Friday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Dems Seek to Purge Constitution 
From Election Process
fTvbR-1LGFFsODD0eV-kmoCJ1h-iKLjJ4v7jrQ1MGWJYRdk3jW_NkPBCl_PBqDhpKnkYZUgi-g56fomZB3REYKtnHq6HWsjG1rJhp4wHH9TAZ3iMGnCl2x8Nd05X7cj5D0wIPa7lKG0ynasDxp8kRGtJ2EozVMDv6QkorVc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jordan Candler  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
After Republican Objects, Democrats 
Keep ‘So Help Me God’ in Committee Oath
EcxUdYJquY7FYTEvdvTKg8g4FzKBG33fifTPm1mYPNRFamnVcbjX43Zrdb4jF-sImNV6dGF49QXe9eZtL26xyfEqpgkFAR3K-4AA4O_UPuSHzmIjJNCT-Lo9aHdmnlg3FNQhevA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Tony Perkins
{dailysignal.com} ~ Just 28 days ago, Nancy Pulosi claimed the speaker’s gavel and promised that her House would be “bipartisan and unifying.” What have we seen since?... House Democrats are pushing to open the floodgates of millions of taxpayer dollars to pay for elective abortions—even as Pulosi insists that she can’t offer more than a dollar to build a border wall. And then earlier this week, Democrats on the Natural Resources Committee announced they would remove “so help you God” from the oath that is administered to witnesses who testify before the committee. So under the new Democratic House majority, it’s “yes” to taxpayer funding for abortion, “no” to a border wall, and “no” to God. On Tuesday night, Rep. Garret Graves, R-La., a Republican member of the committee, joined me on radio to talk about an amendment he filed to put God back in the oath.  On Wednesday, God was put back in the oath...
.
After The Fall  
kX9kXmHLKgj3_44TQqN9Cj8u_aEVmk8rM2OxanVPWN5F8ByRCvCu_zoqezK-Zz8qaDaQUmOND6sCT-9lUSNW8Gs1SeUPrxexL-MQ1fTavD4qEMaQZRWUoKsmL9Tp4w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by David Harsanyi  
{thefederalist.com} ~ In the summer of 1968, my mother and father, both in their mid 20s, packed one bag each and left a cramped apartment they shared with relatives in Budapest, Hungary... and boarded a train to enjoy a once-in-a-lifetime vacation in Rome. The process of obtaining permission from authorities to take this holiday — which my parents were enormously fortunate to have received — would strike an American as a bizarrely grueling bureaucratic exercise. But since nearly any effort to secure a “luxury” item in communist Hungary — owning a car or visiting a country with free enterprise or religious freedom, for instance — met a similar shakedown, the process seemed about right to them. The real trick for my parents was to act eager, but not too eager. What they couldn’t divulge to most who knew them was that they would not return. They would be abandoning all their belongings modest as they were, secure lifetime jobs, government-provided health care and benefits, everything they knew to defect to a country that they were taught was rife with injustice and depravity. Luckily, decent people never believe their governments. No, there was no starvation, nor were there death camps in Eastern and Central Europe — at least, not during this iteration of collectivism — yet thousands of people took flight, year after year, sneaking under wires, climbing over walls, hunching down in airplane landing hatches, floating in balloons . . . devising a million creative ways to flee communism...  http://thefederalist.com/2019/02/01/after-fall-socialism/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=cacea71427-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-cacea71427-83771801
.
Pulosi Digs in on Border: 
‘There’s Not Going to Be Any Wall Money’
GzIVGn1yI8rvJ8L1NVRNpkmVVE4i5erl_CH_zTaGtkWDPwPqYam9QrCR2-hCmhVoL0lKjlp45ED1Ni2o9CLNqriOe4gc95yGkUk2vrMB2ZsbTf8yHGL0F8NT2Q5ubdH_obE7OirzYilatXwGuX1JmJvTXjiSrCxlUSkxjG4mog=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Connor D. Wolf
{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ House Speaker Nancy Pulosi (D-Calif.) said on Thursday morning there will not be any funds for a border wall as lawmakers negotiate the issue... to avert another partial government shutdown. The shutdown was well into a record number of days when it finally ended on January 25. President Donald Trump signed a spending bill that reopened the government for another three weeks to give both sides time to negotiate a deal on border security. The conference committee to negotiate that deal first met Wednesday. “There’s not going be any wall money in the legislation,” Pulosi told reporters during a press conference. “However, if they have some suggestions about certain localities where technology, some infrastructure, as I’ve said, about the ports of entry, they might need some ports of entry, we might need some roads — that’s part of the negotiation.” Pulosi was responding to a question about whether she was committed to allowing a floor vote on whatever bill the conference committee comes up with. Pulosi said that she would, of course, bring up the bill if the group comes to a bipartisan consensus. But then she was pushed on whether that applies to a deal that includes border security. Trump himself said Thursday morning during his own press conference that the country must “put up a physical barrier … our country is going to be a very unsafe place” if the wall is not put up on the southern border...  