GOP House: The Good and the Bad

Some change is good and some not so good, but the concept of change simply for the sake of change is often a recipe for disaster. Yesterday, House Republicans unanimously voted to keep Paul Ryan (R-WI) as speaker of the House. While it's clear not every Republican is a fan of Ryan and he probably won't get unanimous support for the upcoming speaker election, this display of party unity is significant. It strengthens the party for the inevitable policy opposition and battles it is sure to face from Democrats and the Leftmedia. This also bodes well for Donald Trump's policy plans since both Reince Priebus and Mike Pence are good friends of Ryan — having the three work together to craft policy should encourage conservatives.
Unfortunately, the bad news is that several House Republicans are seeking to revive earmarks, a practice the GOP disallowed upon retaking the House in 2010. Earmarks have been associated with causing corruption in Washington. It's this type of government cronyism, which caters to special interest groups, that Trump specifically identified as needing to be cleaned up. And for all his faults, former House Speaker John backstabber-Boehner detested earmarks and defended the ban.
Andy Koenig, vice president of policy at Freedom Partners, said, "Hard working Americans want their tax dollars spent wisely and transparently." Tea Party Patriots co-founder Jenny Beth Martin warned, "Any member of Congress who votes to bring back old-school, backroom, pork barrel spending through earmarks is putting himself or herself firmly against the American people who just elected Donald Trump president, as he campaigned emphatically on the issue of draining the swamp in Washington." And Ken Cuccinelli, president of Senate Conservatives, argued, "Americans are tired of politicians in Washington using their power to rig the system for special interests. ... It would be a major mistake for Republicans to bring back earmarks as their first act after the elections. It would be a slap in the face to the millions of Americans who just voted to drain the swamp." The House is voting today via secret ballot. Let's hope this proposal is defeated. ~The Patriot Post
.
liar-nObama's Denial Tour
Among the first things Barack liar-nObama did upon assuming office in 2009 was to embark on his infamous apology tour, visiting various world leaders to express his heartfelt sorrow for America's failings. Now on his last foreign trip, billed as an attempt to reassure allies after Donald Trump's election, liar-nObama has revived his apologize-for-America rhetoric, while at the same time attempting to defend his own record. It's as if liar-nObama were saying to his leftist, globalist, elitist buddies, "It's hard work attempting to rule those obstinate and ignorant rubes." In Greece, liar-nObama declared, "We have to deal with people's fears that their children won't do as well as they have. The more aggressively and effectively we deal with those issues, the less those fears may channel themselves into counterproductive approaches that pit people against each other. And frankly, that's been my agenda for the last eight years." What a completely disingenuous statement given liar-nObama's incessant practice of "pitting people against each other." liar-nObama, the divider in chief, rarely let an opportunity go by to blame some group — whether it be the "gun lobby" or "racist cops" or those "do-nothing" Republicans or, his seemingly favorite target whenever referencing the poor economy or the problems in the Middle East, George W. Bush.
While seeking to protect his legacy and continue to promote his ideal of globalism, liar-nObama also sought to warn the world against populist movements. He cautioned that people around the world "are going to have to guard against a rise in a crude sort of nationalism, or ethnic identity, or tribalism." This too is ironic, as it was his administration that endlessly practiced identity politics based entirely on tribalism.
In one of liar-nObama's more narcissistic moments, he attempted to explain why Americans seem to like him but rejected so much of what he accomplished. He boasted, "People seem to think I did a pretty good job, and so there is this mismatch I think between frustration and anger. Perhaps the view of the American people is that you just need to shake things up." In other words, he wasn't the problem; Americans just don't know what's good for them. Maybe he forgot that he spent the entire campaign running around telling anyone who would listen that he wasn't on the ballot but his policies were. Americans do know one thing: We don't much like those in government dictating to us what we're allowed to think and speak.
~The Patriot Post.
Dobbs – Paul Ryan Is The Biting Snake In
Story Trump Told During Campaign
by Rick Wells

{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs offers a few thoughts on what he describes as “a curious direction taken in our national swamp, you know, the one the president-elect promised to drain, and a dangerous, dangerous course it seems to be... All is now set to hold House leadership elections tomorrow, Speaker Paul Ryan running unopposed for reelection.” Dobbs reminds his viewers, “This is the same Ryan who was working more closely with ‘president’ liar-nObama than his own conference, who, dare I mention this? Who betrayed his party’s nominee for president? Ryan, after all, was on a losing, not winning Republican ticket just four years ago, and he was crushed in the debate that year by none other than Joe loose lips-Biden.” “This is the same over-full Hamlet who took a month to endorse Trump after he became the presumptive nominee,” says Dobbs, “who said he had an obligation to ‘call out’ Trump? He slammed Trump and attacked his immigration proposals. Ryan criticized and deferred and never once advocated for Trump.”... http://rickwells.us/dobbs-paul-ryan-biting-snake-story-trump-told-during-campaign/ The Left's Political Warfare Against
Steve Bannon is Simply Proof of His Effectiveness
by SECURE FREEDOM MINUTE
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ The radical left seeks through vilification to neutralize those that they consider to be formidable adversaries. Generally speaking, the more formidable, the more vitriol... Evidently, electorally challenged leftists are absolutely panicked over President-elect Donald Trump's selection of Stephen Bannon as his Counselor and chief strategist. And with good reason. Few people in public life today have a keener mind, a clearer vision, a stronger attachment to the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees and a more demonstrated ability to bring those qualities to bear decisively than Steve Bannon. His success as CEO of the Trump campaign in the critical closing months augurs well for the Trump presidency - and poses a serious problem for its assorted critics... New Judicial Watch Release Of IRS
Docs Shows Groups Targeted
Based on ‘Party Affiliation’
by Jeff Dunetz
{lidblog.com} ~ We all knew that the bottom line of the IRS scandal was that the agency was engaging in viewpoint discrimination, targeting groups whose philosophy differed with the liar-nObama administration... Now thanks to Judicial Watch we have proof…from their own hands. The latest release from the watchdog group announced it had received 1593 pages of new documents from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from its Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit against the agency. Included in the pile of documents were handwritten notes from a 2011 interoffice meeting that revealed a top IRS official admitting the famous Cincinnati office was targeting organizations requesting tax exempt status based on “guilt by association” and “party affiliation.” According to former IRS Director of the Office of Rulings and Agreements Holly Paz, “they think they know what the org is really doing, rather than looking at actual activities.”... .

