john lillpop's Posts

Open Letter to Under/Unemployed Americans: Barack Obama Owes You an Apology!

Posted by john lillpop on June 14, 2011 at 10:30am

Open Letter to Under/Unemployed Americans: Barack Obama Owes You an Apology!

By John W. Lillpop

Dear Fellow American Citizens:

President Barack Obama and his Democrat party colleagues in Congress owe an apology to each and every Citizen who is unable to find work or whom is working below his/her capabilities.

For in your hour of need, this Administration and Congressional Democrats are actively working against you, perhaps unwittingly, but nonetheless with devastating consequences.

Barack Obama has never had to meet a payroll in his life. He simply does not understand, or respect, the fundamentals of free enterprise.

Even worse, Obama’s arrogance and hostility toward U.S. private enterprise is unprecedented in U.S. history.

This president, as well as most Democrats, believes that government creates good-paying, secure jobs. The fact is that private enterprise, and only private enterprise, can create job opportunities.

Barack Obama’s old-school liberalism has driven him to wage war against the very people who could, if not hindered by taxes and excessive regulation, create the high-paying jobs that every talented and ambitious American citizen deserves.

His non-stop rants against business and the Chamber of Commerce, in conjunction with his refusal to curb spending and face America’s debt crisis, are major reasons why business owners are reluctant to take risk and invest in new employees.

Barack Obama simply does not get it when it comes to business. In his warped way of thinking, business is bad, while greedy, corrupt labor unions are fine.

In Obama’s madness, the profit motive is always suspect. He apparently believes that government has a duty to use the tax code to “level the playing field” as it were, and to take from the “rich” in order to enrich the poor.

Barack Obama refuses to admit that government can best help the economy and the jobs situation by simply getting the hell out of the way and letting the barons of profit go to work!

Another example of Obama’s betrayal of American workers concerns his obsession on behalf of illegal aliens. Given his choice, Obama would grant amnesty to 12-20 million illegal aliens, with little or no regard for how that might impact American citizens struggling with employment issues.

Building the base of the Democrat Party by pandering to invaders who should not even be here is more important to Barack Obama than advocating of behalf of American citizens!

In 2009, Barack Obama saddled the American people with a “stimulus bill,” which cost nearly 1 trillion dollars. At the time that he signed the bill, President Obama promised that this bill would create or save 3-4 million American jobs.

Obama was so convinced that the stimulus was the right thing to do that he and fellow Democrats shoved the bill through will little or no debate. According to Obama, the economic crisis was too urgent to waste time on debate.

Three plus later, unemployment is still over 9 percent and the economy appears to be going from bad to worse, due in part to foolish spending like the stimulus bill.

Now, Obama declares that, “Recovery will take more time,” as the American people grow more and more frustrated with his failed economic policies.

Perhaps if he had taken an appropriate amount of time in 2009, America could have solved the vexing unemployment problem long ago.

Again, Barack Obama has been a full-time enemy of the under and unemployed American citizen.

His tenure must end in 2012—for your sake and that of the nation as a whole

Charles Rangel Brilliant Defense of Weiner: “At least He Wasn’t going out With Little Boys!”

Posted by john lillpop on June 13, 2011 at 11:19am

Charles Rangel Brilliant Defense of Weiner: “At least He Wasn’t Going out With Little Boys!”

By John W. Lillpop

Leave it to Charles Rangel, self-anointed moral ombudsman for the Democrat Party, to come up with an argument in favor of Anthony Weiner that may save the other disgraced New York Democrat from House banishment and perhaps worse.

Rangel’s brilliant argument, terse but tough, consisted of the following quotable quote, “At Least He(Weiner) didn’t go out with little boys!”

Hmmm.

Just how can you be sure, Charlie? Remember, the Weiner scandal started out as a third-rate hack job by a pervert, according to Weiner. It then escalated to an admitted bit of “foolishness” on Weiner's part, but not worthy of headline news or resignation.

The next shoe to drop was the news that Weiner was somehow involved, digitally, with a 17-year-old girl in Cyberspace chit chat, none of which was inappropriate or salacious.

According to Weiner, that is.

To say that Weiner’s recent record with respect to the truth is somewhat tainted would be akin to saying that Congress spends too much! The obvious is, well—too damn obvious.

