Saturday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Give Me Your Dreamers…
by Ann Coulter 
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
DOJ Admits They Have a 
Grand Jury Empaneled in FBI and DOJ Investigation
gvfooCA5IgZyIxxtP8UsnY3hWk-ATtRxKj28Id7NOTdrf4vYGPjCvzGyrQ_H1VfxeBDxcCmnhzy-s8SPQCRD0HIwI7-Bi-Hc56neCovfRX0lMlIMTjZkVSydYzy_oG1gD29nl2plHTV0mxRJnTACUWcuuFonD6Vqvo_ygtEz_v8zdajU9Q=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) is one of the top three people throughout the entirety of congress... with a comprehensive knowledge of the events surrounding the investigations of the FBI and DOJ. Chairman Goodlatte is one of only four people outside the DOJ who have read the full DOJ FISA application used for a Title-1 Surveillance warrant of Carter Page. The House Judiciary Committee holds the primary statutory oversight over the U.S. Department of Justice. Additionally, Chairman Goodlatte is the congressional office working closest with DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz. In short, Goodlatte is the center of all ‘oversight’ information circling the investigations into the DOJ and FBI. However, all of that said, even Chairman Bob Goodlatte doesn’t, and shouldn’t, know what criminal investigations are underway. We’ve explained this dynamic of disconnect numerous times. We really began emphasizing this when AG Jeff Sessions admitted he brought in a prosecutor from outside Washington DC to work with Inspector General Horowitz....
United Nations Report 
Highlights North Korea Sanctions Violations  
Z54WDsLfaHfeAAm-QSqUl1qMhk2gvn2Xj-R9fi9Tmdb30zOYJl9mUk6UbZBV0jEELJ_6lTKsZVxVOdnoTb6ThOGK5dYGKzyhxhgo2bPj4QYHW7Ch4aqZ5wZnarZt1DrYI0RSvGiantXqB47XrlViVHxm1A=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Mathew Ha 
{ defenddemocracy.org } ~ Last week, the UN Panel of Experts released its latest report on sanctions violations by North Korea and its enablers... The contents of the report indicate that the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign is working, yet there remains much to be done to ensure that Western pressure on North Korea is truly at a maximum. The Panel’s new report uncovered North Korea’s illicit military cooperation with countries across Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. Particularly disturbing is the “substantial new evidence” regarding Pyongyang’s support for the development of Syria’s chemical weapons program. North Korean support for the production of Syrian WMD also serves as an apt reminder of Pyongyang’s role in building a nuclear reactor in Syria that Israel destroyed in 2007. The UN also highlighted North Korea’s cyber operations against South Korean shipbuilding companies, such as Daewoo Ship Building & Marine Engineering Co. Ltd, to steal confidential information about warships, submarines, and other naval technologies. Such information would be invaluable for North Korean weapons developers. Specifically, the panel noted that North Korea stole information on “cold launch” technology it could use for its submarine-launched ballistic missile program...  http://www.defenddemocracy.org/media-hit/mathew-ha-united-nations-report-highlights-north-korea-sanctions-violations/
.
Lou Dobbs Interviews Wilbur Ross on Tariff’s Targeting China
os0YJ9rMZor5GIQ9cg965l5BOhTzPbHnjtb_m-mI0UFel4cdj2T67fx9503O4mLzYl3VLZjv6PECAZ7Wy7VEUq_UEiuk6_Y93q1GKtuzJU3-xqm5SJLDf73czjGkcEZbvmhiahl7cQaI-vb4OuIKwA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross appears on Lou Dobbs show to discuss the ongoing trade initiatives against China and the issues of intellectual property theft... The world's second-largest economy has responded to President Donald Trump's controversial trade tariffs. China's commerce ministry proposed a list of 128 U.S. products as potential retaliation targets, according to a statement on its websiteposted Friday morning. The U.S. goods, which had an import value of $3 billion in 2017, include wine, fresh fruit, dried fruit and nuts, steel pipes, modified ethanol, and ginseng, the ministry said. Those products could see a 15 percent duty, while a 25 percent tariff could be imposed on U.S. pork and recycled aluminium goods, according to the statement...
.
Germany at odds with US on condemning Hezbollah in Iran talks 
98j28hGJzXFU0250Nhv2T_W_cFTwlVDjKqGlXCztCQBR7sJR1ieqkL-XA39pwuTA3NfhX_y4n889H-eifWWLoEJKmxvwvoHILXZF5o7cwwenH97YZBMoN-pYjbIsQJ46tXraJhUPFn8dLbz6G26Bkq7-hJkvLA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
by Benjamin Weinthal 
{ defenddemocracy.org } ~ Germany’s government has refused to agree to a key U.S. demand to designate the entire Lebanese Islamic militia Hezbollah... and not just a piece of it -- a terrorist organization as part of talks to rein in the nuclear program in Iran. Two sources familiar with the U.S. talks with Germany, France and the United Kingdom over remedying defects in the Iran nuclear deal told Fox News of Berlin's stance, saying that German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s administration is the “least cooperative” of the three European powers. Germany is resisting the U.S. negotiating team appeal---and President Donald Trump's position-- to outlaw all of Hezbollah because that demand, say German diplomats, is linked to Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. The sources said Germany views the Trump administration as too pro-Israel. As a result, Germany does not want to ban all of Hezbollah, specifically its “political wing,” within its territory, where 950 Hezbollah members raise funds and are recruiting members...Say good-bye to Germany. http://www.defenddemocracy.org/media-hit/germany-at-odds-with-us-on-condemning-hezbollah-in-iran-talks/
.
Bruce Ohr, Fusion GPS, & the DNC-Funded Trump Dossier

