“Sovereignty…as understood in the Declaration of Independence was originally, and by nature, the equal and unalienable possession of individual human beings. The original equality of all human beings was an equality of sovereignty; no man had more right to rule another than the other had to rule him.” 

― Harry V. Jaffa

In a world that is virtually unrecognizable from the universal principles that underpinned Western Civilization, the fundamental concept of national sovereignty is being attacked as a relic of a former age. The New World Order is designed to eliminate the self-government of sovereign nations. While individuals live under the domain of established states, the fact that specific regimes operate within and often under the auspices of international hegemony that routinely violates the independence of specific countries is undeniable. The “world community” is not a voluntary association of collaborating governments; it is a euphemism of a top down despotic authoritarian system for global control and punishment for uncooperative governments. 

When the United Nations was established after World War II, the true objective of destroying the axis of competing Neo Global Totalitarianism exposed its real path and agenda for worldwide domination.  The New World Order emerged with the full blessing of the United States. An uninterrupted march towards imposing the will of global elites upon individual countries has been the results from setting into motion the forces of internationalism. 

America has been totally betrayed by our designated and appointed officials during the decades of systematic dismantling of our independence and economic prosperity. With this assault against the nation-state, the peoples of the world have been herded into a global concentration camp that far exceeds the wildest dreams of the Nazi SS. 

NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY: WHY IT IS WORTH DEFENDING by Cornell professor Jeremy Rabkin, who provides a compelling argument. Review his book, The Case for Sovereignty. 

“Many people criticize national sovereignty as implying that there is no appeal beyond the sovereign state. But there is always some appeal, because there are always other states offering competing examples and places of refuge for those fleeing the most onerous policies of particular states. The idea of national sovereignty is inseparable from the idea of a multitude of sovereignties, hence there is some possibility for choice, which implies the possibility of mistakes or wrong choices which others may avoid. Where there is least chance for appeal is from a world that is governed by one and only one set of world standards.” 

Now what happens when the planet rushes towards a one world government? Jeremy Rabkin continues on some pressing questions in the interview, A Defense of Sovereignty. 

“All members of the EU have now bound themselves to a scheme in which the European Court of Justice treats mere treaties as superior to national constitutions–and national courts give priority to the rulings of this European Court, even against their own parliaments and their own national constitutions. This is way, way, way, beyond anything we could accept in America. To find an analogy, you must imagine that NAFTA officials in Montreal claim the authority to override the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court–and federal judges in America agree that the NAFTA policy must take priority.  

What makes the European scheme particularly bizarre–at least from our point of view–is that Europeans aren’t really prepared to pursue their “Union” to its logical conclusion. They don’t trust the EU to have an army or police or even criminal courts of its own. So Europeans are entrusting supremacy to a government they don’t really trust–at least not enough to entrust with traditional attributes of sovereignty.” 

Americans are not much different from their European cousins. They no longer trust the political class. Selected leaders are not elected but must pass a screening process to gain office. They do not protect the common culture and national integrity, but only serve the interest of the globalists.   

Steven Groves asks, Why Does Sovereignty Matter to America?  

“A people subject to foreign taxation, or to being transported across the seas to face criminal charges in a foreign land, are not truly independent. In the Declaration, the Founding Fathers gave notice that these infringements on American sovereignty would not stand. 

But today, our sovereignty faces new threats. International organizations and courts seek to reshape the international system. Nations are to give up their sovereignty and be governed by a “global consensus.” Independent, sovereign nations will be replaced by “transnational” organizations that reject national sovereignty. 

The demand that the United States bow to this “global consensus” does not respect American sovereignty. The offenses the Founders complained of in the Declaration of Independence now have an international flavor. This new project is filled with examples of institutions, courts, and “taxes” that violate the spirit of the Declaration:” 

Some traditionalist cast the dilemma in a framework that no longer applies in a world where counties are unable, and certainly unwilling, to wage war against hostile governments. 

The Thomas More Law Center promotes a Just War viewpoint in their Defending National Security introduction. 

“The Thomas More Law Center supports America’s First Military Principles of Virtue, Honor, Patriotism and Subordination, established by John Adams in 1775. The U.S. military is the most effective fighting force in the history of the world, and it is the only institution Americans can depend on to defend our Nation and our Constitution. The Law Center opposes any attempt to downsize, degrade or dismantle the combat effectiveness of our Armed Forces. 

The Law Center opposes any attempt to surrender our national sovereignty to the United Nations or any other international organization. In addition, the Law Center supports the right of States to protect their borders against the massive invasion of illegal immigrants.” 

Posing a dialectic nature between national sovereignty and the NWO misses the most important aspect of the post WWII migration into a global gulag. Primary elements behind the organization of the New World Order are the evil elites that actually run and dictate their master plan on America itself.  

Long before the American Revolution, the European dynasties of cosmic control lusted for total domination. America, from its inception posed the last best hope for humanity. The persistent and methodical encroachment into the very fabric of independent self-government has been part of the eternal struggle, which was transplanted into the new world. 

Over the centuries the disease of populace subjugation grew with each succeeding generation. The breakdown of awareness and the sapping of the will to resist the drive to impose governance in place of self-determination has resulted in the internationalization of the body politik. 

Efforts like that of THE CENTER FOR SOVEREIGNTY & SECURITY, have a noble objective. 

“An informed and engaged citizenry is vital to the health of our Republic. Freedom Alliance’s Center for Sovereignty and Security educates lawmakers, opinion leaders, and the public at large on a host of issues – particularly those that relate to national sovereignty, national security, and constitutional government.”   

However, it is a losing battle to view the conflict in a simple us against them context. When the us is a primary director of the global tyranny, how can our own government be trusted to direct its energies to abolish the NWO traitors that have become the actual architects of the globalist system of aristocratic privilege.  

Because of this fundamental quandary, informed and rational patriots are now targeted as the ‘Enemy of the State”. In order to transcend this false perversion of national sovereignty, the true nature and meaning of nation needs to be crystal clear. A nation is the embodiment of the people. The sovereignty resides within the individual person before he or she provides consent to any governmental organization or structure that operates only under the authority granted by a free population.  

As it stands now, the American government has forfeited any claim as a legitimate steward of the public trust. Compounding this fact is that the technocratic superstructure of agencies, institutions and authorities has become integral parts of inflicting the New World Order upon the entire world.  

Contrary to the hopes and dreams of the few remaining loyal Americans of the revolution, there is no George Washington coming to your rescue on a white horse. 

True national sovereignty starts with resistance to all forms of government compliance that fosters and is part of  Obeying the Nefarious Warrior Organism. 

When the Marquis de Lafayette speaks of “natural and imprescriptible rights”, those civil liberties are endowed by our creator and cannot be rightfully be removed by any regime.  

Citizens must come to embrace their Inherent Autonomy. Throughout all of history, force and coercion has been the primary tool used by governments to compel a given population into compliance.  

The New World Order certainly follows this convention but uses and relies upon a much more potent component. Public acquiescence and voluntary abidance is the primary factor that feed the cavalcade of capitulation.  

A global outcry of opposition to the integration and consolidation of the New World Order dictatorship is required in order to defend national sovereignty. Democracy has proven that electing champions of a traditional society has failed because the quality of the character of citizens has sunk to the level of dullard serfs. 

The burden of responsibility falls upon the remaining moral and honorable souls to defend all that is worth protecting.