Still, there is a bit of good news that Charlie could have used to defend the wayward Weiner: At least he did not cheat on his taxes!

What say ye, Charles?

While Napolitano Calls Profiling of Muslims Illogical, TSA Focuses on Mentally Disabled!

Posted by john lillpop on June 12, 2011 at 7:30am

By John W. Lillpop

The most serious challenge to America’s home land security is surely the “progressive” policies of the Obama Administration, particularly as articulated by Janet Napolitano, the leftist in whom President Obama has imprudently entrusted the well-being of over 300 million of we the people.

Secretary Napolitano once again defied common sense by declaring that the profiling of Muslim men under 35 was “illogical” as a tool for preventing terrorist attacks. She made her remarks at a forum on U.S. security and preventing terrorist attacks, as reported, in part, at reference 1.

While Big Sis was regaling forum attendees with her homeland security expertise, TSA agents in Detroit were headed in another direction as described, in part, at reference 2:

A Detroit father said agents with the Transportation Security Administration singled out his special-needs son for a pat-down while the family was headed to Disney World, MyFoxDetroit.com reported, an incident that the TSA admitted was a “case of bad judgment.”

David Mandy said agents at Detroit Metro Airport took his son Drew, 29, and asked him about the padding underneath his pants, which turned out to be adult diapers. Drew, who is severely mentally disabled, had trouble understanding the agents’ orders because his family said he has the mental capacity of a 2-year-old.

When the father tried to intervene and explain Drew’s disability, he said the two agents said, “Please, sir, we know what we’re doing.”

The agents confiscated a six-inch plastic hammer, something Drew had carried with him for 20 years for comfort. Agents called it a security threat, his father said, adding that they tapped the wall with it and said, “See, it’s hard. It could be used as a weapon.”

The family was told they’d have to ship the hammer if they wanted to keep it, David Mandy said.

“I understand they’re trying to keep people safe,” Mandy said told MyFoxDetroit.com. “But come on, does he look like a terrorist?”

In a statement to FoxNews.com, the TSA said it’s reviewing the incident but early findings indicate this was an “isolated case of bad judgment.” The TSA reached out to the Mandy family to apologize and said the man’s toy hammer should have never been confiscated.”

ISOLATED case of bad judgment?

In fact, with folks like Janet Napolitano running TSA, bad judgment is the rule, rather than the exception.

Another outrage that the American people need to “get used to,” Mr. President?

Ref 1
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/06/09/napolitano_no_logic_in_profiling_muslim_men_under_the_age_of_35.html

Ref 2
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/national/TSA-Admits-Bad-Judgment-After-Disabled-Man-Subjected-to-Airport-PatDown_54930533

Napolitano Calls Profiling of Muslims “Illogical,” TSA Focuses on Mentally Disabled!

John W. Lillpop

San Jose, California

Media Witch Hunt Backfires, Boosts Palin’s Public Image!

Posted by john lillpop on June 11, 2011 at 8:46am

Media Witch Hunt Backfires, Boosts Palin’s Public Image!

By John W. Lillpop

With a sitting member of the U.S. House guilty of distributing self-serving pornography on the Internet, with the President of the United States guilty of several high crimes and misdemeanors, including an illegal war, for which he should be removed, and with the Democrat Party acting in unison to drive America into the moral and economic abyss of a third-world disaster, one would suppose that the e-mail doings of a former governor and failed candidate for the vice presidency would be of scant interest to mainstream media.

However, the personage of Sarah Palin always draws huge crowds, even if only for the purpose of ridiculing and dismissing the lovely lady from Alaska.

The great news is that the media lust for Palin- blood appears to have backfired smack dab back into the faces of the leftist lunatics who were salivating at the prospect of culling through Palin’s e-mail and finding evidence of corruption, greed, stupidity, political malfeasance, rampant scandal, and other juicy details that would send Sarah Palin into hiding until well after the 2012 elections.

It was a public lynching that the media were hoping to promote, and these jackals were betting all that Palin’s e-mail would lead them to the goodies, which they could twist, distort, and exploit in order to effect a brutal political assassination of a dreaded conservative.

