Should Politicians Face Jail Time For Malpractice?

24cc7c6f-4052-42dc-ab36-1d5bf95cc170.jpg?profile=RESIZE_400xThis could open Pandora’s Box and let untold lawfare loose, but on the other hand, when We the People hire a person to do our business for us and that officeholder mismanages their position to the point of damage and loss, then should that official pay for their folly?

Look at it this way. The devastating wildfires in Los Angeles and other regions highlight a glaring issue: government mismanagement of public land. This systemic negligence not only endanger lives but also exacerbates the destruction of homes and communities. Politicians and public officials who deliberately fail in their duty to manage wildfire risks must be held accountable—even to the point of facing jail time for their inaction.

Prime example! In Pacific Palisades, residents like Barry Josephson have long voiced concerns about overgrown brush on government-owned land. This brush, a well-known fire hazard, has fueled multiple fires in the area over the years. Despite repeated warnings and pleas from the community, government agencies failed to act effectively. The labyrinth of bureaucracy, where city, county, state, and federal agencies overlap, has paralyzed meaningful action. Meanwhile, the government fails to clear dangerous vegetation, leaving residents burdened with costly permits.

Will they simply disappear, leaving us to bear the consequences? The consequences of this neglect are catastrophic. In the recent Palisades fire, 27 people lost their lives, and thousands of structures were destroyed across the region. Although residents took it upon themselves to fund brush clearance and save their homes, public agencies fell short of their responsibilities. A report commissioned after the 2018 Woolsey Fire proposed practical measures to mitigate wildfire risks, yet most of these recommendations remain unimplemented.

Sad! This pattern of mismanagement is not unique to Los Angeles. Unmaintained vegetation has exacerbated wildfires in places like Maui and Paradise, California, across the country. The failure to implement preventive measures, such as community wildfire plans, underscores a lack of urgency and foresight among those in power.

Final Word: If the American people begin to prosecute politicians for mismanagement, you and I are certain the Progressive Democrats will grab that opportunity and exploit it. They will prosecute all of their political rivals, try them in their liberal courts, and imprison good men and women for no apparent reason. How do I know this? Just look at how they tortured Trump, his family, and his friends!

But how should the American people hold their elected officials accountable?

Give us your opinion in the comments below. 

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No... however, they should be open to civil suit for damages resulting from malfeasance, or criminal acts by the politician.

    Malfeasance is a broad term that describes conduct that is inherently wrong or unlawful. It is most commonly used in reference to actions by public officials or employees who have failed to perform the duties required of them by statute. This description of corruption or misconduct may be used in both civil and criminal legal actions. To explore this concept, consider the following malfeasance definition.

     

     

    Corruption - Definition, Examples, Cases
    Corruption defined and explained with examples. Corruption is unethical or dishonest behaviors by someone who has been entrusted with authority.
  • Prison.

  • It would appear an Article V Convention of States should deal, not only with term limits, but the ability to RECALL traitorous, villanous federal officials as well and the sooner we do it, the better off the country will be.

  • Holding public office is a serious responsibility, not a game, not a joke. It isn't a position to make one famous, powerful or rich, it is to be a guardian of the constitution, of our republic. Every person thinking of  running should have to have a test on the  constitution before they are allowed throw their hat in the race! If they make any move against the constitution, they should have to answer what the heck they were thinking! Malpractice for a politician is to go against the constitution! We are a constitutional republic, going against it should be treated as a crime, braking a law would mean to have to answer like everyone else should have to.

    • I completely agree with you. They take the Oath and they had better know what that means. Violation is refusing to honor their Oath, which is first to God, then to the country and to us. Removal is warranted with further retribution if the crime warrants it. 

    • I've said for years politicians should have to sign a legal document to follow the constitution, which also states that we the people can call on them to step down  immediately if they brake the rule. It should be a position to consider seriously with serious consequences if they brake their oath. I'm sick of them taking the position casually, speaking without consequence. They are leaders, much like a coach who never tells the kids to hate the other team because they are like Hitler! 

    • An Oath is a legal and lawful promise to provide, like any contract. I am also pretty sure, it includes, "So Help Me, God." An Oath to God. To Country. To Honor. 

  • Agree that lawfare is not the solution, but elections are. Shaming such individuals in the public square and exposing their misdeeds is a more Christian approach that just might save some of them from eternal damnation. And if they are not appropriately responsive or repentant, then the justice system can and should be employed to address any future breaches of the public order or trust. And if any egregiously serious crimes come to the light, then the perpetrators and those who were complicit must be held accountable. I agree with commenter Sanders that an Article V Convention of States is long overdue to address the unconstitutional amendments to our Constitution by an out-of-control Congress and activist federal judiciary. We the People of the States shall decide, not the Washington DC swamp and those who aspire to power and wealth by using our government for personal gain.

    • Thank you for the post. Our founder wrestled with this same question and there may not be a good answer. However, if a office holder breaks the law in a significant manner then they must be removed from office and tried in a court of their peers.

      They are innocent until proven guilty.......now RickMik, do you know of any 'innocent' office holders? (lol) 

       

  • The voters have should have the right to recall aay rep who goes against their wishes.

This reply was deleted.