.
The Slacker Mandate and the
Safety Pin Generation
by Michelle Malkin

{freedomsback.com} ~ News flash, kids: Things aren’t free. Things cost money. And “free” things provided to you by the government cost other people’s money.
Donald Trump gets it — somewhat. He vows to repeal liar-nObamacare’s most burdensome federal mandates that are jacking up the price of private health insurance. But he also plans to preserve the most politically popular provisions of the Orwellian-titled Affordable Care Act, including the so-called “slacker mandate.” It’s the requirement that employer-based health plans cover employees’ children until they turn 26 years old.
That’s right: Twenty-freaking-six.
Is it any wonder why we have a nation of dependent drool-stained crybabies on college campuses who are still bawling about the election results one week later?
Trump briefly mentioned during a “60 Minutes” interview on CBS this weekend that the slacker mandate “adds cost, but it’s very much something we’re going to try and keep.” That’s because most establishment Republicans in Washington, D.C., are resigned to keeping it. Once the feds hand out a sugary piece of cradle-to-grave entitlement candy, it’s almost impossible to snatch it back.
Who pays for this unfunded government mandate? As usual, it’s responsible working people who bear the burden.
Earlier this year, the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the No Slacker Left Behind provision resulted in wage reductions of about $1,200 a year for workers with employer-based insurance coverage — whether or not they had adult children on their plans. In effect, childless working people are subsidizing workers with adult children who would rather stay on their parents than get their own.
Moreover, according to company surveys and other economic analysis, the slacker mandate has resulted in overall increased health care costs of between 1 and 3 percent. The nonpartisan American Health Policy Institute reported one firm’s estimate of millennial coverage mandate costs at a whopping $69 million over 10 years.
At the time the federal slacker mandate was adopted in 2010, some 20 states had already adopted legislation requiring insurers to cover Big Kids — some up to age 31!
Yes, thirty-freaking-one.
In Wisconsin, the slacker mandate covered not only adult children, but also the children of those “children” if they lived in single-parent homes. In New Jersey, champions of the provision claimed it would help cover 100,000 uninsured young adults. But health policy researcher Nathan Benefield of the Commonwealth Foundation reported that “only 6 percent of that estimate has been realized” in its first two years. “The primary reason — health insurance is still too expensive.”
That has only gotten worse, of course, as liar-nObamacare’s other expensive mandates — especially guaranteed issue for those with pre-existing conditions — sabotage the private individual market for health insurance, leaving young and healthy people with fewer choices, higher premiums and crappier plans. The solution is not more mandates, but fewer; more competition, not less.
The liar-nObama White House will brag that the slacker mandate has resulted in increased coverage for an estimated 3 million people. As usual with liar-nObamacare numbers, it’s Common Core, book-cooked math. Health care analyst Avik Roy took a closer look and found that the inflated figure came from counting “(1) young adults on Medicaid and other government programs, for whom the under-26 mandate doesn’t apply; and (2) people who gained coverage due to the quasi-recovery from the Great Recession.”
To add insult to injury, another NBER study found that roughly 5 percent of people younger than 26 dropped out of the workforce after the provision was implemented. They used their spare time to increase their socialization, sleeping, physical fitness and personal pursuit of “meaningfulness.”
Then there are the hidden costs of the millennial mandate: the cultural consequences. All this “free” stuff, detached from those actually paying the bills, reduces the incentives for 20-somethings to grow up and seek independent lives and livelihoods. Why bother? The societal sanctions have been eroded.
Now, the nation is suffering the consequences of decades of that collective coddling. Precious snowflakes can’t handle rejection at the ballot box or responsibilities in the marketplace. Appropriately enough, the new virtue signals of tantrum-throwing young leftists stirring up trouble are safety pins — to show “solidarity” with groups supposedly endangered by Donald Trump.
Safety pins are also handy — for holding up the government-manufactured diapers in which too many overgrown dependents are swaddled.
http://freedomsback.com/michelle-malkin/the-slacker-mandate-and-the-safety-pin-generation/
Comments