Somali Muslims Take Over Small Tennessee Town And Force Absolute HELL On Terrified Christians

( Muslims do not assimilate! They infiltrate! )

WATCH: Liberal Scumbag Steps on American Flag, Look Closely How Our Troops Respond

Entitled liberal haters claim they mean no disrespect to our military and our men and women in uniform. They just don’t like the policies of the…

riseagainamerica.com

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rW0h58Dh09s

Comment

Obama Rigged Deal To Secretly Smuggle US Uranium To Europe, Asia

Posted on November 3, 2017 by Rick Wells in Foreign Policy, Globalism World Govt, Obama, Organized Leftist Opposition, Political Corruption, Soveriegnty, Take Our Country Back // 0 Comments

Obama manipulated the deal to provide a method of secretly transporting the Uranium One uranium out of the US, to Canada, Europe and Asia despite promises otherwise…

The interview with John Solomon of the Hill and Sarah Carter exposes another false claim that was made by the Obama regime and others who stood to benefit from the Uranium One deal, that none of our uranium would be exported outside of the United States.

Solomon says that claim is “definitely disproven,” there’s not any doubt that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission authorized, through a back door, a third party license to let Uranium One export to Canada and then according to the Department of Energy records and according to a statement that Uranium One gave us, some of that uranium left Canada and went to Europe and possibly to Asia.”

Asked if we know where in Europe or Asia, Solomon replies that we do not, that “it’s proprietary information, the final destinations, at least so far, we’ve not been able to get that.”

He notes that they’ll keep digging but says “The most important point is we’re a country that has to import most of our uranium. Here’s uranium in the United States and for some reason we let it go to Canada and possibly to Europe and beyond.

He notes those were the concerns of lawmakers who objected at the time, and the assurances they were given are now exposed as lies. Hannity questions Solomon on another aspect of his reporting which links Hussein Obama directly to the nefarious deal.

Hannity says, “Barack Obama purposely manipulated the process to allow this trucking company to be the conduit by which they got the uranium out of the country.” Solomon explains there were a series of decisions made by the Obama administration, time and time again between 2010 and 2012, that are incredibly favorable to Rosatom, the state owned Russian nuclear energy industry.”

He notes, “Time and again these decisions are being made while the FBI knows that there is criminality going on by that company’s executives.” Hannity injects the examples of “bribery, extortion, money laundering, racketeering and so on.”

Solomon continues, “And there’s a second thing that I’m just starting to report out now but there were also concerns in the Obama administration, very specific concerns that Russia was engaged in a uranium scheme, that it was going to get enough control of Uranium, dump it on the market, drive all the prices down and put all the other people out of business.”

He says, “Those are two legitimate national security concerns that don’t seem to have an effect on all of these giveaways. Sara Carter also has troubling information about a Department of Energy employee that she shares.

Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells at https://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/, https://gab.ai/RickRWells, https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RickwellsUs and on my website http://RickWells.US

When the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation published their inaugural survey on American attitudes toward socialism and communism last year, the results revealed some very disturbing trends in American society.

Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation (VCMF), a D.C.-based nonprofit were startled to see that one out of every two millennials in the United States say they would rather live in a socialist or communist country than a capitalist democracy such as the United States.

VCMF Reports:

This year’s centennial anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution has caused many to reflect on communism’s place in our collective memory. It has been a full century since Vladimir Lenin’s Bolsheviks seized power in Petrograd and communism made its bloody debut on the world stage. Authors, activists, and politicians alike are asking the question: what has America learned from one hundred years of communism?

The answer? Apparently, not much.

When the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation published our inaugural survey on American attitudes toward socialism and communism last year, the results revealed some disturbing trends in American society.

We discovered a rampant amnesia about the crimes of communist regimes and a growing inclination among younger Americans toward favorable views of communism and socialism.

This week we completed our second annual study, tracking how opinions about communism among Americans have changed since 2016. The results are not encouraging.

For starters, as of this year, more Millennials would prefer to live in a socialist country (44%) than in a capitalist one (42%). Or even a communist country (7%). The percentage of Millennials who would prefer socialism to capitalism is a full ten points higher than that of the general population.

The significance of this finding cannot be overstated—as of last year, Millennials surpassed Baby Boomers as the largest generational cohort in American society.

The largest generation in America would prefer to live under socialism or communism than under a free market system that respects the rule of law, private property, and limited state intervention. This finding is coupled with the fact that, despite Millennials’ enthusiasm for socialism and communism, they do not, in fact, know what those words mean.

