The Front Page Cover
The Events of the Week -- Featuring:
A Fitting Final Chapter
to the Sleaze Sweepstakes
by George Will
by George Will
.
Behind liar-nObama's Continued Interference in the
liar-Clinton Probe
Allyne Caan: If there's one person for whom blindness is a prerequisite, it's Lady Justice. But Barack liar-nObama is yet again trying to strip her of her blindfold while putting his thumb on the scales she holds. The latest case in point is FBI Director James Comey's recent decision to reopen the investigation into liar-Hillary Clinton's private email server.
Recall that earlier this year liar-nObama stuck his presidential nose in the investigation (while fervently denying doing so), promising "there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI." In almost the next breath, he said, "I continue to believe that [liar-Hillary Clinton] has not jeopardized America's national security." In other words, "Department of Justice, don't you dare contradict me and charge liar-Hillary."
As we all know, in July, Comey chose not to recommend charges. That was then. This is now.
Among the newest revelations is that U.S. intelligence is 99% sure at least five foreign intelligences agencies hacked liar-Hillary's server. That jeopardized national security, contrary to liar-nObama's claim.
After finding a slew of new related emails as part of a separate investigation of former NY Congressman Anthony Weiner's disturbing sex addiction, Comey has reopened the liar-Clinton email probe. And liar-nObama isn't happy. Of course, as an accomplice to liar-Hillary's crimes, he has good reason not to be.
You see, one reason liar-nObama was desperate to avoid charges against liar-Clinton is that he would have implicated himself in the process. Despite claiming he learned of liar-Clinton's use of a private email server "the same time everyone else learned it, through news reports," it turns out POTUS communicated with liar-Clinton using a pseudonym via that private server. Oops.
Another reason for liar-nObama's latest interference is that there are reports of a "likely" indictment stemming from the FBI's separate probe of the liar-Clinton Foundation's pay-to-play schemes — a probe that has now taken a "very high priority."
Remember that Most Transparent Administration in History™? Yeah, we don't either.
liar-nObama would never own up to putting national security at risk, lying to the American people, and trying to obstruct justice, so he's going after Comey instead.
Commenting on Comey's decision to disclose to Congress that the FBI is looking into new emails that could be related to the liar-Clinton probe, liar-nObama asserted that he didn't want to "look like I'm meddling" but noted, "I do think that there is a norm that when there are investigations, we don't operate on innuendo and we don't operate on incomplete information and we don't operate on leaks. We operate based on concrete decisions that are made." In other words, "I don't want to meddle — but I'm going to meddle."
liar-nObama went on to complain, "When this was investigated thoroughly last time, the conclusion of the FBI, the conclusion of the Justice Department, the conclusion of repeated congressional investigations, was she had made some mistakes but that there wasn't anything there that was prosecutable." Well, of course the feds decided not to charge liar-Clinton after liar-nObama pressured them to reach that conclusion.
As for liar-nObama's reference to "norms" as justification for attacking Comey's renewed probe, it's laughable. The "norm" would using a secure government server for classified information. The "norm" would not be for the State Department, upon being alerted by The New York Times of its blockbuster on liar-Clinton's private server, to first contact liar-Clinton's campaign to coordinate a response. The "norm" would be prosecuting a secretary of state after finding her guilty of "gross negligence in handling classified material" — particularly when the law says such negligence is a felony. And as Hot Air's Allahpundit explains, the "norm" would be "for the president not to insert himself into a criminal investigation that's been reopened by suggesting the matter is settled."
It's little wonder that likely voters now view Donald Trump as more honest and trustworthy than liar-Hillary, 48% to 36%. Back in September, the two were tied on the honesty-meter.
As National Review's David French wryly observes, "It turns out that when you spend days and days pitching a fit about being under FBI investigation, you end up reminding people that you're under FBI investigation."
And here's an October "surprise" for you, liar-Hillary: It's hard to trust a candidate who's getting lots of attention from a G-Man spotlight.
A final thought: liar-Clinton, liar-nObama and every other Democrat are working furiously to discredit Comey for many reasons, but one may stand out as primary. Winning the election might be the only way liar-Hillary stays out of prison. ~The Patriot Post
.
.
