Saturday Noon ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Jews have a right to their 'own land,' 
Saudi crown prince says as charm 
offensive continues
by Rick Noack  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Important – Catherine Herridge Confirms Lisa Page Statements
Contradicted Andrew McCabe, Ultimately Leading to His Firing
YK7PxyLGHlIOUONkWMfB8cQtnW7_Li7GzAAxGAb1uEbv1RzMbmD5eEtIoSfNwONWp9hUm1JB6SGXGtRKzTQQboQg7nSX96WUzvGh_BkZ2ivvI6mkXoLFK1Pe9jDYBGQkJE63tRAhr4pqIaosSnE4E7tgehR5-szVULEjbWwMGR6Z9f0=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Fox News Catherine Herridge reports today, per her FBI investigative sources... it was an investigative interview with FBI Attorney Lisa Page, in July 2017, that contradicted FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and ultimately led to his firing. That revelation is exactly what we anticipated was the origin to Inspector General Michael Horowitz gaining the text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. The issue is actually more stunning than presented.  However, first here’s the report from Herridge. In May, June and July 2017, while FBI Deputy Director Andrew “Andy” McCabe was lying to FBI investigators and the Inspector General, Lisa Page was working for McCabe as his legal counsel. Therein lies the heart and origin of the motive for Lisa Page to flip against the conspiracy group when she discovered Andrew McCabe lying to investigators about his instructions to her...  https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/04/05/important-catherine-herridge-confirms-lisa-page-statements-contradicted-andrew-mccabe-ultimately-leading-to-his-firing/ 
.
Iran Continues to Hide Past Nuclear Weapons Work 
QGZzNZjfFdnNh4MjTHsNK8a3toByxejozcYz0Mex_pWp_8E06SyhEXMi-mVMRKxH0-tBenQJ1SJmxO1yquZ93j4PksxhDt3Tut2e-A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Adam Kredo
{ freebeacon.com } ~ Iran continues to hide key work it undertook on nuclear weapons development while perfecting ballistic missile technology... that could carry such a weapon, according to a new report from a senior Israeli military official that has fueled calls from Trump administration insiders and Congress to nix the deal ahead of a May deadline. Significant flaws in the original nuclear deal reached by the liar-nObama administration with Iran has enabled Iran's ballistic missile program and permitted the Islamic Republic to obfuscate ongoing work on nuclear enrichment and possible weaponization technologies, according to Jacob Nagel, the former head of Israel's National Security Council. Loopholes in the original agreement have allowed Iran to continue working on advanced nuclear centrifuges that can enrich uranium—the key component in a nuclear weapon—at least 15 to 20 times faster than original models of these devices, according to Nagel, who is serving as a visiting fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, or FDD...
.
commie-Bernie Sanders Finally Admits 
the Ugly Truth About the Democratic Party
kCLvSpbvxUrYSn11b1XqM-T51eyzvDOpMy0cfWDm9EvDKXAT-nzdokZBuyJsddhZe8zRl8uLEJtBW7Szi0BQGioAMN15Ns_-UVjjp4XyrDTKQs8_Ce47rHgHXE3cs4dpIOfjzU_2OBJGOA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by CILLIAN ZEAL
{ conservativetribune.com } ~ Over a year after the Democrats relinquished control of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Barack liar-nObama’s legacy is being chipped away at, day after day... And it’s not just his legacy — it’s also the legacy that Democrats tried to build during their opposition to the Bush administration. It’s almost like the last 15 years or so have been a failure for the Democrats. But don’t take my word for it — take commie-Bernie Sanders’. At an event Wednesday, the socialist independent senator and rumpled Clarence Darrow impersonator from Vermont told an audience that “the last 15 years or so has been a failure” for the Democrats. It’s almost like commie-Bernie Sanders was reading my mind. The remarks came during an appearance in Jackson, Mississippi at of course a “forum for economic justice” honoring the 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s death, during which The New York Times speculated he was trying to court black voters... https://conservativetribune.com/bernie-sanders-ugly-truth/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=conservative-tribune.