Unfortunately for the dim-witted editors and reporters from the New York Times and other equally disgusting branches of the DNC posing as “independent” journalists, Sarah Palin is one of the few women in national politics with the courage and stamina to bark back at the so-called journalists.

She is also an honorable woman of integrity, unlike, say, Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and other Democrat women who are nearly as despicable as they are dumb!

So after culling through boxes and boxes of Palin e-mails, just what have the Lords of Mistruth and Deceipt discovered?

Well, while Anthony Weiner, Charles Rangel, and John Edwards were busy photographing their own “junk,” evading income taxes, and using campaign contributions to cover-up adultery, Governor Palin was engaged in fulfilling her responsibilities to the good people of Alaska.

No corruption, no scandal. No crotch photos, no abandonment of one’s spouse dying of cancer for satisfying lustful matters of flesh, no tax evasion.

In sum, Sarah was just Sarah—Governor of Alaska, thank you!

Pity that the New York Times and other media whores wasted so much money on travel, living, and booze just to prove that Sarah Palin is exactly whom she claims to be: One hell of a good American!

Anthony Weiner and the “Peter Principle”

Posted by john lillpop on June 10, 2011 at 4:43pm

By John W. Lillpop

As defined at the reference,

“The Peter Principle states that "in a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence", meaning that employees tend to be promoted until they reach a position at which they cannot work competently. It was formulated by Dr. Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull in their 1969 book The Peter Principle, a humorous [1] treatise which also introduced the "salutary science of hierarchiology”

Has there even been a more profound example of the Peter Principle than the beleaguered Anthony Weiner?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle

Great News: Alabama Now Has Nation’s Toughest Immigration Law!

Posted by john lillpop on June 9, 2011 at 12:53pm

To:

Great News: Alabama Now Has Nation’s Toughest Immigration Law!

By John W. Lillpop

There has been a recent run of great news in America’s war to end the invasion of illegal aliens, mostly from Mexico.

As reported at the link, the great state of Alabama has just enacted the toughest immigration law in America:

Republican Governor Robert Bentley on Thursday signed into law a crackdown on illegal immigration in Alabama that both supporters and critics consider the toughest in the nation.

Under the new measure, police must detain someone they suspect of being in the country illegally if the person cannot produce proper documentation when stopped for any reason.

It also will be a crime to knowingly transport or harbor someone who is in the country illegally. The law imposes penalties on businesses that knowingly employ someone without legal resident status. A company's business license could be suspended or revoked.

The law requires Alabama businesses to use a database called E-Verify to confirm the immigration status of new employees.

"We have a real problem with illegal immigration in this country," Bentley said after signing the law. "I campaigned for the toughest immigration laws and I'm proud of the Legislature for working tirelessly to create the strongest immigration bill in the country."

Alabama is the latest state to follow the lead of a controversial measure passed in Arizona last year. The courts blocked implementation of a provision allowing Arizona police to check the immigration status of people there.

But the U.S. Supreme Court recently endorsed a separate Arizona law requiring employers to use E-Verify. The court also ruled that Arizona could suspend or revoke business licenses of those companies that knowingly hire illegal immigrants.

Alabama's law is unique in requiring public schools to determine, by review of birth certificates or sworn affidavits, the legal residency status of students.

Kudos to Alabama lawmakers and governor for injecting common sense and pro-American thought into this issue!

Ref: http://beta.news.yahoo.com/alabama-governor-signs-nations-toughest-immigration-law-160234529.html

Weinergate” Stifles Democrats' Chortling Over Win in NY-26th

Posted by john lillpop on June 9, 2011 at 8:48am

“

By John W. Lillpop

Just what the hell is going on with men in the US House from the state of New York? An obsession with removing one’s clothing, photographing one’s self (including private parts), and posting inappropriate photos on the Internet seems to have overwhelmed members from both parties.

First it was Christopher Lee, a Republican, Representative of the 26th New York congressional district, who used the Internet and e-mails to circulate a bare-chested photo of himself.

Lee’s lack of discretion forced him to resign from the House, which then led to a special election on May 24 in which Democrat Kathy Hochul emerged the winner. That result was touted as a referendum of Paul Ryan’s proposed budget cuts and was celebrated by Democrats far and wide.

The Democrats’ celebration included disgusting displays of chortling and gloating.

