NATO (Article 5) requires the US to defend the UK
— Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) August 27, 2025
The UK has its own treaty obligations prohibiting it from deporting violent, criminal refugees
That’s suicidal
Having a defense treaty with a suicidal county is itself … suicidal
Raise your hand if you find that troubling https://t.co/MclvlZuVo9 pic.twitter.com/6pfqMj8i9W
Why the UK Can't Deport Refugees, Even Criminal Ones
A Scottish teen’s viral clash with a migrant, and a MP’s new report on R*pe G*ngs, have reignited debate over asylum and deportation in Britain.
This thread will detail:
⚖️ what treaties the UK signed onto
✈️ why deportations get blocked again and again
💷 the financial incentives built into the system
It’s more complex — and more instructive for the US — than most headlines admit.
Patience while I pull the thread together… 🌍📜

A Scottish teen’s viral clash with a migrant, and a MP’s new report on R*pe G*ngs, have reignited debate over asylum and deportation in Britain.
This thread will detail:
⚖️ what treaties the UK signed onto
✈️ why deportations get blocked again and again
💷 the financial incentives built into the system
It’s more complex — and more instructive for the US — than most headlines admit.
Patience while I pull the thread together… 🌍📜


@RupertLowe10 Two UNHCR treaties, the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol, form the foundation for international refugee law.

@RupertLowe10 The 1951 Refugee Convention defined who a refugee was and also who was not (e.g., war criminals), created when WWII displaced tens of millions of people.
It sets out certain rights, such as providing free access to courts and providing identity documents.
It sets out certain rights, such as providing free access to courts and providing identity documents.

@RupertLowe10 The cornerstone of the 1951 Refugee Convention - and thus the basis for much of what the UK faces obstacles in - is the principle of non-refoulement.
A refugee *cannot* be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their freedom.
A refugee *cannot* be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their freedom.

@RupertLowe10 The 1951 Convention was limited to certain countries and to pre-1951 events. The 1967 Protocol extended that to include all countries and no time limits.

The United States is a party to the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, and it did enter two specific reservations.
Taxation (Article 29): The U.S. reserved the right to tax refugees who are non-resident aliens on the same basis as other non-resident aliens, rather than giving them the full exemption from discriminatory taxation that resident refugees enjoy.
Social Security (Article 24(1)(b)): The U.S. reserved the right, in cases where its Social Security Act conflicts with the Convention’s provisions, to treat refugees no better and no worse than other aliens in similar circumstances.

Taxation (Article 29): The U.S. reserved the right to tax refugees who are non-resident aliens on the same basis as other non-resident aliens, rather than giving them the full exemption from discriminatory taxation that resident refugees enjoy.
Social Security (Article 24(1)(b)): The U.S. reserved the right, in cases where its Social Security Act conflicts with the Convention’s provisions, to treat refugees no better and no worse than other aliens in similar circumstances.


@RupertLowe10 The UK is bound to ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights) signed 1950. Notably, Article 3's ban on torture or degrading treatment has been broadly interpreted to mean no deportation at all if the refugee is at risk of this in their home country.

@RupertLowe10 This comes from a 1996 case law in the UK - Chahal vs. United Kingdom.
The court ruled even a terrorist could not be deported if he risked facing degrading treatment or punishment at his home country.
The court ruled even a terrorist could not be deported if he risked facing degrading treatment or punishment at his home country.

@RupertLowe10 The UK tried to get around this by sending refugees arriving by boat back to Rwanda, where they could then apply for asylum elsewhere.
The ECHR issued an injunction against that, stating that the refugees were at substantial risk of deportation if they were sent to Rwanda.

The ECHR issued an injunction against that, stating that the refugees were at substantial risk of deportation if they were sent to Rwanda.


@RupertLowe10 The application of ECHR Article 3 is so broad that it even extends to substandard health care. If you believe you won't receive good health care in your home country, you can't be deported. Even if you're a criminal.

Another legal constraint on deportations comes from the Council of Europe’s Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (ECAT).
The treaty obliges the UK to identify and protect potential trafficking victims through the National Referral Mechanism (NRM). Once someone receives a positive “reasonable grounds” decision, they must be given a recovery period and cannot be removed during that time. In practice, this means many individuals flagged as potential trafficking victims have their deportations paused while their case is assessed.
The treaty obliges the UK to identify and protect potential trafficking victims through the National Referral Mechanism (NRM). Once someone receives a positive “reasonable grounds” decision, they must be given a recovery period and cannot be removed during that time. In practice, this means many individuals flagged as potential trafficking victims have their deportations paused while their case is assessed.

@RupertLowe10 And as we all know -- NGOs exist to facilitate refugees through the seas. Does that make them "victims of trafficking" in a sense?

@RupertLowe10 Most refugees come from Middle Eastern countries. For many countries, the ultimate acceptance rate to be a refugee reaches 99% (!).

Once someone is granted refugee status in the UK, they receive leave to remain for five years. At the end of that period, they are eligible (with no application fee) to apply for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), provided their protection needs persist. 12 months on ILR, and they can apply for citizenship.





