The Front Page Cover
2016 The truth will set you free
Featuring:
liar-Hillary Clinton and the FBI
by Judge Andrew Napolitano
~~~
.
The Straw Man Quarterback
The NFL's — and specifically the San Francisco 49ers' — lack of a substantive response to Colin Kaepernick's unpatriotic and insulting behavior toward our nation and its police led the union representing the Santa Clara Police Department to send a letter to 49ers CEO Jed York warning that the department may stop working security for 49ers home games. The letter stated that failure by the 49ers to discipline Kaepernick for his insulting behavior "could result in police officers choosing not to work at your facilities." The letter made it clear that the union viewed Kaepernick's statements and behavior — including wearing socks depicting pigs as cops — as "obviously insulting, inaccurate and completely unsupported."
Not surprisingly Barack nObama, while overseas at the G20 summit, decided to weigh in on the now backup quarterback's behavior. nObama defended Kaepernick saying, "My understanding is he's exercising his constitutional right to make a statement. I don't doubt his sincerity. I think he cares about some real, legitimate issues that have to be talked about." He also argued, "Maybe some of his critics will start seeing that he has a point." Similar to his supporting statements of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and others, nObama relishes jumping into the "America is racist" narrative whenever an opportunity arises. This is not a First Amendment issue, this is an issue of truth and respect for our nation and its Constitution. Where was nObama defending Curt Schilling's First Amendment right to speak out against homosexuality, transgenderism and radical Islam? For nObama, appealing to the Constitution while subverting the Constitution is merely par for the course, especially when he can advance a racial narrative at the same time.
The NFL, the 49ers and nObama are using the First Amendment rights line as an excuse not to look like they are taking sides. Remember, the NFL recently nixed the Dallas Cowboys' helmet decal honoring the police, citing uniform standards that all teams are subject to. And they turned the other way when several Rams players took the field with their hands up. Is it too much to ask the National Football League to show a little patriotism? ~The Patriot Post
.
Iraq Isn't Lost Yet
In 2011, having let expire the Bush administration's status of forces agreement (SOFA) that helped secure our hard-won gains in Iraq and the region, Barack nObama declared, "Everything Americans have done in Iraq, all the fighting, all the dying, the bleeding, the building and the training and the partnering, all of it has led to this moment of success. ... We're leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq." We all know how well that turned out. nObama left a vacuum that allowed for the rise of the Islamic State.
Fortunately, there's a glimmer of hope. nObama doesn't want us to know it, but there are American boots on the ground (and in the air) in Iraq again, and together with Iraqi forces they're making gains. Specifically, as Islamic State territory shrinks, another crucial battle for Mosul looms.
"nObama's decision to abandon Iraq in 2011 ranks as one of the worst strategic blunders of modern times," writes Mosul veteran David French. However, he says, "[I]t is to nObama's credit ... that he reversed course in time to save Baghdad and Kurdistan and reverse enemy momentum. The level of force hasn't been sufficient to prevent ISIS from consolidating its gains, providing a home for jihadists worldwide, and beginning the process of educating a new generation of terrorists, but a prior generation of American politicians behaved much worse than nObama when they allowed South Vietnam to fall. There was no helicopter on the roof moment in Baghdad, and instead the enemy is now in retreat."
The recent gains against the Islamic State could mean Iraq still has a chance — if this and the next administration are willing to hold those gains this time. ~The Patriot Post.
New Bill Calls on Iran
to Return nObama’s Ransom
by shawn
{totalconservative.com} ~ Congress is back in session, and Senate Republicans aren’t wasting a minute of their precious time. Florida Senator Marco Rubio introduced a piece of legislation on Tuesday that would block the nObama administration from delivering any more funds to Iran... The bill also calls on Tehran to return the $1.7 billion they’ve already received – a portion of which has been rightfully described as “ransom” by the administration’s critics. “President nObama’s disastrous nuclear deal with Iran was sweetened with an illicit ransom payment and billions of dollars for the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” Rubio said in a statement. “The U.S. government should not be in the business of negotiating with terrorists and paying ransom money in exchange for the release of American hostages.” Well…when you put it that way…But, unless you’re a shill for nObama, there’s no other way to put it. Whether or not that money was “owed” to the Iranians is completely immaterial. We managed to sit on that debt for nearly thirty years and we could have easily continued to sit on it for thirty more. But then, we might not have gotten our prisoners back. And maybe the whole nuclear deal would have toppled like so many dominoes. No, no, nObama wasn’t going to let that happen...