Abedin’s Computer, Confirming l
iar-Hillary Was Behind the Murder of
Ambassador Chris Stevens
by Harry Hibbs
{gopthedailydose.com} ~ Wikileaks is about to confirm the story that The Common Sense Show told 4 years ago in that Ambassador Stevens was set up to die because his stories of gun-running, child trafficking and drug-running... on behalf of the CIA in order to promote regime change in Libya using terrorists funded by these illegal activities, were leaking out and it was only a few months until the election. Subsequently, Ambassador Stevens had to be silenced. And Petraeus had to be put in a place where he was not forced to testify before Congress because he could not take the 5th before Congress. liar-Hillary Clinton has been destroyed with email hacks and document leaks for nearly two months now, and she will be waking up this morning to another one. In an email released Monday regarding liar-Hillary’s Benghazi investigation, there was one specific message that detailed the exact location of Ambassador Chris Stevens. Because this email was sent through the unsecured server, it is highly probable that terrorists intercepted the message... http://gopthedailydose.com/2016/11/03/wikileaks-abedins-computer-confirming-hillary-behind-murder-ambassador-chris-stevens/
.
Lynch DOJ Is Obstructing Justice In Stonewalling
liar-Clinton Investigations
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs speaks to the internal conflict that has broken out between the FBI and “Justice” Department over the liar-Clinton investigations... He says, “A number of sources tell us that the liar-nObama “Justice” Department blocked FBI agents’ access to standard investigative aids including a grand jury.” Dobbs says, “The Wall Street Journal reports a secret audio recording of an informant led to that internal battle between the FBI and “Justice” Department. Those arguments over the strength and persuasiveness of the evidence. Justice Department headquarters officials even telling officers investigating the Foundation to ‘stand down’ back in February. But as we know, because of the integrity and the judgment of the field agents, the liar-Clinton Foundation pay-to-play probe, while slowed, never ended and it’s now a high priority.”...
.
Holes and Moles in U.S. Intelligence
by Cliff Kincaid
{aim.org} ~ One of the biggest jokes of the presidential campaign is that the WikiLeaks disclosures prove that Vladimir Putin favors Donald J. Trump for U.S. president... I’m not naïve about Russia. I co-authored Back from the Dead: The Return of the Evil Empire, about a resurgent Russia. I believe there are Russian links to global Islamic terrorism. They also target the U.S. for propaganda and disinformation operations. But The Washington Post has been cheerleading for liar-Hillary Clinton for president, on the spurious grounds that she is knowledgeable about the Russian threat and Trump is not. Have we so soon forgotten the failed Russian reset and the Russian uranium deal?... http://www.aim.org/aim-column/holes-and-moles-in-u-s-intelligence/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email110416&utm_medium=email
.
Surveillance "Reforms" Allow NSA Greater
Access Than Ever to Phone Data
by C. Mitchell Shaw
{thenewamerican.com} ~ Even as surveillance hawks such as FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and joint chairs of the Senate Intelligence Committee Senators Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) continue to claim... that terrorists and other criminals are using technology to “go dark,” so America needs an increased ability to perform civilian surveillance, the reality is that the hawks have more access to more data than ever before. And — as recent information confirms — many of the reasons for that increased surveillance ability are the supposed “reforms” that were sold to the American people as a way to curtail that surveillance. Those in power — especially those who have built their careers in government by expanding the surveillance state — are not above using manipulation to increase their power by increasing that surveillance. The recent surveillance “reforms” — particularly the misnamed USA FREEDOM Act — prove that point perhaps better than anything else could. As this writer said last year: ...
Islam's "Human Rights"
by Janet Tavakoli
by Janet Tavakoli
To the 57 members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation,
all human rights must first be based on Islamic religious law, Sharia
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ After witnessing the Islamic Republic of Iran violate human rights, adopt sharia law, persecute other religions, murder dissenters, and compel the judiciary to serve the Ministry of Intelligence... it seems clear that the worst thing that can happen to a free Western country is to allow Islamic fundamentalists to take over a government. Most of the world's 1.6 billion Muslims pray in Arabic, even if it is not their mother tongue. The problem, however, is not in the translation; it is in the ideology. Muslim scholars did not unite to protest the act of terrorism on 9/11. Instead, many celebrated a victory; the Quran includes passages that permit violence to expand Islam...
.
