William M. Finley's Posts (2815)

Sort by

FBI Chief Instructed Agents To Lie About Benghazi To Protect Hillary

FBI boss instructed agents to lie about Benghazi to protect Hillary Clinton

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe instructed agents at the bureau to lie to the public and Congress about the Benghazi attack, in order to protect his pal Hillary Clinton.

Rep. Ron Desantis (R-FL) claims that he recently interviewed a retired FBI supervisor who revealed to him that McCabe instructed him not to refer to the 2012 attack as an act of terrorism when distributing the FBI’s findings to the larger intelligence community – despite knowing that terrorists were responsible for the attack.

The agent found the instruction concerning because his unit had gathered incontrovertible evidence showing a major al Qaeda figure had directed the attack and the information had already been briefed to President Obama, the lawmaker said. -The Hill

Zerohedge.com reports: After the September 11, 2012 attack against U.S. government facilities in Benghazi, Libya, the Obama administration peddled a lie, telling the public that the attack was related to Muslims who had become enraged at an anti-Islam YouTube video, and not a planned act of terrorism – despite Hillary Clinton emailing Chelsea Clinton from her unsecure @clintonemail.com server the night of the attack to say exactly that.

Chelsea – using the pseudonym “Diane Reyonds” probably didn’t have the clearance to receive classified intelligence from her mother, the Secretary of State.

“Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Queda-like group: The Ambassador, whom I handpicked and a young communications officer on temporary duty w a wife and two young children. Very hard day and I fear more of the same tomorrow.” -Hillary Clinton to Chelsea Clinton

http://yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/claim1_0-150x61.png 150w, http://yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/claim1_0-300x122.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" width="500" height="204" />

And we now know FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe lied for the Obma administration in a clear, partisan violation of the FBI’s mandate to “detect and prosecute crimes against the United States,” not “lie for the President so as not to offend Islam.”

As Rep. DeSantis told The Hill:

“What operational reason would there be to issue an edict to agents telling them, in the face of virtually conclusive evidence to the contrary, not to categorize the Benghazi attack as a result of terrorism? By placing the interests of the Obama administration over the public’s interests, the order is yet another data point highlighting the politicization of the FBI.”

DeSantis and other GOP lawmakers say they plan to question FBI Director Christopher Wray at a Thursday hearing in front of the House Judiciary Committee about claims of growing concern among certain FBI supervisors over political bias clouding decisions at the highest levels of the agency.

The case against the FBI for overt political bias couldn’t be more clear. Over the last week we’ve learned of veteran FBI investigator Peter Strzok’s dismissal for texting his mistress anti-Trump messages, which the DOJ is handing over to the House Intelligence Committee. We also learned yesterday that a second prosecutor on Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel, Andrew Weissmann, praised then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates after she refused to defend President Trump’s travel ban.

Fox News reports:

A top prosecutor who is now a deputy for Special Counsel Robert Muellers Russia probe praised then-acting attorney general Sally Yates after she was fired in January by President Trump for refusing to defend his controversial travel ban.

The email, obtained by Judicial Watch through a federal lawsuit, shows that on the night of Jan. 30, Andrew Weissmann wrote to Yates under the subject line, I am so proud.

He continued, And in awe. Thank you so much. All my deepest respects.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called the new Weissmann document an astonishing and disturbing find.

“The data points we have regarding politicization are damning enough but appear all the more problematic when viewed against the backdrop of investigations whose ferocity seemed to depend on the target: the Clinton case was investigated with an eye towards how to exonerate her and her associates, while the Russia investigation is being conducted using scorched earth tactics that seek to find anything to use against Trump associates,” DeSantis told The Hill.

DeSantis also said his FBI source pointed to an incident after Trump’s National Security Advisor Mike Flynn resigned over lying to Vice President Mike Pence over his contacts with Russia’s ambassador. An FBI executive is said to have made an inappropriate comment during a video teleconference indicating that the agency had a personal motive in investigating Flynn and ruining his career.

“The wildly divergent ways these investigations have been conducted appear to dovetail with the political bias that has been uncovered,” DeSantis said.

In response to the overt political bias at the FBI, the Inspector General’s office (OIG) has launched an investigation into Strzok and other officials connected to both the Clinton email investigation as well as the Trump-Russia investigation. Agent Peter Strzok who was removed for anti-Trump text messages ran both investigations, the latter Trump-Russia having been taking over by Robert Mueller’s probe which he was recently kicked off of.

Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, meanwhile, is directly under investigation by the OIG for potentially violating the Hatch Act or engaged in ethical conflicts pertaining to his wife’s run for the Virginia senate in 2015 as a Democrat. She received $700,000 in campaign contributions tied to Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe (D) – an ally of Hillary Clinton who was under FBI investigation at the time. The Hill reports that records show McCabe attended a March 2015 meeting with McAuliffe designed to secure the governor’s support of Jill McCabe’s candidacy.

http://yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/claim2_0-150x150.jpg 150w, http://yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/claim2_0-300x298.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" width="500" height="496" />

As The Hill concludes:

McCabe has said he sought FBI legal advice on how to deal with his wife’s campaign. He nonetheless presided over the Clinton email case until just a few days before it was closed, when he unexpectedly recused himself.

Multiple Republican lawmakers said Wednesday they believe the email case was tainted by political favoritism and special treatment for the 2016 Democratic nominee and planned to press Wray about their concerns.

“We are here today calling for an investigation into FBI systems and procedures that have allowed special treatment and bias to run rampant,” Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) said. “The law demands equal treatment for all, not ‘special’ treatment for some. There is a clear and consistent pattern of treating the Clinton investigation differently than other investigations.”