Then another New York member of the House was discovered to be lacking even a smidgen of modesty. Thus began the “Weinergate” scandal involving Anthony Weiner, a Democrat, who exposed much more of himself than a bare chest.

Weiner apparently photographed his genitals and, for whatever reason, decided that his Junk was worthy of Tweeting.

Unlike the Republican Lee, Democrat Weiner has refused to resign although several prominent Democrats have urged him to do so.

Meanwhile, all of the chortling and gloating from the Left has been replaced with horror, anger, and denial over Weiner's insane self-promotion.

Anthony Weiner has, at least for now, offset the Republican loss in the 26th District.

YOUR Share of Non-funded Federal Spending Commitments: $527,000!

Posted by john lillpop on June 8, 2011 at 4:37am

YOUR Share of Non-funded Federal Spending Commitments: $527,000!

By John W. Lillpop

The next time Barack Obama, Harry Reid, or Charles Schumer warns against “extreme” measures proposed by the GOP to deal with the spending-debt crisis, remind him of the following, as reported as the reference, in part:

“The federal government's financial condition deteriorated rapidly last year, far beyond the $1.5 trillion in new debt taken on to finance the budget deficit, a USA TODAY analysis shows.

The government added $5.3 trillion in new financial obligations in 2010, largely for retirement programs such as Medicare and Social Security. That brings to a record $61.6 trillion the total of financial promises not paid for.

This gap between spending commitments and revenue last year equals more than one-third of the nation's gross domestic product.

Medicare alone took on $1.8 trillion in new liabilities, more than the record deficit prompting heated debate between Congress and the White House over lifting the debt ceiling.

Social Security added $1.4 trillion in obligations, partly reflecting longer life expectancies. Federal and military retirement programs added more to the financial hole, too.
Corporations would be required to count these new liabilities when they are taken on — and report a big loss to shareholders. Unlike businesses, however, Congress postpones recording spending commitments until it writes a check.

The $61.6 trillion in non-funded obligations amounts to $527,000 per household. “

-------------------------------------

These startling facts should make it plain that entitlement reform WILL HAPPEN. The only question is whether the reform will be orderly and peaceful, or will the entitlement programs simply stop sending money out at some point?

Is America headed for chaos in the streets?

It’s pay me now or pay me later—not paying is not an option!

Anthony Weiner Does Not Belong in the U.S. Congress!

Posted by john lillpop on June 7, 2011 at 8:33am

In addressing “Weinergate,” Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Chair of the DNC said, “I think Anthony Weiner is dealing with a personal matter and that’s where it should be left.”

That myopic view might make sense if Weiner was employed in a menial calling involving little or no public responsibility.

However, Anthony Weiner is NOT working in a menial job, not yet, that is.

Rather, Weiner has been elected to serve the people of New York as a member of the United States Congress.

Serving in the “People’s House” is a major honor for those selected, but it involves responsibility for deciding on major issues facing the nation.

Issues such as whether or not to declare war, whether or not to adopt ObamaCare, how best to reduce the soaring deficit, and other vital matters facing Americans.

In other words, being a member of Congress requires sound JUDGEMENT.

When politicians run for high political office, the voting public assumes that the candidate will exercise mature, wise and prudent judgement.

Listening to Anthony Weiner sob his way through his second mental breakdown in less than one week, one was struck by his immaturity, lack of wisdom, and imprudent judgement.

One would expect an immature ten-year-old boy just discovering the wonders of sex to photograph his own genitalia, to Twitter said photo throughout cyberspace, and to engage in lust-laden e-mails and phone conversations on Facebook and other social networks.

But a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives who also just happens to be married?

Even lefty partisans like Wasserman Schultz must find such behavior bizarre and outrageous. Intoleraable!

In the coming ethics investigation, Congressional leaders must demand an answer to the following question:

Why in the hell did Anthony Weiner find it necessary to wander throughout cyberspace for sexual adventure when he is married to a drop-dead beautiful, well educated and sophisticated young lady waiting for him at home?

Are there other deep, dark psychological problems haunting Weiner?

Regardless of the exact details, Anthony Weiner is not fit to serve in the United States Congress.

He must go, and now!

John W. Lillpop

Another Immoral Democrat Melts Down: "Weinergate" Ends in Tear and Defiance!