U.S. Senator Demands Communist West Point Graduate Be Removed

Our study indicates that the attraction of socialism for Millennials has less to do with their familiarity with the ideology and more to do with their discontent with the current economic system, the flaws of which they blame on free-market capitalism.

At 53%, Millennials reported the highest levels of discontent with the American economic system and indicated their belief that the American free enterprise system worked against them. Seven in ten Americans felt that the highest earners in America do not pay their fair share. Half of them indicated that increased taxes on the rich are the way to solve inequality, while 37% advocated for a “complete change of the American economic system.”

One remarkable finding of our survey is that over two thirds of Americans favor absolute protections for free speech, regardless of their views of communism or socialism. This is good news and indicates that the violent protests and intimidation of guest speakers on American college campuses is not widely sanctioned behavior.

Communists in particular and socialists more broadly have historically and ideologically favored state regulation of the press, speech, and voluntary association.

Our results suggest that Millennials who favor socialism and communism have not thoroughly considered the implications of their stated political beliefs.

Given the apparent growing preference for socialism, one might think that Millennials would be familiar with the world’s newest socialist country—Venezuela.

Unfortunately, Americans are as ignorant of the developing situation in socialist Venezuela as they are of the definition of socialism itself. Six out of every ten Americans surveyed were wholly unfamiliar with Venezuela’s socialist dictator, Nicolás Maduro, and the economic crisis and human rights abuses that have occurred under his rule.

So, 100 years after the Bolshevik Revolution, the majority of the largest generational cohorts in America show great enthusiasm for socialism while completely failing to correctly identify its definition when asked or examine its consequences. It gets worse.

Seven in ten Americans drastically underestimate the number of people killed at the hands of communist regimes over the last century. This is unsurprising, given the fact that half of all Millennials say they have never heard of Mao Zedong, a man whose policies killed nearly 60 million people, making him the greatest mass murderer of the twentieth century.

Unfortunately, these data points are not the only indication of the pervasive ignorance in the West regarding communism’s legacy of fear, genocide, and destruction. This year, communist ensigns emblazoned with hammer and sickle waved opposite Nazi flags in Charlottesville. Ireland issued stamps of Ernesto “Che” Guevara—a racist, homophobic murderer—as thousands gathered in Cuba, Bolivia, and Argentina on the 50th anniversary of his death.

A West Point cadet and Afghanistan veteran wore Che’s image in uniform while publicly proclaiming that “communism will win.” Violent, militant groups on the far left intimidate and antagonize in the name of “anti-fascism” and are praised in the media for doing so. News outlets publish articles extolling the virtues of life under communism, pointing out “all the good things” that communism accomplished.

Meanwhile, communist China’s leader—newly christened the most powerful man in the world—rules the most populous nation on earth with an iron fist while his underlings proclaim him the new Mao Zedong. At home, he uses force and intimidation to consolidate his power while denying his people the most basic human rights. Abroad, he uses deceit, misinformation, and cyber espionage to shut down publishing houses and drown out critical voices while engaging in the most ambitious imperial project since the Soviet Union’s “Evil Empire” days.

Communism isn’t back:  It never left. We simply forgot about it. And as it rears its ugly head once more, openly and shamelessly, we seem far less prepared to meet the ideological challenge in this century compared to the last.

A communist revolution in 1917 launched the bloodiest century in human history. In 2017, we have all but forgotten the appalling legacy of this gruesome ideology. We continue to be led astray by the false promises, the mendacious rhetoric, and the ignorant romanticizing of history’s most effective death cult.

Thankfully, there is a silver lining. Compared to last year, more Millennials now think communism is still a problem today. Additionally, Millennial favorability toward communist figures like Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, and Che Guevara has dropped over the past year. Meanwhile, America’s youngest generation—Generation Z—exhibits an appreciation of individuality and a deep mistrust of collectivism in all its forms, especially that of communism. Having come of age after the Great Recession, they are frugal, entrepreneurial, and confident that the American economic system works in their interest.

Despite this positive trend, America’s youngest generation is still largely ignorant of the crimes of communist regimes or how Marxist ideology directly enables such atrocities.

If we want to truly put this horrific ideology on the ash heap of history, we have a responsibility to warn a new generation of Americans about its dangers. We have a responsibility to tell the truth.

Within the inaugural survey, the data is very revealing.

