Friday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Dan Crenshaw on Limited Government
IramoCsTpiGyooQ7fcawdw7XeZ1v-DjODzgVpmDgr1Emz9M0CsyzXqwA9eMfzq2KjRNyyBt6nHt39QdxQstH0u69r0MFMDzFJUAke9-n_erc-9G5qFF4r2WvVvme4517iiZYAwjMv7eo0Mgwq0xUDxOrqRQvdsIyE1Cvnrk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Democrats Cannot Hide Their 
Anti-Semitism Problem
OX7j5j4HBU7PMhagBOzWzpB6ffmvhuE7TllGyARl6aZeU0QmVudnaP-0wxcJjZ_wLndjpqMwD3cR-fw8-7qQXYSLQBq4WUAlIYU_6oJh4Fdcxl71k-I=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Abraham H. Miller
{americanthinker.com} ~ The Democrats will not produce a meaningful resolution denouncing anti-Semitism. The vile hater, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, will not be named... Her position on the powerful Foreign Relations Committee will be as secure as ever. The resolution will dilute anti-Semitism by conveniently placing it among other hatreds. Such duplicity is reminiscent of the New York Times burying the Holocaust in the back pages. They covered it, just not where you could see it. The Times, like the Roosevelt administration and the British Foreign Office, knew of  the Holocaust since 1942 and chose to ignore it. The Democratic Party has once again abandoned the Jews. The Jews, however, refuse to abandon the Democratic Party.  I grew up in a Democratic home in Chicago where Franklin Roosevelt was revered as if he were some form of deity. Little did my parents and grandparents know the Roosevelt’s State Department worked tirelessly with the British Foreign Office to obstruct and delay the rescue of  European Jews so that Hitler could continue to kill them as the clock ran out and, consequently, eliminate the problem. Like today’s Democrats, they created mechanisms to give the symbolic appearance of being concerned about the plight of the Jews while doing nothing until the last days of the war...
.
35 Key People Involved In The Russia 
Hoax Who Need To Be Investigated  
yqx2hcsvA0p3KXAOyKm2iU8-tk50or9WYw4IntH0uzCpnjDLExTxQyb9vt28DS38AjwugPlbv60zvom8FBs7veJ2HP3TBeQ1lRcCPmPsBA97bgh9q1HZICRo0AWEptdKSAYZymC0w_K9-w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Willis L. Krumholz  
{thefederalist.com} ~ Funny how things change. The Washington Post couldn’t say a nice thing about congressional Republican efforts to investigate the scumbag/liar-nObama administration and FBI shenanigans... that occurred before and after the 2016 election. That’s if they even covered these efforts at all. But with Democrats controlling the House, and that legislative body’s subpoena power, the establishment media’s line has changed. Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have just sent letters to 81 people, all associated with President Trump or the Russia probe, demanding answers on Russian election interference. This is part of Democrats’ effort to continue their hunt for proof of Russia collusion—although they are already sure that Trump is guilty—as Special Counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s investigation appears to be winding down. To cover these events, the Post’s Philip Bump wrote an article titled: “The 81 people and organizations just looped into the Trump probe—and why they were included.” Of course, the article is totally unquestioning of the House Democrats’ desired narrative and motivations. It isn’t worth it to go through Bump’s whole article, but even the commentary about the first name on the list—Rinat Akhmetshin—omits glaring and important facts. Bump says Akhmetshin “joined his colleague Natalia Veselnitskaya, a lawyer linked to the Kremlin, at the June 9, 2016, meeting in Trump Tower predicated on providing information that would undermine scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s campaign.” But, Bump says, “the focus of the meeting instead reportedly focused on the Magnitsky Act—a law that resulted in sanctions on numerous prominent Russians.” Partisan Democrats in the scimbag/liar-nObama administration were all too willing to believe the allegations, and use them as an excuse for bad behavior whether they believed them or not. The  documents have been called “dossiers,” but that really just attaches a fancy term to a Word document full of unverified mumbo jumbo that alleged Trump-Russia collusion...
.
White House Communications Director 
Bill Shine resigns
VvOzVfAHI3lXTBtseD98XPk3ynKWoU4Al2frEejE6RhDsMXZi60X7djR4Dp7UhB6l27VfTUSJ56kiluszOv3yJoq58CtOh87dfxX30mbl3zkrrFWUxEYmhL5EOqI6LilZBl_BNQXpBiUWqQ6JzvDfX-rYZqsyJkLoX9RTfsmImnnEwz5l-XZN9G0gc0wwCKa45m_twNXBhQ1A3VmVezENbbBl4vk9fapbhyRnFHfbHv_ScYUtIiiBLmeihvQECnTojCwxi1OV0WVwS2wMWaqFGEPe1Q7zSLXRGPq7j8qIooUbz5ES8UnwC-hJm06_gQ6bTb1lSfPIRa_7PwocAY=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Melissa Quinn
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ White House Communications Director Bill Shine has resigned, the White House said Friday. Shine, assistant to the president... offered President Trump his resignation Thursday evening, and the president accepted it. He will join the Trump campaign as a senior adviser, but the reasons for his departure were unclear. “Serving President Trump and this country has been the most rewarding experience of my entire life,” Shine said in a statement. “To be a small pat of all this president has done for the American people has truly been an honor.”Trump, in his own statement, praised Shine for his work and said he looks forward to continuing working together on the 2020 campaign. “Bill Shine has done an outstanding job working for me and the administration,” Trump said. White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney called Shine "an asset of invaluable importance to this West Wing."...
