The Tradesman's Posts (205)

Sort by

​"America Is Doing Great.  Not To Worry"

Reprinted with permission of author Ron Ewert;

4064604685?profile=original

"America Is Doing Great.  Not To Worry"
from "In Defense of Rural America"
By Ron Ewart, President
National Association of Rural Landowners (www.narlo.org)
and nationally recognized author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues for over 11 years
© Copyright Sunday, April 1, 2018 - All Rights Reserved

4064604726?profile=original

Life is good in America.  The economy is humming along at a brisk pace.  Millions of Americans have jobs, money in their pockets and in their bank accounts.  People live in nice homes, drive expensive cars and take enjoyable vacations.  Those other problems don't matter.  Food is plentiful, gas is relatively cheap and there are thousands of ways to be entertained.  Certainly, in light of the good times, there is no need to worry about those other problems.
 
Most of our civil rights are still intact. We have free speech, well sort of, unless you are on a college campus where liberal thought and speech reign, or you are a member of the alleged "free" press.  We mostly have freedom of religion.  We can assemble peaceably and seek redress from government without being arrested, even though government doesn't listen.  The print and electronic news media provides ample news for us to chew on and determine for ourselves if what they are providing is factual.  Media bias and those other issues don't matter.
 
The 2nd Amendment, giving the right of every person to own firearms, is still in force.  But the Democrats are doing everything in their power to erode that right.  The United Nations, to which America is a member, has issued policy statements stating that all firearms must be removed from the masses.    England and Australia, both Western Democracies, complied with the UN policies and confiscated the people's firearms by force.   When will America follow suit?  If it weren't for the NRA the Democrats would have gotten their way long ago.
 
No, America's military or national guard have not taken up residence in a person's home (the 3rd Amendment) ..... yet, but heavily armed SWAT teams have invaded the wrong person's home on way too many occasions.
 
We are relatively free from illegal search and seizures, (4th Amendment) unless of course a person violates one of the ten "gillion" laws and bureaucratic rules the government has passed.  Then there is the civil forfeiture rule that allows government to legally steal.  Further, government is now getting criminal warrants for land use and environmental violations, where before these were civil violations.  As we have seen, criminal warrants are very easy to obtain.  Just ask the DOJ, the CIA, the DNI, the FBI, Andy McCabe, James Comey and Carter Page. 
 
The 5th Amendment provides for just compensation if the government TAKES a person's property.  But pursuant to a U. S. Supreme Court decision, the government can TAKE up to 95% of a person's property before a TAKING has occurred for which just compensation must be paid.  The 5th Amendment also preserves the right of a person not to incriminate him or her self, but that doesn't apply to IRS income tax returns, where a person waives his or her right to 5th Amendment protection by signing the perjury statement on IRS Form 1040 when there is no way a taxpayer can be sure that his or her tax return is accurate, with over 70,000 pages of IRS rules.
 
Then of course each person has a right to a speedy trial under the 6th Amendment, except that a speedy trial now means two years or more before your case can come to trial while you rot in jail even if you are innocent.  We suppose that in some minds, especially attorneys that make $300 to $600 an hour, two years could be considered a speedy trial.
 
Under the 7th Amendment the right of a jury trial shall be preserved but unfortunately that doesn't apply to fines and penalties levied by the Internal Revenue Service.  In place of a jury trial Americans get the Kangaroo Tax Court, or just illegal seizures of money and property under "color of law."
 
Of course the government is limited in what fines they can impose under the 8th Amendment wherein it states that "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor shall cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."  The fact that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is authorized to fine a property owner up to $37,500 per day if the landowner does not comply with the Clean Water Act, probably isn't considered an "excessive fine" in the minds of high-paid government bureaucrats.
 
Now the 9th and 10th Amendments are still sitting there in the U. S. Constitution, but have little meaning any more as the federal government buys states off with their own money to get them to capitulate to federal demands. 
 
Now all those other pesky little problems don't really matter, do they?
 
