The Front Page Cover
2016 The truth will set you free
Featuring:
Mexico Will Pay for the Wall
by Katie Kieffer
~~~
.
The 15th Anniversary of 9/11
On Sunday, we'll solemnly mark the 15th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attack on our nation, when 2,977 innocents, mostly American citizens, were murdered by Islamic fascists. In keeping with the presidential proclamation designating Sept. 11 of each year as Patriot Day, all flags should be flown at half-staff in memory of those who lost their lives that day.
We invite you to join us as we offer our prayers for the families of those lost and for our Armed Forces now serving on the front lines of the Long War against Jihadistan. We are already paying the bloody price of appeasement and tolerance in the Middle East against a jihadi foe that is alive and well.
liar-Hillary Clinton, who wants to be judged by her record, says she'll defeat the Islamic State without putting boots on the ground. Never mind that there already are American boots on the ground. Or that the policies she and her boss enacted are responsible for the rise of the Islamic State in the first place. We need a leader who will fight for America's national security, not one who is responsible for the current malaise and who promises to continue it. ~The Patriot Post
.
liar-Hillary Has Casual Contact With the Press
Michael Swartz: If there is a clear contrast in this campaign between Donald Trump and liar-Hillary Clinton, it is this: Trump seeks out the press and attracts them like a magnet to steel, while liar-Clinton is perfectly happy to hold scripted events and avoid answering direct questions. But her blissfulness got to be a little too obvious and the press a shade too insistent, so liar-Hillary finally relented and held a press conference. Sort of.
As with all things liar-Clinton, you have to parse the term "press conference" in order to describe it as such — liar-Hillary set up on an airport tarmac with an awaiting plane and deigned to answer a grand total of six questions from the assembled media. So the long streak "technically" came to an end, but you can bet liar-Hillary endured the entire affair — which barely took 10 minutes — only because she had to.
Still more telling is the fact that not only did this availability lack a sufficient quantity of questions, but the quality was lacking as well. (That's reminiscent of the last time she met the press.) Among the queries were ridiculous softballs about her position in the polls, the "double standard" in her treatment on the campaign trail (along with a companion question about whether the media is too easy on Trump), and reaction to the "what is Aleppo?" comment made by Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson about the Syrian situation, and a piece by Matt Olsen, the former head of the National Counterterrorism Center, who remarked on Wednesday that the Islamic State was supporting Trump. That last howler was asked by longtime liar-Clinton sycophant Andrea Mitchell as liar-Hillary was departing, and she dutifully praised Mitchell for being "indefatigable" about asking questions.
The most substantive questions were deflected by liar-Clinton, who refused to discuss her intelligence briefings (at least with the press) and reiterated her comments from the night before regarding her refusal to commit ground troops to fight the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria — you know, where our ground troops already are fighting.
"This could barely be called a press conference," wrote commentator Ashe Schow. "liar-Clinton probably gets asked more questions by coffee baristas."
In this era of 24/7 media, it's fascinating how more and more press coverage reveals less and less about certain candidates. In March, we learned that during the Republican primary season Trump was the recipient of nearly $2 billion worth in free media, almost eclipsing the rest of the GOP field combined. (By comparison, second-place liar-Hillary received just shy of $750 million worth.) Coverage of all things Trump led off newscasts for months, which allowed him to develop his own narrative against the remaining Republican field.
Yet while we have a good idea why Trump has dubbed liar-Clinton "Crooked liar-Hillary," reporters seem reticent to do much digging. (Perhaps they worry about the undertaking leading them to the undertaker.) No one dared ask these obvious questions at the brief press conference, and it's doubtful that the subject will be broached at one of the upcoming Presidential debates. It's more likely the most damaging revelations will conveniently come out in the months after the election.
Pundits dismissively speak of "low-information" voters, but it's not the lack of information that's the problem. Instead, it's the shortage of useful information provided to them by the lapdog press. In terms of a legitimate press conference, liar-Clinton sparing 10 minutes on the tarmac to field a few softballs doesn't even pass the giggle test. ~The Patriot Post
.
nObama Nominates
First Muslim for Federal Judge
by Trey Sanchez
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Breitbart is reporting that President nObama nominated a Muslim lawyer to serve as a federal judge... Not only does this mark the first time that’s ever happened, but nObama becomes the first president ever to make that happen. Amid Riaz Qureshi is a lawyer in Washington D.C. and if confirmed by the Senate, would serve on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the report states. He is a ’97 graduate of Harvard and works on health care fraud and securities violations cases for the firm Latham & Watkins LLP. nObama released the following statement: I am pleased to nominate Mr. Qureshi to serve on the United States District Court bench. I am confident he will serve the American people with integrity and a steadfast commitment to justice...You can tell by nObama actions he is destroying America. http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/obama-nominates-first-muslim-federal-judge
.