.
Iran: Child Executions, Amputations, Floggings
Rur3iFutmwJOyd3SFwP20jcYaftQY85gTCXDtz8ifmbuho7JxeJy3RSPrMrCZJX701d_l_FpzB4u-ODUbDod9tWB-g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Majid Rafizadeh
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ According to a report published by Amnesty International on February 26, the human rights situation in Iran has "severely deteriorated"... Why then does the European Union continue to pursue appeasement policies with a regime that has an excruciating human rights record? Sadly, Europe -- in spite its endless moral preening and self-righteousness -- seems to have become the world most immoral player -- if it was not already. The European Union, for instance, unjustly singles out for bullying the only liberal, democratic, human-rights-abiding country in the Middle East: Israel. Not Turkey for occupying Northern Cyprus, China for obliterating Tibet, or Pakistan for occupying Kashmir. Europe and the corrupt United Nations do not lay a glove on the real perpetrators of crimes against humanity such as China, Cuba, Russia, Turkey, North Korea, Nigeria or Sudan, to name just a few. The stench of Europe's duplicity cannot be overstated. Europe ravenously throws sanctions on a country that has been home to Jews for more than three thousand years, yet tries to find ways to keep on doing business with a country such as Iran that is not only trying to establish its hegemony throughout the Middle East -- through proxies in Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Lebanon -- but is also the serial violator of just about every human right imaginable. The only conclusion one can come to is that Europe would evidently still like to kill the Jews and is happy to support those wishing to kill them. How much more immoral can one get? The list of unspeakable human rights violations committed by Iran's regime is lengthy; however, by far the most disturbing seems the cruelty enacted against children. According to the Norway-based organization Iran Human Rights (IHR), which closely monitors executions in Iran...  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13841/iran-executions-amputations-floggings 
Telling The Truth About Islam Always Gets 
You In Trouble With Democrats
cvQ5ApPK67jXi52aA53nltuiueiunM2-RbCMpfjPrZ8grLNNsad1GGkiC7W-dUr6IA_LPc3JpyT8xGTBLhJFiHw5VmR03lcWhBPvyS27GuIsFBz-xBYd8fx9Kv-gzA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by George Rasley
{conservativehq.com} ~ Recently, twelve pro-Israel organizations signed a letter addressed to Speaker Nancy Pulosi and Rep. Eliot Engel, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee... calling on them to remove Rep. Ilhan Omar (MN-5) from the Foreign Affairs Committee after she espoused a series of anti-Semitic tropes. The Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET), a longtime pro-Israel advocacy group, spearheaded the effort. While some of the groups are avowedly conservative, most of the organizations that signed on are either Jewish groups or groups that have close ties to the Jewish community. The reaction from the Left and from Left-aligned Islamists was swift and vicious. Emily Kopp, a former press intern for House Speaker Nancy Pulosi, used an op-ed in Capitol Hill’s Roll Call newspaper to describe ACT for America and our friends at the Center for Security Policy as "anti-Muslim hate groups" that "peddle anti-Muslim conspiracy theories." Kopp also accuses ACT for America of having ties to a neo-Nazi, based on disinformation published by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Wrote Kopp: But the coalition behind the letter — described by conservative media to be “leading Jewish organizations” — includes groups that maintain no relationship to the American Jewish community and peddle anti-Muslim conspiracy theories. One of the groups was once found to have ties to a longtime neo-Nazi. However, as PJ Media’s Debra Heine documented, ACT for America's "ties to a longtime neo-Nazi" consist entirely of an incident involving a white nationalist in Batesville, Ark., who tried to host a "March Against Sharia" event in their name in June 2017...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Dan Crenshaw on Limited Government
IramoCsTpiGyooQ7fcawdw7XeZ1v-DjODzgVpmDgr1Emz9M0CsyzXqwA9eMfzq2KjRNyyBt6nHt39QdxQstH0u69r0MFMDzFJUAke9-n_erc-9G5qFF4r2WvVvme4517iiZYAwjMv7eo0Mgwq0xUDxOrqRQvdsIyE1Cvnrk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Nate Jackson:  Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) is no stranger to the fight. The former Navy SEAL lost an eye in an IED explosion during his third combat tour in Afghanistan. Ironically, he’s probably best known so far for his amicable performance on “Saturday Night Live” last November. But he’s not just a warrior who can get along with his leftist opponents. He’s a philosopher espousing the principles of constitutionally limited government.