What is wrong with her?
Feds make biggest-ever fentanyl bust at the border
JmgXdtcMUMPuUAjQBbhl2d7JdjOcuRBVASdrulTzaKDV1Q16tPvgKmgoO6kprfQ76IWXjWfmw6YWvnC-MnHBIoCf7oWfmEYY6JyM-xPI6uQsxXokIcxDQ_PXit8qL-l-cn0kDQ6PmrSqmabh41b2TMlfJZ-aZBMcUFuK0PQd1rJxrGuZG7YELVP0_VqOhJaosV-zw4thFPni0EpD9lN1ncaBoCBoAXNUgflRVhMCiFmxX5lTNJkSOG_QVy_7zNZuYMpnf6HNHqKDgMZ_5oua5pgq1LgJjjXNd0H6iTcLl8APc9c_-LlxU0Vm1qHQHRehRJlabzes5AUJsPwtsg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Anna Giaritelli
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ Federal law enforcement agents stationed at the U.S.-Mexico border in Nogales, Ariz., made the largest-ever seizure of fentanyl Saturday... after stopping a truck that was purportedly trying to bring cucumbers into the country, according to Customs and Border Protection officials. CBP officials said Homeland Security employees stationed at the border crossing found 254 pounds of fentanyl in a single bust. Nogales area Port Director Michael Humphries said the seizure would likely save U.S. lives. "One kilogram of fentanyl contains 1 million fatal doses," he said. A few grains of fentanyl can put a person in a coma. Fentanyl is up to 50 times as strong as heroin and 100 times stronger than morphine, and it led to more than 20,000 deaths in 2017. The Trump administration has cited illicit drugs being smuggled from Mexico into the U.S. as a leading factor for enhancing security at the 2,000-mile border. But Democrats say most drugs are transported through formal checkpoints such as the one at Nogales... So what, build the damn wall.  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/feds-make-biggest-ever-fentanyl-bust-at-the-border?utm_source=WEX_Breaking%20News%20Alert_01/31/2019&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_Breaking%20News 
Congresswoman Wants 90% Tax Rate
to Fund Healthcare, scumbag/liar-nObamacare
34jmPKHpsOFQ-MyfgqRotgN4Zg1G6pwYlhjaE1qGz93xYPSBEgYuP646sIwbSjR2c7xz5A0HtvXORet9TUgri8WS9UuxkyTG38gPIr-eEa884Asw-hTSb7tz8IDapsAkUMo5GN7zroUQHcS2geKQdaYl=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Kaylee McGhee
{headlinehealth.com} ~ Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., is proving she might be the most radical freshman Democrat recently elected to Congress... In an interview with Yahoo News, Omar suggested that wealthy Americans should pay up to 90 percent in taxes to fund government programs. Omar’s colleague, Democratic socialist Rep. commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., previously said the rich should get taxed up to 70 percent. But Omar wants to go further. “There are a few things that we can do,” Omar said when asked how she’ll fund radical initiatives like universal healthcare access. “One of them, is that we can increase the taxes that people are paying who are the extremely wealthy in our communities. So, 70 percent, 80 percent, we’ve had it as high as 90 percent. So, that’s a place we can start.” “The one percent must pay their fair share,” she continued... Omar is completely out of her mind. She is going to be impeached or a one term Rep.  https://headlinehealth.com/muslim-congresswoman-wants-90-tax-rate-to-fund-healthcare/
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Dems Seek to Purge Constitution From Election Process
fTvbR-1LGFFsODD0eV-kmoCJ1h-iKLjJ4v7jrQ1MGWJYRdk3jW_NkPBCl_PBqDhpKnkYZUgi-g56fomZB3REYKtnHq6HWsjG1rJhp4wHH9TAZ3iMGnCl2x8Nd05X7cj5D0wIPa7lKG0ynasDxp8kRGtJ2EozVMDv6QkorVc=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Jordan Candler:  It didn’t get much play, but on Jan. 3, Democrats introduced the For the People Act of 2019 in the 116th Congress. This bill purports “To expand Americans’  access to the ballot box, reduce the influence of big money in politics, and strengthen ethics rules for public servants, and for other purposes.” Unfortunately, “for the people” is a misnomer. In truth, this bill is “for the Democrats.”

