The Front Page Cover
The Events of the Week -- Featuring:
Final Days, Awful Choice
by Charles Krauthammer
.
The Bottom Line on liar-Clinton
Mark Alexander: Over the past year, the 24-hour MSM news recyclers across the political spectrum have spun and re-spun, ad nauseam, allegations and denials about the criminal activities of liar-Hillary Clinton and her chief prevaricator, DNC point man Bill liar-Clinton. The media is, first and foremost, interested in ad revenue (one reason The Patriot Post does not take advertising), and the relentless ranting has resulted in "scandal fatigue."
The big winners in this election cycle are the MSM bank accounts. The big loser is the American people, because what is important has been diluted by what is not, and too many media consumers can no longer distinguish between the two.
Alternatively, The Patriot Post has offered cogent analysis on liar-Hillary Clinton's illegal effort to keep all of her communications as secretary of state off the grid in order to conceal them from freedom of information requests, which would expose her role in nefarious activities like the Benghazi cover-up to protect Barack liar-nObama's 2012 re-election and her own 2016 presidential plans.
I have clearly chronicled liar-Hillary's prolific record of malfeasance, and like Bill, her pathological penchant for lying. I have provided concise analysis on their criminal Cliar-linton Foundation enterprise and renewed FBI investigation into their criminal activity — despite protection from "Justice" Department fixers.
The fact is, the liar-Clinton's abject corruption contaminates everything they touch, and it's about to swamp the national government.
Allow me to summarize where this all stands on the eve of the presidential election.
The announcement by FBI Director James Comey of a renewed investigation into liar-Clinton's concealed communications is too little too late. The fact is, liar-Clinton ordered 32,000 emails "bleached" from her server archives after congressional subpoenas were issued for those communications. liar-Clinton and her attorneys (who have inexplicably been given immunity) decided for themselves what to turn over and what to destroy. It's highly unlikely that those destroyed communications will ever surface.
The acknowledgment that the FBI has confidentially continued its investigation into the liar-Clintons' illegal foundation pay-to-play political graft and influence schemes may produce indictments, but to what end?
The courts have determined that a sitting president is immune from criminal prosecution. Thus, if liar-Clinton is elected, the only recourse would be impeachment.
Recall that Bill liar-Clinton was guilty as charged in 1999, but Senate Democrats couldn't muster enough integrity to reach the two-thirds mandate for conviction. The next House could refer charges to the Senate, but it's even less likely now that Democrats would muster the integrity to reach the two-thirds mandate.
The only way to avoid nationalizing the liar-Clinton's crime syndicate is to defeat liar-Hillary Clinton at the polls. ~The Patriot Post
.
.
The IRS Is Also Investigating
liar-Clinton Foundation
by Jeff Dunetz
{lidblog.com} ~ Perhaps it’s because they are growing tired of targeting conservatives–because now the IRS is investigating the liar-Clinton Foundation (and it is totally separate from the FBI’s investigation of liar-Clinton emails... or the FBI’s investigation of the liar-Clinton Foundation/Pay For Play. Earlier this year, 64 GOP members of Congress asked the IRS to investigate why the foundation can keep its nonprofit status. The letter includes “media reports” claiming pay-to-play relationships between former President Bill liar-Clinton, who received large speaking fees, and decisions made by liar-Hillary Clinton to approve choices that benefited foundation donors.... http://lidblog.com/the-irs-is-investigating-clinton-foundation-also/
.
Media Blackout of liar-Clinton's Criminal
Activities Exposes Their Corruption
by Brent Bozell and Tim Graham
{gopusa.com} ~ No one at ABC, CBS or NBC was breaking from the World Series. They couldn’t locate the liar-Clinton story and offer even the briefest summary the next morning... MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski offered a serious report early on “Morning Joe,” but she was alone. The other “news” programs preferred the distraction of breathless baseball updates. The worst moment came on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” where they acted like the story did not exist. Political analyst Matthew Dowd noted a scandal story might still break. “So, anything can happen in that regard,” he said. Sounding totally oblivious to the breaking news, co-host George Stephanopoulos replied, “We’ll see if some big news comes out.”... http://www.gopusa.com/?p=16733?omhide=true
.
.
Appeals Court Hearing on Friday, November
4 on Lawsuit against John hanoi-Kerry
Over liar-Clinton Emails
by JUDICIAL WATCH
by JUDICIAL WATCH
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Judicial Watch today announced that a hearing will be held on Friday, November 4, 2016, regarding Judicial Watch's lawsuit challenging the failure of Secretary of State John hanoi-Kerry to comply... with the Federal Records Act (FRA) in seeking to recover the emails of former Secretary of State liar-Hillary Clinton and other high level State Department officials who used non-"state.gov" email accounts to conduct official business... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/appeals-court-hearing-on-friday-november-4-on-lawsuit-against-john-kerry-over-clinton-emails?f=must_reads
.