A majority of the American people don't think it matters or cares that the nation is over $20 Trillion in debt and rising rapidly.  The Congress just passed a $1.3 Trillion spending bill with both Republicans and Democrats voting for it, without any offset in spending.  Add that to the national debt for your children and grandchildren to pay.
 
It doesn't matter to most Americans that millions of illegal aliens have invaded America, both peaceful and criminal, and they suck up billions of dollars from productive Americans for their subsistence, while they protest in the streets for rights they don't have.  It doesn't matter that some states and cities have declared themselves sanctuary cities and states and purposely ignore federal immigration law and enforcement.  It doesn't matter that these same illegal alien criminals come back into America multiple times after being deported and commit heinous crimes against lawful Americans ..... you know, like Kate Steinle of San Francisco.
 
It doesn't matter that the Federal Government nationalized the entire American Health Care system and sent it reeling into chaos, where a political fix is now impossible, as the Republicans just found out.  Your Democrat representatives gave you Obama Care.  Isn't representative government just grand?  Your representatives, both Democrat and Republican, are spending you into oblivion, while you do what ..........?
 
It doesn't matter that huge percentages of American children don't have biological fathers in their homes any more because of government subsidized welfare benefits that make a mother lose her benefits if she gets married.  Over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock and grow up without fathers.  That is a cultural nightmare of a huge magnitude and results in rising dysfunctional families, drugs, crime, incarcerations and billions of dollars in public expenditures.  But then, so what?  We're a rich country.
 
It doesn't really matter that environmental protections laws have all but eliminated private property rights in America.  It doesn't matter that UN's Agenda 21 policies of smart growth and sustainable development includes crammed-in-together high-rise apartments with shopping and businesses in the same building on rapid transit routes.  This is so people can walk or take their bicycles to work and GET OUT OF THEIR CARS.  Government and environmentalists hate cars.   But cars were the next order of freedom of movement after the horse that Americans crave but government and environmentalists don't want us in our cars and are doing everything in their power to limit that freedom.
 
It doesn't matter that we have to pay for very expensive rapid transit that only transports a fraction of the population.  Meanwhile, roads and bridges are crumbling beneath the tires of our trucks and cars. 
 
It doesn't matter that we are being forced into high-dense communities containing houses with no yards and no place for the kids to play.  All this is a national and international drive to put more and more people in higher and higher densities where they can be more easily controlled by government and vote for liberals for more social programs.  All rural areas are off limits.   They are only for animals, plants and trees.
 
After all, why should it matter that our entire judicial system has been co-opted behind our backs in favor of admiralty/commercial law (Uniform Commercial Code - UCC) instead of constitutional common law.  How did that happen?
 
It doesn't matter that our public schools and colleges have become government institutions of socialist and environmental brainwashing and indoctrination.  Why do you suppose that government wants to set up government-run pre-schools?  It's not to help parents.  It is so they can start brainwashing American children at a very early age when they are most vulnerable, in order to make them compliant little government robots.
 
It doesn't matter that the IRS is totally out of control and has become a political weapon for certain Administrations that illegally use the IRS to squelch or penalize conservative speech.  Hey, that's just politics.
 
It doesn't matter that the nuclear family is breaking down.  Sadly, what that means for the entire American culture is dire indeed.
 
And it doesn't seem to matter that millions of Americans (mostly between the ages of 16 and 45) are compelled by some evil force to get them high on drugs or alcohol.  They are over-dosing at unprecedented and increasing rates.  Maybe that is nature's way of population thinning.
 
Yes, life is good in America.  So why should anyone worry about all those other pesky little problems?
 
It follows that if none of these problems matter and too few care, nothing will change.  If nothing will change the problems will only get worse and they are.  Rush Limbaugh has talked a lot on radio for 30 years, but he hasn't made a difference.  Sean Hannity (Fox News) does what he can but nothing changes.  The news media is a lost cause.
 