judicialwatch.org } ~ In this edition of “Inside Judicial Watch,” Jerry Dunleavy sits down with JW Senior Attorney Ramona Cotca to discuss Judicial Watch’s legal battle... to find out what top-DOJ official Bruce Ohr was up to regarding any connection to Fusion GPS. The opposition research firm was responsible for producing the infamous Trump dossier, which was used by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants to spy on the Trump Team. Bruce was in contact with Christopher Steele, the author of the Trump dossier. In fall 2016, the FBI cut ties with Steele. At the time, Bruce’s wife, Nellie, was an employee for Fusion GPS. This information was not disclosed to the DOJ. Judicial Watch filed two Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against the Justice Department for records about Bruce and Nellie Ohr’s involvement in the Trump dossier... https://www.judicialwatch.org/video-update/inside-judicial-watch-bruce-ohr-fusion-gps-dnc-funded-trump-dossier/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=action+alert&utm_term=members&utm_content=20180323192249.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Give Me Your Dreamers…
JgsglfpPEXZdnEo3U_3WwL7ntQnrKdfb-ZJS94J0cVEodlaRGkWohl9h6K3jobYrT2hFMQHnPg_BlpboGjP572E8A-VehOIXMzMBq_DA70h5aJxUZAFjnhLlDYYsgFN1FOsnzGsvpFbCMr8JFrJdUQo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450

by Ann Coulter
{ freedomsback.com } ~ Does anyone know why President Trump loves “Dreamers” — i.e.: illegal aliens allegedly brought here before the age of 12 which no federal judge will ever check by their parents which no federal judge will ever check, “through no fault of their own” which no federal judge will ever check?

We’ve been lectured by Mark Zuckerberg about how much better “Dreamers” are than you lazy Americans — especially African-Americans, whose jobs are disproportionately taken by illegals. As former Mexican President Vicente Fox once charmingly put it, illegal immigrants “are doing jobs that not even blacks want to do there in the United States.”

So why aren’t we being bombarded with television interviews and profiles of these amazing human beings?

Liberals can’t make an argument without producing a victim. Attack the media — they bleat about journalists getting shot in the face while reporting abroad. Complain about FBI corruption — they choke up over G-men putting their lives on the line EVERY DAY! Denounce the Deep State — they moan that CIA officers have been killed in the line of duty.

Isn’t this the moment for our hearts to be breaking over the millions of wonderful “Dreamers” who will suffer unless we amnesty them immediately?

Let’s see ’em! Surely they’ve got a few Einsteins! After all, the media are capable of turning a gang-admiring thug who forcibly robbed a convenience store and assaulted a cop into “Gentle giant, Mike Brown.” They turned jewelry-stealing juvenile delinquent Trayvon Martin into an altar boy.

But even MSNBC dare not show us Trump’s beloved “Dreamers.” The snarling Muslim showcased by the Democrats at their 2016 convention has gotten more airtime than any “Dreamer.”

There are plenty of vague descriptions of “Dreamers,” all of whom seem to be valedictorians. But can anyone identify precisely what they have contributed to our country — other than lots of police work, welfare and protests?

The best “Dreamers” always sound like the “honor student” in Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities: “somebody who attends class, isn’t disruptive, tries to learn, and does all right at reading and arithmetic.”

How about MSNBC interview five new “Dreamers” every night? Five non-hateful ones are probably the most they could get.

As long as Trump is going to keep babbling about these “absolutely incredible kids” — “I love these kids!” — and obstinately refuse to deport them, he must have met thousands of them. He plans to amnesty millions.

Why doesn’t Trump showcase his favorite two dozen “Dreamers”? Let the rest of us decide how “incredible” they are.

But no Glamour magazine profiles, please! We want to know everything, e.g.: How much have they cost the taxpayers in free school lunches and medical care? How many anchor babies have they had? What percentage have been convicted of a felony or killed someone in a drunk driving accident? How many have been admitted to college by taking affirmative action spots intended for the descendants of American slaves?

In 2009, The New York Times’ Lawrence Downes gushed over illegal alien Benita Veliz. Three years later, liberals still hadn’t come up with a better one: In 2012, she was the featured illegal alien at the Democratic National Convention. It only seems like the Democrats have an illegal alien speak at all their conventions. Veliz was the first.

Downes ticked off Veliz’s “impressive” accomplishments: “She was valedictorian at Jefferson High School” — naturally! — “graduating at age 16. She went to St. Mary’s University in San Antonio on a full scholarship.” A scholarship, I note, that otherwise might have gone to a yucky American.

