Weather Warfare Debate. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), long a critic of geoengineering, seized on the disaster to advance legislation banning weather modification nationwide. In a fiery statement on social media, she declared, “This is not normal. No person, company, entity, or government should ever be allowed to modify our weather by any means possible.”

Greene introduced a bill making the deliberate alteration of weather, through chemical dispersion, cloud seeding, or other emerging technologies, a felony. She likened her proposal to a new Florida law prohibiting geoengineering, citing widespread public concern over potential unintended consequences.

The move was immediately polarizing. Supporters applauded Greene for addressing what they see as a hidden threat to public safety and environmental integrity. Critics dismissed her claims as conspiracy theory run amok, pointing out that Texas had been hit by catastrophic flooding long before any such technology even existed, but many in the know realized their weather experiments may have just been exposed.

Do Green's critics genuinely believe the situation is nothing more than a conspiracy theory run amok, or is it unadulterated plausible deniability?

Official agencies have repeatedly denied that large-scale weather control is currently feasible. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issued a statement last year explaining, “There is no credible scientific evidence that any government or entity can control or significantly modify large-scale weather systems such as hurricanes or persistent thunderstorm complexes.”

Let’s not forget these are the same people who perpetrated the Russia Hoax, hid the Hunter Biden laptop data, and endorsed the ‘Global Warming Scheme. Now they are saying there is no Global Weather Control System.

Several sources have been whispering behind closed doors that it is just a matter of time before the world awakens to the possibility that the weather is now under human control. However, this begs the question: which humans, where are they, and is the Earth in for a weather Armageddon?

Meteorologists agree the Hill Country is especially vulnerable to flash flooding due to its thin soil, steep terrain, and frequent clashes of tropical moisture and dry air. Historical records show severe floods in 1921, 1932, 1978, and 2002. Yet the magnitude and speed of this year’s disaster have given new life to suspicions that something unnatural was at play.

Online weather researchers have pointed to satellite imagery of apparent aerosol trails and radar anomalies, while others caution against reading too much into atmospheric patterns without peer-reviewed evidence.

An ongoing human crisis is unfolding. While the debate rages, search and rescue teams are still combing debris along the Guadalupe River. Among the missing are 23 girls attending a summer camp that was engulfed when the river rose 26 feet in under an hour. As of Saturday morning, at least 9 children were confirmed dead, and dozens remain unaccounted for.

Governor Greg Abbott has issued a disaster declaration, pledging that Texas will do “whatever it takes” to find every missing person. The Texas National Guard and FEMA have deployed airboats, helicopters, and hundreds of personnel in an effort that is likely to continue for weeks.

In today’s interview, Steve Eichler, founder of the Patriot Command Center, stated, “A bigger question is lurking, and that is, ‘Is America ready when the computer-controlled weather machine is turned over to AI, and who is ready to pull the plug if the AI has a mind of its own?’”

Whether the floods were the product of climate extremes, technological intervention, or a tragic collision of both, the catastrophe underscores the fragility of modern communities in the face of nature’s fury and the power of social media to amplify uncertainty.

It also forces the world to reckon with an uncomfortable reality: If weather modification tools ever do become viable, how will we regulate their use and ensure accountability if something goes terribly wrong?

Final Word: If weather modification is a myth, then why is Congress considering its limitation?