After over 12 years of failing to get people involved in making a difference and taking into account that the lion's share of the votes rest in the urban liberal camp, nothing of substance will change without a natural, or man-made drastic event
 
Without intervention, the fate of America is pre-ordained.  The unalienable rights of the Constitution will become meaningless.  Individual freedom will be replaced by the priority of the collective.  America will continue to spend money it doesn't have, for votes, until America becomes a third-world broke banana republic beset with hyperinflation.  The resistance against one-world-order will diminish to the point where America WILL BE merged into World Government because "them's with the gold" rule and the masses don't own the gold. 
 
Remember?  FDR took the gold away from the people in 1933, which meant that every single American dollar is not an asset with value but a debt with an obligation.  Americans are on the hook for that obligation that they had no choice in approving.  Nor are the masses sovereign any more as they were intended to be.
 
If you think what we have described here is doom and gloom without substance, you aren't reading the tealeaves and your head is planted firmly in the sand.  It is very likely the Democrats will take one or both Houses of Congress in November of 2018.  Not that it would make any difference since both parties are the same. 
 
Just look at the millions of "kids" that turned out all around America for more gun control last weekend.  What they really want is the repeal of the 2nd Amendment.  Where are the armed freedom fighters turning out by the millions for freedom?  No where!
 
The hard fact is, no one is going to do anything about all these other pesky little problems until such time the only solution will be a violent one and the "shot heard round the world" will ring in our ears once more in a repeat of 1775.  But this time the outcome will not be a re-birth of freedom.  It instead will be a forceful subjugation of the planet's masses dancing to a slave chant, written, produced and directed by "them's with the gold."
 
Let us know if you DISAGREE.
 
 
Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues and author of this weekly column, "In Defense of Rural America".  Ron is the president of the National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO) (www.narlo.org), a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, acting as an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners.  Affiliated NARLO websites are "SAVE THE USA" (http://www.stusa.us/) and "Getting Even With Government" (http://www.gewgov.com/).   Ron can be reached for comment HERE.
Read more…

Reprinted with permission of author Ron Ewert;

4064604536?profile=original

"The Stories That Government Is Afraid To Tell”
from "In Defense of Rural America"
By Ron Ewart, President of the
National Association of Rural Landowners
and nationally recognized author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues
Copyright Sunday, April 15, 2018 - All Rights Reserved

4064604549?profile=original

Dateline High Point, North Carolina: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
In June, Kay Council of High Point, NC came home one night to find a note from her husband, Alex: "My dearest Kay - I have taken my life in order to provide capital for you. The IRS and its liens, which have been taken against our property illegally by a runaway agency of our government, have dried up all sources of credit for us. So I have made the only decision I can. It's purely a business decision... You will find my body on the lot on the north side of the house." At the end of a nine-year battle over a disallowed tax shelter, the IRS claimed that the Councils owed $300,000 in taxes, interest, and penalties. When their financial resources were exhausted, Mr. Council committed suicide to provide Mrs. Council with $250,000 insurance money to continue the battle. Ironically, Mrs. Council eventually won a court ruling that she and her husband owed the IRS nothing.  Mrs. Council, 48, said, "I was cheated out of growing old with the man I love." 
 
 
 
 
Dateline Columbia River, Washington State: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
Raven bought her land in 1999, not knowing the horror she would endure at the hands of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFW) and two non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) known as the Columbia Land Trust (CLT) and another NGO, Ducks Unlimited (DU).  Armed with millions of dollars of federal grant money, USFW and the two NGO’s set about to restore the Grays River to its pre-human days, in the pursuit of salmon habitat recovery.  From Raven's own words:
 
 “CLT, in partnership with Ducks Unlimited and USFW, began immediately.  A 36-inch tide gate was replaced with two 13-foot culverts.  Sloughs were filled in.  In 2005 CLT asked me to give them my land.  I refused.    More sloughs were filled in, a county road made lower in some areas and higher across my property.  Trees with Eagles nests were bulldozed.  The only thing left alive, were the mosquitoes.  The chum salmon get swooshed onto my fields where they flop around and die.  The rivers depth went from 21 feet to 9 feet due to the increased sediment and debris thrown into the river, thus destroying fish spawning areas.  Much of their so-called restoration work was done in the dead of night so that it would go unnoticed by the locals.” 
 
