Sat Med/PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
Democrats Cut Jobs, Republicans Cut Taxes
0h0pWKawFAhvHCElv3AoD12mryCHbYuEZqK7TaX3GP4UMZwBXOJUtqeQ-oD6bDkVSFYQr--MJmVDRlmMsFNIoeIKzevzNHNFt6DsR98tp8KLWI8d-hjqx4q1WYXYc7tlsrHRyv674Db4UCIgLAUzYy4xr8xZwgmfFyiQUYg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Nate Jackson  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The Taliban plays Trump for a fool
gUmv24RFstjVR5t8-Brs_dAGg4bPVu8ufs4ADp4Tdx_WynEd7sdOHs3VPfGQ3ytDDmvhOGbzVf6woNtlWQy-gFW0nhx2qyUZ57M_BVBvItFyiwzxbDvhAvde4-gOBlHsE9o=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Michael Rubin
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ After months of negotiation, Zalmay Khalilzad, President Trump’s special envoy for Afghanistan, announced that he and the Taliban had agreed on a “framework” for a peace deal... While not formalized, the framework would have the United States withdraw from Afghanistan and the Taliban guarantee to allow no terrorist group to use Afghan territory to strike at America. For Trump and many of his supporters, eager to extricate the U.S. from its longest war, it will suffice. The problem, however, is that such an agreement has been tried before — and it culminated in the Sept. 11 terror attacks. First in Commentary Magazine and then in Dancing with the Devil a history of U.S. diplomacy with rogue regimes and terrorist groups, I outlined the sorry history of past U.S. negotiation with the Taliban. The conventional wisdom that the U.S. turned its back on Afghanistan after the Mujahideen victory over the Soviet Union is wrong. Declassified documents show that, during the scumbag/liar-Clinton administration, U.S. officials and the Taliban met on more than 30 different occasions. The meetings were not limited to low-level officials. In 1998, for example, scumbag/liar-Clinton Cabinet member and United Nations Ambassador Bill Richardson met with the Taliban ambassador. Richardson, who in personality and manner is much like Khalilzad, promptly announced that he had achieved a breakthrough to end the ongoing Afghanistan civil war. Needless to say, that conflict has continued to this day. The broader problem, however, is the shape of the deal Khalilzad proposes making and which Trump apparently wants: Twenty years ago, Amir Khan Mottaqi, the Taliban’s acting Minister of Islam and Culture, assured a visiting State Department peace team led by Assistant Secretary of State Karl Inderfurth that the Taliban would not “allow terrorists to use Afghanistan as a base for terrorism.” After years of engagement with and chaos in Afghanistan, that was music to the scumbag/liar-Clinton administration’s ears. They were willing to accept on paper what they realized was incongruous with reality. The price? Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden having carte blanche to plan their Sept. 11, 2001, operation... I'm sure Trump is watching.
U.N. Censors Israeli-Made 
Wine During Holocaust Event
dpa9wyQz58VROAZLrrSeKIcDIDGOM40s8nHtwrquDKrlZUw7VK0KUV1S4dNZNyC4KBxVf6Jmm1PkHyyPgvOeomQ54vXaxqaxP4_4=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ The United Nations is again facing accusations of anti-Israel bias for erasing from display the location of an Israeli-made bottle of wine during a recent Holocaust remembrance event... according to pictures provided to the Washington Free Beacon. During a U.N. Holocaust memorial event sponsored by Austria and Norway earlier this week, an Israeli-made wine was served. However, "Golan Heights Winery," where the wine was produced, appears to have been blacked out on the label so it can no longer be viewed, according to pictures.The apparent whitewashing of the wine’s origins was first caught by Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices, whose members attended the event and posted photos on Twitter. Bayefsky, who has long tracked and called out anti-Israel bias at the U.N., said the blacking out of the wine's label represents another instance of U.N.-driven discrimination against the Jewish state—especially hypocritical on UN Holocaust Remembrance Day...
Khomeini’s Return From Exile, 40 Years On
4wsQgymDGw3oRPJ7McIohSzoeoiij0bsxmhAChxxN8ftdok8k-aFHZ9FVcWqk2wkfeRtKs0KSbaoV5jTHYAgOck0BCQ86M351nUj=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Aaron Kliegman
{freebeacon.com} ~ Forty years ago on Friday, a great nation changed for the worst. It was Feb. 1, 1979. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini sat in the first-class compartment of a chartered Air France Boeing 747 flight from Paris... accompanied by dozens of reporters. He was returning to Iran, the country from which he had been exiled for more than 14 years. When the plane entered Iranian airspace, Peter Jennings, then a correspondent for ABC News, asked Khomeini how he felt about coming back to Iran. "Hichi," the ayatollah responded, his face unmoved, like stone. "Nothing." Did the bearded 78-year-old cleric, wearing a black robe and turban, really not care? No doubt the response seemed strange to those on the jet, and it still seems strange 40 years later. Critics have argued that Khomeini's remark suggested he was apathetic about Iran and its people. Others say he wanted to distance himself from human emotions and focus on the will of God. Either way, the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolution was creating a future for the country that did not care about the Iranian people. Khomeini landed in Mehrabad International Airport in Tehran, where millions of enthusiastic Iranians came out for his arrival, many viewing him as a divine figure. From there, Khomeini oversaw the complete overthrow of the monarch of Iran, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, and with it the collapse of Iran's 2,500-year-old monarchy. The ayatollah then engineered the formation of the Islamic Republic, which he ruled as its first supreme leader until his death in 1989...
