“Some accused Gribskolen of double standards, considering that last year it staged a ‘Syria Week’ in which Danish children immersed themselves in Middle Eastern culture, and were given lessons by immigrants….’We have a critical lack of self-esteem. We are a Christian country with our own traditions. We should not sacrifice this in the name of multiculturalism.'”
Yes, and if you do, or when you do, there will not be a vacuum. The gap will be filled by something else. Either maintain and preserve your own culture, or see it replaced by another. And that is already happening.
“Criticism after Danish school cancels Christmas to avoid ‘preaching’ to non-Christian children,” RT, December 12, 2017:
Parents of local children, education officials and leading Danish politicians have criticized a primary school after it chose to cancel the traditional Christmas service, due to the presence of students of immigrant backgrounds.
“We took the decision because we have children who are not Protestant,” Marianne Vederso Schmidt, the head of Gribskolen in Graested, a town of fewer than 5,000 people in eastern Denmark, wrote in an intranet posting earlier this month.
Schmidt noted that the decision may have been overdue, as the education law forbids preaching “and it must be left to the individual families whether they want to privately attend a service.”
Ten parents complained to the primary school, and the story was immediately picked up by national media, which speculated that the move was aimed at appeasing the sensitivities of Muslim students. Some accused Gribskolen of double standards, considering that last year it staged a ‘Syria Week’ in which Danish children immersed themselves in Middle Eastern culture, and were given lessons by immigrants.
“I don’t see why our tradition has to be taken away from us, just because someone else at the school believes in something else,” Mette Brüel-Holler, a parent of two enrolled daughters, told TV2. “I come from a small community, where the church is important, and these traditions are beautiful. I remember enjoying them myself as a child, and they are a fundamental part of Christmas.”
The cancellation has also been condemned by the local church pastor, who was due to perform the service and complained that Christmas was being “drained of its deeper meaning” and the mayor of the Zeeland town, who called it a “misguided decision.”
Politicians from across the ruling center-right coalition have joined in the chorus of criticism.
“Danish primary schools have a duty to spread education – and teaching the cultural values and knowledge connected to Christmas is an essential part of that,” Health Minister Ellen Trane Norby wrote on her Facebook page. “What benefits from this decision? Not the culture or level of integration within the country.”
“We have a critical lack of self-esteem. We are a Christian country with our own traditions. We should not sacrifice this in the name of multiculturalism,” wrote Marie Krarup, of the Danish People’s Party, asking social media users whether similar initiatives had been undertaken by other institutions….
On Saturday, radical Islamic activists from across the nation will be protesting outside the White House regarding President Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
The “Jerusalem is forever the capital of Palestine” rally starts at noon just south of the White House.
Earlier this month, the president recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and ordered the State Department to begin the process of moving the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
This set off a ferocious backlash in the anti-Israel community nationwide. One New Jersey imam even called for genocide against Jews.
If the coming Saturday rally is like the other “pro-Palestine” protests since President Trump’s Jerusalem announcement, one can expect to see some severe anti-Israel and anti-Semitic rhetoric.
FBI prosecutors have labeled several organizations sponsoring the D.C. event this weekend as fronts for Muslim Brotherhood operations in the U.S.
These groups include the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which was started to raise money for the Hamas terrorist organization, along with the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), and the Muslim Students Association (MAS), American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), among other outfits.
Sponsors also include at least two major mosques known for their connections to terrorist activity.
One sponsor mosque, Dar al-Hijrah, which is located in northern Virginia, was once led by deceased al Qaeda mastermind Anwar al-Awlaki. The mosque was also attended by two 9/11 hijackers, along with several other convicted terrorists.
The Islamic Society of Boston, another mosque sponsoring the event, has a long history of Islamic extremist activity. It was founded by al Qaeda financier Abdurahman Alamoudi, and one of its original trustees was the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, who has called for suicide bombing attacks against U.S. soldiers.
According to Americans for Peace and Tolerance, “Over the past decade, thirteen congregants, supporters, staff and donors of the ISB have been imprisoned, deported, killed or are on the run.”
There is expected to be a significant amount of attendees at the Saturday protest.
According to the group’s Facebook page, Islamist outfits are renting over a dozen buses to bring in fellow supporters from New Jersey, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, and elsewhere. (For more from the author of “A Radical Islamic Rally Is Coming to DC This Weekend” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/12/radical-islamic-rally-coming-dc-weekend/
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
Moral revival or political civil war
NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
Friday, December 15, 2017
Add Dustin Hoffman to the list of the accused sexual harassers. President Donald Trump continues under fire from accusations. Russell Simmons has now been accused of two rapes. The list keeps growing. Most of the cases do not have criminal or legal complaints filed with them-they are women coming forward to tell their stories long after the fact. Hollywood is overrun with "Me Too's" as woman after woman, and some men, come forward. Politics is also inundated with such stories. A Kentucky state representative committed suicide over allegations by a 17 year old. Several Congressmen have resigned. Does this latest round of moral consciousness signal a moral revival or is it a civil war?
From a political perspective, there really has been a steady stream of violators (can anyone say Bill Clinton?). The past is filled with them. The recent ones, showcased by the perversity of Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner, seemed to be just the tip of the iceberg. In Weiner's case, however, there were charges filed and he went to jail. Since the inauguration of Trump, we have seen accusations of sexual misconduct skyrocket. It's beyond women wearing pink vagina hats in the National Mall and has reached the level that no man could have imagined. One thing for certain: Hollywood and politics have been getting away with the power sex game for decades and it's high time it is cleaned up.
Sadly, most of this is one person's word against another's because no legal complaints were filed and many accusations are several years old. It's one thing for the sex-charged movie and television industry to have these complaints-after all, how do any of them distinguish between what they are doing on screen and what happens in real life? One seems to be an extension of the other, and neither are following any moral code. But the politics is another story. Its sordid business has to do with power and money-usually taxpayer money-enabling what appears in many cases to be a tax-funded orgy atmosphere. And this gets in the way of running the government effectively, or at all.