Read more…

HELP WANTED: DISTRICT VOLUNTEER

Volunteer Form For Drain The Swamp We are in need of various volunteers to help us coordinate our efforts to help in our local communities across our entire…

Here is your chance to do something about this Congress, and this mess that our country is in  and Also the Society Democratic Party! Answer the call today! 
Read more…
Ad
Thursday, December 07, 2017

Islamization of the Workplace: Terror-tied CAIR sues Ariens, prayer times not enough, sues to STOP the line for Muslim migrants

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate!! )

67
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+

The Hamas terror group CAIR has targeted another great American company for Islamic lawfare on behalf of Muslim Somali migrants who walked off the job because the very generous policy of Muslim prayer times wasn’t good enough. They wanted to stop the line for Muslim prayer times. Ariens Co. gives its Muslim worker two 10-minute breaks per work shift for Muslim prayer. Somali Muslims at the company walked off their jobs, demanding that Ariens allow Muslims to leave their work station whenever they want.

Now Hamas-CAIR is suing saying the Muslims were “coerced” into walking out. This is typical of Muslim victimhood strategy — attack, then claim victim status. Now that CAIR’s de facto legal arm, Obama’s DoJ, is not their pocket, success is not assured, but even so, it is a terrible burden on American companies to have to underwrite these enormous costs against a terror-tied org massively funded by foreign countries and liberal American  dupes.

All the plaintiffs are Somali Muslims.

https://9502-presscdn-0-95-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Ariens1-300x200.jpg 300w, https://9502-presscdn-0-95-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Ariens1-400x267.jpg 400w" sizes="(max-width: 547px) 100vw, 547px" width="547" height="365" />

Back in January 2016, I wrote that Ariens, an American equipment company which has a long history manufacturing snow blowers, lawn tractors, and zero-turn lawn mowers for commercial and high-end consumer markets, was under siege by Islamic supremacists who were making impossible Islamic demands on the company.

 

Muslims employed by Ariens are allowed to leave the production line twice a shift to pray two of the five prayers their faith requires of them daily. They prayed five minutes at a time, designating their specific duties to colleagues. Arien is “asking employees to pray during scheduled breaks in designated prayer rooms. Our manufacturing environment does not allow for unscheduled breaks in production.” Not good enough for Muslim workers. They want to stop the line.

Mind you, these Muslim workers don’t have to pray at those times. They can make up the missed prayers later. They don’t stop production lines in Iran and other Muslim countries for prayer. But here in the West, it is a way to impose Islam on the workplace, on the secular marketplace — and on their co-workers.

Muslims at the company objected to management’s recent decision to begin enforcing a policy of two 10-minute breaks per work shift. Instead, they walked off their jobs, demanding that Ariens allow Muslims to leave their work station whenever they want.

The terror group CAIR has filed a lawsuit here.

If Ariens wins and they should, will terrorist group CAIR pay Ariens’ legal fees?

 https://9502-presscdn-0-95-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Screen-Shot-2017-12-06-at-4.59.03-PM-1-300x89.png 300w, https://9502-presscdn-0-95-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Screen-Shot-2017-12-06-at-4.59.03-PM-1-768x228.png 768w, https://9502-presscdn-0-95-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Screen-Shot-2017-12-06-at-4.59.03-PM-1-800x237.png 800w" sizes="(max-width: 1712px) 100vw, 1712px" width="1712" height="508" />

CAIR files federal lawsuit against Ariens Company over break policy

FOX News 11,December 6, 2017:

BRILLION (WLUK) — The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) filed a federal lawsuit against Ariens Company on behalf of Somali-Muslim workers over the company’s break policy Wednesday.

Last year, Ariens began enforcing a break policy, allowing for two scheduled 10-minute breaks for employees after the company says unscheduled breaks impacted the company’s work flow.

 Prior to the new break policy, the lawsuit says Muslim employees were permitted to take short breaks to perform prayers while non-Muslim faith employees took the same amount of breaks to do other things such as smoking, making a phone call or getting a snack.

Muslim workers say the new short scheduled breaks did not allow them to pray at five prescribed times each day, generally at dawn, noon, afternoon, sunset and nighttime.

In the lawsuit, CAIR says its plaintiffs were either coerced to resign their employment or their employment was terminated after asking management to take short breaks to perform their obligatory prayers.

The plaintiffs are asking for their jobs back with short prayer breaks and payment for front and back pay and lost benefits.

Last year, CAIR had filed a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the National Labor Relations Board.

FOX 11 has reached out to Ariens for comment but has not received a reply back.

Read more…
t?e=SHE2I9wX2nI&c=0&r=0&_ts=1512663453427Share:
S.gif
S.gif
S.gif
Daily reporting and analysis of current events from a biblical and prophetic perspective
 
S.gif
Bill Wilson
World stands against Trump's recognition of Jerusalem
NOTEWhen writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.
  
Thursday, December 7, 2017
President Donald Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and declared his intentions of moving the US Embassy to the holy city. Trump said, "I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. While previous presidents have made this a major campaign promise, they failed to deliver. Today, I am delivering. I've judged this course of action to be in the best interests of the United States of America and the pursuit of peace between Israel and the Palestinians. This is a long-overdue step to advance the peace process and to work towards a lasting agreement. Israel is a sovereign nation with the right like every other sovereign nation to determine its own capital. Acknowledging this as a fact is a necessary condition for achieving peace."
 
