In numerology, the number 8 represents assuming power, for now we’ve achieved personal responsibility for our lives. In the 8 cycle, recognition and financial rewards are bestowed in business. We now have reached the point when we can reap what we’ve sown. We’ve learned to view life in broad terms. The quality of life expands to new plateaus, giving one more drive, more perseverance to go to the very top of whatever one chooses to do.
When you take everything into consideration, the power to produce anything at all must come from order, and all the way back to the universe. Order comes from a state of conscious awareness. We give the source of conscious awareness the name “God.”
We humans, consciously aware of more than any other life form on the planet, are aware of ordered liberty—the freedom to be individual as long as we don’t bring harm to others.
We realize that some control must be delegated to government. We Americans, after declaring our independence from England’s government, spent years in the designing of our Constitution. It called for a balance of power in government, a government of the people, for the people.
“We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America,” we, the people, did hold our Constitution to be a sacred trust. What about now?
With regard to numerology’s 8, the Court’s test as to a right was whether the right at issue was “of the very essence of a scheme of ordered liberty,” by reason that neither liberty nor justice would exist if such a right were sacrificed.
During the Great Depression in the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected President. In 1933, Roosevelt: “While it isn’t written in the Constitution, nevertheless, it is the inherent duty of the Federal Government to keep its citizen’s from starvation.” In 1937, Roosevelt went on to assert: “The balance of power between the three great branches of the Federal Government has been tipped out of balance by the Court in direct contradiction of the high purposes of the framers of the Constitution. We have reached the point where we must take action to save the Constitution from the Court.”
It took four years to come from the inherent duty of government to keep citizens from starvation to saving the Constitution from the Court. Justice Stone, dissenting in the Roosevelt idea of redistribution of income, “Expenditures would fail of their purpose and thus lose their constitutional sanction if the terms of payment were not such that by their influence on the action of the recipients the permitted end would be attained. . . It is a contradiction in terms to say that there is power to spend for the national welfare, while rejecting any power to impose conditions reasonably adapted to the attainment of the end which alone would justify the expenditure.” Justice Stone was a prophet.
Justice Brandeis, a Roosevelt appointee, was a prophet. Asserted Brandeis: “Property is only a means. It has been a frequent error of our Court that they have made the means an end.”
The present law in the United States is that in the constitutional scheme of separation of powers, and the deference owed by the federal judiciary to the other two branches of government within the scheme present an absolute bar to taxpayers suits challenging the validity of federal spending programs.
The United States has given itself the authority, if deemed necessary, to take in tax the entire productivity of the American people. The Warren Court, in 1968, disagreed with this idea. It ruled that if the taxpayer had a personal stake in the outcome, he had the constitutional right to challenge. As yet, the Court has never seen a case wherein a taxpayer had a personal stake in the outcome, and why? The IRS is given the authority to make limitless mistakes. It goes with the territory. Attorney General Holder is an example.
As defined in Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, the individual’s soul is his immaterial essence, animating principle or actuating cause. Once you are free to think for yourself, have awakened your soul, your human awareness released, numerology defines as cycles of development, now that we’ve arrived at the personal power cycle, the United States challenging, it goes back to fundamental law, which significantly involves personal discipline.
Personal discipline involves the individual’s ability to make sense. I began with Law Professor Edward S. Corwin’s The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law.
In “The Higher Law,” Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle “advanced in Ethics the concept of ‘natural justice,’ ‘Of political justice,’ he wrote, ‘part is natural part legal—natural, that which everywhere has the same force and does not exist by people’s thinking this or that; legal, that which is originally indifferent. . .’ That is to say, the essential ingredient of the justice which is enforced by the state is not of the state’s own contrivance; it is a discovery from nature and a transcript of its constancy.”