Even worse, the campaign manager for newly-elected Democratic Senator Doug Jones from Alabama is getting accolades for winning an impossible campaign. Unfortunately, he has figured out a way to weaponize sexual misconduct accusations and totally ruin an opponent's life. This strategy will be employed repeatedly in the upcoming election cycles. When all else fails, sex will win the day. So are we seeing a moral revival or a political civil war? This is a war, no doubt. Satan is using the consequences of behavior in the hands of dubious minions to kill, steal and destroy. Jesus said in John 3:19, "And this is the condemnation, that light (Christ) is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil." Let us pray that evil is exposed and those of the Light will be protected.
By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
Tis the season when one’s thoughts turn toward family and friends, get-togethers, joy and good tidings and all the things that encompass Christmas, or Hanukkah…including the giving of gifts.
My thoughts, at this time of the year, always seem to turn toward…
Liberals…
The gift that keeps on giving.
Recently, it seems, liberals have made a transparently awkward attempt at becoming our nation’s political party of morality and the keeping of it, and I say…
Reindeer poop.
After decade upon decade of liberalism supporting, aiding and abetting, subsidizing, and promoting every imaginable form of moral ineptitude and bankruptcy imaginable, and several that basically defy the imagination…like outwardly advocating for an organization that was caught, red-handed, harvesting and selling the body parts of aborted babies…
Liberals now seem to want to be taken seriously as our moral compass?
Elf muffins.
A scientific instrument, of such magnitude and precision as to measure the depth of the moral abyss from which liberals now want to claim the moral high-ground, has yet to be conceived…much less invented…and the actions and behaviors of liberals just continues to provide the smoke to their mirror.
Take Corrine Brown, a once high powered Member of the House from Florida…and a legend in her own mind…who will be spending the next several Christmas seasons behind bars…convicted of several counts of conspiracy and fraud related to skimming money from a fake charity supposedly intended to raise educational funds for poor, and minority students.
How many times over the decades have we all heard one liberal after another tell us all that we must do…whatever…for the sake of the children? Whatever…”whatever” was, it always came with a hefty price tag, or a substantial reduction in our Constitutional rights, but whatever “whatever” was…we had to do it…MUST do it…for the children.
Right?
Now…imagine if you will, a scam artist, a liberal…stealing money from a charity that actually never really existed…that had been sold to the public as a funding machine for poor, underprivileged, minority youth, and using it to do nothing more than pad her paycheck…which by the way, was also a product of the American taxpayer. Further consider that said scam artist was a big cog in the very party that has supposedly suddenly adopted morality as its new and improved calling card.
It’s enough to make your chestnuts roast on an open fire…isn’t it?
Then we have Al Franken-Groper, who just last week delivered, from the floor of the Senate, a heartfelt speech in which he offered his tacit resignation.
Note to liberals who want to be taken seriously as our nation’s new moral compass…
If you decide to deliver a “heartfelt” speech form ANY floor…next time take steps to deliver that speech from your heart…and not read it from a ream of unbound pieces of paper that must be turned every two sentences because, apparently, the font is so large, and bold-faced as to be readily seen from ORBIT.
During his heartfelt reading of a prepared speech that a supposed actor couldn’t have been bothered to commit to memory, Fraken-Groper said that some…SOME…of the allegations were false…and that others, he remembered…differently. He even went so far as to state that…it wasn’t him.
Really? Then who was it? Some impish appearing toad with the abject misgiving of looking exactly LIKE him in all those photos?
Franken-Groper then went the extra mile, and stated there was irony in the fact that he was being forced to leave the dingy halls of the Senate while…”a man who has bragged on tape about his history of the sexual assault sits in the Oval Office and a man who has repeatedly preyed on young girls campaigns for the Senate with the full support of his party.”
Oh…really?
A plethora of Republicans have called for Roy Moore to step aside…so that part of Franken-Groper’s heartfelt reading is a complete lie, and as for his allegations regarding President Trump…show us the evidence, and if all you’ve got is a year’s old audio tape of locker room banter…you’ve got nothing.…I’ll wait and thumb through a litany of photos of you…Mr. Franken-Groper…either fondling the various body parts of a wide array of women…or pretending to fondle those who were, at the time, taking a nap.
Drawing a finer point on Franken-Groper…we should note that after repeated calls from Republicans for him to resign…it wasn’t until his own party…the party that has propped up a dress stainer and cigar moistener for the better part of two decades, and now wants us to believe it is the party of moral righteousness…called for him to shut up and get out, that he finally made the Senate floor version of a Stuart Smally skit, telling us he was good enough, smart enough and that doggone it, people like him…but he’s leaving anyway.
Basically, I don’t give a partridge’s pair poop about Franken-Groper, his party OR their lame claim on morality.
All of that aside…liberals, the gift that keeps on giving, aren’t all the rage in Washington this year…but they are IN a rage…over NOT being invited to President Trump’s White House Hanukkah party.
Get this…
Invites to Jewish Democratic lawmakers weren’t lost in the mail…they were never on the list, and the little liberal snowflakes aren’t taking it very well.
According to Debbie What’s-Her-Name Schultz, “I think it’s an unforced error on the president’s part and a missed opportunity.”
What’s-Her-Name Schultz went on to state… “Why would you make partisan decisions about invitations that are entirely not partisan? Hanukkah is something that’s important to all Jews; the tradition is to invite the Jewish members of Congress. My feelings certainly aren’t hurt by not being invited but the few opportunities that we do have to come together certainly should include a celebration like Hanukkah.”
No…her precious, melting snowflake feelings weren’t hurt…not at all…she just wants to know why Republican Jewish members of congress WERE invited…and SHE…WASN’T.
Well, let me see if I can clear this up for her…Debbie…you spent the last 2 years trying to run Donald Trump into the ground, to the point that you became such a liability to your own party that you were forced out as the head of the DNC…and you wonder why you weren’t invited to the White House Hanukkah party?
Just wait until congressional Republicans get a pony for Christmas from President Trump…
And Debbie DOESN’T.
Then there’s the fact that congressional liberals stood shoulder to shoulder with the closet Muslim Obama for 8 years as he…and they…did everything imaginable to help 7th century barbarians wipe Israel from the map.
That may have played a role in the invitation snub.
In fact, I can think of a number of reasons not to invite What’s-Her-Name Schultz to a party, not least of which is the fact that the snippy poodle is up to her beady eyeballs in the Awan brothers scandal, but the fact that no liberal congress members of the Jewish faith were invited to President’s Trump’s first White House Hanukkah party is nothing more than evidence that Trump is, once again, out thinking the liberals.
