Charles Rangel Brilliant Defense of Weiner: “At least He Wasn’t Going out With Little Boys!”
By John W. Lillpop
Leave it to Charles Rangel, self-anointed moral ombudsman for the Democrat Party, to come up with an argument in favor of Anthony Weiner that may save the other disgraced New York Democrat from House banishment and perhaps worse.
Rangel’s brilliant argument, terse but tough, consisted of the following quotable quote, “At Least He(Weiner) didn’t go out with little boys!”
Hmmm.
Just how can you be sure, Charlie? Remember, the Weiner scandal started out as a third-rate hack job by a pervert, according to Weiner. It then escalated to an admitted bit of “foolishness” on Weiner's part, but not worthy of headline news or resignation.
The next shoe to drop was the news that Weiner was somehow involved, digitally, with a 17-year-old girl in Cyberspace chit chat, none of which was inappropriate or salacious.
According to Weiner, that is.
To say that Weiner’s recent record with respect to the truth is somewhat tainted would be akin to saying that Congress spends too much! The obvious is, well—too damn obvious.
Still, there is a bit of good news that Charlie could have used to defend the wayward Weiner: At least he did not cheat on his taxes!
What say ye, Charles?
By John W. Lillpop
Leave it to Charles Rangel, self-anointed moral ombudsman for the Democrat Party, to come up with an argument in favor of Anthony Weiner that may save the other disgraced New York Democrat from House banishment and perhaps worse.
Rangel’s brilliant argument, terse but tough, consisted of the following quotable quote, “At Least He(Weiner) didn’t go out with little boys!”
Hmmm.
Just how can you be sure, Charlie? Remember, the Weiner scandal started out as a third-rate hack job by a pervert, according to Weiner. It then escalated to an admitted bit of “foolishness” on Weiner's part, but not worthy of headline news or resignation.
The next shoe to drop was the news that Weiner was somehow involved, digitally, with a 17-year-old girl in Cyberspace chit chat, none of which was inappropriate or salacious.
According to Weiner, that is.
To say that Weiner’s recent record with respect to the truth is somewhat tainted would be akin to saying that Congress spends too much! The obvious is, well—too damn obvious.
Still, there is a bit of good news that Charlie could have used to defend the wayward Weiner: At least he did not cheat on his taxes!
What say ye, Charles?
Comments
The Post actually had that as a headline? Wow@
Did it say whose???? LOL
I hear you about Weiner--i remain skeptical