The key findings found:

• The First-of-its-kind YouGov Poll Shows “Bernie Sanders Bounce” for Collectivism
• Surprising Support for Socialism and Communism Among Younger Americans
• 45% of 16-20 year olds would vote for a “Socialist”; 21% for a “Communist”
• One-third of Millennials Believe George W. Bush Killed More People Than Stalin
• Vast Majority Unaware of Communism’s Death Toll
• More Millennials Prefer Words of Karl Marx Over the Bible
• Bernie Sanders’ Philosophy Wins More Support Than Milton Friedman’s

News

White QB Tackled By Black Teammates For Not Kneeling Just Made Shocking Admission About What Else They Did To Him

( People still support kind of behavior by still going to the games and watching on T.V. )

It’s the twenty first century, year 2017, and I am still surprised how things like this still happen and are relevant. Things have escalated very quickly, as a white quarterback suffered a season-ending injury due to extreme racism on the field.

The attitude of black players in the NFL over the past month is getting out of hand. The protests have taken a racist turn, as they are giving black power salutes, inspired by Michael Bennett, a player from The Seattle Seahawks.

Except Derek Carr, all of Oakland Raiders’ players are black. He was the only one from his team that stood proud for the national anthem, as his entire offensive line sat it out.

The talk among the black players who sat out the anthem was, “If he [Carr] wants to stand alone for the National Anthem, he can stand alone on the field.”

The players who needed to protect Carr were not doing their job after the protest. He went on to be sacked four times in a row and had sustained a season-ending injury.

Football is an aggressive sport and we shouldn’t be blaming the other team’s players, after all they were doing their job. It’s Carr’s teammates who are in the wrong, not shielding him and leaving him alone in the field, that attitude lead to Derek sustaining a career-ending fractured spine.

The game came to a complete stop when Carr took a vicious hit. The medics rushed in to help him, but he wasn’t moving at all. He was carried away to a medical tent as the fans were in complete shock to what just occurred.

The Ringer:

“Carr was scrambling in the backfield trying to avoid a sack from multiple Broncos defenders when, falling toward the ground, it appeared he took a knee in the back from Broncos defensive end Adam Gotsis. Carr stayed down on the field before heading to the blue medical tent on the sideline, and eventually the locker room.”

Throwing a game is illegal, and the black players of the Seahawks could go in jail for that, said TV Host Bill O’Reilly later in the broadcast.

Carr’s injury can’t be ruled out as coincidental, because of what his teammates said about leaving him alone on the field. We hope that Carr recovers as soon as possible.

LORETTA LYNCH PLEAD THE FIFTH A WHOPPING 74 TIMES DURING CONGRESSIONAL HEARING

Brazile revelation tears at Democratic scab

Democrats struggling to rebuild their party after their stunning 2016 presidential defeat were dealt another blow on Thursday: Donna Brazile’s acknowledgement that the Democratic National Committee tipped the scales in favor of Hillary Clinton during last year’s primary.

In a surprising excerpt from her upcoming book, Brazile, who took over the DNC on an interim basis last year after Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (R-Fla.) stepped down as chair, criticized the agreement between Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the DNC meant to keep the party financially viable.

The arrangement, she wrote in a book excerpt published in Politico, was “not illegal, but it sure looked unethical.” 

“If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before voters had decided which one they wanted to lead,” Brazile wrote. “This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.” 

Democratic circles were abuzz on Thursday after Brazile’s piece was published because, as one former Clinton aide put it, “it poured buckets of salt on the wounds” of the party.

“It's another episode of the 2016 soap opera everyone wishes was over, that’s for damn sure,” said Tracy Sefl, a Democratic consultant who served as a surrogate to the Clinton campaign during the 2016 race. 

Democrats appearing on cable television on Thursday were asked about Brazile’s revelations, and entered the unending fight.

Asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper if the Democratic Party was indeed rigged for Clinton, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) offered a simple “Yes.”

Sanders aides and supporters said Brazile’s admission proved that they were right all along when they said the DNC was tipping the scales in favor of Clinton. 

Jeff Weaver, who served as Sanders’s former campaign manager, called the DNC actions “egregious” and “undemocratic” in an interview with CNN’s Brooke Baldwin.  

“It can’t be allowed to happen again,” Weaver said. 

“Let me tell this to the elites who today still control much of the Democratic Party apparatus: If you do not open up the party, if you do not allow the people in, if you do not advocate for the types of reforms that we need, you will be destroying the opportunity we have to take on Donald Trump,” Weaver cautioned. 