Liberal boo-hooing over not being invited and placing the blame on Trump’s partisanship is as transparently false as is the liberal’s supposedly new-found sense of morality. Those snooty-patooty liberals were just looking for a way to use the opportunity of an invite to unleash a tirade of some sort against President Trump.
Rep. Lois Frankel, D-West Palm Beach, all but confirmed my theory when she said, “Let me just say this, not to be a hypocrite, I wouldn’t be going to any party at the White House with him. If you think about it, all members should probably be invited. We were all invited to the Christmas party, we should all probably be invited to the Hanukkah party.”
She wouldn’t be going to ANY party at the White House with him…not the Hanukkah party, OR the Christmas party…all she, and ostensibly they wanted, was an invite so THEY could snub President Trump. They would have declined the invitations had they received them, and they would have used the opportunity to launch some new, baseless political attack against our President. As it turned out, Trump beat them to the snub, and simply didn’t invite them.
Why so many Jews in this country are members of the Hate Israel liberal party of newly discovered moral enlightenment I’ll never know, but that’s another reason not to invite liberal congressional Jews to the White House Hanukkah party….the last thing you’d want at a celebration like that, is a bunch of yahoos wearing little pink pussy protest yarmulkes.
Liberals…the party of newly discovered moral enlightenment?
Not by the short hair from which dangles their last holiday-hating dingle berry.
Liberals are to morality what “Palestinians” are to the peace process…counterproductive. While the Palestinians want to fool people into believing they’re actively seeking a peace accord, liberals want to fool folks into believing they’re interested…after all these decades…in seeking the moral high-ground.
The only people either is fooling is themselves…but it’s not all that difficult to fool…fools.
Let’s just have a little look at a few OTHER members of the party that is now trying to convince us that they are the new guardian of our nation’s moral well-being.
There’s Captain UNDERPANTS…John Conyers…who “retired” after it was disclosed he held official Senate office meetings in his UNDERWEAR.
Anthony Weiner…the PETER TWEETER who had been sending selfies of his elfies to under-aged girls.
Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren, who ditched her “white privilege” and pretended to be a Native American for academic benefits and jobs.
Matt Lauer, now the FORMER anchor of NBC’s Today Show, who apparently has been for years, if not decades, the poster boy for misogyny while also being the poster boy for the whole of the liberal mainstream media’s propaganda machine had to pack up his office full of sex toys and take the subway home as his wife skipped the country.
And just blindfold yourselves and toss a dart at the roster of Hollywood elite…you could hardly miss perforating a pervert there. By the way…on the whole Hollywood topic…remember when the perviest guy we knew about in that particular enclave was Pee Wee Herman…who, by the way…only groped HIMSELF???
Now, I’m not saying that the right side of the aisle is lilly white in all of this, as there clearly have been issues with certain bad actors in the Republican party…but…when they surface, the call for them to get the hell out are immediate.
On the other hand…it was Boner Bill Clinton who DEFINED the lack of morality liberal agenda for DECADES…and now, just to try and prove their newly discovered morality, liberals are tacitly throwing HIM under the bus.
The question is…depending on what the definition of “is” is one supposes…have the liberals really, suddenly become…morality enhanced?
Nope. Not even close, and the proof can easily be found if one knows under which rock to look, and turning over that rock is easier than you might think.
Ask yourselves a few simple questions…
Have liberals suddenly turned their backs against…abortion…against socialism…against raising taxes…or against appeasement of our enemies?
Have liberals suddenly turned in favor of the 2nd Amendment…in favor of lower taxes…in favor of building a wall to enhance border enforcement, or if liberals will now…suddenly…be placing manger scenes in city parks?
All of these examples reflect a certain sense of morality in America, and yet liberals have not exhibited one elf’s eyelash of regard for any of those things. The ONLY exhibition of ANY scintilla of newfound morality amongst the liberals is their willingness to throw under the bus…any other liberal they now deem expendable, and replaceable based on what? Claims of sexual misdeeds…with or without any evidence…it doesn’t matter.
The point of doing this, is a desperate attempt to be able to say that THEY went after THEIR own…but when it comes to Trump…we’re not willing to go after OUR own, and use that against us in both 2018 and 2020 elections.
Liberals don’t mind one bit if they have to get rid of a few of Hollywood’s elite or a handful of deep blue state Members of Congress, so long as it serves the furtherance of socialism. Captain Underpants and Franken-Groper are easily replaceable by a new wave of even more socialistic liberals…and Boner Bill became completely irrelevant when he couldn’t deliver the Queen of Uranium sales to the White House.
This new moralism in the liberal machine isn’t a new leaf…it’s just the same old calculating worms under the same old rock.
By the way, it’s already backfiring on them…Roy Moore’s accuser, the one with the media-seeking missile attorney, Gloria All-Washed Up has admitted to forgery where Moore’s supposed inscription in her dusty old yearbook is concerned, and last week, Republican Trent Franks admitted to a boneheaded move with a couple of women on his staff and resigned…EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY…rather than in a few weeks like Franken-Groper and Captain Underpants.
Don’t be fooled…the party that’s stood for, promoted and advocated for every amoral plank on the platform, from slavery to Jim Crow laws, and from socialism, to treason to wetting one’s cigar in an intern is just as sleazy and amoralistic today as they’ve always been.
Liberals pretending to be the pillars of virtue and morality are a lot like monkeys trying to hump a football…they’re both a hoot to watch, but at the end of the day…neither is going to find the satisfaction they’re all hot and bothered for.
Case in point…the day AFTER President Trump issued formal recognition of Jerusalem as the rightful Capital of Israel…and on the day OF the White House Hanukkah party that Debbie What’s-Her-Name wasn’t invited to attend…congressional liberals tried, but failed in an epic fashion, to IMPEACH President Trump.
The vote against the attempt in the House was a staggering 364-58.
In the same week that liberals tried to impeach President Trump…they lost Franken-Groper, Captain Underpants AND Matt Lauer.
In this new video, I discuss the controversy that has broken out over a Maryland housing development that advertised and sold homes only to Ahmadiyya Muslims. Predictably, those who object to this are being accused of “Islamophobia.” And just as predictably, there is nothing to the charge, and plenty to be concerned about regarding this development.