A Fitting Final Chapter
to the Sleaze Sweepstakes
by George Will
by George Will
{nationalreview.com} ~ As the presidential campaigns sink to the challenge of demonstrating that there is no such thing as rock bottom, remember this: When the liar-Clintons decamped from Washington in January 2001, they took some White House furnishings that were public property. They also finished accepting more than $190,000 in gifts, including two coffee tables and two chairs, a $7,375 gratuity from Denise Rich, whose fugitive former husband had been pardoned in President liar-Clinton’s final hours. A Washington Post editorial (“Count the Spoons”) identified “the liar-Clintons’ defining characteristic: They have no capacity for embarrassment. Words like shabby and tawdry come to mind. They don’t begin to do it justice.”
Today, liar-Hillary Clinton strives to live again among some White House furnishings that she and her helpmeet were compelled to disgorge. Her campaign flounders because as secretary of state some of the nation’s business might have been melded with the contents of a computer that is pertinent to an FBI investigation of a former Democratic congressman’s alleged sexual texting with a female minor. Ransack the English language for words to do this justice.
During the recent welter of reports about the liar-Clintons’ self-dealing through their charity that has been very charitable to them, The New Yorker, reporting her plans to uplift the downtrodden, quoted her aspiration: “I want to really marry the public and the private sector.” This would solve the liar-Clintons’ problem of discerning the line between public business and private aggrandizement: Erase the line.
So, herewith America’s choice. Restore the House of liar-Clinton. Or confer executive powers — powers that President liar-nObama by his audacity, and Congress by its lethargy, have proven to be essentially unlimited — on another competitor in the sleaze sweepstakes, Donald Trump, who shares his opponent’s disinclination to disentangle the personal and the political.
RELATED: History Repeats: A Nixonian Cover-up in the Homestretch of the Campaign http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441590/hillary-clinton-richard-nixon-cover-ups-lying-enemies-list?target=topic&tid=3525
Into this political maelstrom, FBI director James Comey injected an announcement that intensified the chaos without providing a scintilla of news that voters can use: An unknown number of e-mails of unknown provenance and unknown content might be “pertinent” to an investigation that already has established, beyond peradventure, that Secretary liar-Clinton was “extremely careless” with sensitive material.
Add the FBI, and the Justice Department to which it belongs, to the carnage of institutions that is a byproduct of bad judgments by the political class that have voters asking Casey Stengel’s question. In 1962, Stengel, manager of the New York Mets, an expansion team en route to a record of 120 losses, looked down his dugout at his woebegone players and wondered aloud, “Can’t anybody here play this game?”
It is grimly hilarious to hear it said that the Justice Department, by not holding Comey to established protocols concerning discussions of ongoing investigations, and concerning pronouncements close to elections, has tainted itself. ;liar-nObamacare would not have passed if Justice Department lawyers had not conducted what a federal judge declared a corrupt prosecution of Alaska’s Republican senator Ted Stevens, costing him reelection. The department has enabled, by not seriously investigating, the IRS’s suppression of political advocacy by conservative groups. Or of the IRS’s subsequent destruction of subpoenaed e-mails pertinent to this. So, unsurprisingly, the most intrusive and potentially punitive federal agency continues to punish conservative groups for being conservative, according to Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer for political groups who confirms there are indeed conservative organizations who were targeted by the IRS and have still not received their tax-exempt status.
In 2013, Barack liar-nObama professed himself “angry” about “inexcusable” IRS behavior, before he decided there was not a “smidgen” of IRS corruption. He claimed to have learned about the IRS behavior from the media. Now he claims that he learned from the media about liar-Clinton’s e-mail abuses, although they had exchanged e-mails using her private server. Perhaps.
RELATED: The Democrat Establishment Has Enabled liar-Hillary’s Corruption at Every Turn http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441618/hillary-clinton-email-scandal-democratic-elites-enabled-corruption?target=topic&tid=3525
The defining scandal of the liar-nObama era has been the media’s lackadaisical consensus that liar-nObama’s administration has had no serious scandal. This, although with the Justice Department protecting the IRS, the administration has (in the words of Richard Nixon’s White House counsel John Dean) used “the available federal machinery to screw our political enemies.”
liar-Clinton, the ultimate author of her current agony, resembles no one so much as Nixon in her paranoia and joyless pursuit of joy. Her government career began with the House committee preparing Nixon’s impeachment. Twenty-two years earlier, he had saved his career by addressing a supposed scandal with his nationally broadcast “Checkers speech,” which was mawkish, abasing, and effective. How fitting it would be for a liar-Clinton “Checkers speech” to end our long national nightmare that this campaign has been.