In the interview, Weaver hinted that the DNC’s behavior could have prevented Sanders from ultimately vying against Donald Trump. 

“There is no doubt that he would have defeated Donald Trump,” he said.

A Clinton spokesman did not return a request for comment. 

Wasserman Schultz ducked reporters in the Capitol on Thursday, stepping into an elevator and referring questions to her office. Her office issued a brief statement, attributed to the congresswoman, that ignored all of the charges lodged by Brazile.

 

"It was a tremendous honor to be asked by President Obama to serve as chair of the DNC. I am proud of the work our team did to support Democrats up and down the ballot in the 2016 election and to re-elect the President in 2012," the statement read. 

 

"With Donald Trump in the White House, Democrats must stay focused on enacting a progressive agenda to protect our citizens, our values and our democracy and remain united towards our goal of electing Democratic congressional majorities in 2018."

The Brazile excerpt comes as tensions between the Clinton and Sanders camps linger.

Multiple Democrats have talked to The Hill about how those tensions complicate the party’s efforts to rebuild.

In her new book, Clinton accused Sanders of inflicting damage on her campaign. And Clinton supporters were miffed when Sanders was asked to speak at a women’s event in Detroit last month. 

“The problem is, some Hillary people still can’t accept the reality that she was a flawed candidate, so they’re trying to blame it on anybody else just like she did in her book,” Bill Press, a Sanders surrogate and radio talk show host, said in an email to The Hill. (Press a regular columnist for The Hill.) 

Sanders aides appearing Thursday generally sought to take the high road.

Weaver in his interview with Baldwin repeatedly said it was important for Democrats to move on and unify in opposition to Trump's policies.

Press argued that that Sanders is “doing the right thing” by refusing to “get drawn into Hillary bullshit, while criss-crossing the country in support of progressive candidates and helping rebuild the Democratic Party.” 

But when it comes to putting the pieces back together, Democrats say they’re concerned about how the party will unify.

“I think it’s a problem. It really is,” said Brad Bannon, a Democratic strategist. “It’s going to make it that much harder to come together. And now that there’s confirmation that this actually went on, it makes it increasingly difficult to incorporate the Bernie people."

“And I don’t blame them either,” Bannon added. “Now there’s confirmation of it, and they have every right to be angry about it because they knew it all along.” 

This story was updated at 8:54 a.m. to include a statement from Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.).

NY Deputy Police Commissioner: “This isn’t about Islam, this isn’t about the mosque he attends”

November 1, 2017 9:59 pm By Robert Spencer 88 Comments

Sayfullo Saipov screamed “Allahu akbar” as he murdered people. Why did he do that? Does John Miller understand what the significance of that cry in the context of a jihad attack is? How can he be so sure that this is not about Islam, when Saipov himself associated his act with Islam?

Video https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/11/ny-deputy-police-commissioner-this-isnt-about-islam-this

And how does Miller know that this isn’t about the mosque he attends? How does he know the mosque didn’t exhort Saipov to commit an act of violent jihad for Allah? Is that a possibility that is just too politically damaging for the de Blasio administration to contemplate?

54 mins

Democratic National Chair candidate, Tom Perez, addresses the audience as the Democratic National Committee holds an election to choose their next chairperson at their winter meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. February 25, 2017. REUTERS/Chris Berry - RC1FEF045460

White men need not apply.

That’s the message from a Democratic National Committee data services  manager, currently on the hunt to filll multiple vacancies in the tech department.

–– ADVERTISEMENT ––

The political organization, which routinely makes grand statements about inclusion, recently sent an email to its employees looking to recruit people for eight open spots including IT Systems Administrator, Product Manager and Chief Security Officer.

Though the Oct. 30 email says that the DNC is looking for a “staff of diverse voices and life experiences,” it apparently doesn’t mean white men.

DNC’s Data Service Manager Madeleine Leader purportedly wrote in an email that the desire for diversity excludes “cisgender straight white males.”

Leader adds, “I personally would prefer that you not forward to cisgender straight white males, as they are already in the majority.”

Cisgender is a term for people whose gender identity matches the sex that they were assigned to at birth.

“The email in question was not authorized by the DNC nor was it authorized by senior leadership," spokesman Michael Tyler told Fox News. "All hiring decisions at the DNC are made consistent with the DNC’s commitment to equal employment opportunity and hiring an inclusive and talented staff that reflects the coalition of the Democratic Party, because our diversity is our greatest strength.”