Trump's decision resulted in an outcry of condemnation by the United Nations and European Union, who sided with the likes of terrorist organizations like Hamas. Sponsors of Islamic terrorists-Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, Palestinian Authority-- straightaway decried the announcement as declaring war in the Middle East. Think about this...the US Congress in an overwhelming bipartisan vote gave the US President authority to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital in 1995. Every president since has kicked the can down the road thinking the move was a barrier to achieving peace in the region. Trump says it's repeatedly doing the same thing while expecting different results. So far, the result is a massive and violent temper tantrum by radical Islamists who claim Jerusalem is historically their city.
 
Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Dozdag said, "Declaring Jerusalem a capital is disregarding history and the truths in the region." This claim doesn't meet the straight face test. It is the very homeland of God's people. History and truth confirm that Islam or Arabs had no claim to the region that God gave to Abraham. In Genesis 21:12, God said to Abraham, "in all that Sarah has said unto you, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall your seed be called." Galatians 4:30 says, "Nevertheless what says the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman." Islam, not even a religion until over 600 years after Christ's death on the cross, claims Ishmael is the heir of Jerusalem and that God does not have a son.
 
The history and the truths in the region undeniably confirm the Abrahamic covenant that God gave the land of Jerusalem to the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, not the seed of Ishmael as claimed by Mohammad some 2,500 years later. This is not so much about the land-there is plenty of land in the Middle East-- as it is about usurpation. It is a family feud as old as Ishmael and Esau, ultimately over the line of Messiah. The Koran repeatedly says that God has no son, and that Christians and Jews are infidels that should be put to death. Iran and Turkey, two major players in the end times, agree. Trump's move may well accelerate the knitting together of the prophetically foretold end time coalition that comes against Israel and is destroyed when Christ returns. We are truly watching history in the making.
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

PS. Please use the "Share This Email" link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!    
Read more…
Conservative Flag

Conservative Flag

News

All HELL Breaks Loose At WH As Trump Uncovers Obama’s Covert Order To Agents To Take Out His Entire Family

3.8k
SHARES

Obama has finally left the White House, but we can’t say the same for his spies that are still hiding inside of it.

It is believed that the ex-president has  his “secret government”  that includes around 30 people who are infiltrated in Trump’s administration as his “secret agents”. Their job is simple- to give confident information to Obama and the liberal media

Even though Trump has been careful with who he trusts, he never expected for his top military general to be one of Obama’s spies. Thanks to the CIA, Trump found out that his trusted adviser was illegally transmitting information to Obama for several months.

Ever since Trump walked into the White House, Obama is restlessly trying to take him down with his operatives hidden into the government.

The first thing that he did was implanting Dina Habib Powell as Trump’s Deputy National Security Adviser, but her intentions were shortly discovered.

Not only that she was a Muslim but she was also friends with Hillary Clinton and Obama’s former advisor Valerie Jarret who was Muslim as well. After finding out that Powell was giving information to the liberal media and that she was another one of Obama’s pawns , Trump immediately fired her.

After this event, Trump has been nothing but careful when it comes to choosing his staff, but as we are finding out,  it turns out that his National Security Advisor General H.R.McMaster was also an Obama operative. McMaster was sharing confidential information with Obama and he also authorized illegal surveillance on the President.

This was uncovered thanks to the CIA agent John R. Maguire. In a recent operation it was revealed that McMaster had put surveillance on Trump and his family, but on Steve Bannon as well. According to Maguire, McMaster was using a burner-cell to provide Obama materials against Trump and it is proved that he was also sending the same information to George Soros.

The Intercept cited:

“Maguire told at least two people that National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, in coordination with a top official at the National Security Agency, authorized surveillance of Steven Bannon and Trump family members, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump.

Adding to these unsubstantiated claims, Maguire told the potential donors he also had evidence H.R. McMaster used a burner phone to send information gathered through the surveillance to a facility in Cyprus owned by George Soros.”

As  The Gateway Pundit reported Trump had enough of the traitors in his government, and he will engage Eric Prince and John R. Maguire to help him “provide CIA Director Mike Pompeo and the White House with a global, private spy network that would go around the U.S.’s official SWAMP-INFESTED intelligence agencies,”

Obama’s secret government will come to an end after Trump launches his private spy network. The FBI and CIA became corrupted while Obama was on the presidential seat, and now it’s time for Trump to  cut out the infiltrators and continue his work without Obama’s pawns interfering.

Obama was U.S. President for 8 years, so he should be aware that what he does is a serious federal crime. He’s out from the White House for a full year and he still manages to do damage to our country through his spies such as McMaster who will soon be punished for what the damage that he has done!

Don’t you think that America has had enough of these traitors? Tell us your opinion by sharing this story.

Featured Image Source H/T: TheIntercept

Read more…

Conservative Flag

News

FBI Director Just BLASTED Obama’s Lie To The Entire Nation…We’ve Had Enough!

3.1k
SHARES

It may be presented to you by Obama and his loyal supporters that getting your hands on a gun in this country is a piece of cake.

Terrorists and criminals can just walk into a gun store and by a weapon and there is nothing, no one can do about it. But the FBI Director Comey just outed Barak Obama’s lies in front of the eyes of the public.

Comey was directly asked to give his facts about the matter and what he had to say has surely put Obama in a quite embarrassing position. If anyone ever again says that America has no control over gun sales, just show them this.

From Cain TV we have the full interview with the FBI Director:

“Last week, our president stated that there are individuals who can’t get on planes, but they can go to a gun shop and buy a firearm there and he said ‘nothing we can do to stop them,’ but – and correct me if I’m wrong – the FBI is notified when someone on the terrorist watch list attempts to purchase a firearm, and a NICS [National Instant Criminal Background Check System] check is requested, and the FBI has multiple avenues that they can pursue,” Grassley said at the committee’s hearing on the oversight of the FBI.