The Battle of Woke Island 
ZOQ1IebpfGJpiQ_hJCQcng6BQOI8nJSefQJxGGBe-gOWKNExw66ewvz4bbaeJNc91llDhgwPBtXmpVKhz4XUnHXNL8ZJGtASj2o=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Matthew Continetti
{ freebeacon.com } ~ Toward the end of Vanity Fair‘s story on the "woke civil war" at the New York Times came this revealing detail... To assuage employees concerned that the paper is not as progressive and socially conscious as it could or should be, publisher A.G. Sulzberger, opinion editor James Bennet, and others have been "holding office hours" where internal critics speak freely. I cannot be the only reader for whom the mere mention of office hours evokes memories of college, of mid-afternoon visits to professors for inquiry, flattery, argument, and complaint. Professors and students, lecturers and auditors participate in "office hours." Editors, reporters, private and public sector workers—all adults outside academia, really—do not. Instead we have these things called "meetings." For the uninitiated, they are mandatory and take place at my convenience. Here, then, is yet another example of how the politics and rhetoric of the university have slowly colonized America's economic, cultural, and political institutions, how recent graduates are carrying with them into the workforce all the bad ideas they learned from their humanities courses, independent research, and campus programming. I am talking about the modes and categories of identity politics, of viewing all human phenomena through the prism of race and gender and sometimes, though rarely, of class, of robbing individual human beings of their moral agency and reducing them to membership in a group, and of organizing these groups into a hierarchy of victimization and grievance...  http://freebeacon.com/columns/battle-woke-island/?utm_source=Freedom+Mail&utm_campaign=ff0f3b234c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_04_05&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b5e6e0e9ea-ff0f3b234c-45611665
Andrew McCabe’s GoFundMe Campaign 
Was Put Together by K Street PR Firm
XkO2RS9i8GPmTgtlITUmu7y-LuYEigcaneSnVODN7D0kYQGrwV1RysjLf22mkBw2Pkh3_GrrU8cj03PKAogYVPJ4MF-wNdY3nHXt2EZc2sGm0L0Nw9qempq1wqpeIzSvpdjoQTGLBH1EBdFewIEt6TA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by Colin Kalmbacher
{ lawandcrime.com } ~ Andrew McCabe recently raised over half a million dollars from small donors by way of crowdfunding platform GoFundMe... McCabe’s cash-collecting prowess was buoyed by several #Resistance-linked personalities and MSNBC’s own Rachel Maddow, who suggested McCabe should run for office because he’s so good at raising money. Was this apparent “grassroots effort” actually a PR campaign put together by high-priced, well-connected, and experienced PR professionals in order to take advantage of the #Resistance’s seething anger at the Trump administration? A Monday report in Slate suggested as much. Law&Crime  can now confirm that some of those allegations are true, while some of them appear to oversell the issues at hand.  At or around 2 p.m. on March 29, “Friends of Andrew McCabe” launched a GoFundMe page to raise money for the “Andrew McCabe Legal Defense Fund.” The unidentified authors of the GoFundMe described the reason for their fundraising effort as follows... https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/andrew-mccabes-gofundme-campaign-put-together-k-street-consulting-and-pr-firm/ 
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Jews have a right to their 'own land,' 
Saudi crown prince says as charm 
offensive continues
_5OHbihsn7R9LrYwVNYOeB8v2TaatY0DtD0tyW_aeZMOStYbu53bJ9MROBkCIhFgzE8v701pPGm12iRmwaUn2TkL9W-AzEAlnThqLPmgQgI3ZLlC4H5kh-l08VAeRQnWw04=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450