Posted by john lillpop on June 6, 2011 at 3:06pm

Another Immoral Democrat Melts Down: "Weinergate" Ends in Tear and Defiance!

By John W. Lillpop

After several days of “Weinergate” drama, the U.S. Congressman who claimed that the release of a lewd photo from his Twitter account was an obvious “hack” job, has finally admitted what was perfectly obvious to everyone else in the world: The entire episode was conceived and executed by Anthony Weiner himself.

That is right, the same left-wing nut ball who fancies himself a suitable person to preside over the city of New York and its 14 million inhabitants.

As reported, in part, at the reference:

Embattled Rep. Anthony Weiner admitted to posting lewd photos of himself on Twitter at a Monday afternoon press conference.

While addressing the media at the Sheraton Hotel in Midtown Manhattan, Weiner made the following statement:

“Last Friday night I tweeted a photograph of myself that I intended to send as direct message as part of a joke to a woman in Seattle. Once I realized I posted it to Twitter, I panicked, I took it down and said that I had been hacked. I then continued with that story to stick to that story which was a hugely regrettable mistake.”

Weiner apologized to the Seattle student, who was on the receiving end of the tweet. “To be clear, the picture was of me and I sent it. I am deeply sorry for the pain this has caused my wife Huma and our family, and my constituents, my friends, supporters and staff,” Weiner said.
In addition, the congressman said that “over the past few years I have engaged in several inappropriate conversations conducted over Twitter, Facebook, email, and occasionally on the phone with women I have met online.”

Weiner said he “exchanged messages and photos of an explicit nature with about six women over the last three years.” He said “most” of the communications took place before his marriage, but admitted some took place afterward.

Weiner also said he would not resign and that he did not believe that he did anything that broke the law. Weiner said it was a mistake but that he was trying to protect his wife.

“This was a mistake and I am very sorry for it and take it very seriously,” he said.

When asked if he would split from his wife, Weiner said he loved his wife very much and that they would not split.”

Hold on there, Weiner! When it comes to Huma, why not let the Lady speak for herself? With her drop-dead beauty and connections, surely she can do better than being manacled to a 46-year-old going on 12?

Furthermore, Weiner claims that all of his sexual communiqués were with adult women, those over 18, although he admits that it is conceivable that some of his tweets were with ladies who “fibbed” about their age.

Hmm. Surely law enforcement will check that all out and advise the beleaguered if criminal culpability exists—right?

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/06/06/shirtless-photos-allegedly-of-anthony-weiner-posted-on-biggovernment-com/

Open Letter to Speaker Boehner:Common Sense “Investment” in America

Posted by john lillpop on June 6, 2011 at 11:46am

Open Letter to Speaker Boehner

Speaker John Boehner
Office of the Speaker
H-232 The Capitol
Washington, DC 20515

Subject: A Common Sense “Investment” in America

Dear Speaker Boehner:

Given the unprecedented debt facing our nation, it is obvious that putting our financial house in order will require sacrifice from virtually all Americans. We understand that there are no simple, painless solutions.

Although spending cuts will impact scores of millions of American citizens, there is an outrageous expense that benefits foreign invaders, those with no legal or moral basis for being here.

I refer to many millions of illegal aliens who have ignored our borders and immigration laws.

As documented in Reference 1, illegal aliens cost American taxpayers $113 billion a year.

Again, illegal aliens, cost American taxpayers $113 billion a year.

As a taxpaying citizen, I wonder why politicians from both sides of the aisle refuse to target this wasteful expense, particularly when our nation is mired in deep financial crisis?

Surely, $113 billion a year cannot be too paltry an amount to summon the attention of those responsible for eradicating wasteful spending?

Clearly, the American people would benefit enormously if the federal government would simply enforce existing laws and take action, through deportations, to return illegal aliens to their nations of origin.

In the past, skeptics have argued that mass deportations would be too costly.

However, Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs, Nelson Peacock, responding to request from several U.S. Senators, recently (December 3, 2010) wrote the following:

“Our conservative estimate suggests that ICE would require a budget of more than $135 billion to apprehend, detain and remove the nation’s entire illegal immigrant population.”

See reference 2 for the complete statement.

Thus, an investment of $135 billion dollars would yield a savings of $113 billion a year.