News

“The Democrat Party is America’s Largest Hate Group” – Look Rush Limbaugh Go After Democrats

By

Conservative Flag

Published on November 1, 2017

The liberal left is more vengeful than ever! The bitterness they show, the hatred are just illustrating their level of desperation. That is because of every election loss so far.

When talking about someone from the conservative right, liberals often use words that would describe the most horrible and wicked demon imaginable, and not another human being with a different opinion.

Rush Limbaugh is a host on the Conservative radio talk show. In his Tuesday broadcast he made an observation about liberals that explains what liberals weren’t able to identify themselves.

As recounted in Breitbart News:

Tuesday on his nationally syndicated radio show, conservative talker Rush Limbaugh pointed out the mood of the Democratic Party, which he described as resentful and unhappy, and noted liberal comedians are “consumed by hatred.”

This combination of negative emotions according to Limbaugh has made the Democratic Party “the largest hate group” in the country.

Partial transcript as follows (courtesy of RushLimbaugh.com):

“Let me tell you something, folks. There is an inescapable observation and conclusion, and it is this.

You have to look very hard — and you have to spend a long time looking — to find a genuinely happy or content left-wing political person. Whether they’re an activist or not.

If they’re engaged in any way, shape, manner, or form of politics, they’re not happy, no matter what. When they elected Obama, they got angrier. They got more enraged. After every success they have, nothing is ever enough. No amount much success ever makes them happy

Look at what they’ve done in the area of marriage. They’ve completely defeated it. There’s never any real laughter, happiness or contentment. It isn’t healthy just seeing a constant level of rage. They can’t be sustained. With this degree of rage and hatred we see in the American left today, a healthy mind and hearth can’t be sustained.

Mr. Rush has always been clever, and has been outsmarting liberals.

Their attitude is becoming a serious issue, violence becomes justified in their minds when they don’t win elections.

They don’t seem happy, and want to shove their disrespect down the throats of anyone who dares to disagree with them, even when they get their way

This attitude can’t go on. Eventually the result will be a torn up America.

ISLAM

It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you

NOT EVEN 12 HOURS have passed since the latest Islamic terrorist attack in NYC, and the media already are making Muslims the “victims”

November 1, 2017 by BareNakedIslam 1 Comment

Sharia-compliant media’s main concern is that Muslims in America again must brace for an anti-Muslim backlash (which rarely happens) following the Halloween Jihad attack in New York City. Despite the fact that an “Allahu Akbar” shouting Muslim slammed a truck into innocent people, killing 8 and injuring 12 more, can the cries of “it had nothing to with Islam”  be far behind?

Umer Ahmad, a 43-year-old Muslim-American physician from New Jersey, was in his Trenton office when he heard that a rented pickup truck had deliberately driven down a bike path in Lower Manhattan, killing eight people and injuring about a dozen more.

Muslims are forbidden to celebrate Halloween, or any other non-Islamic holiday for that matter, so staging a terror attack on the infidel ghosts and goblins is the next best way to participate…I’d imagine.

“My initial reaction was, obviously, concern and shock over what happened,” Ahmad told NBC News. “And then, basically, I was wondering if it was a Muslim who did it.”

The suspect was identified as an Uzbek immigrant named Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov, 29, who entered the United States in 2010, law enforcement officials said.

Saipov hopped out of the truck and shouted “Allahu Akbar,” or “God is great,” before firing a BB or pellet gun, four senior law enforcement sources said. Law enforcement sources said he left a note in the truck claiming he committed the attack for the Islamic State terrorist group.

Trick or Treat?  KABOOM!

“My biggest concern is that he’s readily identified as a Muslim and then that is extrapolated out to my own faith,” he said.

In the wake of Tuesday’s attack, some Muslim Americans and community leaders expressed concerns over how their religion would be perceived and whether Muslims would become targets of violence.

“There has been a history of, sort of, blowback, and that’s obviously going to be something that people think about,” said Ali Najmi, a board member of the Muslim Democratic Club of New York.

Ahmad, the physician, said he worried about backlash every time an attack like Tuesday’s happens. But “I feel I’m more worried about what the response from political leadership would be,” he said.

