Frank Elvin Trinkle's Posts (2)

Sort by

12985114874?profile=RESIZE_710xOpposing the Death Tax: Preserving Family Legacies and Restoring Economic Freedom

One of the most insidious forms of government overreach is the so-called “Death Tax,” more formally known as the estate tax. This tax punishes hard-working Americans who have spent their lives building businesses, family farms, and wealth, only to have the government swoop in upon their death and seize a significant portion of their estate. This is not only a moral injustice but also an economic disaster for the future of American families and businesses.

The Left’s Unjustifiable Defense of the Death Tax

Those on the Left attempt to justify the estate tax by appealing to the idea of “economic fairness.” They argue that large estates represent concentrated wealth that should be redistributed to “level the playing field.” However, this is nothing more than the rhetoric of envy and class warfare. The government has no right to penalize success or to forcibly redistribute what has been rightfully earned through a lifetime of labor, innovation, and entrepreneurship.

The Left often claims that the estate tax only affects the ultra-wealthy and that it’s a way to ensure they “pay their fair share.” But what they conveniently ignore is the catastrophic impact this tax has on family farms, small businesses, and middle-class families who have worked for generations to build a legacy. The threshold for paying the estate tax might seem high at first glance, but when you consider the value of land, equipment, and the business assets necessary to keep a family farm or small business running, it’s easy to see how everyday Americans are caught in the crosshairs of this punitive tax.

How the Death Tax Destroys Family Farms and Businesses

Imagine a family farm that has been passed down through generations. The parents have invested their lives into building a thriving agricultural business that provides food for the community and economic stability for their family. Upon their death, the estate tax demands that a significant portion of the farm’s value—often in the millions, simply due to the high cost of land—is paid to the government. The grieving children, who have planned to continue running the farm, now face a financial burden they cannot bear. The only option? Sell the farm to pay the tax. What does this accomplish? It destroys the legacy that family worked for, while leaving less land in the hands of Americans, often to be purchased by large corporations or even foreign investors. The same scenario plays out with small businesses that are the backbone of our economy.

 

 

Trump’s Role in Ending the Death Tax and Protecting Family Legacies

If Donald Trump is re-elected, he must work tirelessly to eliminate the death tax altogether. His administration made progress in this area, doubling the exemption limit temporarily through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, but more needs to be done. Completely abolishing the estate tax is not just a matter of fiscal policy—it is a moral imperative.

The government should not have the power to strip away family legacies. Businesses and farms built through blood, sweat, and tears should not be at the mercy of bureaucratic confiscation. Ending the death tax would allow families to continue their work, expand their businesses, and create more jobs without fearing that the government will take it all away at the end of their lives.

Beyond abolishing the estate tax, we should also work to remove other burdensome taxes, such as taxes on tips, Social Security, and overtime. These are all punitive taxes that disproportionately harm working Americans. Why should waiters, bartenders, and servers have their tips taxed? These individuals work hard to earn their money, and the government should not be taking a cut of their wages. Similarly, taxing Social Security is nothing short of double taxation. Americans have paid into the system their entire working lives, and taxing their benefits in retirement is a betrayal of that promise. Overtime should also be a reward for hard work, not a trigger for more government greed.

12985114897?profile=RESIZE_710x

Balancing the Budget Without Punitive Taxes

Now, critics will undoubtedly ask how we can balance the budget and reduce the deficit if we eliminate these taxes. The answer is simple: reduce government spending. The federal government is bloated, inefficient, and wasteful. Instead of taking more money from hardworking Americans, we should focus on cutting wasteful programs, reducing unnecessary regulations, and streamlining the bureaucracy.

Moreover, the elimination of the estate tax would stimulate economic growth by allowing family businesses to reinvest their resources instead of selling off assets to pay the taxman. This reinvestment leads to job creation, increased productivity, and ultimately, higher tax revenues from a broader tax base. By allowing businesses to grow and thrive without the threat of death taxes, the economy will expand, generating more prosperity for all.

In addition, we can look at cutting foreign aid, ending costly and unnecessary government programs, and reforming entitlement programs that have ballooned out of control. There is no reason that our government cannot be fiscally responsible without resorting to these harmful and punitive taxes.

Conclusion

The death tax, along with other forms of punitive taxation like taxes on tips, Social Security, and overtime, must be abolished to restore economic freedom and protect American families. The government has no right to confiscate wealth upon death, destroy family legacies, and disrupt businesses that contribute to the prosperity of our nation. With Donald Trump’s leadership, we can end these unjust taxes and set America on a course toward economic freedom, allowing families to build and pass on their wealth without fear of government overreach. It’s time to empower American families, reduce government waste, and ensure that future generations inherit the freedom to continue their family’s work, not a mountain of government-imposed debt.

12985118296?profile=RESIZE_710x

Read and comment on many of my other conservative essays at https://elvinunleashed.substack.com

Read more…

12984487461?profile=RESIZE_710x

As a staunch advocate for national sovereignty and individual freedoms, I firmly reject the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed Global Pandemic Treaty. This plan, which aims to centralize control of pandemic response under the WHO, poses a significant threat to the sovereignty of member nations and the autonomy of their citizens.

Firstly, the principle of national sovereignty is foundational to the freedom and independence of any country. By ceding control over pandemic responses to a global body, we would effectively undermine the ability of individual nations to make decisions tailored to their unique circumstances. Each country has its own healthcare infrastructure, cultural considerations, and political context that are best understood and managed by local authorities, not an international organization.

Moreover, the idea of granting the WHO full control over pandemic measures raises serious concerns about accountability and transparency. The WHO, like any large organization, is not immune to bureaucratic inefficiencies and potential biases. Allowing an external body to dictate health policies could lead to decisions that are not in the best interest of our citizens, as they may be influenced by political or ideological considerations that do not align with our national values.

In addition, the imposition of a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic management is inherently flawed. Different regions face different challenges and risks, and a centralized authority may not be able to respond effectively to the specific needs of each country. Flexibility and local expertise are crucial in managing health crises, and these would be significantly compromised under the proposed treaty.

Furthermore, this treaty could set a dangerous precedent for the erosion of national sovereignty in other areas. If we allow the WHO to take control of pandemic responses, what is to stop other international bodies from seeking similar powers in other domains? The preservation of our sovereignty is essential to maintaining our freedom and ability to govern ourselves according to our own values and priorities.

In conclusion, while international cooperation is vital in addressing global health challenges, it must not come at the expense of our sovereignty. We must reject the WHO's Global Pandemic Treaty and advocate for solutions that respect the autonomy of nations while fostering collaboration and mutual support. National sovereignty and individual freedoms are non-negotiable, and we must stand firm in protecting them.

Read more…