Today, liar-Hillary Clinton strives to live again among some White House furnishings that she and her helpmeet were compelled to disgorge. Her campaign flounders because as secretary of state some of the nation’s business might have been melded with the contents of a computer that is pertinent to an FBI investigation of a former Democratic congressman’s alleged sexual texting with a female minor. Ransack the English language for words to do this justice.
During the recent welter of reports about the liar-Clintons’ self-dealing through their charity that has been very charitable to them, The New Yorker, reporting her plans to uplift the downtrodden, quoted her aspiration: “I want to really marry the public and the private sector.” This would solve the liar-Clintons’ problem of discerning the line between public business and private aggrandizement: Erase the line.
So, herewith America’s choice. Restore the House of liar-Clinton. Or confer executive powers — powers that President liar-nObama by his audacity, and Congress by its lethargy, have proven to be essentially unlimited — on another competitor in the sleaze sweepstakes, Donald Trump, who shares his opponent’s disinclination to disentangle the personal and the political.
RELATED: History Repeats: A Nixonian Cover-up in the Homestretch of the Campaign http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441590/hillary-clinton-richard-nixon-cover-ups-lying-enemies-list?target=topic&tid=3525
Into this political maelstrom, FBI director James Comey injected an announcement that intensified the chaos without providing a scintilla of news that voters can use: An unknown number of e-mails of unknown provenance and unknown content might be “pertinent” to an investigation that already has established, beyond peradventure, that Secretary liar-Clinton was “extremely careless” with sensitive material.
Add the FBI, and the Justice Department to which it belongs, to the carnage of institutions that is a byproduct of bad judgments by the political class that have voters asking Casey Stengel’s question. In 1962, Stengel, manager of the New York Mets, an expansion team en route to a record of 120 losses, looked down his dugout at his woebegone players and wondered aloud, “Can’t anybody here play this game?”
It is grimly hilarious to hear it said that the Justice Department, by not holding Comey to established protocols concerning discussions of ongoing investigations, and concerning pronouncements close to elections, has tainted itself. ;liar-nObamacare would not have passed if Justice Department lawyers had not conducted what a federal judge declared a corrupt prosecution of Alaska’s Republican senator Ted Stevens, costing him reelection. The department has enabled, by not seriously investigating, the IRS’s suppression of political advocacy by conservative groups. Or of the IRS’s subsequent destruction of subpoenaed e-mails pertinent to this. So, unsurprisingly, the most intrusive and potentially punitive federal agency continues to punish conservative groups for being conservative, according to Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer for political groups who confirms there are indeed conservative organizations who were targeted by the IRS and have still not received their tax-exempt status.
In 2013, Barack liar-nObama professed himself “angry” about “inexcusable” IRS behavior, before he decided there was not a “smidgen” of IRS corruption. He claimed to have learned about the IRS behavior from the media. Now he claims that he learned from the media about liar-Clinton’s e-mail abuses, although they had exchanged e-mails using her private server. Perhaps.
RELATED: The Democrat Establishment Has Enabled liar-Hillary’s Corruption at Every Turn http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441618/hillary-clinton-email-scandal-democratic-elites-enabled-corruption?target=topic&tid=3525
The defining scandal of the liar-nObama era has been the media’s lackadaisical consensus that liar-nObama’s administration has had no serious scandal. This, although with the Justice Department protecting the IRS, the administration has (in the words of Richard Nixon’s White House counsel John Dean) used “the available federal machinery to screw our political enemies.”
liar-Clinton, the ultimate author of her current agony, resembles no one so much as Nixon in her paranoia and joyless pursuit of joy. Her government career began with the House committee preparing Nixon’s impeachment. Twenty-two years earlier, he had saved his career by addressing a supposed scandal with his nationally broadcast “Checkers speech,” which was mawkish, abasing, and effective. How fitting it would be for a liar-Clinton “Checkers speech” to end our long national nightmare that this campaign has been.
Comments