“On December 31st, 2005 my home, property and barns were flooded.  My home and the out buildings stayed immersed in water until March 17th 2006.  My utility room flooded, destroying my freezer, all the food, linen, and all supplies that were stored there.  With each high tide, the water got deeper and the property itself stayed flooded until late June.  Almost everything was a total loss.   No automobiles ran, classic cars destroyed, a professional automotive shop and all the tools gone.  My home had extensive damage.  CLT requested I give them the property.  Again, I refused.” 
 
“I repaired what I could.  It took me two months to get enough money to buy a used van.  In the meantime I had to hitchhike to work.  My minimal insurance would not cover anything because the insurance company determined my loss was from third-party error.  The ‘third-party’ refused my demand for damages.”
 
“When my property flooded, I had three-to-four foot waves crashing on to my house.  It sounded as though I was at the beach.   I live 25 miles inland.  The water filled my property, then headed east, flooding Altoona highway and the Scott’s Bed & Breakfast.  Since USFW and the NGO’s started this salmon recovery project, my property has flooded eleven times.  I am out of money and have nothing left to fight with.  The government agency and the NGO’s don’t care.  It appears to me, that neither does anyone else.”
 
Raven eventually gave up, abandoned her land and moved to Idaho to live with relatives having lost everything.
(Full Story)
 
 
Dateline Gig Harbor, Washington: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
John (not his real name) owned a few acres of land in Washington State, about a half hours drive from a big city.  John's neighbor had a minor grievance with John over some work along a common boundary and instead of working it out man-to-man, the neighbor called the county land use authorities (CLUA) and filed a complaint.  The CLUA comes out, looks at what John is doing and says they didn't see any problem. John didn't need a permit and CLUA went away.  That wasn't good enough for John's neighbor and he kept bugging CLUA until they came out to the property and told John that he needed to cease and desist.  But John had already ceased and desisted with the ditch cleaning.  That wasn't good enough for CLUA, thanks to continued bugging by John's neighbor and CLUA finally filed misdemeanor charges against John for continuing to do allegedly illegal work that John had already stopped.  Essentially John's activities consisted of cleaning out some areas around a ditch and burning the slash, for which John had gotten a burning permit.
 
John ignored the CLUA warnings for several months and thought the whole issue had gone away.  But behind the scenes John's neighbor kept pressuring CLUA and the county prosecutor, to "get" John.
 
CLUA and the county prosecutor dragged John into District Court on misdemeanor charges for filling in a wetland.  John elected to represent himself for what he thought was just a minor land use violation that he could make go away.  No such luck.  The prosecutor and the District Court Judge decided to make an environmental example out of John by thwarting every legal attempt John made to defend himself, to the point that the judge found John in contempt of court and sentenced him to 150 days in jail on a full cash bond of $20,000 each, for five separate contempt of court charges.  Not having $100,000 dollars to pay the court, John was forced to sit in jail with thieves and murders for over 60 days before a third party filed a writ of Habeas Corpus in Superior Court and had to fork over $20,000 in cash to get John out of jail on appeal. 
 
The wetland charge was made by creating the wetland AFTER John had done his clearing and burning.  There was no wetland designation in the area anytime before John did his work.  In other words, the prosecutor drummed up the charges by creating a wetland violation after the fact.  That's how they "got" John.
 
While out on appeal John used every legal trick he knew to get the case dismissed but the court clerk would fail to file and record his motions.   Some motions were lost, others ignored.   The District Court judge literally thumbed his nose at all of John's efforts.  When John filed a motion to get his case elevated to Superior Court because according to the state Constitution, the lower court has no jurisdiction in real estate cases, the District Court judge de-railed that too.
 
John filed motions in Superior Court to get the lower court decision rescinded.  The Superior Court refused to hear the case.  The transcript screamed of the District Court Judge's environmental bias against John and he was going to "get" John any way he could.
 