Russian Fighter Came Within 10 Ft.
of Navy Surveillance Plane Over Black Sea
by Sam LaGrone
P-8A Poseidon
{usni.org} ~ A Russian fighter has come within 10 feet of a Navy surveillance flight over the Black Sea on Wednesday, defense officials told USNI News... The incident between the Navy P-8A Poseidon surveillance aircraft and a Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker occurred at about 11:20 A.M. local time in international airspace over the Black Sea, according to a statement provided to USNI News.
Russian Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker Fighter
“During the intercept, which lasted approximately 19 minutes, the Su-27 initially maintained a 30-foot separation distance then closed to within 10 feet of the P-8A, which is considered unsafe and unprofessional,” read the statement. “We have deep concerns when there is an unsafe maneuver. These actions have the potential to unnecessarily escalate tensions between countries, and could result in a miscalculation or accident which results in serious injury or death... https://news.usni.org/2016/09/07/russian-fighter-came-within-10-ft-navy-surveillance-plane-black-sea?utm_source=USNI+News&utm_campaign=88a6d186ae-USNI_NEWS_DAILY&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0dd4a1450b-88a6d186ae-231491269&mc_cid=88a6d186ae&mc_eid=3999f18767
.
Why does the South China Sea
matter to the USA? …
by Michael Mazza
{aei.org} ~ In recent years China has expanded its control over the South China Sea... but why does that matter to the United States? AEI Research Fellow Michael Mazza explains the strategic role that the South China Sea plays in the USA’s foreign, defense, and economic policies. http://www.aei.org/multimedia/why-south-china-sea-matters-to-usa-in-60-seconds/?utm_source=paramount&utm_medium=email&utm_content=AEITODAY&utm_campaign=090816
.
What Happened To Syria’s Chemical Weapons?
by HERBERT LONDON
by HERBERT LONDON
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ In August 2013 President nObama indicated President Bassar Assad of Syria had crossed the "red line" in the use of chemical weapons which killed more than 1400 people... However, instead of launching a much anticipated attack, nObama reached an accord with Russia for the removal and destruction of these chemical weapons. In July 2014 the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) announced the removal of Syria's chemical weapons stockpile. Secretary of State John hanoi-Kerry said, "we got 100 percent of the chemical weapons out." In August 2016 U.S. and European officials reported evidence of deadly chemical agents present in Syria. In fact, according to a Foreign Policy article, Assad "failed to provide sufficient access to senior leaders in its chemical weapons program or to adequately account for 2000 aerial bombs that Syria acknowledges were designed to deliver mustard gas." Despite assurances from Mr. hanoi-Kerry and pledges from Russian officials, the "red line" is now written in invisible ink. U.N. Security Council resolutions about this matter have been ignored and the Assad government has engaged in obfuscation when charges have been levelled... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/what-happened-to-syrias-chemical-weapons?f=must_reads
.
Famous Pic of Refugees
Exposed as Massive Fraud…
{conservativetribune.com} ~ One of the images that has become an icon of the pro-refugee movement from the predominantly Muslim countries has been proven to be cropped.... Oddly enough, the image, shown, has been peen portrayed all over the media as indicative of the plight that these Middle Eastern refugees endure every day. That could absolutely be done without cropping a picture, and yet here the media took another opportunity to lie to the American people. In the commonly published image, it appeared the refugees were helplessly floating in the water, fighting for their lives as best as they possibly can. There’s just one catch with that: They’re floating in about three feet of water...
.
FBI 'Stonewalling' in liar-Clinton Email Case
by Jason Devaney
{newsmax.com} ~ House Speaker Paul Ryan said the investigation into liar-Hillary Clinton's email server reminds him of the one involving the IRS scandal... and both reflected "stonewalling" by the FBI. Ryan talked about the FBI's liar-Clinton investigation during an interview on "The Hugh Hewitt Show" Thursday morning. "Yes, and it's not the first time we've experienced this," Ryan said when asked if the FBI is denying the House's constitutional oversight in the liar-Clinton case. "I was part of the IRS investigation in my last job here in Congress, and I would say it's a very, very similar story. It's a story of stonewalling... http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ryan-fbi-stonewalling-hillary/2016/09/08/id/747297/?ns_mail_uid=29878495&ns_mail_job=1685729_09082016&s=al&dkt_nbr=5f9q31ei
.