“Why does the left hate the tax cuts?” Crenshaw rhetorically asked Tuesday. “[Because] they think the people exist to fund the [government]. We believe the [government] exists to protect the inalienable rights of the people. When people keep their money, we get more jobs & wage growth, & less wasteful spending by ‘benevolent’ bureaucrats.”

With that comment, he posted video of his remarks at a House hearing, where he really nailed it (emphasis his):

We’re talking about a difference in philosophy, not just tax rates. It’s a question of whether the government should be taking more of your money or whether you should keep more of your money. It’s the difference in the role of government, in what we believe. It seems to me that you all believe that the role of government is to tax the people as much as possible so that you and your benevolent fellow academics can dream up more programs for the government to spend money on. I don’t believe that. I don’t believe that’s what the role of government is for.

The role of government is to protect God-given rights that we have and to ensure that we live as free as possible. The role of government is to tax people to the least extent possible, while still taxing them enough to cover basic needs for government. And if we’re questioning what those needs are, we can just look at our Constitution; they’re generally pretty clear there.

Indeed, the Constitution is quite clear on the role of government, and today’s federal behemoth exceeds its mandate at nearly every turn. Much of that growth has been fueled by exactly what Crenshaw rightly criticizes: “more programs for the government to spend money on.” Democrats have become increasingly cynical and “generous” in their vote-buying scheme to offer “free stuff” to more people. But Republicans are hardly blameless. In 2017 and 2018, Republicans controlled both branches of government responsible for spending — and it increased drastically. Everyone wants to cut government, so long as it’s not their program. Thus, government never gets smaller.

If more elected Republicans would follow through on Crenshaw’s philosophy, that might begin to change.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/61593?mailing_id=4117&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4117&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center