Report: The Islamic Regime has never been weaker or more isolated

🔴 Iran update:

I have never seen the islamic regime or its supporters this rattled. The loss of Al Taher shook them.

The level of infighting happening now is not only fascinating, but hilarious.

I saw one regime supporter angrily yelling that China should step in and join… pic.twitter.com/NMrcbfEuUd
— 𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ (@NiohBerg) September 5, 2026

I have never seen the islamic regime or its supporters this rattled. The loss of Al Taher shook them.

The level of infighting happening now is not only fascinating, but hilarious.

I saw one regime supporter angrily yelling that China should step in and join the war on the IR's side (seriously lol).

I saw another one claim MojtabaGPT should reveal himself and fix the situation, not realising he's dead and run by AI bots now.

I saw others blaming all of this on Ghalibaf for signing the MOU in the first place.

It could of course be theatre to give the impression of a fracture, but I doubt it.
They took massive losses this week and they know it. Lebanon is soon no longer their puppet state to exploit.

The Israelis are sensing how weakened this regime is and smell blood in the water. Israeli officials are quite literally begging the islamic regime to attack them now. And why wouldn't they?

After conquering South Lebanon with almost no resistance, Israel is restlessly waiting for any excuse to go back into Iran and destroy the IRGC for good. Somehow, the painfully frustrating ceasefire months have cornered the islamic regime and given both Trump and Bibi the upper hand.

They're running out of money, and they're also threatened by 90 million furious Iranians who want revenge for January and all the executions since.

What remains to be seen is this:

Will Trump and Bibi take the opportunity to help the Iranian people overthrow the regime? Because the IRGC has never been weaker or more isolated. If there ever was a time to set a regime change plan into motion, it's RIGHT NOW.

Not sure where you are getting your news, but you might want to check your sources.

And, yes, Iran HAS lost wars:

Gemini:

Yes, Iran and its predecessor Persian empires have lost several major wars throughout history.

Historical Defeats

The Muslim Conquest of Persia (633–651 AD): The Sasanian Empire was completely defeated by the Rashidun Caliphate, leading to the collapse of the empire and the eventual spread of Islam in the region.

The Mongol Invasions (13th Century): Genghis Khan’s forces utterly devastated the Khwarazmian Empire, leading to mass destruction, heavy casualties, and decades of foreign Mongol rule (the Ilkhanate).

The Battle of Chaldiran (1514): The rising Safavid Empire under Shah Ismail I suffered a catastrophic defeat against the Ottoman Empire led by Selim I, permanently halting Safavid expansion into Anatolia. [1]

Russo-Persian Wars (19th Century): Qajar Iran lost two major wars to the Russian Empire, resulting in the Treaty of Gulistan (1813) and the Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828), which forced Persia to cede vast territories in the Caucasus (modern-day Armenia, Azerbaijan, and parts of Georgia). [1]

Anglo-Soviet Invasion of Iran (1941): During World War II, British and Soviet forces jointly invaded and occupied Iran to secure oil fields and supply routes, forcing the abdication of Reza Shah.

Does the Vatican have an army?

Gemini:

No, the Vatican does not have a formal army capable of fighting a war, as its defense is legally the responsibility of Italy.

However, it does maintain two unique security forces to protect the Pope, the Apostolic Palace, and the borders of Vatican City

By the way, you do realize that 'the Crown' would be speaking German if it wasn't for the USA, don't you?

And, per AI, the US is NOT being 'loaned oil':

No, other countries are not lending oil to the U.S., but the U.S. government is actively loaning out its own oil to private energy companies.

While the concept of "loaning oil" might sound unusual, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) frequently uses a specific legal mechanism known as an "exchange" or loan scheme to manage domestic supply shocks. [1] (https://energynow.com/2026/05/us-to-loan-53-3-million-barrels-of-oi...), [2] (https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/68323/chris-wright-venezuelas-he...)

Replies

Steve Eichler September 13, 2026 at 2:10pm

Time to step on their necks!
- ilona Trommler > Steve Eichler September 13, 2026 at 8:51pm
  
  I'm waiting for Trump to make up his mind, there's no reason we cannot get rid of the remaining members of that regime.
- Paul Simmon > ilona Trommler September 14, 2026 at 7:46am
  
  President Trump is the Commander-In-Chief. He knows what he is doing. Remember he took out the entire Iranian leadership on day one. The military excursion was a huge success and brought Iran to its knees. Their nuclear capabilities were destroyed in the dinner of 2025.
This reply was deleted.
- ADMIN
  Admin Dee September 7, 2026 at 7:08am
  Not sure where you are getting your news, but you might want to check your sources.
  
  And, yes, Iran HAS lost wars:
  
  Gemini:
  
  Yes, Iran and its predecessor Persian empires have lost several major wars throughout history.
  
  Historical Defeats
  
  The Muslim Conquest of Persia (633–651 AD): The Sasanian Empire was completely defeated by the Rashidun Caliphate, leading to the collapse of the empire and the eventual spread of Islam in the region.
  