Over a period of ten years, that would result in more than $1 trillion dollars for American citizens.

In addition, millions of jobs now filled by illegals would be available for unemployed America citizens, and homeland security would be strengthened by removing individuals about whom little or nothing is known, including possible ties to terrorists.

I know that you are committed to eliminating wasteful spending, reducing the federal deficit, creating jobs for Americans, and assuring that our homeland is safe and secure.

Therefore, I respectfully request that you apply your influence and power to require that illegal aliens be deported, thereby freeing America from the extreme financial, employment, and security dangers attendant with a huge population of illegals.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

John W. Lillpop
San Jose, CA

Reference 1:

1http://www.fairus.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=23198&security=1601&news_iv_ctrl=1741

Reference 2

http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/dhs-confirms-cheaper-to-deport-every-illegal-alien-than-allowing-them-to-stay

Should Obama Pardon Anthony Weiner?

Posted by john lillpop on June 6, 2011 at 5:30am

Satire By John W. Lillpop

Although Anthony Weiner has yet to be charged with any crime(s) for his political boner and abuses via Twitter, it is just a matter of time before the law comes crashing down on the pathetic little weasel, Weiner.

Indeed, despite howls of anguish from the Left, it does not appear as though “Weinergate” will Peter-out any time soon. In the parlance of the media, the story has “legs,” to say nothing of other body parts also making headlines on a daily basis.

In an ominous sign that the bombastic little weenie is in deep doo-doo, entirely of his own making, powerful elitists from the Intellectual Left have circled the wagons around their beloved pervert.

Among the high-profile Loon-iares who have rushed to defend Weiner are Bill Maher, Jon Stewart, Charles Schumer, and the most comical of all, the amazing Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Chairwoman of the DNC, who added depth with this brilliant analysis:

“I think Anthony Weiner is dealing with a personal matter and that’s where it should be left.”

Hmmm. Just a personal matter between Weiner and 45,000 of his closest, most trusted Twitter pals, huh? And a young college student in Washington state?

The Wasserman Schultz blahering bears an eerie resemblance to the specious double-talk issued by the Left when President Bill Clinton perjured himself about his sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky.

It is all about “Consensual Sex” they ranted, ignoring the fact that Slick Willie was guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice, serious crimes even when just about sex.

As luck would have it, Weiner’s need for divine intervention just happens to correspond quite nicely with Barack Obama’s desperate need for a post-Osama “bounce” in light of the dreadful employment numbers, crumbling economy, declining dollar, and other devastating impact of Obamanomics.

After flaking out on Israel so miserably recently, Obama also needs to mend fences with the Jewish community.

What better way to do that than by officially pardoning the weiner Weiner, one of the most prominent Jews in American politics?

Obama can add to his mending fences initiative by appointing Weiner to represent the U.S. government in opposing San Francisco’s insane anti-circumcision measure that voters will vote on this Fall.

After all, the measure is an unconstitutional, anti-Semitic usurping of federal responsibility because it involves “Tampering with the U.S. male,” a real no-no.

The bottom line: Obama should pardon Weiner, Wasserman Shultz should stuff a sock in her silly mouth, and San Francisco should be ceded to Russia and/or China!

And most importantly, this burning question must be answered: Is Anthony Weiner gay?

Should Obama Pardon Anthony Weiner?

Posted by john lillpop on June 5, 2011 at 7:21pm

Satire By John W. Lillpop

Although Anthony Weiner has yet to be charged with any crime(s) for his political boner and abuses via Twitter, it is just a matter of time before the law comes crashing down on the pathetic little weasel, Weiner.

Indeed, despite howls of anguish from the Left, it does not appear as though “Weinergate” will Peter-out any time soon. In the parlance of the media, the story has “legs,” to say nothing of other body parts also making headlines on a daily basis.

In an ominous sign that the bombastic little weenie is in deep doo-doo, entirely of his own making, powerful elitists from the Intellectual Left have circled the wagons around their beloved pervert.

Among the high-profile Loon-iares who have rushed to defend Weiner are Bill Maher, Jon Stewart, Charles Schumer, and the most comical of all, the amazing Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Chairwoman of the DNC, who added depth with this brilliant analysis:

“I think Anthony Weiner is dealing with a personal matter and that’s where it should be left.”

