As a staunch advocate for national sovereignty and individual freedoms, I firmly reject the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed Global Pandemic Treaty. This plan, which aims to centralize control of pandemic response under the WHO, poses a significant threat to the sovereignty of member nations and the autonomy of their citizens.

Firstly, the principle of national sovereignty is foundational to the freedom and independence of any country. By ceding control over pandemic responses to a global body, we would effectively undermine the ability of individual nations to make decisions tailored to their unique circumstances. Each country has its own healthcare infrastructure, cultural considerations, and political context that are best understood and managed by local authorities, not an international organization.

Moreover, the idea of granting the WHO full control over pandemic measures raises serious concerns about accountability and transparency. The WHO, like any large organization, is not immune to bureaucratic inefficiencies and potential biases. Allowing an external body to dictate health policies could lead to decisions that are not in the best interest of our citizens, as they may be influenced by political or ideological considerations that do not align with our national values.

In addition, the imposition of a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic management is inherently flawed. Different regions face different challenges and risks, and a centralized authority may not be able to respond effectively to the specific needs of each country. Flexibility and local expertise are crucial in managing health crises, and these would be significantly compromised under the proposed treaty.

Furthermore, this treaty could set a dangerous precedent for the erosion of national sovereignty in other areas. If we allow the WHO to take control of pandemic responses, what is to stop other international bodies from seeking similar powers in other domains? The preservation of our sovereignty is essential to maintaining our freedom and ability to govern ourselves according to our own values and priorities.

In conclusion, while international cooperation is vital in addressing global health challenges, it must not come at the expense of our sovereignty. We must reject the WHO's Global Pandemic Treaty and advocate for solutions that respect the autonomy of nations while fostering collaboration and mutual support. National sovereignty and individual freedoms are non-negotiable, and we must stand firm in protecting them.

I discovered a new report from the World Health Organization (WHO) this morning that destroys Mr. Obama"s and Dr. Frieden's arguments that Ebola is not such a concern...

This report clearly states (quoted):

"Incubation period

The period of 42 days, with active case-finding in place, is twice the maximum incubation period for Ebola virus disease and is considered by WHO as sufficient to generate confidence in a declaration that an Ebola outbreak has ended.

Recent studies conducted in West Africa have demonstrated that 95% of confirmed cases have an incubation period in the range of 1 to 21 days; 98% have an incubation period that falls within the 1 to 42 day interval. WHO is therefore confident that detection of no new cases, with active surveillance in place, throughout this 42-day period means that an Ebola outbreak is indeed over.

The announcement that the outbreaks are over, in line with the dates fixed by the subcommittee on surveillance, epidemiology, and laboratory testing, is made by the governments of the affected countries in close collaboration with WHO and its international partners.

Official announcements for the 2 countries will be made on the WHO website."

Please note, this report tells us that in 3% of those infected with the Ebola virus - there is a 42 day incubation period, not a 21 day incubation period - and that waiting 42 days to clear a person as not infected is reasonable and secure.

Our CDC is releasing people long before 42 days have expired - placing the entire Nation, ourselves, our Children, our Families at risk of lethal infection - on what?

A fantasy it won't happen here?

Seeing as WHO is the organization who has been dealing with Ebola for decades - isn't it reasonable to believe they might know more about this than Mr Obama or the CDC?

I have written my own elected and the media - I strongly encourage those reading this post to contact your own.

Mr. Obama and his entire regime must be removed immediately - not tomorrow. There is NO possible argument he or any of his administration can make that will mitigate this lie. It is patently unbelievable they would not have already known the true incubation period of this disease.

Mr. Obama is taking another of his "risks" - only this time he is risking the lives of Americans... millions of them.

This goes far beyond charges of simple "treason"...

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/ebola/14-october-2014/en/

OBAMA TAKES CARE OF HIS CROOKS " WHILE THE TEAPARTY GETS THE SHAFT"

SEE THE VIDEO!

The IRS official in charge of the exempt organizations office in the Cincinnati branch at the time conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status were unfairly targeted just got a promotion.

Cindy Thomas has been appointed to the senior technical adviser team for the Director of Exempt Organizations.

Thomas, a 35-year IRS veteran, will fill the spot vacated by Sharon Light. Light, a one-time close adviser to Lois Lerner, is the sixth senior IRS official to leave the agency. 

Lerner is the employee at the center of the political storm that hit the nation earlier this year. She was the first IRS agent to publicly acknowledge wrongdoing.  

Light has “accepted a position with the American Cancer Society, leaving a critical vacancy in the Senior Technical Adviser team for the Director of Exempt Organizations,” Kenneth Corbin wrote in a morning email to his employees.

“Cindy brings a strong background in EO Determinations and the history of the organization,” Corbin added. “And, since she is located in Cincinnati, she will provide a voice for the process and challenges faced in determinations work.”

On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa demanded in a letter to Federal Election Commission Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub that the FEC turn over records of more than five years of communications with the IRS.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/10/irs-official-who-oversaw-cincinnati-branch-during-scandal-gets-promotion/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fmost-popular+%28Internal+-+Most+Popular+Content%29#ixzz2baYQ9z9V

JUST WHO IN AMERICA HAS PRESIDENT OBAMA "NOT BETRAYED"

THE BRITISH PETROLEUM CO. is not the only one at fault ! Then there is - THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, and then the ENVIRONMENTS, who would not let us drill, in a safer places. Then there are the UNION'S, who would not let out of the Country,

help with the clean up.

Now we are all going to pay dearly in time.