by Rick Noack 
{ jewishworldreview.com } ~ Saudi Arabia appears to be in the middle of an attempt to rebrand the kingdom as progressive and, judging from the headlines since last year, the strategy appears to be working, at least to some extent.

Last September, the kingdom announced it would finally allow women to drive. One month later, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said he wanted to return to a "moderate Islam."

Now, in an interview with The Atlantic magazine's Jeffrey Goldberg, the crown prince has acknowledged that Jewish people have a right to their own homeland --- long a taboo for the conservative kingdom that was long known as a fierce foe of Israel's creation.

While Saudi Arabia in the past has talked about recognizing Israel in the context of a peace deal with the Palestinians, the crown prince's straight up acknowledgement that the Jews have a right to a homeland is the clearest statement to date.

On a practical level, Saudi Arabia has de-facto acknowledged that right since at least 2002 when it began sponsoring an initiative to foster a two-state solution - a solution that has also long been supported by the United States, even though with different premises. But officially, Saudi Arabia does not recognize the state of Israel.

While Saudi officials made Israel's withdrawal to its territory prior to the 1967 Israeli-Arab war a precondition for closer relations in the past, that fundamental demand was not explicitly repeated by the crown prince in the Atlantic interview.

"I believe that each people, anywhere, has a right to live in their peaceful nation. I believe the Palestinians and the Israelis have the right to have their own land. But we have to have a peace agreement to assure the stability for everyone and to have normal relations," he told The Atlantic.

The timing for the acknowledgment does not appear to be a coincidence, as it follows months of diplomatic gestures, including the opening of Saudi Arabia's airspace to commercial Israel-bound flights and the acknowledgment of backchannel communications between both governments.

After decades of threatening rhetoric, Saudi officials appear increasingly willing to strike a carefully conciliatory tone as they seek a new ally to confront their common arch enemy Iran and build stronger economic ties.

"Saudi Arabia has traditionally been a place that has produced a lot of anti-Semitic propaganda. Do you think you have a problem with anti-Semitism in your country?" Goldberg asked later in the Atlantic interview, to which Mohammed responded: "Our country doesn't have a problem with Jews. Our Prophet Muhammad married a Jewish woman. Not just a friend --- he married her."

"Our prophet, his neighbors were Jewish. You will find a lot of Jews in Saudi Arabia coming from America, coming from Europe. There are no problems between Christian and Muslims and Jews. We have problems like you would find anywhere in the world, among some people. But the normal sort of problems," said Mohammed, adding that there were "lot of interests we share," including economically.

The crown prince's economic reasoning laid out in the interview will likely play into the hands of critics who have long suspected the kingdom's progressive rebranding to be primarily a marketing ploy. When the crown prince announced a more "moderate Islam" last year, critics cautioned that the declaration might have more to do with boosting the kingdom's economy rather than reversing decades-old practices.

Mohammed, 32, has attempted to position himself as a favorite for the kingdom's younger citizens, who are less religious than older generations and are facing disproportionately high unemployment rates. The Saudi leader is currently pursuing a major reform plan, named Saudi Vision 2030, to revitalize the kingdom's economy.

The need for reforms may already have reversed at least some of the leadership's previous ultraconservative stances, including the driving ban for women. The step was widely interpreted as a sign that the modernizers within the Saudi government may have gained ascendance over the conservative hard-liners. Saudi Arabia's hard-liners have been under mounting pressure to agree to such proposals, as the kingdom has become increasingly engulfed in economic woes.

But the reforms have still been limited. Women's subordination to men remains unchanged and repressions against Shiites have continued --- despite Mohammed's assurances in the interview that all was well between Sunnis and Shiites in the country.

In fact, Crown Prince Mohammed has repeatedly stirred tensions against Iran, a majority-Shiite country. In an interview with the Guardian newspaper last year, he blamed Saudi Arabia's arch enemy Shiite Iran for Saudi Arabia's turn toward Wahhabism, an ultraconservative branch of Islam, which is being promoted by Riyadh both domestically and abroad. Religious scholars say that the Saudi state is deeply rooted in and has long been intimately entwined with Sunni Wahhabism. That same Islam was widely promoted in Muslim countries around the world, thanks to the Saudi state's deep pockets.

In the Atlantic interview, Mohammed nevertheless doubled down on his criticism, saying that "the Iranian supreme leader makes Hitler look good."

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center