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QITMUllp2g0

New York: ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ Plan Resubmitted Years After Protests

Never forget, the jihad is relentless. Source: ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ Plan Resubmitted Years After Protests – Tribeca, NY Patch

FINANCIAL DISTRICT, NY — New plans for a Muslim cultural center in the Financial District have been filed, years after the original proposal spurred backlash from opponents furious that the site was so close to the site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Sharif El-Gamal, the developer behind the project, this time plans a smaller center than the 15-story building he had originally envisioned at 51 Park Place. El-Gamal, the founder of Soho Properties, is currently working on a luxury condominium tower at neighboring 45 Park Place.

An application filed with the city’s buildings department last week outlines a plan for a “new education and exhibition and gallery building” that would be 5,000 square feet. It doesn’t include a mosque. Real Estate Weekly was first to report on El-Gamal’s new plans.

The developer had originally designed it to be community space similar to the 92nd Street Y, the Jewish community center that hosts a variety of public events.

The planned center, which was previously named Park51, caused a backlash after the plans were first announced in 2010. The center was nicknamed the “Ground Zero Mosque” and found a vocal opponent in current President Donald Trump.

Trump, at the time a real estate developer in New York City, said that it would be “wrong” for the cultural center to be built on Park Place and offered $20 million to buy the property. (For more information on this and other neighborhood stories, subscribe to Patch to receive daily newsletters and breaking news alerts.)

The application filed last week did not have additional details about the cultural center. People working on the project did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Patch seeking more information.

El-Gamal told the New York Times in May that he still planned to build the cultural center, saying that the smaller space would still accomplish his original vision.

“We are still building an Islamic museum and sanctuary,” he told the newspaper.

Video: Robert Spencer on Ingraham Angle on the NYC truck jihad massacre

November 1, 2017 9:51 am By Robert Spencer 13 Comments

Last night I appeared briefly on Fox’s Ingraham Angle to discuss the jihad massacre perpetrated by Islamic jihaist Sayfullo Saipov in New York City. Ingraham gave the deceitful and oleaginous Islamic supremacist Harris Zafar ample time to spread his dawah and to do his best to silence me, but I got a few words in.

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k46EnsEFDlE

VIDEO Pamela Geller to Geraldo Rivera: Why Should I ‘Pat on the Back’ Muslims Who Don’t Want to Kill Me?

Fatwa: Hunted in America

67

I was on Hannity this evening and things got pretty heated between Islamic apologist Geraldo Rivera and me:

Pamela Geller to Geraldo Rivera: Why Should I ‘Pat on the Back’ Muslims Who Don’t Want to Kill Me?

Mediaite, October 31, 2o17:

On Tuesday night, things got heated between Pamela Geller and Geraldo Rivera in the wake of the terrorist attack that took place this afternoon in New York City.

The feud began when Rivera claimed that the NYPD had the “best surveillance,” but Geller insisted it was “dismantled” by CAIR and Mayor Bill de Blasio.

“They’ve been disarmed,” Geller said. “Last week, a jury convicted a Muslim jihadi in a plot to behead me in an ISIS-inspired attack.”

Rivera shot back saying this was the first successful terrorist attack in NYC since 9/11.

“When you guys talk about Muslims being the devil,” Rivera continued, “you overlook the fact that––”

“Who said that?” Geller interrupted. “Why do I have to pat on the back every Muslim that doesn’t want to kill me? I expect that. We’re not talking about ‘all Muslims.’ We’re talking about jihadis. Stop conflating them together. Stop broad brushing Muslims all as jihadis.”

Rivera then mentioned how 4% of the U.S. population is Muslim, which Geller called “irrelevant.”

“What you have to do now is good police work, good surveillance, pass those sections of the Patriot Act that have lapsed,” Rivera said.

“They’ve been dismantled,” Geller repeated. “NYPD had to dismantle their counterterrorism program. Thank you, Mayor de Blasio. Remember that in the election booth.”

Watch the clip above, via Fox News.

Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNSKBxHxTA0

Rachel Rahabi shared Rachel Cohen's post.
2 mins

WE MUST FIGHT FOR OUR YOUNG. Please have all become informed and involved now @ "Choose to Refuse Common Core". https://www.facebook.com/groups/CHOOSETOREFUSECOMMONCORE/.
Please SHARE this post from my personal page if "share" option not available.
Rachel Cohen
3 hrs

In Middle school, my son was taught about "Islam" for 3 weeks.
AMERICA, we must halt the ISLAMIST indoctrination of our youth now.
Like
Show more reactions