Finding no help in the two lower courts, John filed motions with the state appellate court.  No help there either.  John went to the State Supreme Court.  They refused to hear the case. 
 
Finally, just days before the District Court's order to send John back to jail for another 90 days and pay a fine of another $1,000, John filed for clemency with the Governor of the state.  The Democrat Governor ignored John's plea.  John tried to get the District Court to give him credit for time served and for good behavior while in jail for the first 63 days.  The District Court judge said emphatically NO! and John went back to jail to sit with thieves and murders again, essentially for doing maintenance on his property. 
 
John was forced back to jail for another 90 days for a charge of clearing out a wetland that didn't exist before the act of clearing.   John became a sacrificial lamb in the name of radical environmentalism.  (Full Story)
 
 
Dateline California: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
A man and his wife in California bought some rural acreage that had a home and outbuildings on it.  After they bought the land, the local Land Use Agency said that one of their buildings was not in code and filed a code violation against them.  But it turns out that the Land Use Agency had filed a code violation on the property 12 years ago against the previous owner for the same reason, but the code violation did not show up on the Title Report for the new purchaser.  Nevertheless, the new owners were still responsible for the old code violation and had to fork over $28,000 in fees and fines to bring the property in compliance.  They also discovered that there is no statute of limitations on land use code violations.
 
 
Dateline Georgia: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
A man and his son had all the permits necessary to fill in a portion of the waterfront property.  Along came the Army Corps of Engineers and hit them with a criminal violation of filling in a wetland and took them to Federal Court.  The judge would not allow the landowners to enter into evidence their permits and sentenced the man and his son to 21 months in a federal prison, with the further requirement to restore the property when they were released.
 
 
Dateline Los Angeles County California: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
In Antelope Valley, a very rural area of Los Angeles County, the rural landowners are being faced with fully armed SWAT teams that haul the landowner off to jail or court, if they haven't moved fast enough in clearing up a code violation.  Los Angeles County calls the SWAT team a "nuisance abatement team".  America has become a police state?
 
 
Dateline Ohio: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
A rural Ohio family, with a going family business, faced the same dilemma with the Army Corps of Engineers. They were also criminally charged with filling in a wetland.  The Corps took them to Federal Court.  But the hitch was, they hadn't filled in a wetland.  However, that didn't stop the Army Corps from pursuing the case.  The family first tried to defend themselves in court and quickly used up their savings in the process.  They were then approached by the Ohio Farm Bureau who offered to help them with their case.  All they had to do was to put up their land as collateral for the Farm Bureau loan.  The Farm Bureau lost the case and then took the farm from the family to repay the loan, including most of their possessions on the farm.  This proud Ohio family, with a going business, was left penniless for a manufactured environmental violation.  (Full Story)
 
 
Dateline Idaho: _.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
An Idaho couple bought a lot in a completed subdivision with homes all around them and applied for a building permit to build their dream home.  The lot was over 500 feet from the nearest body of water.  That didn't stop the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) who came on their property as the couple was clearing and leveling the lot for the foundation and slapped them with a non-compliance order for, you guessed it, filling in a wetland.  The EPA then told them that they would have to restore the property to its original condition, at great cost, they couldn't build on it and if they didn't comply, they would be faced with a $37,500 per day fine.
(Full Story)
 
_.. ---.. --... ..--- .---
 
Ladies and gentlemen, stories like these are going on all across the country every day but you never hear about them.  If all of these thousands of stories were taken in total, made public and told all at once, the outcry could spark an uprising or even a revolution.  Whether it is the IRS, FBI, BLM, DOJ, EPA, USFW, or thousands of state and local bureaucracies, this isn't just a matter of a little injustice, this is outright intimidation, domination and condemnation under law, one American at a time, by an out-of-control, narcissistic and cold-hearted government that has lost all allegiance to its solemn duty to protect our individual liberties and to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help them God!
 
