“While it isn’t written in the Constitution,” declared President Roosevelt in 1933, “nevertheless, it is the inherent duty of the Federal Government to keep its citizens from starvation.” Providence did not provide us with the ability to cope. We must depend on the inherent duty of authority. We are like sheep. This is my question: I’m not a dumb animal; I’m a human being with God-given rights.
Roosevelt’s New Deal law was declared unconstitutional by the “old” Supreme Court. The old Supreme Court’s idea on the God-given right to property: whether the duty of government, or the New Deal at issue here was not in violation of the very scheme of ordered liberty by reason that neither liberty nor justice would prevail if such a right were sacrificed. The old Court’s reason, reason being fundamental to the law, was that “a tax to promote the general welfare cannot be wrested out of its setting and legalized by ignoring its purpose as the mere instrumentality for bringing about a desired end.” In other words, Roosevelt’s New Deal law, the end justifies the means, did not pass constitutional muster in the old Supreme Court.
After being shot down by the old Supreme Court, Roosevelt and the Democrats in control came up with this idea in 1937: While it isn’t written in the Constitution, “The balance of power between the three great branches of the Federal Government has been tipped out of balance by the Court in direct contradiction of the high purposes of the framers of the Constitution. We have reached the point where we must take action to save the Constitution from the Court.” A Roosevelt appointee to the Supreme Court, Justice Brandeis: “property is only a means. It has been a frequent error of our Court that they have made the means an end.” So now it is the government’s end, not the producer’s end. The government entitled possess higher rights, by the Supreme Court’s decree, than taxpayers. Our Constitution has been overturned in favor of Roosevelt’s Constitution.
Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations identified due process with the doctrine of vested rights drawn from natural law. Under the present Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution, the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, of the so-called Bill of Rights—my rights—which formerly permitted me to be heard in a meaningful way in a meaningful place, has no weight under the present Court’s interpretation. The Fifth Amendment is as a moon partially eclipsed by other parts of the Constitution. Specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras. In other words, the Constitution, rather than interpreted as written, is whatever the Court says it is. Positively, my God-given rights have been eclipsed. Man’s lust for power leaves out reason and long held principles of justice. Under the present Court’s interpretation of justice, as far as humans are concerned, anything deemed to be in the interest of the majority vote is legal. With more than 50 percent of the American people receiving handouts from government, robbing the taxpayers of their right to exist on the fruits of their own labor, under the present interpretation Hitler was legal in sending Jews to death camps. But neither Hitler’s law nor America’s law, as far as taxpayers are concerned, is lawful. Neither has any substance. What’s next? Another banana republic.
In Miller v Nut Margarine Co,today’s duplicitous Supreme Court held that margarine could not be taxed as butter. Declared the Court: “It is elementary that tax laws are to be interpreted liberally in favor of taxpayers and words defining things to be taxed may not be taxed beyond their clear import” This is exactly what the U.S. Supreme Court held—things, like margarine and corporations, but excluding human beings, may not be taxed beyond their clear import. Then the Court goes on to recognize that in cases where the complainant shows that in addition to the exaction in the guise of tax, “there exist special and extraordinary circumstances sufficient to bring the case within some acknowledged head of equity jurisprudence, a suit may be maintained to enjoin the collector,” again excluding human beings.
Human beings, as a practical matter, are government owned property, devoid of any and all rights. Government, according to Roosevelt and the Democrats, has the duty to redistribute justice according to the Democrats’ political will. They call it social justice. Under social justice philosophy, the IRS confiscated my property and admitted it in a front page story in The Palm Beach Post. (see my blog, “A Word on Government Entitlement”)
The fact is that the American people have not cared about their God-given rights enough to fight for them. They fear the IRS. And rightly so, the IRS is above the law. We live under the law of might makes right. Consequently, poverty is the rule; prosperity is the exception. America is overdue becoming another third world nation. We are literally living on borrowed time. What’s the answer?
Jesus said, Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Jesus was born at the beginning of the Age of Pisces, the symbol of which is two attached fish swimming in opposite directions. We are now entering the Age of Aquarius, a time when brotherhood and fraternity will prevail, a time when natural law will reign supreme.
After seven years of writing my memoirs, it all comes clear to me. In 1975, after studying my Constitution, as distinguished from Obama’s Constitution, Harvard law school’s Constitution, the present Supreme Court’s Constitution, I heard voices of the past speaking to me, my spiritual guides. I had a bigger than life calling.
I took the above stated issue to the Supreme Court. I was rejected without a word. Anything said that would have defended a form of law position, but devoid of the substance of the law—law that is for things and corporations, but against human beings—defended its tacit holding, in my case, that human beings are the same as government property, would have been proven to be a lie. So, like unidentified flying objects, they can’t be real; I’m not real, I’m a taxpaying piece of crap making a stink, the usual and customary act of government to say nothing about its injustice, the Court has the right to remain silent, but in my case the Court’s silence is deafening.
Comments