liar-Clinton Lies, Espionage Further
Exposed, Dissent At The FBI
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Catherine Herridge reports that one of her contacts has reviewed three of the liar-Clinton emails and multiple markings on the documents, including the “C” for confidential as well as every other paragraph being marked “SBU,” which means sensitive but unclassified... She says, “You never see these codes in the context of anything but classified information.” Herridge points out that this really undercuts the laughable claims liar-Clinton made to the FBI that she misinterpreted the “C” to mean some type of alphabetical listing, which is inconsistent with the nature of the documents. She details the events of March 2015 and how they relate to liar-Clinton obstruction of justice. On March 2nd the New York Times reported on the existence of the personal account that liar-Clinton was using for government business. She says, “Then within that first week there was a preservation order and also a subpoena for all of liar-Clinton’s emails from Congress. By the 9th of March the IT firm, Platte River Networks, that was managing the server, was notified they had to preserve the records. By the 25th of that month there was a conference call with liar-Clinton’s lawyers and then shortly after that the records were deleted by Platte River Networks using that Bleachbit technology.”... http://rickwells.us/herridge-clinton-lies-espionage-fbi/
.
liar-Clinton Returns To Original Lie,
No Classified On Her Illegal Server
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ What the heck is this corrupt, demonic little woman who wants to be president claiming now? Has she gone full circle and returned to the original lie that there was no classified information on her illegal home server and that she never used it to transmit classified information?... Is she deliberately acting like she’s lost her marbles to set up an insanity defense? Classified documents were found to have been stored there and they only got there by being transmitted in some form, physically removed from the secure system and loaded onto the unsecured. Many were manipulated to remove the markings. Their existence in that unsecured setting and their transmission are not in dispute. She has already acknowledged that fact with her lie about not understanding what the “C” meant. How can she now be claiming, as her head noticeably bobs up and down in some weird, apparently involuntary motion, that the classified communications she engaged in illegally were done only on a secure system. She had only one email account and that was on the illegal, vulnerable and easily hacked system. Is she now getting to the point where she’s lied so much she literally can’t remember what her latest position is?... http://rickwells.us/clinton-returns-original-lie-classified-illegal/
.
nObama Admin Wants to Cut Army’s
Force Size by 25,000 by 2018
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ The nObama administration is seeking to cut the U.S. Army’s total force size by 25,000 soldiers by 2018, bringing America’s force strength down to 450,000 from its current size of 475,000... according to a new congressional report that shines a spotlight on a growing debate over how large the force should be. Both chambers of Congress and the White House hold disparate views about how large the U.S. Army should be, according to a new congressional research report that highlights the differences between the governing bodies. While the nObama administration’s Defense Department is seeking to cut the force by 25,000 over current levels, the House is proposing to grow the Army by 5,000. The Senate is proposing to cut levels by 15,000...He won't be around by 2018. http://freebeacon.com/national-security/obama-admin-wants-cut-armys-force-size-25000-2018/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=8abfbba1ca-WFB_Morning_Beacon_09_08_169_7_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-8abfbba1ca-45611665
.
Tomi Lahren: liar-HILLARY Is Either
‘Dumb as a Rock … or She’s Lying
by Dylan
{gopthedailydose.com} ~ liar-Hillary Clinton’s vice presidential running mate, Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, attempted to explain liar-Clinton’s use of a private email server on ABC News, but many of his responses seemed to contradict previous statements, especially FBI findings... “She did make a mistake,” Kaine said. “She made it by deciding she wanted to use one device instead of multiple devices. She’s apologized for that. She said it was a mistake, and she’s learned from it.” His statement more than agitated conservative commentator Tomi Lahren: She used 13 or more devices! She didn’t use one device. She used at least 13 freaking devices! Are you seriously going to sit here and lie to the American people?... http://gopthedailydose.com/2016/09/08/tomi-lahren-hillary-either-dumb-rock-shes-lying-take-pick/
.
.
Mexico Will Pay for the Wall
by Katie Kieffer
{townhall.com} ~ Mirror, mirror on Donald Trump’s 2,000-mile wall! Who will pay $25 billion for you to be built long and tall? “Mexico. Yes, Mexico, will pay for the wall,” whispers the mirror.
Last Wednesday, Trump accepted a meeting invitation that his opponent, liar-Hillary Clinton, turned down. A meeting with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto.
Proving himself to have the thick skin necessary of America’s top executive, Trump flew to Mexico to meet Peña Nieto on his home turf, despite the fact that Peña Nieto had previously compared Trump to vile German dictator Adolf Hitler and his Italian ally, despot Benito Mussolini.