Geller Report editor’s note: These vicious genocidal calls for the slaughter of Jews are met with deafening silence. It’s what the Nazis did before the systematic extermination of the Jews — the dehumanization of a people. And now, 70 years later, silence again. A yet when I (or my colleagues) quote the Quran or Muslim leaders inciting to bloody holy war, we are called “racist- islamophobic-anti-muslim-bigots,” even though we have never called for violence, killing or anything other than equality for all before the law. No news story about Pamela Geller is not prefaced with libel and defamation (hate group leader, anti-Muslim etc). And yet antisemitic bigots such as Linda Sasour are spoken of with deference and respect. =================================================
Times Square – December 8, 2017 – 4:30 pm to 7 pm – Seventh Avenue and 42nd st.
4:15 pm. The “Palestinians” were already gathering in their pen and YELLING. I soon saw why, the PRO-Israel patriots, they, TOO, were already on-site. Not as many. But the flag of Israel was driving them to taunt their opposition with as much NOISE as they could muster.
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
How can Christians support a man accused of sex crimes?
NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
Thursday, December 14, 2017
People are being accused daily of sexually harassing others. Some are being accused of rape, others of pedophilia. More often than not in this hate-filled atmosphere these accusations are about alleged events that took place years ago, there were no reports to authorities, no charges filed, no court dates, no trials. The statute of limitations ranges from none to 30 years, depending on the state, but many of these allegations are coming long after the statute of limitations is run out. In California, for example, the statute of limitations for rape is ten years. In New York there is none. People are wondering how Christians can support a politician who has been accused of sexual crimes when the Bible would instruct otherwise.
First, the people in this country have become so mean-spirited and nasty toward one another that there is a natural backlash against accusations-whether they are true or false-cast toward those who represent Christian values. We feel they are being persecuted. Second, we are a country of laws. If charges were not filed, even though there are years and years in which to file them, and suddenly allegations are made in public long after statutes of limitations are expired, no law has been broken. This brings us to another point-what is the motive of these accusations years after the alleged incident? Those that accuse, when they are accused, they say, "Why are you bringing this up, that was years ago?"
No one should endure sexual harassment, sexual assault, or rape-never. Likewise, an innocent person should not be accused of such. So long as there are natural attractions between men and women, there will be sexual interaction. But people now are even cautious about greeting one another with a hug. Satan will try to use that to disrupt and destroy. This satanic effort is very effective in separating the natural in favor of the unnatural. We know that satan accuses the brethren as in Revelation 12:10, "...before our God day and night." Those on earth do the same. But disciples of Jesus know the truth of Romans 5:8, "But God commends his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us."
I am reminded of the woman who was caught in the very act of adultery and she faced the terrible death by stoning when Christ intervened. He said in John 8:7, "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her." Ashamed, they left one by one. Then Jesus said to the woman, "go, and sin no more." As Christians, we can look at repentance and a person's body of work as a testimony to who they have become. As written in 1 Corinthians 6:11 of a list of sinners who will not inherit the kingdom of God, "And such were some of you: but you are washed, but you are sanctified, but you are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, by the Spirit of our God." During this time of hate-filled incivility, let us call on the Lord to protect our minds, help us discern the truth, and speak it boldly, yet humbly, to others. It's how we win this battle.
Text messages released by the Department of Justice Tuesday revealed an extreme anti-Trump bias by Peter Strzok, a former senior member of special counsel Robert Mueller’s election probe team. The texts also hint at the possibility that the James Comey-led FBI may have had a plan to illegally thwart Trump’s presidential ambitions.
Following an internal Justice Department investigation, agent Strzok was quietly reassigned from his senior post at the FBI to a human resources position in the Bureau. It’s unclear at this time whether his text messages had anything to do with his reassignment. He was exchanging messages with Lisa Page, a fellow FBI official at the time, during the 2016 election campaign, according to reports.
Some have argued that Strzok did no wrong, because he had every right to criticize and use explicit language to target then-candidate Trump in his private exchanges. Strzok and Page frequently called the president “an idiot,” or “awful,” which is 100 percent their right to do as observers of politics.
However, some of the texts hint at the possibility that Strzok may have stepped over that line, and that he moved beyond simply expressing his discontent with the Republican presidential nominee.
One particular text may be interpreted as strategizing to interfere in the electoral process — what could be understood as discussing a plan to work with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to stop Trump from becoming president.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s (McCabe) office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok texted Page in 2016.
Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor, remarks that the text “clearly indicates” that Strzok was “infected by political viewpoints,” describing the text as “disqualifying.”
The text’s possible reference to Andrew McCabe raises another giant red flag about Comey’s deputy.
Although McCabe’s wife was running for office with the help of Clinton allies, the FBI deputy director refused to recuse himself from the Clinton email investigation until one week before the presidential election. Judicial Watch later found out that he was using his work email account to spread the word about his wife’s political ambitions.
It’s worth recalling that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the research into the infamous “Trump-Russia” dossier. The FBI (under James Comey and McCabe) then reportedly paid for this information and used the mostly debunked dossier to wiretap Trump advisers.
The ongoing investigation into the 2016 election was far from a smooth-running ship prior to these latest revelations. Peter Strzok is far from the only extreme partisan on Mueller’s investigation team. (For more from the author of “As Trump-Russia Goes Cold, Clinton-Comey Turns up Smoking Gun” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/12/trump-russia-goes-cold-clinton-comey
Text messages released by the Department of Justice Tuesday revealed an extreme anti-Trump bias by Peter Strzok, a former senior member of special counsel Robert Mueller’s election probe team. The texts also hint at the possibility that the James Comey-led FBI may have had a plan to illegally thwart Trump’s presidential ambitions.
Following an internal Justice Department investigation, agent Strzok was quietly reassigned from his senior post at the FBI to a human resources position in the Bureau. It’s unclear at this time whether his text messages had anything to do with his reassignment. He was exchanging messages with Lisa Page, a fellow FBI official at the time, during the 2016 election campaign, according to reports.
Some have argued that Strzok did no wrong, because he had every right to criticize and use explicit language to target then-candidate Trump in his private exchanges. Strzok and Page frequently called the president “an idiot,” or “awful,” which is 100 percent their right to do as observers of politics.