@RupertLowe10 Once asylum is granted, refugees are allowed to work, study, and receive government benefits. The number of people receiving Universal Credit skyrocketed from 500K to over 7 million in less than a decade.





The UK has tried many ways around the international laws it is strangled with. One such deal was an exchange with France -- if UK turns back small boats to France, they accept an equal number of asylum seekers from France.
The benefit is that the hope that smugglers become deterred at the prospect of being sent back to France, and the transferred cases are more likely to be people with stronger UK ties.
The benefit is that the hope that smugglers become deterred at the prospect of being sent back to France, and the transferred cases are more likely to be people with stronger UK ties.

@RupertLowe10 There are other financial incentives. A Syria resettlement program gives local authorities £20,520 per refugee by the UK to and these authorities are allowed to "spend the tariff as they see fit."
Which I interpret to mean that they can pocket it all if they wished.

Which I interpret to mean that they can pocket it all if they wished.


@RupertLowe10 Local authorities are also granted education, language, and healthcare stipends, plus housing costs for refugees.

⚖️✈️ The bottom line
Once someone sets foot on UK soil, the system is stacked towards settlement.
Deportation from the UK is not simple. Even when they want to remove someone, it runs into hard legal walls (non-refoulement, ECAT trafficking protections, ECHR Article 3) and practical barriers (no travel documents, hostile origin states, lack of flights, limited detention space).
At the same time, there are incentives to keep people in: councils receive funding, local authorities get resettlement tariffs, and refugees move straight onto mainstream benefits and housing.
Once someone sets foot on UK soil, the system is stacked towards settlement.
Deportation from the UK is not simple. Even when they want to remove someone, it runs into hard legal walls (non-refoulement, ECAT trafficking protections, ECHR Article 3) and practical barriers (no travel documents, hostile origin states, lack of flights, limited detention space).
At the same time, there are incentives to keep people in: councils receive funding, local authorities get resettlement tariffs, and refugees move straight onto mainstream benefits and housing.
Replies
The globalists are obviously ruling the UK. The USA can't be in bed with a country like that.
SO RIGHT PAUL!
We should'nt be 'in bed' with any country on this earth. We should only stand on and with our founding documents, principles, standards and original definitions. That means that MUCH must be thrown down, destroyed and rebuilt from the foundation.
Things lost sight of AND/OR stolen from us:
WOW, VERY WELL SAID, THANKS FOR POSTING!
YW, Michael
Jea9 and Paul Simmon, know this. Biden was never in charge. He was dead. BO was in charge. He was like an hour glass. The globalists told him what to do. The orders passed through him down to those who carried out his orders. That is the negative, dark, side. Now look at the positive side, the bright side. Donald is parallel to BO. God is handing orders down to Donald, the bright-shining hour glass. Donald passes God's orders on to his workers. Notice the Donald does not pass the orders down. He passes them onward. Light wins. Have NO fear. BO's side has that (fear). Light casts out darkness. Faith casts out fear. A 24-hour period is soon to come. All will change suddenly. All that Jea9 says above will occur suddenly, and more! All that any of us can imagine will occur suddenly and more! This "Suddenly" day may happen by early October. Get ready to celebrate! A September to remember! An October to recall over and over. A Christmas like no other since the Savior's birth! Get ready to dance over BO's dead body. You will find his corpse next to 10,000 others on one side and a 1,000 on the other side! And you will not have one scratch!
I saw the vids of the fake Oval Office and of the different scenes outside the Oval Office along with the atupid French Provincial desk that someone might buy for a 14yr old girl. So someone or someone's took great care to get intel out there. And 0"s Seal falling off his podium. So, we await the final act in the Great Awakening. I just put all that behind and focus on now. Glad you know.
Jea9, I totally agree with you. Everyone in the United States needs to follow these rules strictly if we want to preserve the American way of life, our liberties and freedom. If you don't follow, get out or get locked up. It's as simple as that.
They have to be restored first, then maintained. Outlawed and enforced, as far as the jxx schedule. Brutal regulations upon hospitals for what they have gotten away with. And pharma does NOT label the M of F lines as M or F, they have a code, that no one would know what it is, so hospitals are also a criminal enterprise, along with pharma, because they KNOW and still enforce forced injections. Everything at this point that has to do with injections is now highly suspect. Rabies shots last 10 years. Tell your vet that. Cutting out 2/3 of the endocrine system of a dog, ask them Why? Apply logic. "Are you telllng me that YOU would give up 2/3 of YOUR endocrine system?" Watch them go blank. No one has accused them YET and it must happen. CoVid, exposed a LOT. ......and it is ALL part of a beast system. CoVid proved a LOT.
The UK has destroyed itself from within through the adoption of laws that fail the common sense test, but the UK is not alone, most of the EU nations are in the same boat. If the real citizens of these nations fail to rise up and address this problem, Islam will have taken most of Europe within another 10 years.