I gather Veliz is the left’s designated baby seal of “Dreamers.”

Veliz is probably a nice lady, but she was valedictorian at a school that Downes would never send his kids to. Jefferson High School is 98 percent minority, less than half the students are “English proficient,” and only 16 percent are ready for college.

HOW DID AMERICA EVER GET BY WITHOUT HER?

Or to use Downes’ more-relaxed standard: “How will this country be a better place once we force Benita Veliz to leave it?”

Off the top of my head: There would be less strain on education budgets, hospital emergency rooms, roads and bridges, and that college scholarship Veliz got would be open to an American kid.

This is a country built by Western Europeans. Immigrants arrived after it was already set up and running well. The idea that any immigrant who hasn’t committed a felony is someone we can’t live without is absurd.

If you’re a yuppie in a rich white area and don’t like cleaning your toilets, the Trump administration has been great for you. But if you’re a Trump voter, you’re scratching your head wondering what happened to those campaign promises that set him apart from every other Republican. 


{ freedomsback.com } ~ Does anyone know why President Trump loves “Dreamers” — i.e.: illegal aliens allegedly brought here before the age of 12 which no federal judge will ever check by their parents which no federal judge will ever check, “through no fault of their own” which no federal judge will ever check?

We’ve been lectured by Mark Zuckerberg about how much better “Dreamers” are than you lazy Americans — especially African-Americans, whose jobs are disproportionately taken by illegals. As former Mexican President Vicente Fox once charmingly put it, illegal immigrants “are doing jobs that not even blacks want to do there in the United States.”

So why aren’t we being bombarded with television interviews and profiles of these amazing human beings?

Liberals can’t make an argument without producing a victim. Attack the media — they bleat about journalists getting shot in the face while reporting abroad. Complain about FBI corruption — they choke up over G-men putting their lives on the line EVERY DAY! Denounce the Deep State — they moan that CIA officers have been killed in the line of duty.

Isn’t this the moment for our hearts to be breaking over the millions of wonderful “Dreamers” who will suffer unless we amnesty them immediately?

Let’s see ’em! Surely they’ve got a few Einsteins! After all, the media are capable of turning a gang-admiring thug who forcibly robbed a convenience store and assaulted a cop into “Gentle giant, Mike Brown.” They turned jewelry-stealing juvenile delinquent Trayvon Martin into an altar boy.

But even MSNBC dare not show us Trump’s beloved “Dreamers.” The snarling Muslim showcased by the Democrats at their 2016 convention has gotten more airtime than any “Dreamer.”

There are plenty of vague descriptions of “Dreamers,” all of whom seem to be valedictorians. But can anyone identify precisely what they have contributed to our country — other than lots of police work, welfare and protests?

The best “Dreamers” always sound like the “honor student” in Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities: “somebody who attends class, isn’t disruptive, tries to learn, and does all right at reading and arithmetic.”

How about MSNBC interview five new “Dreamers” every night? Five non-hateful ones are probably the most they could get.

As long as Trump is going to keep babbling about these “absolutely incredible kids” — “I love these kids!” — and obstinately refuse to deport them, he must have met thousands of them. He plans to amnesty millions.

Why doesn’t Trump showcase his favorite two dozen “Dreamers”? Let the rest of us decide how “incredible” they are.

But no Glamour magazine profiles, please! We want to know everything, e.g.: How much have they cost the taxpayers in free school lunches and medical care? How many anchor babies have they had? What percentage have been convicted of a felony or killed someone in a drunk driving accident? How many have been admitted to college by taking affirmative action spots intended for the descendants of American slaves?

In 2009, The New York Times’ Lawrence Downes gushed over illegal alien Benita Veliz. Three years later, liberals still hadn’t come up with a better one: In 2012, she was the featured illegal alien at the Democratic National Convention. It only seems like the Democrats have an illegal alien speak at all their conventions. Veliz was the first.

Downes ticked off Veliz’s “impressive” accomplishments: “She was valedictorian at Jefferson High School” — naturally! — “graduating at age 16. She went to St. Mary’s University in San Antonio on a full scholarship.” A scholarship, I note, that otherwise might have gone to a yucky American.

I gather Veliz is the left’s designated baby seal of “Dreamers.”

Veliz is probably a nice lady, but she was valedictorian at a school that Downes would never send his kids to. Jefferson High School is 98 percent minority, less than half the students are “English proficient,” and only 16 percent are ready for college.

HOW DID AMERICA EVER GET BY WITHOUT HER?

Or to use Downes’ more-relaxed standard: “How will this country be a better place once we force Benita Veliz to leave it?”

Off the top of my head: There would be less strain on education budgets, hospital emergency rooms, roads and bridges, and that college scholarship Veliz got would be open to an American kid.

This is a country built by Western Europeans. Immigrants arrived after it was already set up and running well. The idea that any immigrant who hasn’t committed a felony is someone we can’t live without is absurd.

If you’re a yuppie in a rich white area and don’t like cleaning your toilets, the Trump administration has been great for you. But if you’re a Trump voter, you’re scratching your head wondering what happened to those campaign promises that set him apart from every other Republican. 

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center