However, some of the texts hint at the possibility that Strzok may have stepped over that line, and that he moved beyond simply expressing his discontent with the Republican presidential nominee.
One particular text may be interpreted as strategizing to interfere in the electoral process — what could be understood as discussing a plan to work with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to stop Trump from becoming president.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s (McCabe) office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok texted Page in 2016.
Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor, remarks that the text “clearly indicates” that Strzok was “infected by political viewpoints,” describing the text as “disqualifying.”
The text’s possible reference to Andrew McCabe raises another giant red flag about Comey’s deputy.
Although McCabe’s wife was running for office with the help of Clinton allies, the FBI deputy director refused to recuse himself from the Clinton email investigation until one week before the presidential election. Judicial Watch later found out that he was using his work email account to spread the word about his wife’s political ambitions.
It’s worth recalling that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid for the research into the infamous “Trump-Russia” dossier. The FBI (under James Comey and McCabe) then reportedly paid for this information and used the mostly debunked dossier to wiretap Trump advisers.
The ongoing investigation into the 2016 election was far from a smooth-running ship prior to these latest revelations. Peter Strzok is far from the only extreme partisan on Mueller’s investigation team. (For more from the author of “As Trump-Russia Goes Cold, Clinton-Comey Turns up Smoking Gun” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/12/trump-russia-goes-cold-clinton-comey
On a radio show Monday, former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly came to the defense of President Donald Trump amid accusations that the president engaged in sexual misconduct with multiple women.
O’Reilly told Glenn Beck, host of “The Glenn Beck Program,” that there would be a “tremendous assault” coming for Trump in the near future as a last ditch effort by Democrat’s to derail his potential re-election in 2020.
A tape exists, according to O’Reilly, that if made public would expose a supposed plot to dethrone the president by use of falsified sexual misconduct allegations.
“There is a tape Beck — an audio tape of a(n) anti-Trump person offering $200,000 to a woman to accuse Donald Trump of untoward behavior,” O’Reilly said. “It’s there.”
Beck questioned O’Reilly’s statement, asking if the tape would ever be released to the public.
“I may have to go to the U.S. attorney myself,” O’Reilly said, before stating his reluctance to insert himself into the situation.
“I had my lawyer listen to the tape — my attorney — he listened to it,” the former Fox News host added. “There are at least three crimes on the tape.”
O’Reilly cited his duty as a U.S. citizen for feeling the need to ensure the release of the supposed tape, before adding that the evidence was currently “in the hands of someone who knows the seriousness of the situation.”
When pressed on the unnamed individual’s reluctance to release the tape, O’Reilly relayed that he could not discuss that information. However, he did add that someone of extreme importance is aware of the tape’s existence.
“But I can tell you that Donald Trump knows about the tape,” O’Reilly added.
He did admit that he was perplexed by Trump’s decision to refrain from exposing the “powerful piece of evidence” that would expose an “industry” built on perpetuating false sexual misconduct allegations for political gain.
He made sure to include that the audio doesn’t necessarily absolve Trump of all wrongdoing, but it does raise awareness of the existence of a sinister scheme that involves “money changing hands” in order to stain reputations.
“It’s there. It’s amazing. And it will change the whole discussion if it ever gets out,” O’Reilly said.
As reported by The New York Times, several women who came forward during the 2016 presidential election accusing Trump of sexual misconduct renewed their claims Monday.
“Now it’s just like, ‘All right let’s try Round 2, the environment is different, let’s try again,’” former Miss USA contestant Samantha Holvey said on Monday’s edition of “Megyn Kelly Today.”
Over 50 female Democrat lawmakers have called for an investigation into the accusations, according to Reuters.
On Monday, the White House released a statement Monday, denying the accusations against Trump.
“These false claims, totally disputed in most cases by eyewitness accounts, were addressed at length during last year’s campaign, and the American people voiced their judgment by delivering a decisive victory,” the statement said. (For more from the author of “Reporter: Tape Exists of a Woman Being Offered Hundreds of Thousands to Make False Claims Against Trump” please click HERE) undreds-thousands-make-false-claims-trump/
A celebrity bone surgeon became embroiled in the Clinton Foundation’s Haiti controversy when he and another doctor penned a startling 2010 article that exposed the corruption at the heart of the Haitian earthquake relief efforts.
Almost seven years later, Dr. Dean Lorich, 54, was found dead in his luxury apartment Sunday.
Police say the body was found with a knife buried in the chest, but investigators ruled the mysterious death a suicide according to The New York Post. There were no signs of forced entry at his downtown Manhattan apartment.
The violent death came has been a shock to those who knew the orthopedic surgeon. Lorich, who was happily married and extremely successful, reportedly left no suicide note for his family, which included three children.
The mainstream media has noted that Lorich was being sued by former NFL player Michael Cox over alleged complications following his ankle surgery.
“But Cox’s lawyer, Steven North, believed the lawsuit would have been covered by the insurance of Lorich’s employer, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and the New York-Presbyterian Hospital, where Lorich served as associate director of the Orthopedic Trauma Service,” The Epoch Times reported.
And more recently, when his name was found in twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s emails, which were released during her private server scandal last summer.
As a whistleblower to the inadequate response to the Haitian earthquake, Lorich was fiercely critical of the Clinton Foundation’s efforts on the ground.
In the now-declassified emails, Lorisch complained to Hillary that her efforts “only portended the difficulties we would have once we arrived” and that the Clinton Foundation had a “complete lack of any organization on the ground. Noone [sic] was in charge, we had the first functional up and running hospital in the P OP [sic] area yet noone and I me NOONE came to the hospital to assess what we were doing, what we were capable of doing and what we would need, to be more efficient.”
“We all felt as though we abandoned these patients and that country and feel terrible,” Lorich’s email wraps up. “Our role now being back in NY is to expose the inadequacies of the system to the media in the hopes of effecting a change in this system immediatly [sic].”
Unsatisfied with the Clinton Foundation’s response, the famed surgeon then wrote his blistering criticism.
“The difficulties in getting in — despite the intelligence we had from people on the ground and Dr. Helfet’s connections with Partners in Health and Bill and Hillary Clinton — only hinted at the difficulties we would have once we arrived,” he wrote in his 2010 op-ed slamming the medical situation in the Caribbean country.
Nothing was ultimately done about the Clinton Foundation’s corruption in Haiti.