“These are some of these avenues: delay the firearms transaction, and if the person is actually a terrorist, the FBI can arrest them for any crime for which there is probable cause, and in addition, the FBI can intervene and directly confront the individual.

The FBI can also put the suspect on what’s called around-the-clock surveillance. My question: Aren’t these some of the tools available to the FBI to stop a suspected terrorist from buying a gun?” Grassley asked.

“Mr. Chairman, you’re right,” said Comey. “There are a variety of things that we do when we are notified that someone on our known or suspected terrorist database is attempting to buy a firearm.

“The FBI is alerted when that is triggered, and then we do an investigation, understand, are there disqualifiers that we’re aware of that could stop the transactions, and if the transaction goes through, the agents who are assigned to that case, to that subject are alerted to it so they can investigate,” Comey added.

“Thank you very much for that clarification,” said Grassley. “So there are then actually many things that can be done, done right now to stop one, someone on the no-fly list from buying a gun, and that leads me to say that our president is misrepresenting the facts and misleading the American people on that point.”

To sum that up for you, there already is an existing law that is meant to stop suspected terrorists  from being able to purchase a weapon freely.

Obama is continually trying to feed you lies, just like with the “gun show loophole”  so he can support his argument to pass more laws for gun control which in the long run are not going to make any significant change.

Help your friends learn about these lies which are spread throughout our  country on a daily basis, and share this post!

Featured Image Source H/T : Consjournal

Read more…

Do Not Talk to Me About Honor and Integrity!’ Steve Bannon Savages Entire Romney Clan After Mitt’s Insult to Vietnam Vet Roy Moore

Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon

unleashed a stream of indignation at failed presidential

candidate Mitt Romney after Romney impugned West Point-

grad and Vietnam veteran Roy Moore’s “honor and integrity”

Tuesday.

“What did [Mitt Romney] say yesterday? … That judge Moore lacked honor and integrity and that’s why he couldn’t vote for him?” Bannon asked the audience in a packed Fairhope, Alabama barn who had come to support Judge Moore’s U.S. Senate bid.

Despite currently holding no elected office or position in the Republican Party, Romney jumped into the Alabama U.S. Senate race Monday to undermine Moore’s campaign, tweeting, “Roy Moore in the US Senate would be a stain on the GOP and on the nation. Leigh Corfman and other victims are courageous heroes. No vote, no majority is worth losing our honor, our integrity.”

The tweet incensed Bannon. “Judge Moore is a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point,” he said. “Judge Moore served his country in one of the toughest wars we ever had, in Vietnam.”

That’s honor and integrity, Mitt,” Bannon said, calling out Romney directly. “And while we’re on the subject of Vietnam, and honor, and integrity, you avoided service, brother.”

Bannon then launched into an extended takedown of the entire Romney family’s failure to serve:

Mitt, Mitt, here’s how it is brother. The college deferments … we can debate that … but you hid behind your religion. You went to France to be a missionary while guys were dying in rice patties in Vietnam. Do not talk to me about honor and integrity!

And now I’m gonna get personal. You ran for commander-in-chief. You had five sons. Not one day of service in Afghanistan and Iraq. We have 7,000 dead and 52,000 casualties. Where were the Romneys during those wars?

You want to talk about honor and integrity brother? Bring it. Bring it here to Alabama! You have the guts to get on the stage with a man who served in Vietnam and you expect us to believe “honor and integrity?” Judge Roy Moore has more honor and integrity in the pinky finger than your entire family has in its whole DNA!

This did not, however, prove to be the end of Bannon’s riposte to Romney. He then tied the entire affair back to Romney’s shocking disavowal of his successor as Republican presidential nominee at the critical juncture of the 2016 campaign. Similar to his comments about Judge Moore, Romney, in March of 2016, called Trump, who had wholeheartedly endorsed him four years earlier, a “fraud” and a “phony.” Eight months later Donald Trump did what Romney could not despite two attempts: win the presidency of the United States.

“[Romney’s] still bitter about Donald Trump,” Bannon told the crowd in the barn. “Embrace it, Mitt. He is President of the United States and commander-in-chief of the armed forces, something you so miserably failed at.”

Bannon and Romney have come repeatedly into conflict as Mitt tries to relaunch his political career as the leader of so-called “Never Trump” Republicanism. Reports have named Bannon as one of the primary obstacles preventing Romney from doing so with a Senate bid of his own in Utah.

Read more…

Dr. Gina Loudon in Alabama Sends ‘Message to the Swamp: We Don’t Take Orders from You!’

Dr. Gina Loudon harkened back to the first days of the Tea Party in Alabama as she rallied supporters of Alabama candidate for U.S. Senate Judge Roy Moore and told the Washington, DC, swamp that Alabamans don’t take orders from them.

From a barn in Fairhope, Alabama, Loudon spoke of the serious decision that Alabamans have to make in the next week, a decision that she said she knows they don’t take for granted. “I’ve heard your serious thoughts on this matter,” said Loudon. “I know that you want to do right by God, by Alabama, and by your country because that’s what you do here in Alabama.”

Loudon recalled her many years in Alabama, a place she considers home.

She told the crowd that she knew they had thought hard, listened, assessed, evaluated, and “have rejected the lies of the swamp that have lied to you for all these years.” She declared that they all would stand and elect Roy Moore on December 12.

advertisement

Loudon spoke of her days as a media surrogate for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. She called on the crowd’s memory of that time, the polls, the accusations — “doesn’t this feel just a little bit like that?”