Investor’s Business Daily says, “Far-left media advocates for the Democrats’ have benignly called the proposed new law ‘election reform’, claimed it ‘could save American Democracy’ and characterized it as ‘a sweeping anti-corruption proposal.’ It is none of those things. Instead, H.R.1, the new law’s official designation, is a shocking power grab on the part of the Democrats who seek to nationalize all elections so they can permanently silence the Red States that stand in their way. It does so by transferring most of the power over elections to the federal government, and taking it away from the states, as the Constitution requires.”

On Jan. 29, the Conservative Action Project unveiled an opposition memo, which Investor’s explains is cosigned by “some 154 conservative former government officials, think tank heads, writers and activists.”

The memo reveals that the legislation “would allow the Federal Election Commission to track and and catalogue more of what Americans are saying, register even very small political donations, and make public those who donate to different charitable and nonprofit organizations.”

Furthermore, “H.R. 1 reasserts the ability of the federal government to micromanage state elections through a process known as ‘preclearance.’ Preclearance, which was previously overturned by the Supreme Court, requires states to get permission from the federal government for changes as small as modifying the hours of an election office, or moving a voting location from a school gym to the library.”

As if that’s not bad enough, “The Federal Election Commission, which is currently a neutral body, would be given a 3-2 makeup, guaranteeing a partisan outcome with little accountability toward the actual votes which are cast. H.R. 1 also includes a 600 percent government match for political donations, and authorizes even more public dollars to campaigns. The bill also wants to make Election Day a new paid holiday for government workers, with additional paid vacation given to bureaucrats to oversee the polls. All of these changes are designed to distance the outcome of the election from those casting their votes.”

The memo further explains that voter registration would become mandatory; all felons would be permitted to vote; early voting would be protracted; same-day voter registration would be required; the ability to cross-reference voters from different states would be hamstrung; election observers would be free from having to assist in cases related to election abnormalities; political speech that may dissuade a person’s voting would be outlawed; states would be forbidden from legislating mail-in votes; chief election officials partaking in federal election campaigns would be made illegal; absentee ballots would become “free”; and redistricting commissions would be necessitated.

The cosignees warn that “H.R. 1 would cause sweeping and irrevocable damage to the free speech, privacy, and integrity that are central components to free and fair elections in America.” Investor’s adds, “It’s a blatantly unconstitutional Democratic attempt to create a permanent national majority, a one-party leftist state. That would freeze out Republicans, conservatives, libertarians and even most Independents.” Of course, neither the GOP Senate nor President Donald Trump would ever sign off on the For the People Act of 2019. But this is the mother of all omens. And it signals some of what Democrats hope to achieve if future elections tilt their way.

It would, for all intents and purposes, be the most damaging attack yet on our Republic and accelerate — perhaps irreversibly — its demise.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60842?mailing_id=4044&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4044&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center