TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Is This Any Way to Confirm
a Supreme Court Justice?
.
dummycrats-Dems Refuse to Vote,
Walk Out of Judiciary Meeting on Kavanaugh
by Benny Johnson
{dailycaller.com} ~ Two dummycrats-Democrats refused to vote on a motion to advance Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination... and multiple dummycrats-Democrats serving on the Senate Judiciary Committee walked out on the proceedings directly after the vote. Sens. scumbag-Cory Booker and lowlife-Kamala Harris refused to answer when they were asked to vote yay or nay on a motion to schedule a Kavanaugh vote for later in the day. When scumbag-Booker’s name was called, he shook his head. lowlife-Harris merely stared at Chairman Chuck Grassley with her hand on her chin. “They are not answering because this is so unfair, Mr. Chairman,” their colleague Amy Klobuchar explained. After the motion passed, confirming a 1:30 p.m. EST vote time for Friday, lowlife-Harris, Connecticut Sens. scumbag-Richard Blumenthal and scumbag-Sheldon Whitehouse, and Hawaii Sen. scumbag-Mazie Hirono left the room in protest. lowlife-Harris tweeted soon after, “Moments ago I walked out of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Kavanaugh. This hearing is a sham and Dr. Ford and the American people deserve better.”... .
Kavanaugh and the Depth of dummycrats-Democratic Evil
by Lloyd Marcus
{americanthinker.com} ~ Like many of my fellow Americans, I wept for Brett Kavanaugh while watching him deliver his powerful, heartfelt, and facts-filled opening statement at the hearing... Witnessing the evil dummycrats-Democratic smear machine's destruction of this great man's character and life was heartbreaking. Reasonable Americans must conclude that the 36-year-old, evidence-free sexual assault allegations against him are false. Making the point that the smear of Kavanaugh is gutter politics at its unprecedented lowest, Newt Gingrich said even the ten dummycrats-Democrats at the hearing know that the sexual assault allegations are false. Decent people saw and felt the pain and suffering cruelly inflicted upon Judge Kavanaugh and his wife and children by the dummycrats-Democrats' outrageous lies to block his confirmation. And yet, after the hearing, the grotesque American left relentlessly tripled down on its demonic mission to destroy Kavanaugh and his family. dummycrats-Democratic talking heads continue to sell their absurd lie that Kavanaugh is a gang rapist, ignoring the facts he gave proving his innocence. dummycrats-Democratic Sen. Dianne Fein-stein and her minions have no shame, no regrets, no morality, and no decency – laser-focused on blocking Kavanaugh and Trump at any and all cost, throwing the truth under the bus. For years, I have tried to sound the alarm to my family that, as a black conservative political activist, I am engaged in a battle of good versus evil rather than differing well meaning political views. The American left is evil: anti-Christian, anti-American, and anti-freedom. Nothing proves my point more clearly than the dummycrats-Democrats' deviant attempt to keep Kavanaugh, a Christian constitutional conservative, off our nation's highest court. dummycrats-Democrats fear that Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court will throw a wrench into their ability to kill babies as late as the date of birth. The abortionist delivers the entire body except for the baby's head. He then shoves scissors into the brain from behind to kill the child. Abortion mill staffers say that upon hearing the screams of partially birthed babies, they have soured on the horrific procedure. dummycrats-Democrats celebrate every abortion because of their perverted belief that killing babies "saves the planet."...
Kavanaugh friend Mark Judge agrees to cooperate
with FBI probe, denies latest allegations
by Brooke Singman
{foxnews.com} ~ The high school friend of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, whose name has been drawn into the allegations leveled against the Supreme Court nominee by several women... said Friday he would cooperate with any law enforcement investigation that will “confidentially” probe the allegations, which he “categorically” denies. In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ranking Member Dianne Fein-stein, D-Calif., Friday, Mark Judge, denied the latest round of accusations brought against him and Kavanaugh by Julie Swetnick—the client of Stormy Daniels’ attorney Michael Avenatti. Swetnick accused Kavanaugh and Judge of making unwanted sexual advances at women while at parties in high school in the early 1980s, drugging the “punch” at parties, and participating in “gang rapes” and “train rapes.” Swetnick claims she is a victim of gang rape, and said that both Judge and Kavanaugh were there to watch the incident. “In response to the Committee’s request for information, I, MARK JUDGE, declare: The allegations in the Swetnick affidavit are so bizarre that, even while suffering from my addiction, I would remember actions so outlandish. I categorically deny them,” Judge, a recovering alcoholic, said in the letter. “I do not know Julie Swetnick,” he continued. “I do not recall attending parties during 1981-1983 when I fondled or grabbed women in an aggressive or unwanted manner.”... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/28/kavanaugh-friend-mark-judge-agrees-to-cooperate-with-fbi-probe-denies-latest-allegations.html.
Senator scumbag-Cory Booker Can't Shake
His Own Lurid Sexual Misconduct Allegations
by DEBRA HEINE.
Leaks Begin – FBI Contacts Accuser Deborah Ramirez
by sundance.