Hmmm. Just a personal matter between Weiner and 45,000 of his closest, most trusted Twitter pals, huh? And a young college student in Washington state?

The Wasserman Schultz blahering bears an eerie resemblance to the specious double-talk issued by the Left when President Bill Clinton perjured himself about his sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky.

It is all about “Consensual Sex” they ranted, ignoring the fact that Slick Willie was guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice, serious crimes even when just about sex.

As luck would have it, Weiner’s need for divine intervention just happens to correspond quite nicely with Barack Obama’s desperate need for a post-Osama “bounce” in light of the dreadful employment numbers, crumbling economy, declining dollar, and other devastating impact of Obamanomics.

After flaking out on Israel so miserably recently, Obama also needs to mend fences with the Jewish community.

What better way to do that than by officially pardoning the weiner Weiner, one of the most prominent Jews in American politics?

Obama can add to his mending fences initiative by appointing Weiner to represent the U.S. government in opposing San Francisco’s insane anti-circumcision measure that voters will vote on this Fall.

After all, the measure is an unconstitutional, anti-Semitic usurping of federal responsibility because it involves “Tampering with the U.S. male,” a real no-no.

The bottom line: Obama should pardon Weiner, Wasserman Shultz should stuff a sock in her silly mouth, and San Francisco should be ceded to Russia and/or China!

And most importantly, this burning question must be answered: Is Anthony Weiner gay?

Stuck on Stupid in San Francisco in the War on Illegal Aliens

Posted by john lillpop on June 5, 2011 at 5:53am

.

Stuck on Stupid in San Francisco in the War on Illegal Aliens

By John W. Lillpop

San Francisco has a well-deserved (and appropriate) reputation as a nesting place for left-wing buffoons, anti-American politicos (Can you say Nancy Pelosi?), and just plain goofy, out-of-touch policies.

For example, take the issue of ILLEGAL immigration. Illegal capitalized because that vital word is almost always omitted by moon bats on the left who favor open borders, suspension of the rule of law, and anything and everything in the way of benefits and perks for anyone who can prove that she or he is here illegally and prove it by speaking absolutely no English, but perfect grade-school Spanish.

The latest anti-American immigration fiasco in not-so-good old San Francisco involves the conflict between the Sanctuary City status prescribed by City law and the federal law called Secure Communities.

As described at the reference, in part, San Francisco Sheriff Mike Hennessey has decided that City Law trumps federal law at least in this bastion of leftist maniacs:

SAN FRANCISCO -- If the San Francisco sheriff's plan becomes reality, illegal immigrants arrested for petty crimes won't be held in jail longer than necessary, even if federal immigration agents may want them detained for possible deportation.

Instead, starting Wednesday, deputies will treat those eligible for release just like U.S. citizens: They will be cited to appear in court.
City officials, however, aren't so sure about Sheriff Mike Hennessey's plan.

The new policy is his attempt to comply with a city law that prevents police from aiding federal authorities in non-felony crimes and a U.S. law that requires authorities to share fingerprints with immigration agents.

"I'm in a position where I'm trying to enforce a local law as well as not violate the federal law and this is the `in-between,"' he said. "It's a difficult area to tread on because emotions run very high here in California and throughout the country on immigration issues."

Actually, this is NOT a difficult area to tread on, Sheriff. Not at all, at least if you have the ability to think with reason.

Think back, Sheriff, to 2008 when on June 22 in San Francisco, California, a 21-year old MS gang member, Edwin Ramos, shot and killed a father, Anthony Bologna, 48, and his two sons Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16, after their car briefly blocked Ramos from completing a left turn down a narrow street as they were returning home from a family barbecue.

Ramos was an illegal alien whom San Francisco authorities had released because of idiotic compassion and concern for illegals and zero concern for American citizens.

Do the deaths of Bologna and his sons mean nothing to Sheriff Hennessey and his liberal colleagues in this god-forsaken din of inequity?

And where are Barack Obama and Eric Holder when it comes to local authorities whom defy federal law?

Or is it Obama government policy to ignore such defiance when illegal aliens benefit at the expense of citizens?

http://www.ktvu.com/news/28067653/detail.html