Flip-flopper! Wavering! and Photo-Op King! Such insults were hurled at Trump after he met with Mexico’s president.
Why? Because Trump supposedly reneged on his long-standing campaign promise to make Mexico pay for the wall that he plans to build along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Reality check: Trump didn’t flip-flop. Mexico will pay for the wall if Trump becomes president. Furthermore, the wall’s cost and payment are negligible in the big picture. Here’s how, and why.
November 8, 2016: America’s Big Payday
Election Day (Tuesday, Nov. 8) will be America’s big payday if Trump is elected president. Not because Mexico will literally write us a check for $25 billion with Border Wall Project on the memo line.
Every savvy businessperson knows there is more than one way in which to collect proper payment from a debtor. Banks, for example, place liens against homes for which they offer mortgages. If a bank’s customer fails to make payments, the bank will enforce the lien by initiating foreclosure procedures and seizing the home.
Every year, Mexicans working in the U.S. send at least $20 billion back to Mexico in the form of remittances, placing a huge drain on our economy. Through a combination of legal and procedural challenges, Trump could impound such remittances.
Tune into your local Spanish TV or radio network on any given day and—if you’re fluent in Spanish—you’re bound to catch frequent advertisements from organizations promising to help you send money home to Mexico. Trump’s administration could have the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) enforce large fines on networks that air such commercials.
Mexico’s government, unsurprisingly, threatens that if the U.S. impounds remittances, it will feel harsh consequences—like an uptick in money laundering. But the U.S. could easily push back even harder—legalizing drugs and effectively snuffing out Mexico’s drug cartels and crime rings overnight.
Besides cracking down on remittances, “visa fees,” “visa cancellations,” and the enforcement or enactment of “trade tariffs” are three additional ways in which Trump proposes to make Mexico pay for the wall.
Stopping Sneaking Syrians
Securing the U.S.-Mexico border is necessary because it will help safeguard our country from terrorists who originate far beyond Mexico. USA Today and many other major news outlets have confirmed that refugees originating from the terror hotbed of Syria are using our porous border with Mexico to slip into the United States without detection.
A 2016 study by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs indicates that nearly two in three Americans do not support accepting Syrian refugees into the United States. liar-Hillary, meanwhile, has voiced a willingness to outdo President nObama’s recklessness by welcoming around 550 percent more (65,000) incompletely vetted Syrian refugees into America.
Anyone who tells you that Trump’s immigration views are “hardline” or “alt-right” is disingenuous. It is liar-Clinton’s immigration policy that is “alt-left” and far outside the realm of what most Americans desire in terms of national security.
It’s Not the Money, Honey
If you still doubt Trump’s ability to compel Mexico to pay for the wall, stop focusing on the cost. The cost of building the wall—estimated to range between $10 and $25 billion—is negligible in comparison to the billions we routinely squander on programs that set back our national security.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has an annual budget of $2 billion. For this expenditure, we the taxpayers receive a TSA that corrals us like cattle every time we fly—only to have a 96 percent fail rate at catching weapons and explosives.
Trump could ask America to cover every penny of building his “tall, physical, impenetrable, beautiful wall along the southern border to stop the influx of illegal immigration” and our country would be far more secure than after dumping billions down the TSA Toilet.
1st-Timer vs. 4th-Timer
Don’t buy into claims that Trump is a flip-flopper because he went from claiming to be “softening” to “hardening” his immigration stance within a matter of days. We can’t forget that this is Trump’s first rodeo. liar-Hillary has run for president four times if you include her husband’s two runs. She has been a politician for at least 20 years whereas Trump has been a politician for barely one year.
liar-Hillary has scripted her views to the point where even she sometimes forgets her “lines,”—like when she said she would increase taxes on the middle class. Trump, in contrast, has to force himself to use a teleprompter to organize his naturally free-flowing communication style. It takes time to convert strong ideologies and values like those Trump espouses into public policies that are applicable in the real world. Trump isn’t wavering on immigration. He’s refining.
So give Trump a chance, especially when he insists Mexico will pay for the wall. As I’ve shown above, even if Mexico didn’t pay for the wall—which it will, one way or another—the wall’s cost is negligible. And liar-Hillary’s alternative immigration plan will compel you to house and clothe improperly vetted refugees and immigrants.
It only takes one criminal crossing our border to succumb your son or daughter to the tragic fate of Kate Steinle and Sarah Root. Build it tall. Build the wall.
Last Wednesday, Trump accepted a meeting invitation that his opponent, liar-Hillary Clinton, turned down. A meeting with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto.