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement
attracting groups with terrorist ties
by Jonathan Schanzer and Kate Havard
{defenddemocracy.org} ~ This week, George Mason University is hosting a conference promoting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, an anti-Israel campaign that has recently swelled its ranks by participating in “solidarity work” with sympathetic organizations... But as the BDS campaign has grown, its “big tent” philosophy may have attracted organizations with ties to terrorism. In May 2016, for example, the Miami-based organization Dream Defenders flew a group of activists that included a Florida lawmaker to Israel and the Palestinian territories. While in the West Bank, participants were led by a tour guide identified with the terrorist group Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)... http://www.defenddemocracy.org/media-hit/schanzer-jonathan-boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-movement-attracting-groups-with-terrorist/
.
WikiLeaks Releases
Batch #29 – John Podesta Emails…
{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ Today WikiLeaks released another batch of emails from the archives of life-long liar-Clinton family fixer John Podesta. The total release now exceeds 47,000 pages:
Read the Release Emails: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult
In addition a secondary website: http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/
.
.
Final Days, Awful Choice
by Charles Krauthammer
{freedomsback.com} ~ Rule of thumb for a presidential campaign where the two candidates have the highest unfavorable ratings in the history of polling: If you’re the center of attention, you’re losing.
As Election Day approaches, liar-Hillary Clinton cannot shake the spotlight. She is still ahead in the polls, but you know she’s slipping when she shows up at a Florida campaign event with a week to go accompanied by the former Miss Universe, Alicia Machado.
The original plan was for liar-Clinton to pivot in the final week of the campaign from relentless criticism of Donald Trump to making a positive case for herself. Instead, she reached back for a six-week-old charge that played well when it first emerged back then but now feels stale and recycled.
The setback and momentum shift came courtesy of FBI Director James Comey. liar-Clinton’s greatest hurdle had always been the Comey primary, which the Democrats thought she’d won in July when he declined to recommend prosecuting her over classified emails. This engendered an outpouring of Democratic encomiums about Comey’s unimpeachable integrity and Solomonic wisdom.
When it was revealed last Friday that there had been a Comey recount and liar-Clinton lost, Solomon turned into Torquemada. But, of course, Comey had no choice. How could he have sat on a trove of 650,000 newly discovered emails and kept that knowledge suppressed until after the election?
Comey’s announcement brought flooding back — to memory and to the front pages — every unsavory element of the liar-Clinton character: shiftiness, paranoia, cynicism and disdain for playing by the rules. It got worse when FBI employees began leaking stories about possible political pressure from the Department of Justice and about parallel investigations into the liar-Clinton Foundation.
At the same time, liar-Clinton was absorbing a daily dose of WikiLeaks, offering an extremely unappealing tableau of mendacity, deception and the intermingling of public service with private self-enrichment. It was the worst week of her campaign, at the worst time.
And it raises two troubling questions:
— Regarding the FBI, do we really want to elect a president who will likely come into office under criminal investigation by law enforcement? Congressional hearings will be immediate and endless. A constitutional crisis at some point is not out of the question.
— And regarding WikiLeaks, how do we know it will have released the most damning material by Election Day? A hardened KGB operative like Vladimir Putin might well prefer to hold back whatever is most incriminating until a liar-Clinton presidency. He is surely not above attempted blackmail at an opportune time.
There seems to be a consensus that Putin’s hacking gambit is intended only to disrupt the election rather than to deny liar-Clinton the White House. Why? Putin harbors a deep animus toward liar-Clinton, whom he blames personally for the anti-Putin demonstrations that followed Russia’s rigged 2011 parliamentary elections.
Moreover, Putin would surely prefer to deal with Trump, a man who has adopted the softest line on the Kremlin of any modern U.S. leader.
In a normal election, the FBI and WikiLeaks factors might be disqualifying for a presidential candidate. As final evidence of how bad are our choices in 2016, Trump’s liabilities, especially on foreign policy, outweigh hers.
We are entering a period of unprecedented threat to the international order that has prevailed under American leadership since 1945. After eight years of President liar-nObama’s retreat, the three major revisionist powers — Russia, China and Iran — see their chance to achieve regional dominance and diminish, if not expel, American influence.