Sunday, Lorich ended up dead on the floor of his Manhattan apartment with a knife in his chest.
Fake news was a major issue over the past few weeks but that’s not the only way the left-wing media is attacking President Trump.
Regarding fake news, media companies such as CNN and ABC News were caught reporting on matters relating to President Trump that were factually wrong.
In addition to fake news, evening news broadcasts by the major networks were extremely negative towards President Trump.
According to a report by the Media Research Center, the three major networks had ten times the number of negative statements about President Trump than positive statements.
But as the Media Research Center has been documenting all year, the media have approached the Trump presidency with unrelenting hostility. Our latest numbers show that coverage of Trump on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts in September, October and November was more than 90 percent negative (our methodology counts only explicitly evaluative statements from reporters or non-partisan sources).
In September, there were just 31 pro-Trump statements on the Big Three vs. 359 negative. In October, the number of positive statements grew to 41, while the negative statements swelled to 435.
The new study of major broadcast coverage reveals that 90 percent of statements made by reporters and nonpartisan sources the last three months on ABC, NBC and CBS evening newscasts about Mr. Trump and his administration were negative.
It’s all in the numbers. The analysts found 1,123 out of 1,228 statements made about the president on the “Big Three” news networks during September, October and November were critical of Mr. Trump. Only 105 of the statements were considered positive in tone or content.
We’ve all been witness to the constant attack from the Mainstream Media against President Trump and conservatives with biased and just fake reporting. And any time those on the right have tried to fight back the MSM has blasted them with more of the same. However, we now have a Warrior for Truth in White House Press Secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
Yesterday, during her daily Press Briefing, Sarah was asked a question about claims the Media is so biased they will regularly not only report inaccurate news but will in fact, often create false reports to advance their liberal agenda.
From past experiences with those in Sarah’s position, we’d often see a dance around the question, BUT not so from this strong woman. She wasted NO time voicing her opinion on the subject with the perfect response.
“There’s a very big difference between making honest mistakes and purposefully misleading the American people. Something that happens regularly. You can’t say – (a reporter tried to interrupt her)- I’m not done. You can’t say that it’s an honest mistake when you are purposely putting out information that you know to be false or when you’re taking information that hasn’t been validated, that hasn’t been offered any credibility and that has been continually denied by a number of people including people with direct knowledge of an incident. This is something that — I’m speaking about the number of reports that have taken place over the last couple of weeks. I’m simply stating that there should be a certain level of responsibility in that process.”
Boom… mic drop!
Watching her slap, the sanctimonious grins off the Media piranhas seated in the room was a thing of beauty. While everyone can make a mistake when reporting on fast-moving events, there’s a HUGE difference in just making up news on a particular subject. We have all seen FAKE news reports from those in the Liberal/Progressive Media. We’ve all been witness to the attempted destruction of President Trump and the Make America Great Again movement by the lap-dogs in the media on behalf of their masters in the Democrat Party.
One such instance is the latest article on the CNN website. They make a weak argument of how just because a claim made in a report turns out to be false doesn’t make it FAKE NEWS. Oh, really? If that’s the case, I guess it just means those in the MSM are just lazy or unwilling to do their due diligence to provide accurate reporting. Reporting FAKE NEWS can have far-reaching effects. I’m sure we all remember what happened when Brian Ross reported on ABC, citing a single source, that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was prepared to testify to Special Counsel Robert Mueller that then-candidate Donald Trump had directed him to reach out to the Russians during the campaign. However, later that day, Ross corrected his reporting, noting his source was wrong on the timing. He clarified that President Trump had told Flynn to reach out to the Russians as President-Elect. This changes the charge considerably. Brian Ross was suspended for a month and will no longer report on the White House.
By running with the false story, there was a considerable drop in the stock market, costing people thousands of dollars before it eventually rebounded once the truth came to light. There is always a price to pay for reporting lies and I, for one, am thrilled to have those serving in the White House who are unafraid to call the MSM out for not holding true to the facts.
An industry panel discussed ways to avoid Muslim stereotypes in film and TV while also offering suggestions to ensure more authentic representations of Islam and Muslims in Hollywood at a recent event presented by the Writers Guild Foundation and the Hollywood Bureau of the Muslim Public Affairs Council.
The MPAC’s Hollywood Bureau consults with production companies on authentic portrayals of Muslims and connects companies with Muslim creatives in writers rooms to tell their own stories to ensure that the stories told on the screen are accurate.
The panel discussion, held Monday night at the WGAF/WGA headquarters in Los Angeles, included MPAC president Salam Al-Marayati, actor-writer Dan Milano (Robot Chicken, Greg the Bunny), creator/executive producer/writer Chris Keyser (Party of Five, The Last Tycoon, Tyrant), writer Sohrab Noshirvani (Dry River Road, Junkyard Dogs), producer Cherien Dabis (Empire, Quantico), and writer Y. Shireen Razack (Shadowhunters: The Mortal Instruments, Haven). Writer/producer Valerie C. Woods (Any Day Now, Soul Food) moderated the panel.
“It’s no secret that the industry has a knack for vilifying marginalized communities,” said Sue Obeidi, director of the MPAC’s Hollywood Bureau told The Hollywood Reporter. “However, we did notice that before Trump got into the White House, before he was even elected, representatives of the entertainment industry, television executives and creatives, reached out to us about creating Muslim characters, not your traditional ‘bad-guy Arab villain Muslim,’ but more authentic narratives.”
The Hollywood Bureau is currently consulting for Disney’s Aladdin (the upcoming live-action version), ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy, Hulu’s The Looming Tower, NatGeo’s The State, Paramount/Amazon’s Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan and Nickelodeon’s Glitch Techs.
The MPAC’s ultimate goal is to get more Muslim creatives involved in the corporate structure.
“I want to make sure that to us [MPAC’s Hollywood Bureau], ultimate success is not having a Muslim TV network, but to have Muslims at the helm of a major network, studio and production company,” said Obeidi. “In order to really make a difference in the narrative, we cannot afford to be burning daylight by preaching to the choir. Muslims, like all other members of vulnerable communities, need to be in decision-making roles at major mainstream TV networks, studios and production companies, as well as showrunners and executive producers.”