Dr. Loudon continued:

We were asked to care more about the interests of the elite than we were to care about our own families, our own loved ones, our own states, and our own countries, but we rejected them then. We reject them now, and we will keep rejecting them until they finally understand that we don’t answer to them — we never have and we never will, and December 12 will show them.

“Mitch [McConnell], we’re talkin’ to you,” she said.

She commented on the $32 million spent against Moore in the primary election and the four decades that he has spent in public service. She remarked at the oddity that it was hearing criticisms come up against him in these final days after all those years of silence.

Loudon then turned to the hard-working, business-owning, some struggling, “strong women of Alabama.” She asked rhetorically, “Why in the world would you listen to the party of abortion-on-demand about how much they care about women?” In the reference to the Democratic Party, she added, why would they listen to the party that defended letting Kate Steinle’s killer back into the U.S. five times, the “party of [Sen. John] Conyers, [former Congressman Anthony] Weiner, [former President Bill] Clinton, right? [Sen. Al] Franken…”

“Why would you listen to them about your own decision in this election,” said Loudon. “I know the women of Alabama are just plain smarter than that.”

She recalled for the Alabama crowd being introduced to Steve Bannon by Andrew Breitbart “at the very birth of our Tea Party. In those days, and many of you were there, we birthed a movement.”

“Who would have thought that eight years later we would have the House, the Senate, and one doggone fine president?” said Loudon.

She closed with a quick look back, then looked forward:

[Bannon] was there with Judge Moore from day one, he was there with our president from day one. He never faltered, and he was there with us from day one of this movement, and it is up to us to deliver this victory, to continue this legacy that we started all those years ago, knowing that days like this would come, but knowing that we could keep winning because we’re going to make America great again together. You’re going to elect Judge Moore on December 12, and I am going to be really proud of my sweet home Alabama.

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2990&v=z1AT1W

Follow Michelle Moons on Twitter @MichelleDiana

Read more…

NFL Open Letter from U.S Marine

From a Marine
Semper Fi🇺🇸

Commissioner,
I have been a season ticket holder at Yankee Stadium, Yale Bowl and Giants Stadium.

I missed the 1990-91 season because I was with a battalion of Marines in Desert Storm. Fourteen of my wonderful Marines returned home with the American Flag draped across their lifeless bodies. My last conversation with one of them, Sgt Garrett Mongrella, was about how our Giants were going to win the Super Bowl. He never got to see it. Many friends, Marines and Special Forces Soldiers who worked with or for me through the years returned home with the American Flag draped over their coffins.

CLICK HERE TO GET YOUR FREE HAT

Now I watch multi-millionaire athletes who never did anything in their lives but play a game, disrespect the brave Americans who fought and died protecting something much greater than a piece of inflated pigskin in a safe controlled environment.

They are essentially spitting in the faces on the graves of real men who have actually done something for this country besides playing with a ball and believing they’re something special! They’re not!

My Marines and Soldiers were!
You are complicit in this!

CLICK HERE TO GIVE A GIFT OF TRUMP

You’ll fine players for large and small infractions but you lack the moral courage and respect for our nation and the fallen to put an immediate stop to this.

Yes, I know, it’s their 1st Amendment right to behave in such a despicable manner. What would happen if they came out and disrespected you or the refs!

I observed a player getting a personal foul for twerking in the end zone after scoring. I guess that’s much worse than disrespecting the flag and our National Anthem. Hmmmmm, isn’t it his 1st Amendment right to express himself like an idiot in the end zone?

Why is taunting not allowed yet taunting America is OK? You fine players for wearing 9-11 commemorative shoes yet you allow scum on the sidelines to sit, kneel or pump their pathetic fist in the air. They are so deprived with their multi-million dollar contracts for playing a freaking game! You condone it all by your refusal to act. You’re just as bad and disgusting as they are. I hope Americans boycott any sponsor who supports that rabble you call the NFL. I hope they turn off the TV when any team allows this disrespect to occur without consequence on the sidelines. I applaud those teams with respect for their country, their flag and themselves.

Order HERE

Legends and heroes do NOT wear shoulder pads. They wear body armor and carry rifles. They make minimum wage and spend months and years away from their families. They do it 24/7 often with lead, not footballs, coming in their direction. They watch their brothers carted off in pieces not on a gurney to get their knee iced. They don’t even have ice! Many return home at the end of the day with no arms or legs.

Some wear blue and risk their lives daily on the streets of America. They wear fire helmets and go into fires rather than down to safety. On 9-11 hundreds vanished. They are professionals. They are heroes.

I hope that your high paid protesting pretty boys and you look in that mirror when you shave tomorrow and see what you really are…legends in your own minds. You need to hit the road and take those worms with you!

Time to change the channel.

Col Jeffrey A Powers USMC (Ret)
Vista, California

 

Read more…

Latest revelations make the entire ‘collusion’ probe look like a partisan hit

So Peter Strzok wasn’t just a top investigator for special counsel Robert Mueller until he was axed for anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias: He was also a major player in the Hillary email probe and the FBI work that led to the “collusion” investigation.

And Mueller and the FBI both dragged their feet on sharing key info about all this with Congress.

Including the news that Strzok was the one who changed then-FBI chief Jim Comey’s draft language on Clinton’s use of that private server from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in the final version.

That’s huge, because the statute specifies that gross negligence in the handling of classified info is itself a crime, whatever the intent — though Comey declared that Clinton shouldn’t face prosecution precisely because she had no “intent” to break the law.