.
nObama Admin Might Have Given Tehran
Over $30 Billion in Cash, Gold Payments
by Barney Breed-Portnoy
Foundation for Defense of Democracies Executive Director Mark Dubowitz
{algemeiner.com} ~ While the nObama administration has admitted to transferring $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year to Tehran, even more cash might have been given by the US to the ayatollahs... following the January 2014 implementation of the interim nuclear agreement reached by the Islamic Republic with six world powers, an Iran expert revealed at a congressional hearing on Thursday. According to the testimony of Mark Dubowitz, the executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, “the worst-case scenario here is that Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals” between 2014 and 2016. Concluding his testimony, Dubowitz stated, “The illicit financial consequences of cash transfers to Iran warrant further congressional investigation beyond whether such a payment was a ransom. It is important to investigate the possibility that the Obama administration authorized the movement in cash of many billions of dollars related to JPOA and JCPOA sanctions relief as well as Tribunal claims.”... http://www.algemeiner.com/2016/09/08/iran-expert-tells-congress-obama-administration-might-have-given-tehran-over-30-billion-in-cash-gold-payments/#
.
liar-Hillary's 'mystery man' spotted during
blood-clot hospitalization
by wnd.com
{wnd.com} ~ America wants to know: Who is the “mystery man” attached at liar-Hillary Clinton’s hip while she campaigns for the White House?... He’s been on the stage, in her plane, by her side and following her everywhere she goes. He touches her frequently, wrapping his arm around her or helping her up stairs, and responds immediately when liar-Clinton has one of her coughing fits. Some speculate he could be a physician on hand in case liar-Clinton experiences a health emergency, a possibility considering nearly 71 percent of physicians informally surveyed by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons said concerns about liar-Clinton’s health are “serious” and “could be disqualifying for the position of president of the U.S.”... http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/hillarys-mystery-man-spotted-during-blood-clot-hospitalization/
.
Fifteen Years After 9/11–
America’s Leaders Have Forgotten The Pain
by Jeff Dunetz
{lidblog.com} ~ Just about everyone remembers where they were when they found out about the attacks on 9/11. But many of us, especially our supposed leaders in the nObama administration, have forgotten the collective national pain... the reasons we were attacked, and have reverted to the appeasement that made the terrorists strong. Under Barack nObama, liar-Hillary Clinton, and John hanoi-Kerry, the U.S. government has returned to the pre-9/11 mindset of treating terrorist acts as crimes, and the terrorists as criminals who can be rehabilitated. Most importantly, we’ve forgotten that the hateful ideology and malignancy of their terrorist tactics that are still alive, and very well. It was fifteen years ago but the vivid memory of driving into Manhattan at six a.m. that day (as I did every day) is still fresh in my mind. For some reason as my car made its way over the bridge leading to the midtown tunnel, I gazed downtown at the two towers of the World Trade Center thinking that it was a particularly beautiful day, not a cloud in the sky. Little did I know that in just a few hours later, that view of the towers would be replaced by an impenetrable black cloud, and America —indeed the entire world, would be changed forever... http://lidblog.com/fifteen-years-after-911-americas-leaders-have-forgotten-the-pain/
.
In Memory of America
by CATHY HINNERS
by CATHY HINNERS
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Ask most Americans where they were on September 11, 2001, and they can describe what they were doing or where they were at that very moment. Ask Americans today what the threat to America is, and the answers are astounding... From Donald Trump supporters, to Black Lives Matter activists, many believe they are the menaces to our society. How quickly Americans have forgotten. The true enemy has been living amongst us, quietly inserting themselves into positions of power, and effecting changes so seemingly inconsequential most never recognize who they are. However, those small incremental changes have led to the rise of Islamists and their radical agenda, transforming America like never before. They don't need a war, large guns and bombs, they are coming from within. This enemy is the same one that flew planes into buildings on September 11, but now they are dressed in suits and ties, they exist on college campuses, they enter your churches professing their god and yours are the same, and they roam the halls of our highest branches of U.S government... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/in-memory-of-america?f=must_reads
.
FBI Documents Show The Fix Was In For
liar-Clinton From The Beginning
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Judge Andrew Napolitano comments on liar-Hillary Clinton’s responses during the Commander-in-Chief forum as well as other aspects of the liar-Clinton web of criminality... He describes how “on liar-Hillary Clinton’s first day in office as Secretary of State she received a two hour tutorial from two FBI agents specializing in national security who explained to her her obligation in the proper care and handling of national security secrets.” That training included “her obligation in recognizing those secrets whether there’s a header on them or not.” He also points out that “At the end of that two hour tutorial she signed an oath promising to obey the law and to recognize secrets on the basis of their content not on the basis of what’s stamped on them.” Napolitano is disappointed that the FBI chose not to follow “a lot of trails here” in the prosecution but that their hands were tied, the fix was in from the beginning. He says, “I think the FBI was told to exonerate Mrs. liar-Clinton at the outset of their investigation and I say that for a number of reasons. No grand jury was summoned, no evidence was presented to a grand jury, no subpoena was issued, no search warrant was issued.” He points out, “If you read the FBI documents that came out the weekend before Labor Day, there are five times in there in which the author of those documents said, ‘we couldn’t find, we didn’t have, we hoped we could acquire. That’s because their hands were tied by whatever political forces are controlling the FBI.”... http://rickwells.us/napolitano-fbi-documents-fix-clinton/
.