Proving himself to have the thick skin necessary of America’s top executive, Trump flew to Mexico to meet Peña Nieto on his home turf, despite the fact that Peña Nieto had previously compared Trump to vile German dictator Adolf Hitler and his Italian ally, despot Benito Mussolini.
Flip-flopper! Wavering! and Photo-Op King! Such insults were hurled at Trump after he met with Mexico’s president.
Why? Because Trump supposedly reneged on his long-standing campaign promise to make Mexico pay for the wall that he plans to build along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Reality check: Trump didn’t flip-flop. Mexico will pay for the wall if Trump becomes president. Furthermore, the wall’s cost and payment are negligible in the big picture. Here’s how, and why.
November 8, 2016: America’s Big Payday
Election Day (Tuesday, Nov. 8) will be America’s big payday if Trump is elected president. Not because Mexico will literally write us a check for $25 billion with Border Wall Project on the memo line.
Every savvy businessperson knows there is more than one way in which to collect proper payment from a debtor. Banks, for example, place liens against homes for which they offer mortgages. If a bank’s customer fails to make payments, the bank will enforce the lien by initiating foreclosure procedures and seizing the home.
Every year, Mexicans working in the U.S. send at least $20 billion back to Mexico in the form of remittances, placing a huge drain on our economy. Through a combination of legal and procedural challenges, Trump could impound such remittances.
Tune into your local Spanish TV or radio network on any given day and—if you’re fluent in Spanish—you’re bound to catch frequent advertisements from organizations promising to help you send money home to Mexico. Trump’s administration could have the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) enforce large fines on networks that air such commercials.
Mexico’s government, unsurprisingly, threatens that if the U.S. impounds remittances, it will feel harsh consequences—like an uptick in money laundering. But the U.S. could easily push back even harder—legalizing drugs and effectively snuffing out Mexico’s drug cartels and crime rings overnight.
Besides cracking down on remittances, “visa fees,” “visa cancellations,” and the enforcement or enactment of “trade tariffs” are three additional ways in which Trump proposes to make Mexico pay for the wall.
Stopping Sneaking Syrians
Securing the U.S.-Mexico border is necessary because it will help safeguard our country from terrorists who originate far beyond Mexico. USA Today and many other major news outlets have confirmed that refugees originating from the terror hotbed of Syria are using our porous border with Mexico to slip into the United States without detection.
A 2016 study by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs indicates that nearly two in three Americans do not support accepting Syrian refugees into the United States. liar-Hillary, meanwhile, has voiced a willingness to outdo President nObama’s recklessness by welcoming around 550 percent more (65,000) incompletely vetted Syrian refugees into America.
Anyone who tells you that Trump’s immigration views are “hardline” or “alt-right” is disingenuous. It is liar-Clinton’s immigration policy that is “alt-left” and far outside the realm of what most Americans desire in terms of national security.
It’s Not the Money, Honey
If you still doubt Trump’s ability to compel Mexico to pay for the wall, stop focusing on the cost. The cost of building the wall—estimated to range between $10 and $25 billion—is negligible in comparison to the billions we routinely squander on programs that set back our national security.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has an annual budget of $2 billion. For this expenditure, we the taxpayers receive a TSA that corrals us like cattle every time we fly—only to have a 96 percent fail rate at catching weapons and explosives.
Trump could ask America to cover every penny of building his “tall, physical, impenetrable, beautiful wall along the southern border to stop the influx of illegal immigration” and our country would be far more secure than after dumping billions down the TSA Toilet.
1st-Timer vs. 4th-Timer
Don’t buy into claims that Trump is a flip-flopper because he went from claiming to be “softening” to “hardening” his immigration stance within a matter of days. We can’t forget that this is Trump’s first rodeo. liar-Hillary has run for president four times if you include her husband’s two runs. She has been a politician for at least 20 years whereas Trump has been a politician for barely one year.
liar-Hillary has scripted her views to the point where even she sometimes forgets her “lines,”—like when she said she would increase taxes on the middle class. Trump, in contrast, has to force himself to use a teleprompter to organize his naturally free-flowing communication style. It takes time to convert strong ideologies and values like those Trump espouses into public policies that are applicable in the real world. Trump isn’t wavering on immigration. He’s refining.
So give Trump a chance, especially when he insists Mexico will pay for the wall. As I’ve shown above, even if Mexico didn’t pay for the wall—which it will, one way or another—the wall’s cost is negligible. And liar-Hillary’s alternative immigration plan will compel you to house and clothe improperly vetted refugees and immigrants.
It only takes one criminal crossing our border to succumb your son or daughter to the tragic fate of Kate Steinle and Sarah Root. Build it tall. Build the wall.
Comments