Strzok also conducted the FBI interviews of Clinton and her top aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, in the email probe.

in-art-close-icon-128x128.png

–– ADVERTISEMENT ––

opt-out-icon2.png
unmiss-sound-button-muted.svg

More, he was reportedly one of the major FBI figures urging investigations on the basis of the “Steele dossier” of Russian-sourced scurrilous anti-Trump allegations, which we now know was commissioned by the Clinton campaign.

More, he signed the documents that opened the ensuing “collusion” probe. And he led the FBI interview of Gen. Mike Flynn, in which Flynn told the lies that eventually forced him out as Trump’s national security adviser, and for which he’s now pleaded guilty in a deal with Mueller.

Meanwhile, Mills and Abedin’s testimony in their interviews has been shown false in one major regard: Contrary to their denials, each had been well aware of Clinton’s private server — they had to deal with the office fallout whenever it went down. Unlike Flynn, though, they never faced charges for lying to federal investigators.

Which makes President Trump’s request to Comey to go easy on Flynn look reasonable enough.

The public doesn’t know just how egregious Strzok’s bias was, and won’t until the release of his texts with his mistress, an FBI lawyer who (sigh) was also on Mueller’s team.

But as things stand, it now looks like the fix was well and truly in on the Hillary probe. Far worse, it also looks like the “collusion” probe was a partisan hit from the start — which undermines the basis for Mueller’s own investigation.

What a mess.

Read more…

Report Details Links Between Georgetown Univ’s Islamic Studies Dept and Radical Islam

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

georgetown-696x464https://creepingsharia.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/georgetown-696x464.jpg?w=150 150w, https://creepingsharia.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/georgetown-696x464.jpg?w=300 300w, https://creepingsharia.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/georgetown-696x464.jpg 696w" sizes="(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px" />

Georgetown University, the United States’ oldest Catholic university, now a bastion of radical islam?

via New Report Details Links Between Georgetown University’s Islamic Studies Department and Radical Islam – The Georgetown Review

The Georgetown Review secured a report from academic watchdog Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum, that details troubling financial and ideological connections between Georgetown’s various Middle East studies faculty and Islamism, anti-Western scholarship, and anti-Semitism dating back to the 1970s.

Entitled “Islamists, Apologists, and Fellow Travelers: Middle East Studies Faculty at Georgetown,” the report segments the professors at the center of the Campus Watch investigation into two categories, the “old” and “new” guard, and illustrates the questionable ideological and political affiliations of the field’s most prominent staff.

Among these employees is John Esposito, the founding director of the Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding (ACMCU). According to Campus Watch, Esposito began the program’s transition to radicalism. For example, in 2005, Esposito secured a $20 million gift from Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal to support and expand the Center’s mission. Since this donation, ACMCU has been criticized as a “magnet for Arab and Muslim money,” as the Center developed ties to individuals and organizations directly involved in Islamic terrorism. These include convicted Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas Operative Azzam Tamimi and his Institute for Islamic Political Thought, and Hamas Spokesman Ahmad Yusuf.

Esposito has also tweeted links to vicious articles attacking a now-late Holocaust-survivor for being “anti-Palestinian” as well as claiming that Israeli soldiers have used Palestinian children as “soccer balls.” He has praised Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who has expressed repeated support for suicide bombing, including against American service members in Iraq.

Fast forward to today and the current director, Jonathan Brown, has not simply cemented Esposito’s poisonous legacy, but extended it. Our readers might remember Jonathan Brown as the professor who defended Islamic slavery and rape in early 2017. Brown is also a signatory to the Religious Studies Scholars Statement of Solidarity with the Palestinians BDS Movement and the 2014 Academic Boycott of Israel letter.

The report argues that this increasingly biased focus contradicts the Center’s mission of creating a free and open dialogue between faiths. In order to remedy this polarization and to combat anti-Semitic tendencies, Campus Watch calls for Georgetown University to adhere to academic integrity with the presentation of rigorously derived, unbiased information to its students; the certainty that funds given to the Middle East studies departments are promoting non-partisan scholarship; and a reining in of anti-Semitic and anti-American ideologies.

Read more…

Read more…

Southern Poverty Law Center Refuses to Label Antifa a Hate Group

The Southern Poverty Law Center refuses to label the left-wing extremist organization antifa a hate group.

The SPLC’s “hate map” features groups and organizations that it classifies as hateful according to its own criteria. On this map, people can find the U.S. Border Patrol and the Family Research Council.

However, the antifa label is nowhere to be found, The Washington Times reported.

Although there are countless videos demonstrating the left-wing extremist organization’s violent behavior and rhetoric, SPLC president Richard Cohen believes that antifa doesn’t demonstrate hate.

“If you are familiar with our work, we write about antifa often,” Cohen said Thursday in a testimony he gave to the House Homeland Security Committee. “We condemn their tactics — I’ve said so publicly and we do so always — but antifa is not a group that vilifies people on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion and the like.”

Pennsylvania Republican Scott Perry told the SPLC during Cohen’s testimony on domestic terrorism that the SPLC “reduces” their “credibility” by refusing to add antifa to their list of hate groups.

“So you’re OK with antifa as long as they don’t say things that you don’t agree with, but it’s OK if they hit people on the head with a bike lock or set things on fire or riot and flout the law by wearing face masks and incite riots — you’re OK with that?” Perry asked.

Cohen responded by stating: “We condemn groups like antifa, we write about them often. We don’t list them as hate groups.”

When asked about why the SPLC doesn’t include groups such as the Students for Justice in Palestine who have reportedly advocated for violence against Jewish people on their list, Cohen responded with the following.