UK Councils adopt an agreed list of examples
of Sharia violations (under the guise of islamophobia)
fZ5g2d8gGEROB4Cl0Jo07Z_DRanLNvjwDWKQFaMgkKg29Z1HepFbCBovzeKwdhtPEU46cKMo5yi8-dcECHcjxHGwDgW0CbkcGvH5E0TeFiSJtItkmOSCQC5zOZ_5TA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=by Pamela Geller
{gellerreport.com} ~ Councils across the UK are starting to adopt an agreed list of examples of “islamophobia.” It is nothing less than the imposition of Islamic law... the most brutal and inhumane legal system on the face of the earth. For the enemies of freedom, telling the truth about the sharia and jihad terror in all its various guises is stigmatized as “Islamophobia.”  The very word “Islamophobia” is a fictional construct, as journalist Claire Berlinski explains:  “The neologism ‘Islamophobia’ did not simply emerge ex nihilo. It was invented, deliberately, by a Muslim Brotherhood front organization, the International Institute for Islamic Thought, which is based in Northern Virginia….Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, a former member of the IIIT who has renounced the group in disgust, was an eyewitness to the creation of the word. ‘This loathsome term,’ he writes, ‘is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.’” The term “Islamophobia” was designed specifically for the Western mindset of liberal white guilt, stealing the “civil rights” narrative from black Americans and mining the “oppression” Native Americans – even throwing in the specter of the Japanese internment camps during World War II. These are the clubs Islamic supremacists in the West use to beat down their opponents. Islamophobia is the knee-jerk smear thrown at anyone who dares to speak out or push back against the encroaching Sharia, the appeasement of Islamic supremacists demands on the secular marketplace, and the restriction of free speech...
.
The scumbag-Soros-funded propaganda smear machine Center
for American Progress fires staffers for leaks about UAE influence
ZGZD2jC2VpTKhfuRB2fX9IaSqmFVkJkPaN-tWK__5mk0omplQdK4m6JJ9YohVe_Ku3cpSg_QdkBOYq0anfZRrLxLbAiSd9V84m5Ibj7ZMOQbMSsegh_nGomjR7g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=by ROBERT SPENCER
{jihadwatch.org} ~ The Center for American Progress is the extraordinarily well-funded, mendacious and subversive hard-Left organization that published a highly deceptive and misleading report on “Islamophobia,”... a neologism designed to intimidate people into fearing to oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression. The CAP is antisemitic as well. And now we see why: it’s on the payroll of the United Arab Emirates, which uses it to promote an Islamic supremacist agenda in the United States. Meanwhile, Pope Francis praises the UAE for its “diversity.” “Center for American Progress Fires Staffers for Leaks About UAE Influence,” by Robert Kraychik, The Intercept reported on Wednesday that the Center for American Progress (CAP) — a left-wing think tank founded by scumbag/liar-Clinton and scunbag/liar-nObama administration alumnus John Podesta in 2003 — fired two staffers suspected of leaking information related to the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) influence over CAP’s operations. The UAE is one of CAP’s primary donors, with CAP listing the Gulf state’s embassy as having donated between $500,000 and $999,999 in 2017. CAP’s internal investigation of leaks followed The Intercept’s publication of a report in December examining left-wing groups’ — including CAP’s — responses to legislative efforts to end U.S. military support for Saudi Arabia in Yemen’s ongoing civil war...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Democrats Cut Jobs, Republicans Cut Taxes
0h0pWKawFAhvHCElv3AoD12mryCHbYuEZqK7TaX3GP4UMZwBXOJUtqeQ-oD6bDkVSFYQr--MJmVDRlmMsFNIoeIKzevzNHNFt6DsR98tp8KLWI8d-hjqx4q1WYXYc7tlsrHRyv674Db4UCIgLAUzYy4xr8xZwgmfFyiQUYg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Nate Jackson:  Last July, DNC Chief Tom Perez made an election pitch based on despair: “Too many members of our society are still struggling to find a good-paying job.” His assessment was quite the contrast to a little place we like to call “reality,” where unemployment is at record lows and wages are up due to competition for talent. The only ones taking away jobs are Democrats imposing unrealistic minimum wages in blue states and cities. Dems are hoping for recession, after all. A month into 2019 and three months removed from the Democrats’ win in the House, where do things stand?