At a time of such tectonic instability, even the most experienced head of state requires wisdom and delicacy to maintain equilibrium. Trump has neither. His joining of supreme ignorance to supreme arrogance, combined with a pathological sensitivity to any perceived slight, is a standing invitation to calamitous miscalculation.
Two generations of Americans have grown up feeling that international stability is as natural as the air we breathe. It’s not. It depends on continual, calibrated tending. It depends on the delicate balancing of alliances and the careful signaling of enemies. It depends on avoiding self-inflicted trade wars and on recognizing the value of allies like Germany, Japan and South Korea as cornerstones of our own security rather than satrapies who are here to dispatch tribute to their imperial master in Washington.
It took seven decades to build this open, free international order. It could be brought down in a single presidential term. That would be a high price to pay for the catharsis of kicking over a table.
As Election Day approaches, liar-Hillary Clinton cannot shake the spotlight. She is still ahead in the polls, but you know she’s slipping when she shows up at a Florida campaign event with a week to go accompanied by the former Miss Universe, Alicia Machado.
The original plan was for liar-Clinton to pivot in the final week of the campaign from relentless criticism of Donald Trump to making a positive case for herself. Instead, she reached back for a six-week-old charge that played well when it first emerged back then but now feels stale and recycled.
The setback and momentum shift came courtesy of FBI Director James Comey. liar-Clinton’s greatest hurdle had always been the Comey primary, which the Democrats thought she’d won in July when he declined to recommend prosecuting her over classified emails. This engendered an outpouring of Democratic encomiums about Comey’s unimpeachable integrity and Solomonic wisdom.
When it was revealed last Friday that there had been a Comey recount and liar-Clinton lost, Solomon turned into Torquemada. But, of course, Comey had no choice. How could he have sat on a trove of 650,000 newly discovered emails and kept that knowledge suppressed until after the election?
Comey’s announcement brought flooding back — to memory and to the front pages — every unsavory element of the liar-Clinton character: shiftiness, paranoia, cynicism and disdain for playing by the rules. It got worse when FBI employees began leaking stories about possible political pressure from the Department of Justice and about parallel investigations into the liar-Clinton Foundation.
At the same time, liar-Clinton was absorbing a daily dose of WikiLeaks, offering an extremely unappealing tableau of mendacity, deception and the intermingling of public service with private self-enrichment. It was the worst week of her campaign, at the worst time.
And it raises two troubling questions:
— Regarding the FBI, do we really want to elect a president who will likely come into office under criminal investigation by law enforcement? Congressional hearings will be immediate and endless. A constitutional crisis at some point is not out of the question.
— And regarding WikiLeaks, how do we know it will have released the most damning material by Election Day? A hardened KGB operative like Vladimir Putin might well prefer to hold back whatever is most incriminating until a liar-Clinton presidency. He is surely not above attempted blackmail at an opportune time.
There seems to be a consensus that Putin’s hacking gambit is intended only to disrupt the election rather than to deny liar-Clinton the White House. Why? Putin harbors a deep animus toward liar-Clinton, whom he blames personally for the anti-Putin demonstrations that followed Russia’s rigged 2011 parliamentary elections.
Moreover, Putin would surely prefer to deal with Trump, a man who has adopted the softest line on the Kremlin of any modern U.S. leader.
In a normal election, the FBI and WikiLeaks factors might be disqualifying for a presidential candidate. As final evidence of how bad are our choices in 2016, Trump’s liabilities, especially on foreign policy, outweigh hers.
We are entering a period of unprecedented threat to the international order that has prevailed under American leadership since 1945. After eight years of President liar-nObama’s retreat, the three major revisionist powers — Russia, China and Iran — see their chance to achieve regional dominance and diminish, if not expel, American influence.
At a time of such tectonic instability, even the most experienced head of state requires wisdom and delicacy to maintain equilibrium. Trump has neither. His joining of supreme ignorance to supreme arrogance, combined with a pathological sensitivity to any perceived slight, is a standing invitation to calamitous miscalculation.
Two generations of Americans have grown up feeling that international stability is as natural as the air we breathe. It’s not. It depends on continual, calibrated tending. It depends on the delicate balancing of alliances and the careful signaling of enemies. It depends on avoiding self-inflicted trade wars and on recognizing the value of allies like Germany, Japan and South Korea as cornerstones of our own security rather than satrapies who are here to dispatch tribute to their imperial master in Washington.
It took seven decades to build this open, free international order. It could be brought down in a single presidential term. That would be a high price to pay for the catharsis of kicking over a table.
http://freedomsback.com/charles-krauthammer/final-days-awful-choice/
Comments