Obeidi is hopeful that there will be a Muslim lead on a television drama and sitcom within the next few years.
Nickelodeon’s new animated series Glitch Techs will feature a multiethnic cast, including a Muslim-American female character who will wear a hijab on the show. Glitch Techs writer David Anaxagoras originally created the character for another program, Amazon’s Gortimer Gibbon’s Life on Normal Street, but viewers never saw the character because of the show’s cancellation.
When developing Glitch Techs, the co-creators recognized the need to incorporate characters reflective of the viewing audience, whether they are background characters or main characters, so “someone somewhere [can look] for themselves on television,” said Milano, who co-created the show with Eric Robles. The creators consulted with the MPAC to figure out how to accurately display an authenticity, even down to little behaviors.
“Even though we’re an animated show and they are trying to catch creatures, we want small things. We want to know that a stray hair came out of that hijab, and she had to tuck it behind her ear because that’s a human moment, that’s a practical moment, from everyday life,” said Milano.
Added Al-Marayati: “Five years ago and 10 years ago, we never thought we’d actually have an audience to talk to, but now, I think we should thank Donald Trump because we’re finally having a conversation, and it’s unfortunate that it had to take that to have that conversation, but hey, beggars can’t be choosers, so we welcome this opportunity.”
Muslim girls have to tuck stray hairs in because if they don’t, or if they remove their hijabs, they risk being beaten or killed. But Hollywood won’t go there.
Established in 1988 by followers of the Muslim Brotherhood and admirers of Hezbollah
Marayati first came to public attention in the late Nineties, when the Democrats’ then-leader in the House, Richard Gephardt, nominated him to serve on the National Commission on Terrorism — a nomination that Gephardt later withdrew when it emerged that Marayati had spoken sympathetically of violent jihad.
…
In October 2000, MPAC hosted a rally in Washington’s Lafayette Park at which Abdurahman Alamoudi — then regarded in Washington as another “moderate” Muslim leader — was featured as a speaker. To often raucous applause, Alamoudi asserted, “I have been labeled by the media in New York to be a supporter of Hamas. Anybody supports Hamas here? [Crowd cheers responsively] . . . Hear that, Bill Clinton? We are ALL supporters of Hamas. Allahu Akhbar! I wish they added that I am also a supporter of Hezbollah!”
This video and what this Islamic cleric says speaks for itself. And other devout Muslim clerics and groups support this violent jihad to impose the brutal and extreme sharia. Of course we expect people to recoil and reject this savagery. That’s a given. The problem is the Muslims who respect it, adhere to it, and believe in holy war in the cause of Islam. That is our problem. The constant admonishing about peaceful Muslims is a distraction. The existence of peaceful Muslims is irrelevant. No one has an issue with them, and they are doing nothing to stop their jihadi brethren.
Where are the Muslim protests against jihad and calls for a reformation in Islam? The only demos I ever see by Muslims and their Antifa SS army are violent protests against Israel. Why is that?
It’s all about the ideology, jihad. Monitor the mosques. Protect human life and freedom from this scourge.
And yet the Democrats are intent upon forcing us to accept more “refugees,” among whom will be an unknowable number of these jihadi savages.
>
34,239
“Kuwaiti Cleric Saalim At-Taweel: Jihad for the Sake of Allah Means Fighting the Infidels to Make Them Convert to Islam; Enslaving Infidels Is One of the Virtues of Islam,” MEMRI, November 7, 2017:
On November 7, Kuwaiti cleric Sheikh Saalim Bin Sa’d At-Taweel published a lecture on his official YouTube channel explaining the concept of Jihad. Sheikh At-Taweel said that while “Jihad” has different meanings, “Jihad for the sake of Allah” means fighting infidels in order to spread Islam. He further explained that slavery is part of Islam and said that Muslims should not try to deny this. In fact, he said, slavery is “one of the virtues of Islam” because it provides infidels with an opportunity to become Muslims and avoid the Hellfire. Over the past decade, Sheikh At-Taweel has made several visits to the United States and was guest lecturer in mosques in Worcester, Massachusetts, Modesto, California, and New York, and elsewhere. In 2016, he participated in the 3rd Annual U.K. National Knowledge Conference.
Saalim Bin Sa’d At-Taweel: When we speak about Jihad for the sake of Allah, we mean fighting for the sake of Allah. The word “Jihad” has other meanings apart from “fighting.” “Fighting” is only one of the meanings of the word “Jihad,” but “Jihad for the sake of Allah” refers to “fighting.”
[…]
Indeed, (Jihad) is the pinnacle of Islam. If Islam were a camel, Jihad for the sake of Allah would be the top of its hump. The Prophet Muhammad called it the pinnacle of Islam. It is undoubtedly among the best forms of worship. It involves the sacrifice of one’s soul and one’s money, and great effort merits great reward.
[…]
Yes, there is defensive Jihad and offensive Jihad. Defensive Jihad means defending yourself. When you need to defend yourself, you do not need a fatwa. When you are attacked, you are allowed to defend yourself any way you can. Waging offensive Jihad means attacking the infidels in order to conquer their countries and bring them into the fold of Islam. If they refuse to convert to Islam, they are commanded to pay the jizya poll tax, and if they refuse to pay the jizya, they are killed. This is called “offensive Jihad.”
[…]
Indeed, the greatest goal of Jihad for the sake of Allah is to instate monotheism, “until religion belongs to Allah alone,” or “until religion belongs to Allah,” according to another verse. “Fight them until there is no more fitna” – which means polytheism – “until religion belongs to Allah alone,” or in other words, until people adhere to monotheism and believe in Allah alone. This is a clear and unambiguous verse in the Quran. According to the Sunna, as it appears in the two Sahih compilations, the Prophet Muhammad said: “I was ordered to fight the people.” Why? He said: “until they attest that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His prophet, and they establish prayer, and pay the zakkat.”
[…]
The reason we fight is in order to spread Islam. Let’s say there is someone who prevents you from spreading Islam to all the infidels, all people on Earth, who were created by Allah so that they could worship Him. You want to spread your religion both to jinns and to people. If somebody is preventing you from doing so, you may fight him, so that you can spread Islam.
[…]
We do not do this in order to take the money of (the infidels), in order to expand the Muslim lands, or in order to gain control over them… No. We fight them so that they will become Muslims.