Besides the massive abuse that the IRS inflicts on Americans, rural landowners are also getting hit hard all across America by land use and environmental dictatorial edicts.  If you are a landowner, you would be wise to contact the "National Association of Rural Landowners" and check out their defenses and offenses against government abuse. 
 
 
Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues and author of this weekly column, "In Defense of Rural America".  Ron is the president of the National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO) (www.narlo.org), a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, acting as an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners.  Affiliated NARLO websites are "SAVE THE USA" (http://www.stusa.us/).   Ron can be reached for comment HERE.
 
Read more…

In the last Hundred years Presidents from T. Roosevelt to G.W.Bush issued a combined total of 121 Executive Orders that changed how America did things, and how laws were to be interpreted. Obama has issued 293 and still counting since he has been in office. They drastically change not only how laws are interpreted, some of them create new meanings not intended by Congress for those laws.

 

See: http://www.justice.gov/olc/predirective.htm This gives the definition of the legal effectiveness of Presidential orders as compared to executive orders.

Obama has been using Executive Orders since he was first sworn in in his first term, to bypass and render Congress Obsolete and Ineffective. I wonder why Congress has not directly met this threat to their Constitutional Authority except Minimally and Marginally to date? This President has many times deliberately overstepped his Constitutional Authority to advance his Socialist Agenda. Obama also picks and chooses which laws he wants enforced through the DOJ.  This is a direct violation of Article II Section 3 Clause 5 of the Constitution. This President is regularly committed to usurpation of Congressional Power and violation of Constitutional Law as evidenced by his continuing actions.
 
Article 1 Section 1 of the Constitution Clearly states "All powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives." and further confirms it in Article 1, section 8-18:  To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof. These preclude the Chief Executive from Legislating, and limits his Executive Orders to offices of the Federal Government Bureaucracies only. Unfortunately his orders include his CZARS and their regulatory powers in their Bureaucratic positions. Regulations which have the force of law unless overturned by Congress, and that has not happened yet.
 
Executive Orders made in open and Flagrant violation of Constitutional Law, show that Obama uses his Executive Orders to hide the fact he lacks the leadership capabilities necessary to gain the majority of Congressional support needed to get his Agendas enacted into law. He also uses/relies on them to advance his Ideology in willfully ignoring the Accepted interpretations of the Constitution, and by default Ignores Constitutional Law on a regular basis to advance his agendas without benefit of Congressional Approval. 
 
This issue is basic to the Constitutional basis of 'Rule of Law' for America. When Obama states in creating an Executive Order, "He can't wait for Congress", not only is it a violation of the most basic precept of Constitutional Law, it is a violation of the trust given to him by the people of America. It is also a violation of his solemn Oath of Office.
 
Congress must take a stand against this flagrant abuse of power by Obama of using the Executive Orders to trivialize them, and render them essentially powerless. What is at issue with this President using Executive Orders, and previous Presidents use of them, is the underlying Constitutional Construct of America, which every elected government official has sworn an Oath to uphold, and not to basically change to fit their personal beliefs.
 
To make it crystal clear, I am not trying to attack  Obama the man personally. I am deliberately attacking his corrupt agenda to change America into a Socialist Welfare Nation. His Imperialistic disregard for Constitutional Law and Accepted American Traditions, must be officially challenged by Congress, and unofficially challenged by the public at every turn, if we are to remain a Republic governed by the people instead of becoming a Dictatorship or Satrap governed by a Despot.
 
Since for reasons unknown, congress has been unreasonably silent on this critical Issue; 
Please take a few minutes to contact your Representatives in Congress and explain the situation to them as you see it. Ask them to act in their, and in our best interests, to stop the erosion of power, and return the division/enumeration of powers to their proper Constitutional context, and re-institute the original Checks and Balances our Nation was Founded on.
 
As always, feel free to pass this on as you see fit.
 