“I don’t know about that particular group,” he said. “We try to call hate as we see it. We limit our list not by left versus right but by groups that vilify others for factors such as race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion or the like.”

Virginia Republican Rep. Thomas Garrett then pointed out that leaders of the SPLC almost exclusively donate to Democrats, prompting the possibility that liberal influence may seep its way into the SPLC’s decision making processes.

“The liberal tradition is an inclusive one,” Cohen said. “Hate is the opposite of that liberal tradition of inclusivity. So it’s not surprising to me that people at the SPLC, people at other inclusive organizations tend to give money to liberal organizations. It seems obvious to me.”

Although Cohen and the SPLC have refused to label antifa as a hate group, there have been multiple examples of its members espousing extremely violent behavior and rhetoric.

In the video that can be seen below, an antifa member identified as Eric Clanton can be seen hitting a Trump supporter with a bike lock.

Michael Isaacson, a professor at John Jay College and self-proclaimed antifa member, also tweeted a horrific statement aimed at his students.

“Some of ya’ll might think it sucks being an anti-fascist teaching at John Jay College but I think it’s a privilege to teach future dead cops,” Isaacson wrote, as reported by the New York Post.

Isaacson was reportedly suspended in September after pressure was put on the college to dismiss him. (For more from the author of “Southern Poverty Law Center Refuses to Label Antifa a Hate Group” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/12/southern-poverty-law-center-refuses-la

Read more…

Supreme Court allows full enforcement of Trump travel ban

  • The Supreme Court is allowing President Donald Trump's latest travel ban on six Muslim-majority nations to go into effect.
  • Two of the nine justices — Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor — dissented.
  • The ban applies to travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen.
Published 19 Hours Ago Updated 18 Hours Ago
The U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court rules travel ban can go fully into effect   19 Hours Ago | 01:27

The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to fully enforce a ban on travel to the United States by residents of six mostly Muslim countries.

This is not a final ruling on the travel ban: Challenges to the policy are winding through the federal courts, and the justices themselves ultimately are expected to rule on its legality.

But the action indicates that the high court might eventually approve the latest version of the ban, announced by President Donald Trump in September. Lower courts have continued to find problems with the policy.

Opponents of this and previous versions of the ban say they show a bias against Muslims. They say that was reinforced most recently by Trump's retweets of anti-Muslim videos.

"President Trump's anti-Muslim prejudice is no secret. He has repeatedly confirmed it, including just last week on Twitter. It's unfortunate that the full ban can move forward for now, but this order does not address the merits of our claims," said Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Immigrants' Rights Project. The ACLU is representing some opponents of the ban.

Twitter

Just two justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, noted their disagreement with court orders allowing the latest policy to take full effect.

The new policy is not expected to cause the chaos that ensued at airports when Trump rolled out his first ban without warning in January.

The ban applies to travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. Lower courts had said people from those nations with a claim of a "bona fide" relationship with someone in the United States could not be kept out of the country. Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.

The courts were borrowing language the Supreme Court itself came up with last summer to allow partial enforcement of an earlier version of the ban.

Now, those relationships will no longer provide a blanket exemption from the ban, although visa officials can make exceptions on a case-by-case basis.

The justices offered no explanation for their order, but the administration had said that blocking the full ban was causing "irreparable harm" because the policy is based on legitimate national security and foreign policy concerns.

In lawsuits filed in Hawaii and Maryland, federal courts said the updated travel ban violated federal immigration law. The travel policy also applies to travelers from North Korea and to some Venezuelan government officials and their families, but the lawsuits did not challenge those restrictions. Also unaffected are refugees. A temporary ban on refugees expired in October.

All the rulings so far have been on a preliminary basis. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, will be holding arguments on the legality of the ban this week.

Both courts are dealing with the issue on an accelerated basis, and the Supreme Court noted it expects those courts to reach decisions "with appropriate dispatch."

Quick resolution by appellate courts would allow the Supreme Court to hear and decide the issue this term, by the end of June.

Read more…

by Lanny Carruthers:

Well what do you know…a rogue FBI agent recently released from the special counsel investigation has been released by Robert Mueller and been reassigned to the human resources office.  It also has been uncovered that he may have sabotaged the Clinton email investigation which former FBI Director James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch described as a “matter”.  Yesterday in The Trump Times I wrote an article regarding the rogue agent asking how he may have compromised the Clinton email investigation.  Well now we know.  If you have not had time to read the article, here are the questions I posed:  “Will Mueller’s team credibly investigate what actions Strzok may have taken that stonewalled or compromised the Clinton email investigation?  Was Strzok involved in the investigation of Clinton Foundation bribery by foreign governments?  Did Strzok violate any code of conduct regulations of the FBI?  What did James Comey know and when did he know it?  After all the special prosecutor has been given authority to examine “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.” This revelation has opened up Pandora’s Box in relation to potential FBI corruption, FBI integrity, bad news for Mueller’s reputation and investigation.”

FREE TRUMP 2020 HATS

NOW…it has been uncovered that Strzok changed wording in Comey’s draft describing Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless.”  The law regarding “gross negligence” in handing of classified information is as follows:

18 U.S. Code § 793 (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Give the Gift of TRUMP

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

At this point I believe James Comey needs to delete his Twitter account, because this blows his credibility out of the water with a stick of dynamite.  This outs James Comey as another rogue agent, undermines any credibility he had left, and forever batters his already tarnished reputation.  Sad state because I always thought James Comey was a good cop until the gross negligence in handling of the Clinton email investigation.

While I hate popcorn I am tempted to pop a bag, recline back in my recliner and watch the fireworks that should provide a good show.  Otherwise, we will know the Mueller Investigation was a dud from the beginning.