[…]
One of the virtues of Islam is that the women and children (of the enemy) are not killed. They are taken as slaves, and they are treated well. They are called upon to convert to Islam. How many Muslim ulema were white slaves, who were put to use by Allah as Islamic scholars. If they had died as infidels, they would have been condemned to eternal Hellfire. Instead, they were taken captive. The Prophet Muhammad took a Jewish woman and married her, and she became the Mother of the Believers. Imagine that! She had been Jewish before. Had she died believing in her distorted Judaism, she would have gone to Hell. Instead, she was taken captive, and she was found to be the most suitable woman for the Prophet Muhammad.
[..]
So this is one of the virtues of Islam, but some people are trying to shrug it off, and say: “There is no slavery in Islam.” How can you say this? It is in the Quran.
What is most telling is that the new security measures, namely the CCTV cameras, have sparked outrage among the local Muslim community. This terror mosque has a notorious past, tied to ISIS and Islamic terror. Shouldn’t the Muslim community welcome such measures, or do they sympathize with those slaughtering in the cause of Allah?
These national security measures are exactly what, at minimum, should be imposed on any mosque tied to jihad terror. But really they should be shut entirely.
This mosque should never have been reopened.
Mosque linked to ISIS Jihadi terror forced to install CCTV to monitor Islamic worshippers
MUSLIMS at a mosque which was closed after it was accused of being “a breeding ground for Jihadists” will now worship under the watchful eye of CCTV.
By Romina McGuinness, The Express, December 12, 2017
Al-Rawda Mosque is located in Stains, a suburb north-east of Paris
Following a nationwide crackdown on extremism, intelligence officials in France have demanded the al-Rawda mosque install an extensive surveillance system.
The al-Rawda mosque, which is located in Stains, an impoverished suburb north-east of Paris, was closed down by the interior ministry in November 2016 after it was identified by French intelligence officials as a “breeding ground for Salafi-jihadists”.
It was one of the 30 mosques to be shut down under the country’s two-year emergency rule, which allowed authorities to shut down ‘radical’ places of worship without prior warning.
French counter-terrorism officials started keeping a close eye on the mosque after it was found that two top Islamic State (ISIS) propagandists – Adrien Guihal and Fabien Clain – had prayed there regularly before fleeing France to join the terrorist organisation in Syria.
But the new security measures, namely the CCTV cameras, have sparked outrage among the local Muslim community.
“It’s total nonsense. Religion is a private matter,” a local Muslim youth told the French daily Le Figaro.
“How would you feel if someone told you you had to install surveillance cameras inside your church?” another Muslim youth said.
“Local officials pray at this mosque, including police officers who wish to keep their faith private and who can no longer come to al-Rawda. It’s problematic,” Mohammed Hemmiche, the general secretary of the Union of Muslim Associations of Seine-Saint-Denis, told Le Figaro.
“We just hope that the new conditions will allow us to turn the page on the mosque’s radical past,” Mr Hemmiche added.
Pamela Geller's shocking new book, "FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA" is now available on Amazon. It's Geller's tell all, her story - and it's every story - it's what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
Dems emboldened
NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Doug Jones is the new Democratic Senator from Alabama. He beat Roy Moore by a small margin in Tuesday's special election. The Democratic Party believes this is historical in that Jones is the first Democratic senator elected in the state in some 25 years, it is believed to be a rejection of President Donald Trump's agenda, and an indicator of how democrats will make great gains in the upcoming midterm elections. If you are a Democrat, this is all good news. If you are a Republican, it's bad news. If you are an American, the election was historic in a very bad way. The recruitment of reputable people to run for office will become far more difficult in this vile environment. Bad may well beget worse.
There have been many accusations against candidates for sexual impropriety over the centuries. Many remember the rumors flying about Franklin Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, and so on. But nothing on the political landscape has matched the accusations of a sexual nature that have occurred in recent years. For some reason, the mere mention of sexual harassment, unproven, innuendo, or whatever has become the Achilles Heal to bring candidates down. Make the accusation, get the story, repurpose the story for mass media, and the firestorm begins that never ends.
Politics never has been a clean game. But the level to which it has now fallen is compounded and weaponized by 24/7 news media. Complicating matters even more is a news media that is predominately leftist. The news cycles are very competitive and try to "one-up" each other, causing a din of leftist rhetoric, rarely fact checked, emotionally driven and without concern for truth, facts, context or human decency. Any self-respecting person with a desire to do what is right in the eyes of the Lord, governed by the Golden Rule, would have to think long and hard before entering the sordid ring of politics where he will be accused of things his mind probably couldn't even comprehend. This is the nation we are living in.
This causes a downward spiral of the quality of candidates and their character. Wait to see-President Trump will be accused repeatedly for sexual harassment. This will not go away. It will stymie the business of the nation, grind the good things government could do (tax relief, border security, regulation reduction, etc.) to a standstill. The angry, misinformed, disingenuous, evil ones who believe victory is theirs will be further emboldened thinking this vile way of conducting politics is working to their advantage. As Christian Americans, we must be ever vigilant to understand our purpose and not be deceived. As is written in James 1:22, "But you be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves." Stay true to the Lord. He has us in the palm of his hand, but we cannot be complacent, we must be doers.
The Orange County, California, district attorney’s office has announced that two baby-body-parts dealers investigated after a series of undercover videos about the abortion industry’s profits on fetal tissue have been ordered to close down.
The companies are DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences.
They “must permanently close and cease all operations in the state of California within 60 and 120 days, respectively, pay a settlement amount of $7,785,000 through the donation of assets and biological materials to a non-profit academic and scientific teaching institution affiliated with a major U.S. medical school, and pay $195,000 in civil penalties,” explained a statement from the office of District Attorney Tony Rackauckas about a settlement in the case.
The companies were identified in undercover videos released in 2015 by the Center for Medical Progress which identified abortion-industry players, including those at Planned Parenthood, negotiating for pieces of the bodies of unborn infants killed through abortion.
The OCDA opened its investigation based on a complaint submitted by the CMP and, based on the evidence uncovered, “filed a complaint for violations for unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent business practices in the Superior Court in the state of California in Orange County.” (Read more from “2 Baby Body Parts Dealers Ordered to Close” HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/12/2-baby-body-parts-dealers-ordered-cl
