In numerology, 4 is stability, the symbol of law, system and order. It is the builder submitting to earthly things where form and substance are the predominant elements.
In Entangled Minds, chapter 4, Dean Radin, student of the paranormal, wrote the reason some of us understand things others don’t is due to a property paranormal specialists know as “latent inhibition, an unconscious process that degrades the ability to pay attention to stimuli that in the past has had no consequence.”
The more the latent inhibition, the more focused one is, the more tuned into system and order. The more imaginative one is, the less the focused attention. They are more creative and better suited for change.
When I came into this life, I couldn’t talk or walk. I fell a lot. Got burned on the stove. Crying didn’t help. After I grew teeth, I was expected to eat the food put before me, most of which I didn’t like. A lot was expected of me. Small children have short attention spans. They are more imaginative, more creative. They have low latent inhibition.
After I had become comfortable with the routine at home, I was hustled off to school, and a whole new, somewhat hostile world. And if that wasn’t bad enough, came the day I had to exist on what I was taught. I was a slow learner. At midlife, I had no place to go, and left strictly on my own. After the initial feeling of panic, then acceptance, and finally what to do, I decided to cut out and start from scratch.
I decided to write a book of memoirs. Thinking back on my life caused me to pay attention to the stimuli I’d ignored.
Radin remarked that he was not a good history student. I flunked high school history. Said Radin, learning dates and places of important events isn’t the important thing to learn. Radin and I think alike on this: who we are and what we are about is deeply rooted in the past. Whatever the challenge and whatever the reaction is the important thing to know about history.
Again, Radin and I think alike. Early Americans, Radin points out in chapter 4, did not have “cell phones and grocery stores and life was hard. Nature was unpredictable and unforgiving. . . Magic has been defined as ‘the employment of effective techniques to allay anxiety when effective ones are not available.’” In other words, necessity is the mother of invention.
Magic, we know, is a hand-is-quicker-than-the-eye game. The mainstream, focused on this or that, don’t see themselves as the individual they were created to be. These latently inhibited folks don’t see which shell the pea is under. Their attention is focused on things. This leaves the door open to political, legal, and religious authorities to practice their magic on us.
The author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, was a deist. Deism: belief in the existence of God on the evidence of reason and nature, with rejection of supernatural revelation. We Americans are told we practice freedom of religion. It’s a shell game. Some Americans want us to be freed altogether of religion. A Christian told me I was a secular humanist. I looked it up. Secular humanism: any set of beliefs that promotes human values—without specific allusion to religious doctrines; in other words, deism.
Under secular humanism is secularism: a system of political or social philosophy that rejects religious faith and worship; the view that public education and other matters of civil policy should be conducted without the influence of religious beliefs. Distinguish the difference. Secularism embraces the expedient idea that Jesus was a socialist: that Christians who believe otherwise are against Jesus. President Obama is an advocate of Liberation theology, “collective salvation.” It’s a shell game dividing America. United we stand, divided, we fall. To be sure, we Americans are “latently inhibited.” One never knows where the ax will fall next.
In 1975, I was living from hand to mouth. The IRS claimed, mistakenly, that I owed $1,500 in tax. My landlord was threatening to lock me out for non-payment of rent. Uncle Sam was taking in withholding tax 20 percent of my meager wages. I had petitioned the Tax Court but that didn’t solve the immediate problem. If I didn’t pay the tax the IRS said I owed, the IRS had the right to seize my car, the only thing of value I owned. I would lose my job—be a homeless bum on the street.
I filed a carry back tax refund form for $5,000 of already paid tax I was entitled to get back. The IRS informed me that it was taking the $1,500 tax I allegedly owed off of what it owed me and would not send the balance until I withdrew my petition to the Tax Court, thinking I’d be forced to accept this deal. The IRS was not authorized to hold the balance of my refund. The IRS was breaking the law in more than one way. The IRS knew that its $1,500 assessment was erroneous.
The IRS was playing the old shell game on the wrong person. I’d made an intense study of the law. I knew which shell the pea was under. I could play the same game. I made it known to Attorney General William B. Saxbe in 1973 that the United States was unconstitutionally taxing me. He forwarded my letter to Director of Internal Revenue Ervin B. Osborne for answer, who wrote:
"I am glad to respond to your letter of August 19 addressed to me and your letter of July 12 addressed to Attorney General William B. Saxbe, which has been passed along to me for reply."
"You asked if Congress has the right to tax any amount of personal income tax up to 100%, with no limitations."
"The 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which was passed by Congress in 1909 and finally ratified by three-fourths of the states in 1913 provides . . . "
"This Amendment to the Constitution, which has been upheld by the Supreme Court, makes no mention of limitations, so I assume that Congress has the power to tax total income at a given level."
Imagine that, assuming the power to take every cent of our effort to provide for ourselves. I doubt very much that you knew that. The Director was lying. It was not the 16th Amendment he wrote about. It was the 3,000,000 ambiguous word-long U.S. Tax Code. A congressional shell game gave your elected representative full control over your lives.
The law said I had the right to challenge the IRS “mistake” in Tax Court, but I must pay the deliberately mistaken tax and wait three or four years to be heard, an act of Congress. Clearly, America’s elected representatives, due to the latent inhibition in the American people, were taking away my right to exist in violation of a fundamental right. Due to latent inhibition, the United States, the world’s police force, is out of control. Today is Veteran’s Day. I’m a World War II veteran. Since World War II, the American people have been needlessly sacrificing their lives and going bankrupt fighting losing wars.
The beginning of the greatest fraud of all times, the United States of America, was In 1937, and by none other than We-have-nothing-to-fear Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal Law—the old shell game. Claimed Roosevelt, “The balance between the three great branches of the Federal Government has been tipped out of balance by the courts in direct contradiction of the high purposes of the framers of the Constitution. We have reached the point where we must take action to save the Constitution from the Court.”
A Roosevelt appointee to the Supreme Court, Justice Brandeis, asserted, “Property is only a means. It has been a frequent error of our Court that they have made the means an end.” Goodbye to my inalienable right to exist on the fruits of my labor. The United States gave itself the authority to put me on the street and nobody knew that, thanks to latent inhibition. You can read more about it at the Internet’s Google.
The law in today’s America is based on the majority vote. Anything can be lawful. The house of cards America’s elected representatives have built will collapse. You can be sure of that. And then what? What’s taking place in America today is a repeat performance of what happened in Germany. The Weimer government, the same as America’s government, ran the nation bankrupt. Hitler was the answer. The likes of Obama is America’s answer.
Comments