🚨 Brivael reads the globalists' minds, episode 480384 🚨
⚠️ Here is what they are going to do, and attempt, to impose regulation on AI. ⚠️
In order. With the texts that already exist.
Let's start with a fact nobody connects to anything.
For the past eighteen months, nearly every Western government has been asking you for exactly the same thing: be able to survive on your own for 72 hours.
March 2025, the European Commission publishes its Preparedness Strategy: every household should be able to live three days with nothing. On November 20, 2025, France releases its guide "Tous responsables." 72 hours. 6 liters of water per person. Battery radio. Cash. Iodine tablets. Germany says ten days. Sweden and Switzerland, a week. The Netherlands recommends cash, canned food, batteries. Finland runs a national campaign literally called "72 hours." The UK, Canada, Japan, America's FEMA: same number. And on November 3, 2026, ten days ago, Brussels pushed the message again.
Now add a detail almost nobody noticed. France was supposed to run a nationwide electrical blackout exercise in 2027. It was moved up to November 2026. This month.
I'm not saying these people are preparing something. I'm saying they are preparing for something. That is not the same sentence, and it's the only one I will write.
The kits aren't the plan. They're the backdrop that makes the plan possible.
Now connect it.
There is one thing the Western ruling class understood before you did: AI is destroying scarcity. Not reducing it. Destroying it. Intelligence becomes a commodity. Code becomes free. Diagnosis becomes free. Value creation decouples from hours worked.
And scarcity is the raw material of political power. The entire redistributive machine is built on top of it. If abundance arrives through the machine instead of through the State, nobody needs the people who promise to share the pie anymore. They don't become a minority. They become unnecessary.
People who become unnecessary never go quietly. They change the rules.
Step 1: take back control of the tap.
On November 12, Jensen Huang left Nvidia. The trigger was a private scandal involving a woman US intelligence suspects of working for China, and the board had met the night before to consider ousting him.
I'm not saying he was set up. I don't know, and neither does anyone else.
I'm saying: look at who wins.
Huang was one of the most consistent voices in the industry against tightening export controls, and above all against restricting open-weight models. TechCrunch ran the headline that same day: the open source community had just lost one of its strongest defenders. And on the very day he walked out, Bloomberg reported that OpenAI had told US lawmakers it backs tightening China's access to chips, while Congress pushed in the same direction.
In twenty-four hours, the main industrial obstacle to closing AI disappeared from the board.
Step 2: wait for the crisis. Not cause it. Wait for it.
Because it doesn't need causing. On April 28, 2025, Spain and Portugal lost power in under 90 seconds. 50 million people in the dark. Around ten undersea cables have been cut in the Baltic since 2022. CSIS has counted more than 150 hybrid incidents across Europe. The head of France's cyber agency told lawmakers about possible strategic pre-positioning by state actors on roughly thirty interconnection points of the French grid.
Milton Friedman spelled out the mechanism in 1982: only a crisis produces real change, and when it hits, what gets done depends on which ideas are already within reach. Rahm Emanuel, Obama's right hand, said it more bluntly in 2008: never let a serious crisis go to waste.
You don't need a conspiracy when you have a vulnerability and a bill sitting in a drawer.
Step 3: the moratorium.
And here you don't have to imagine anything, because the text already exists. It's called the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act. Filed September 23, 2026, by Bernie Sanders in the Senate and Greg Casar in the House. Bill number S. 5493.
What's in it: an outright ban on developing superintelligence. Twenty years in prison, the same bracket as nuclear weapons. A pause on advanced model development. A new federal Department of Artificial Intelligence to write the rules. Supervised destruction of any superintelligence discovered. And an explicit call for international coordination to extend the ban to the entire planet.
Nineteen pages. Public. You can read them tonight.
Step 4: and this is where it tips.
Ask yourself the only question that matters. If you ban superintelligence, how do you verify that nobody is building one in secret?
There is exactly one answer. You monitor the compute. Then the data centers. Then the networks. Then the code. Then the people writing the code. Then the payments to the people writing the code.
A global ban on a technology that runs on consumer hardware isn't a law. It's a surveillance architecture. There is no gentle version.
And in Europe, the rails are already laid. Chat Control, whose voluntary version has been in force since July 31, 2026, with the permanent one still in trilogue and detection orders still on the table. The digital euro, which the ECB wants legislated before the end of this year, piloted in 2027, issued by 2029, with an indicative cap of 3,000 euros per citizen. The DSA, which turned speech control into an administrative competence. The European digital identity wallet.
Every one of those texts is defensible on its own. That is precisely what makes them work. Nobody ever votes for 1984. People vote for protecting children, for payment sovereignty, for fighting disinformation, for cutting red tape.
Step 5: there is no step 5. By then it's done.
And what you get at the end is not twentieth century communism.
Mises proved in 1920 that socialism was impossible for a technical reason: without prices, no planner can calculate. Hayek drove the nail in 1945. Knowledge is dispersed, local, tacit, and it does not exist until people act.
Socialism didn't die of bad intentions. It died of a calculation problem.
And that's what AI changes. For the first time in a century, someone will be able to say: now we can calculate. We can model everything, allocate everything, optimize everything, anticipate everything. No more need for markets. No more need for prices. No more need for you.
They will be wrong, because Hayek wasn't talking about processing power, he was talking about the nature of knowledge itself. But they will try anyway. With the cameras, the programmable money, the message scanning, and a law that makes the freedom to compute a crime.
Communism on hormones. A system that will never run short of anything again, except one thing.
They asked you to hold out for 72 hours.
Nobody told you what happens in the 73rd.