liar-Clinton Has A Lot Of Bad News On The Horizon
And More Lies Waiting To Be Told
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Lou Dobbs notes that the tough times liar-Hillary Clinton is experiencing are likely to get a lot worse, and runs through some of her current problems as well as those on the horizon... He notes that while the nObama FBI and DOJ may have decreed that case against liar-Hillary Clinton is closed, but sees that as “a somewhat narrow view.” Mr. Dobbs points out that, “The State Department has yet to release all of liar-Clinton’s schedule when she headed the Department. It says it will do so before the election, not later now than October 17th. We’ll see how that deadline adjusts, if it does at all.” Dobbs says, “There are convincing claims that liar-Clinton ran the State Department like a racketeering enterprise for her family foundation. Supportive evidence to that effect is mounting. Also we’ll be hearing a lot more about liar-Clinton’s conduct in a lawsuit brought by Citizens United. Yes, that Citizens United. We owe Citizens United a great deal because they do have inquiring minds and are producing answers to questions that have avoided, well, even Congress for some time.”...
.
nObama administration shuts down one
prison camp at Guantanamo Bay
by foxnews.com
{foxnews.com} ~ The nObama administration has gotten one step closer to shuttering the Guantanamo Bay detention center, closing down a 100-cell maximum-security prison and moving to reduce the U.S. presence there... A military official confirmed to Fox News on Thursday that the site known as Camp 5 will be closed, with parts of it turned into a medical clinic to "improve operations." “Camp V at Joint Task Force Guantanamo has been closed as a detention facility and repurposed into another function and the detainees consolidated," spokesman Capt. John Filostrat said in a statement...This is one Hugh mistake. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/08/obama-administration-shuts-down-one-prison-camp-at-guantanamo-bay.html
.
The Cost of Terror & Most Hated Man in Britain
by Sharyl Attkisson
{sharylattkisson.com} ~ As the 15th anniversary of 9/11 approaches, we begin our new season of Full Measure by quantifying the Cost of Terror... How much US tax money has been spent on the War against Islamic extremism? And what are the costs to our way of life? The head of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Sen. Ron Johnson, will tell us what vulnerability worries him most today. Also, Scott Thuman reports from the UK on the Most Hated Man in Britain: Islamic extremist recruiter Anjem Choudary. He recruited openly for decades, and his followers are said to be responsible for dozens of murders in terrorist attacks... https://sharylattkisson.com/the-cost-of-terror-most-hated-man-in-britain/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SharylAttkisson+%28Sharyl+Attkisson%29
.
Canada to pass Sharia Bill 59 to
criminalize criticism of Islam
by Clyde
{gopthedailydose.com} ~ Canada is overrun with Muslims and they are working Sharia Law into their government... Muslims are trying to implement Sharia Law in the United States too. Your Vote counts on November 8th, Vote Trump... http://gopthedailydose.com/2016/09/09/canada-pass-sharia-bill-59-criminalize-criticism-islam-video/
..
liar-Hillary Clinton and the FBI
by Judge Andrew Napolitano
05T184202Z_2_LYNXNPEC84130_RTROPTP_3_USA-ELECTION-CLINTON.JPG" />{townhall.com} ~ On Sept. 2, the FBI released a lengthy explanation of its investigation of liar-Hillary Clinton and a summary of the evidence amassed against her. It also released a summary of liar-Clinton's July FBI interrogation.
The interrogation was in some respects standard and in others very troubling. It was standard in that she was confronted with emails she had sent or received and was asked whether she recalled them, and her judgment about them was challenged. The FBI was looking for gross negligence in her behavior about securing state secrets.
The failure to secure state secrets that have been entrusted to one for safekeeping is known as espionage, and espionage is the rare federal crime that does not require prosecutors to prove the defendant's intent. They need only prove the defendant's gross negligence.
At one point during the interrogation, FBI agents attempted to trick her, as the law permits them to do. Before the interrogation began, agents took the hard copy of an innocuous email liar-Clinton had sent to an aide and marked it "secret." Then, at her interrogation, they asked liar-Clinton whether she recognized the email and its contents. She said she did not recognize it, but she questioned the "secret" denomination and pointed out to the agents that nothing remotely secret was in the email.