One example of leftist policy is a report on Barack scumbag/liar-nObama’s crackdown on franchising as a favor to his Big Labor pals. “A report put out by the International Franchise Association and a Chamber of Commerce found that the scumbag/liar-nObama administration provoked an ‘existential threat’ to the franchise model in which small business owners operate under the umbrella of a national corporate brand,”  reports The Washington Free Beacon. (Think McDonald’s and other fast-food chains.) “The scumbag/liar-nObama administration departed from decades of precedent when the National Labor Relations Board [NLRB] held that parent companies could be held liable for labor violations committed by franchisees. The report estimated that the new joint employer standard set curtailed expansion in the industry, leading to between 142,000 and 376,000 lost job opportunities — a 2.55 to 5 percent reduction in the workforce.” It also put a $33 billion dent in the economy each year since 2015. Thanks scumbag/liar-nObama.

The damage was already done, but at least the NLRB under Donald Trump has begun unwinding that regulation.

On the Republican side, 2017 saw the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — without a single Democrat vote. This week marked the beginning of tax-filing season for 2018 income, which means millions of Americans will be reminded just how much money they’re saving. While most of the attention was focused on corporate rate cuts, and while no tax law benefits everyone, Ryan Ellis, president of the Center for a Free Economy, reminds us “the biggest part of the tax cut by far was tax cuts for individuals.”

He explains, “To start with, tax rates for families were cut across the board — for everyone. The top rate of 39.6 percent was reduced to 37 percent. The tax rates underneath went down, too. The most common middle class marginal tax rates of 15 and 25 percent were reduced to 12 and 24 percent, respectively. The marriage penalty was eliminated in all but the top tax bracket.” Furthermore, because the standard deduction was substantially raised, nearly 30 million fewer families will waste time tracking down receipts for itemized deductions — saving both time and money by going for the standard deduction. And the child tax credit doubled to $2,000 per child.

Ellis also notes, “A median income family of four with two kids makes about $80,000 per year. Their income tax burden was reduced from about $4,600 to about $2,300, a 50 percent cut in income tax. A single parent with two kids making $60,000 per year got an even bigger tax cut, seeing her taxes reduced from $3,000 to $800. Even an individual making $35,000 got in on the fun — his taxes are cut from $3,200 to $2,600.”

Maybe the mainstream media should spend a little more time reporting that good news instead of attacking Catholic boys.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60889?mailing_id=4050&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4050&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center