 

Read more…

Read more…

More Anti-Trump Messages Reportedly Sent By Members Of Mueller's Team: "A Lot More Is Going To Come Out"
Tyler Durden's picture
by Tyler Durden
Dec 5, 2017 8:23 AM
1.5K
SHARES
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit

Days after it emerged that former Special Counsel investigator Peter Strzok was fired from Robert Mueller's Trump-Russia probe in August for sending anti-Trump text messages to his mistress while the two were working together on the Clinton email investigation, Sara Carter of Circa told a Fox News panel that there are more anti-Trump messages sent by Mueller's team floating around.

Carter previously emerged as one of the handful of people to review documents obtained by an undercover FBI informant embedded in the Russian uranium industry. Appearing on Hannity's show Monday night, Carter was asked about rumors of more anti-Trump sentiment expressed by Mueller's team:

Sean Hannity: I’m hearing rumors all over the place Sara Carter that there are other anti-Trump text-emails out there. And we know about them.

Sara Carter: I think you’re hearing correctly Sean and I think a lot more is going to come out. In fact, I know a lot more is going to come out based on the sources I’ve spoken to.

Video http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-05/more-anti-trump-m

Tangentially, it has been widely reported that Mueller's special counsel is stacked with investigators who have donated to Obama, Clinton or other Democrat causes. As Jessica McBride reported in Heavy:

Andrew Weissmann: Weissmann is a Barack Obama and Democratic campaign donor, according to federal records. “Weissmann, who led the Enron investigation, previously gave $2,300 to Obama’s first presidential campaign in 2008 and $2,000 to the Democratic National Committee in 2006
Jeannie Rhee: donated $5,400 to Hillary Clinton in 2015 and 2016, according to FEC records. The records show she gave $2,500 each to Obama for America and Obama Victory Fund 2012 in 2011
Andrew Goldstein: According to Fox News, “Goldstein contributed a combined $3,300 to Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012”
Greg Andres: FEC records show that Andres has donated at least $2,700 to Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
James Quarles: Donated thousands of dollars to the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. He has also donated money recently to other Democrats, including Friends of Chuck Schumer and two other Democrats. He has a lengthy donation history dating back years. He did donate to two Republicans over the years, however.
Elizabeth Prelogar: A former law clerk to Justics Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagen, gave $250 to Hillary Clinton in 2016, according to FEC records. She also gave $500 total to Obama for America and the Obama Victory Fund 2012.
Brandon Van Grack: gave small amounts to ActBlue, an effort to raise money for Democrats, and to a Democratic candidate for Congress in 2012. In 2008, he gave about $286 to Barack Obama.
Rush Atkinson: donated $200 to Clinton’s campaign in 2016.
Kyle Freeny: In 2012, Freeny gave $300 to Obama. In 2008, Freeny also gave $250 to Obama, FEC records show.

Trending Articles
China Deploys Jets To South China Sea, As US Simulates War…

Late last week, China for the first time confirmed the of its J-11B jet fighters to the heavily disputed South China…

Powered By

To review: veteran FBI agent Peter Strzok, working under James Comey, headed up both the Clinton email investigation and the Trump-Russia probe before Mueller's special counsel was created to take the reigns. Strzok - who was responsible for changing the FBI's opinion of Clinton's mishandling of classified info from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," - had an extramarital affair with FBI lawyer Lisa Page while the two were working on the Clinton "matter." During the investigation, Strzok sent Page anti-Trump / pro-Clinton text messages, which resulted in the dismissal of both Strzok and Page from Mueller's Trump-Russia probe. Strzok now works in the FBI's HR department.

Strzok's conduct during the Clinton email investigation and any other politically charged cases he's worked on, are now being investigated by the DOJ's Office of Personel Management the results of which, per Sara Carter of Circa, will be coming out in December and January.

Moreover, as we reported earlier today, House Speaker Paul Ryan accused the DOJ and FBI of "stonewalling" the House Intelligence Committee's wide-ranging subpoena related to the "Trump dossier," along with the fact that the FBI appears to have willfully tried to conceal the reason for Strzok's reassignment from the committee.

Meanwhile, upon being blindsided with this information and publicly embarrassed, Intel committee chairman Devin Nunes was understandably less than pleased.

In a statement issued Sunday, Nunes announced a serious escalation: His committee, he said, is preparing to hold Andrew McCabe and assistant AG Rod Rosenstein in contempt for the DOJ's failure to comply with Nunes's subpoena. He also accused the FBI and the DOJ of willfully refusing to comply with an Aug. 24 subpoena in part by refusing the committee's request "for an explanation of Peter Strzok's dismissal from the mueller probe."

“By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress’ constitutional oversight responsibility. This is part of a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this Committee’s oversight work, particularly oversight of their use of the Steele dossier. At this point, these agencies should be investigating themselves.

“The DOJ has now expressed—on a Saturday, just hours after the press reports on Strzok’s dismissal appeared—a sudden willingness to comply with some of the Committee’s long-standing demands. This attempted 11th-hour accommodation is neither credible nor believable, and in fact is yet another example of the DOJ’s disingenuousness and obstruction. Therefore, I have instructed House Intelligence Committee staff to begin drawing up a contempt of Congress resolution for DOJ Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray. Unless all our outstanding demands are fully met by close of business on Monday, December 4, 2017, the committee will have the opportunity to move this resolution before the end of the month."

It now appears that the FBI will have even more explaining to do as evidence of additional anti-Trump bias among members of Mueller's investigation appear to be on the horizon...

Read more…