  The Mongol Invasions (13th Century): Genghis Khan’s forces utterly devastated the Khwarazmian Empire, leading to mass destruction, heavy casualties, and decades of foreign Mongol rule (the Ilkhanate).
  
  The Battle of Chaldiran (1514): The rising Safavid Empire under Shah Ismail I suffered a catastrophic defeat against the Ottoman Empire led by Selim I, permanently halting Safavid expansion into Anatolia. [1]
  
  Russo-Persian Wars (19th Century): Qajar Iran lost two major wars to the Russian Empire, resulting in the Treaty of Gulistan (1813) and the Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828), which forced Persia to cede vast territories in the Caucasus (modern-day Armenia, Azerbaijan, and parts of Georgia). [1]
  
  Anglo-Soviet Invasion of Iran (1941): During World War II, British and Soviet forces jointly invaded and occupied Iran to secure oil fields and supply routes, forcing the abdication of Reza Shah.
  
  Does the Vatican have an army?
  
  Gemini:
  
  No, the Vatican does not have a formal army capable of fighting a war, as its defense is legally the responsibility of Italy.
  
  However, it does maintain two unique security forces to protect the Pope, the Apostolic Palace, and the borders of Vatican City
  
  By the way, you do realize that 'the Crown' would be speaking German if it wasn't for the USA, don't you?
  
  And, per AI, the US is NOT being 'loaned oil':
  
  No, other countries are not lending oil to the U.S., but the U.S. government is actively loaning out its own oil to private energy companies.
  
  While the concept of "loaning oil" might sound unusual, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) frequently uses a specific legal mechanism known as an "exchange" or loan scheme to manage domestic supply shocks. [1] (https://energynow.com/2026/05/us-to-loan-53-3-million-barrels-of-oi...), [2] (https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/68323/chris-wright-venezuelas-he...)
- ADMIN
  Admin Dee > Admin Dee September 7, 2026 at 7:10am
  "All of the nations are rising up against Israel", Wrong again.
  
  While public opinion across the Middle East remains deeply hostile toward Israel, several regional governments have leaned into a realpolitik partnership
  
  driven by a shared existential threat: Iran. [1]
  
  The UAE and Bahrain: These nations maintain formal diplomatic relationships established under the Abraham Accords. Because of localized conflicts with Iran and its regional proxies, Israeli military technology and security partnerships have become highly valuable to Gulf states. [1]
  
  Oman and Jordan: Jordan, alongside states like Oman, coordinates heavily on regional security frameworks. These countries cooperate quietly on intelligence sharing, regional stability initiatives, and countering the expansion of Iranian-backed proxy networks. [1]
  
  3. Key European Allies
  
  Historically, Israel’s strongest European backing comes from nations where historical and post-WWII obligations run deep, though the relationship across Europe is often heavily debated. [1]
  
  Germany: Despite continuous domestic friction and pushback regarding Palestinian humanitarian crises, Germany remains a major European partner. However, the country has frequently conditioned or frozen aspects of its cooperation based on West Bank settlement developments.
  
  Central and Eastern European Nations: Countries like the Czech Republic, Romania, and Serbia have consistently acted as more vocal, unconditional allies within Europe, providing various levels of logistical, defense procurement, or diplomatic backing. [1, 2, 3]
  
  4. Pragmatic & Rising Alliances
  
  India: New Delhi maintains a robust defense, trade, and technological partnership with Jerusalem. Driven by shared concerns over Islamic extremism and a heavy reliance on Israeli defense exports, India represents one of Israel’s most stable geopolitical relationships.
- Paul Simmon September 9, 2026 at 3:58am
  
  Grumpy, why do you need to keep the dumocrats out of the office for 12 years? If President Trump sets it up the right way, dumocrats will never get back into office and the Republican Party will be the only party that survives. Less is more. Just look at the mess in Europe where they have many viable parties rather than the two we have and one of our two parties is very problematic.
  
  As for the deficit and debt, President Trump is taking care of that as we speak. Some parts of the Big Beautiful Bill are only becoming effective in 2027. I trust him that he will get the deficit down and pay back the debt just like he promised.
- Paul Simmon September 8, 2026 at 12:20pm
  
  Grumpy, what are you trying to say about President Trump's bitcoin trading?
- Paul Simmon September 9, 2026 at 8:54am
  
  Grumpy, I played golf with a guy the other day who told me at some point that we needed to cut out government corruption. I had to test him and asked whether he was talking about the $2 bln President Trump earned last year. He answered that he didn't care "how Trump enriches himself while he is in office", he cared about getting rid of government corruption. In my book, that's the right attitude and all patriots need to adopt it if they haven't already.
- ilona Trommler September 9, 2026 at 5:40am
  
  Be careful Grumpy, unless you completely, blindly agree and support Trump no matter what, you'll be accused of not being patriotic, you may even become a traitor.
Paul Simmon September 6, 2026 at 9:01am

President Trump brought them to their knees. What an amazing Commander-In-Chief.

of 2

This reply was deleted.