The Tradesman
Read more…
Here is how it applies to ACA/Obamacare, the policy cancellations, and Obama's overstepping his Constitutional Authority when he ordered a change in the Law by instructing Insurance companies to reinstate policies thus changing an existing law (Article II section 1  violation), and not enforcing an existing law ( Article II, Section 3, Clause 5 ) that would have necessitated either the ACA/Obamacare be sent back to Congress to be changed to conform with existing law, or that the 1996 existing law be repealed or changed.
He did something like this previously when he extended the compliance time period for business, without benefit of congress changing the law. Congress still has not called him out on either of these usurpation's of their Constitutional Powers.
Obama and the rest of the Socialist/Democrats adamantly pushing ACA/Obamacare miss the mark on ACA/Obamacare Fixes, was it a deliberate omission on his/their part, or was it done to ultimately save Obama's signatory Train Wreck ACA/Obamacare, and/or was it geared to further his Transformation of America into a Socialist Workers Paradise?
 With the disastrous roll out of ACA/Obamacare with the resultant cancellations of a multitude of non-grandfathered policies. Reports confirm that the Democrats who so vehemently pushed this law were aware this would happen. Guess what else they suppressed; Federal Law Prohibits Their Cancellation.
 Remember when those reprobates promoting the ACA/Obamacare bill paraded so many people across the public consciousness who "Lost" their insurance when they Got Sick? the Democrats could have acted honorably, and cited the existing law prevented those cancellations, and had those cancelled policies reinstated according to the law. Instead they chose to use those peoples troubles for their and Obama's Political Gain, and to help him Transform America.
 I would say that Obama's FIX is at best ignorance of Federal Laws he should know, and at worst a deliberate scheme to misdirect the public from their Legal Rights under Existing Federal Law ( HIPPA law section 2742). It has been Illegal since 1997 to cancel someones Health Insurance Coverage when a person is either sick or has claims.
 That little tid bit was made Law under that other Democratic President Bill Clinton's administration, so the Democrats are either extremely dim witted, or they deliberately conspired suppress this information in order to usher in Obamacare by using Emotional Hysteria and Public Outrage from the public, to push their Healthcare Takeover instead of using the truth to help the people ( Their Constituents ) to regain the policies that were illegally terminated under Public Law 104-191 ( http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/pl104191.htm ). That Federal Law supersedes anything that H.S.S. or Sebelius has written into Regulation.
 
One recourse to anyone who has had their Healthcare Insurance cancelled by their insurer, is to remind the Company of HIPPA Law section 2742, and Public Law 140-191 ( Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ) and contact their Governors Office, State Attorney General's Office as well as the State Insurance Commissioner's Office with the details of their case, and cite the two mentioned laws to them as precedent to have their insurance reinstatement ordered.
 
 Remember this; What is posted in the Federal Register, and was not passed by Congress, does not trump Federal Law. There was a precedent set in Cancer Patient Bill Elliot's case (  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxCG7cZdKhc (Preview ), if you take these actions your policy will be reinstated at the previous cost and level of coverage to comply with Federal Law.
 
Lets face facts, the insurance companies have reviewed the regulations in the ACA/Obamacare law, and are ignoring a law that has been on the books for 17 years. It appears like they are doing it with the knowledge and consent of the Democrats who passed that law in 1996. It's becoming obvious they are doing it so they could reap the higher fees that were mandated in the over coverage of ACA/Obamacare. You know things like Men having coverage for Mammograms, birth control, and Abortion coverage, and  post menopausal women having to carry abortion and birth control care coverage just to name a few.
 
Here's a rub, when Obama ordered insurance companies to renew these policies even though he did not have the authority to do so, he never mentioned that pre-existing laws were being violated by the cancellations in the first place. We have a major crisis in the making since it is estimated that 14 million insurance policies were purchased that most probably will be cancelled due to ACA/Obamacare Regulations even though those Regulations are in flagrant violation of existing Federal Law.
Maybe Obama should have followed his requirements under Article II, section 3, Clause 5 of the Constitution ( the clause that states; The President " Shall take care to see that the Laws be Faithfully executed") and required Federal Laws pertaining to Healthcare Insurance be followed and enforced.
Read more…