Left & Right Wednesday, September 26, 2018
by Tom Mclaughlin
{tommclaughlin.blogspot.com} ~ Newspaper publisher Mark Guerringue again sits in the left chair. Mark suggests Republicans don't believe America is great, or why the slogan MAGA or "Make America Great Again."... I say scumbag/liar-nObama tried to stifle hydro-fracking, but Mark claims he encouraged it. I credit Trump for today's booming economy; Mark credits scumbag/liar-nObama. We argue. It's the day before the big Senate hearing on Kavanaugh. We speculate about whether his appointment will be ratified. I think maybe yes, Mark thinks no. We discuss the charges by Christine Ford. I don't believe them. Mark does, but this is before the hearing. Marks asks if I think Ford is lying. I say that's a different question. I ask Mark why Dianne Fein-stein held Ford's letter off until the last minute when she had it in July. Are Republicans trying to get to the truth about whether Kavanaugh sexually assaulted Ford? I suggest they are. Mark thinks that naive. I contend dummycrats-Democrats would destroy Kavanaugh and his family to preserve Roe V Wade. Most of the rest of the show concerns the Kavanaugh hearings. We know now what happened there. My predictions were pretty much borne out when Kavanaugh went after the Democrats as on a "search and destroy" operation.
Is This Any Way to Confirm
a Supreme Court Justice?
{townhall.com} ~ Until two weeks ago, President Donald Trump's nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court seemed a sure thing. He ably handled more than 1,200 questions put to him by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He demonstrated even to his adversaries a masterful command of constitutional jurisprudence. The FBI had completed six background investigations of Kavanaugh throughout his career in government, and it found no blemishes.
Trump promised that he would appoint federal judges and justices who generally share his views on life, guns and administrative regulations and who have a minimalistic view of federal power. When he announced the Kavanaugh nomination, it appeared he had found his man.
The nomination requires Senate confirmation by a majority vote. The Senate currently has 51 Republicans and 49 dummycrats-Democrats. A few Republican senators do not share the president's stated views on the judiciary, and a few dummycrats-Democrats do. The inside consensus was that enough dummycrats-Democratic senators running for re-election in states that Trump carried in 2016 would vote to confirm Kavanaugh and those dummycrats-Democrats would handily offset the few Republicans who might oppose him.
During his confirmation hearings, Kavanaugh dutifully followed the pattern of all current sitting justices at their confirmation hearings by declining to answer hypothetical questions which sought answers as to how he might vote on certain issues likely to come before the court. He survived the grueling cross-examination by Committee dummycrats-Democrats and even won begrudging praise from a few.
Then, Sen. Dianne Fein-stein, a dummycrats-Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, dropped a bombshell.
She revealed that a constituent who wished to remain anonymous had written a letter to a member of the House of Representatives, who had turned the letter over to Fein-stein. The letter contained allegations by the writer, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, that Kavanaugh had drunkenly attempted sexual assault against her 36 years ago. Fein-stein had the letter for two months before she revealed its existence -- a week after the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings had ended.
This is reminiscent of allegations leveled by Professor Anita Hill against then-Judge Clarence Thomas, though those allegations were of inappropriate words in the workplace and the Ford allegations are of force and violence in a bedroom. When Hill's allegations were published, President George H.W. Bush dispatched the FBI to resume its background investigation of Thomas, and it did so.
Trump has declined to dispatch the FBI to investigate Ford's allegations, and other allegations that have now followed hers, because he and Senate Republicans are determined to seat Kavanaugh by next week.
In the absence of an FBI investigation, Ford gave an interview to The Washington Post in which she aired her complaints in graphic detail, despite missing facts and fuzzy recollections. dummycrats-Democrats demanded that the Judiciary Committee hear from her and again from Kavanaugh. They appear to be assuming that Kavanaugh should not enjoy the American presumption of innocence and -- without hearing a word from Ford or seeing any corroborating evidence - have concluded that Kavanaugh must be guilty of this alleged offense and thus cannot be confirmed.
Then the folks in the White House who are managing the Kavanaugh nomination advised him to violate Criminal Procedure 101: Don't deny publicly an allegation before it has credibly and publicly been made. So, Kavanaugh was interviewed by my Fox News colleague Martha MacCallum. Her questions were far better than his answers.
His answers to the allegations contained in a newspaper story were three-fold -- he didn't do it, he wants a fair process and -- unthinkably -- he was a virgin during his high school and college years. I say "unthinkably" not because virginity is beyond belief but because this claim was not in response to any of MacCallum's questions and it bore so deeply into Kavanaugh's personhood as to be none of the public's business. And it is not a defense to the Ford allegations.
What's going on here?
What's going on is crisis and panic. The pro-choice dummycrats-Democrats are in crisis: They are so fearful of a decisive vote to limit the Supreme Court's abortion jurisprudence that they are willing to destroy a qualified judge's career to block his advancement. And Kavanaugh's handlers, who, at this writing, probably lack the votes for confirmation, have recklessly put him on the offensive, even if it is debasing and invasive.
Now we await a potentially tragic confrontation on national television between Ford and Kavanaugh, which will come down to perception rather than reality. The issue is not whether he did it. Rather, it is whether his denials are more believable than her allegations. At the end of their Judiciary Committee confrontation, will the general public perception be that Ford was more credible or that Kavanaugh was more credible?
There are no rules here. Ford has no legal obligation to prove her allegations, and Kavanaugh has no legal obligation to disprove them.
A tie -- the public perception that Ford and Kavanaugh are equally credible -- will be very troublesome for Kavanaugh. No woman would go through what Ford is going through if she lacked a personal commitment to the truth. So Kavanaugh can only win if Dr. Christine Ford is generally disbelieved.
The Kavanaugh nomination was supposed to be Trump's gift to his pro-life, conservative, evangelical base. It has become anything but that. If Judge Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed, will he ever lose the taint of these allegations? If he is not confirmed, can he return to the second-highest court in the land, on which he now sits? Is this how the framers expected the selection process for the Supreme Court to play out? In a word: No.
Comments