I had no intention of the Tea Party Movement to become a Third Party. I have Republicans in Florida who are trying to make this a third party and I may have to take legal actions against them. I believe the best course of action is to be a watchdog or Inspector General to keep political parties honest. I will use the movement to attract people and it the political parties responsibility to convince the public that you are the alternative from the major political party or other choices.I get very upset when I see candidates on the main stage, but my structure allows for staging area where candidates can invite audience to hear about the real issues and real solutions. I think this brings value to any legitimate organization, especially when the major players prevent access to the Party Platform via finance, media, influence and ballot access. I believe the candidate with the best message should represent that political platform and eventually to lead the nation.Currently, we have no real choices. It is the progressives (i.e.Elitist, Aristocrats, Nobles, etc.) who own both Major Parties then the question is not choice but rather the rate of speed as a selection. These parties seem to be going the same direction. That is why we call it the lesser of two evils. I think Evil is Evil. Why can't we have a party or candidate that brings value to the American People. So I don't agree that the Tea Party Movement should be a third party. We pole better than the major party and could easily win, however, we as a nation would be lesser for it, because eventually we become the new foxes in the hen house. We need a permanent solution not temporary one. However, we should direct attendees to those who believe their message is the right one for the current situation.God Bless,Dale RobertsonTea Party Founder
Comments