🚨 Brivael reads the globalists' minds, episode 480384 🚨 ⚠️ Here is what they are going to do, and attempt, to impose regulation on AI. ⚠️ In order. With the texts that already exist. Let's start with a fact nobody connects to anything. For the past eighteen months, nearly every Western government has been asking you for exactly the same thing: be able to survive on your own for 72 hours. March 2025, the European Commission publishes its Preparedness Strategy: every household should be able to live three days with nothing. On November 20, 2025, France releases its guide "Tous responsables." 72 hours. 6 liters of water per person. Battery radio. Cash. Iodine tablets. Germany says ten days. Sweden and Switzerland, a week. The Netherlands recommends cash, canned food, batteries. Finland runs a national campaign literally called "72 hours." The UK, Canada, Japan, America's FEMA: same number. And on November 3, 2026, ten days ago, Brussels pushed the message again. Now add a detail almost nobody noticed. France was supposed to run a nationwide electrical blackout exercise in 2027. It was moved up to November 2026. This month. I'm not saying these people are preparing something. I'm saying they are preparing for something. That is not the same sentence, and it's the only one I will write. The kits aren't the plan. They're the backdrop that makes the plan possible. Now connect it. There is one thing the Western ruling class understood before you did: AI is destroying scarcity. Not reducing it. Destroying it. Intelligence becomes a commodity. Code becomes free. Diagnosis becomes free. Value creation decouples from hours worked. And scarcity is the raw material of political power. The entire redistributive machine is built on top of it. If abundance arrives through the machine instead of through the State, nobody needs the people who promise to share the pie anymore. They don't become a minority. They become unnecessary. People who become unnecessary never go quietly. They change the rules. Step 1: take back control of the tap. On November 12, Jensen Huang left Nvidia. The trigger was a private scandal involving a woman US intelligence suspects of working for China, and the board had met the night before to consider ousting him. I'm not saying he was set up. I don't know, and neither does anyone else. I'm saying: look at who wins. Huang was one of the most consistent voices in the industry against tightening export controls, and above all against restricting open-weight models. TechCrunch ran the headline that same day: the open source community had just lost one of its strongest defenders. And on the very day he walked out, Bloomberg reported that OpenAI had told US lawmakers it backs tightening China's access to chips, while Congress pushed in the same direction. In twenty-four hours, the main industrial obstacle to closing AI disappeared from the board. Step 2: wait for the crisis. Not cause it. Wait for it. Because it doesn't need causing. On April 28, 2025, Spain and Portugal lost power in under 90 seconds. 50 million people in the dark. Around ten undersea cables have been cut in the Baltic since 2022. CSIS has counted more than 150 hybrid incidents across Europe. The head of France's cyber agency told lawmakers about possible strategic pre-positioning by state actors on roughly thirty interconnection points of the French grid. Milton Friedman spelled out the mechanism in 1982: only a crisis produces real change, and when it hits, what gets done depends on which ideas are already within reach. Rahm Emanuel, Obama's right hand, said it more bluntly in 2008: never let a serious crisis go to waste. You don't need a conspiracy when you have a vulnerability and a bill sitting in a drawer. Step 3: the moratorium. And here you don't have to imagine anything, because the text already exists. It's called the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act. Filed September 23, 2026, by Bernie Sanders in the Senate and Greg Casar in the House. Bill number S. 5493. What's in it: an outright ban on developing superintelligence. Twenty years in prison, the same bracket as nuclear weapons. A pause on advanced model development. A new federal Department of Artificial Intelligence to write the rules. Supervised destruction of any superintelligence discovered. And an explicit call for international coordination to extend the ban to the entire planet. Nineteen pages. Public. You can read them tonight. Step 4: and this is where it tips. Ask yourself the only question that matters. If you ban superintelligence, how do you verify that nobody is building one in secret? There is exactly one answer. You monitor the compute. Then the data centers. Then the networks. Then the code. Then the people writing the code. Then the payments to the people writing the code. A global ban on a technology that runs on consumer hardware isn't a law. It's a surveillance architecture. There is no gentle version. And in Europe, the rails are already laid. Chat Control, whose voluntary version has been in force since July 31, 2026, with the permanent one still in trilogue and detection orders still on the table. The digital euro, which the ECB wants legislated before the end of this year, piloted in 2027, issued by 2029, with an indicative cap of 3,000 euros per citizen. The DSA, which turned speech control into an administrative competence. The European digital identity wallet. Every one of those texts is defensible on its own. That is precisely what makes them work. Nobody ever votes for 1984. People vote for protecting children, for payment sovereignty, for fighting disinformation, for cutting red tape. Step 5: there is no step 5. By then it's done. And what you get at the end is not twentieth century communism. Mises proved in 1920 that socialism was impossible for a technical reason: without prices, no planner can calculate. Hayek drove the nail in 1945. Knowledge is dispersed, local, tacit, and it does not exist until people act. Socialism didn't die of bad intentions. It died of a calculation problem. And that's what AI changes. For the first time in a century, someone will be able to say: now we can calculate. We can model everything, allocate everything, optimize everything, anticipate everything. No more need for markets. No more need for prices. No more need for you. They will be wrong, because Hayek wasn't talking about processing power, he was talking about the nature of knowledge itself. But they will try anyway. With the cameras, the programmable money, the message scanning, and a law that makes the freedom to compute a crime. Communism on hormones. A system that will never run short of anything again, except one thing. They asked you to hold out for 72 hours. Nobody told you what happens in the 73rd.
— Brivael Le Pogam (@brivael) November 13, 2026
Comments