“The discovery that custom was neither immutable nor invariable even among the Greek city states impelled the Sophists to the conclusion that justice was either merely ‘the interests of the strong,’ or at best a convention entered upon by men purely on considerations of expediency and terminable on like considerations. Ultimately, indeed, the two ideas boil down to the same thing, since it is impossible to regard as convenient that which cannot maintain, while that which can do so will in the long run be shaped to the interests of its sustainers.” What could be truer of America’s makers and keepers of the law?
If America’s lawyers are correct, numerology’s eighth cycle is null and void. “We are our brother’s keeper” is distorted by those who use their reasoning ability to empower themselves at everyone else’s cost—and it is as easy as falling off a log. People don’t know the law. By knowing the law—and using it for my personal benefit—America’s lawyers were not prepared. I reversed the process. America’s lawyers hung themselves with their own rope.
In The “Higher Law,” Aristotle advanced this idea: “even the best of men in authority are liable to be corrupted by passion. We may conclude then that the law is reason without passion and it is therefore preferable to any individual.” So know this: no matter what they say, they are not in their positions of power and control to protect your God-given rights. Most are lawyers. They make and keep the law for their own benefit. And whose fault is it?
If we knew the power we individually possess to cope, do you think Congress would remain doing nothing to solve the nation’s growing out of control spending? Would the big spenders be able to keep President Obama supplied with the power to turn America into a socialist dictatorship? Would the Federal Reserve Bank and Wall Street be able to continue ripping off taxpayers? Would fraud, waste, and mismanagement be tolerated? Do you think union workers could remain commanding far higher wages and benefits? Or do you think all of the above named abuses of taxpayers would end if we all knew the law?
A lawyer told me it would cost big money to take my $1,500 tax issue to court, and even if I won, no judge would grant the lawyer more than a small fraction of his cost. Why do we need lawyers? What are they doing for us? The law is designed by the powerful for the powerful. What would America’s makers and keepers of the law do if working people, because they had a personal stake in the outcome, took their tax issues to court? If they knew the law, they could do this without a lawyer. It takes time and study, but it doesn’t take a superior brain to know the law. I proved that. If working people knew the law, the powers that be would not be able to rob workers of their rights.
The escaped slave, Dred Scott, was heard by the Supreme Court, but remained a slave. In the estimation of those who make and keep the law, my personal stake must be sacrificed for the good of all—the idea that without all of society pulling together none of us could survive. Judges are not going to stick their necks out for us if we don’t demand our rights. They would have long ago stopped lawmakers from feathering their own nests at our expense if we’d have taken the self-serving frauds to court.
Story said: “The Constitution was, from its very origin, contemplated to be the frame of a national government of special and enumerated powers and not of general and unlimited powers. A power to lay taxes for the common defense and general welfare of the United States is not in common sense a general power. It is limited to those objects. It cannot constitutionally transcend them.” We need to inform President Obama, in a meaningful way in a meaningful place, the voting booth, that his transformation is unconstitutional; he is not fit to be President.
My case was before the Supreme Court. It was not heard. Was it for the good of all that America had black slaves? They were essential to the South’s economy. Was bailing out Wall Street at taxpayer expense essential? We are far better off without slaves. Why not tell America’s lawyers to take a hike; we’ll handle our own cases from now on? It would take little time to balance the national budget. We’d be doing posterity a great favor.
My new life began by cutting from the herd and going on my own—by establishing a new identity—by learning who I really was. It was not for the sake of learning the law but for taking action to protect what I considered to be my inalienable right to enjoy the fruits of my labor. The IRS called me a Fifth Amendment freak. They knew how to deal with me. They ended eating their humble pie. If we’d have known the law and acted, the quality of life would have expanded to new plateaus, giving people more drive, more perseverance to go to the very top of whatever they chose to do.
The Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Barack Hussein Obama have their answer. Wright goddamned America. Obama favors the Muslim Brotherhood and “collective salvation.” They need to get a life. We need to get a life.
I awakened this morning with a vision similar to a television screen not on a station, just dancing black lines with a background of grey. A hand appeared in the middle of the scene that turned into fire. It’s an omen.
Comments