By examining the contents of the email to see whether it contained state secrets, which it clearly did not, liar-Clinton demonstrated an awareness of the law -- namely, that it is the contents of a document or email that cause it to be protected by federal secrecy statutes, not the denomination put on it by the sender.
This added to the case against her because she later told the FBI that she had never paid attention to whether a document contained state secrets or not. In the strange world of espionage prosecution, this denial of intent is an admission of guilt, as it is profoundly the job of the secretary of state to recognize state secrets and to keep them in their secure government-protected venues, and the grossly negligent failure to do so is criminal.
The FBI notes of the interrogation recount that liar-Clinton professed serious memory lapses 39 times. She also professed ignorance over what "C" means in the margin of a government document. "C" in the margin means "confidential," which is one of the three levels of federal state secrets. The other two levels are "secret" and "top secret." Under federal law, liar-Clinton was required to keep in secure government venues all documents in those three categories. The FBI found that she had failed to do so hundreds of times.
By denying that she had paid attention to notes in margins designating the presence of secrets, by denying that she recognized a secret when she saw one and by denying that the location of planned drone strikes is secret an obvious secret with which FBI agents confronted her, she succeeded in avoiding incriminating herself.
But by saving herself from indictment, she may have doomed her campaign for president. In this dangerous world, how can a person seeking the presidency be so dumb or ignorant or indifferent or reckless or deceptive about what is a secret and what is not?
The records released last week also reveal that the FBI must have been restrained from the outset from conducting an aggressive investigation. It did not present any evidence to a grand jury. It did not ask a grand jury for any subpoenas, and hence it didn't serve any. It did not ask a judge for any search warrants, and hence it didn't serve any. The data and hardware it gathered in the case were given to it in response to simple requests it made.
I counted five times in the report where the FBI lamented that it did not have what it needed. This is the FBI's own fault. This tepid FBI behavior is novel in modern federal law enforcement. It is inimical to public safety and the rule of law. It is close to misconduct in office by high-ranking FBI officials.
Someone restrained the FBI.
The FBI did not ask liar-Clinton aggressive follow-up questions. Her interrogators just blithely accepted her answers. They failed to present her with documents she had signed that would have contradicted what she was telling them -- particularly, an oath she signed on her first day in office promising to recognize state secrets when she came upon them and to keep them in secure venues. And agents violated Department of Justice policy by not recording her interrogation when her lawyers told them she would not answer questions if her answers were recorded.
Now the FBI has interjected itself into the presidential campaign by releasing these documents. Notwithstanding the mountain of evidence pointing to liar-Clinton's guilt, it is highly improper and grossly unfair to release evidence gathered against a person who will not be prosecuted. Moreover, it is tendentious to release only part of the evidence -- only what agents want the public to see -- rather than the complete file. Yet all this evidence is secret under DOJ regulations. Had any of it been intended for or presented to a grand jury, the release of it would have been criminal.
What happened here? The FBI seriously dropped the ball, and liar-Clinton was more concerned about being indicted than she was about losing the race for the presidency.
It is apparent that some in FBI management blindly followed what they were told to do -- exonerate liar-Hillary Clinton. There is no other explanation for the FBI's failure from the outset to use ordinary law enforcement tools available to it. Yet some in the FBI are not professionally satisfied by this outcome. They know that a strong case for prosecution and for guilt is being ignored for political reasons.
What else do they know?
The interrogation was in some respects standard and in others very troubling. It was standard in that she was confronted with emails she had sent or received and was asked whether she recalled them, and her judgment about them was challenged. The FBI was looking for gross negligence in her behavior about securing state secrets.
The failure to secure state secrets that have been entrusted to one for safekeeping is known as espionage, and espionage is the rare federal crime that does not require prosecutors to prove the defendant's intent. They need only prove the defendant's gross negligence.
At one point during the interrogation, FBI agents attempted to trick her, as the law permits them to do. Before the interrogation began, agents took the hard copy of an innocuous email liar-Clinton had sent to an aide and marked it "secret." Then, at her interrogation, they asked liar-Clinton whether she recognized the email and its contents. She said she did not recognize it, but she questioned the "secret" denomination and pointed out to the agents that nothing remotely secret was in the email.
By examining the contents of the email to see whether it contained state secrets, which it clearly did not, liar-Clinton demonstrated an awareness of the law -- namely, that it is the contents of a document or email that cause it to be protected by federal secrecy statutes, not the denomination put on it by the sender.
This added to the case against her because she later told the FBI that she had never paid attention to whether a document contained state secrets or not. In the strange world of espionage prosecution, this denial of intent is an admission of guilt, as it is profoundly the job of the secretary of state to recognize state secrets and to keep them in their secure government-protected venues, and the grossly negligent failure to do so is criminal.
The FBI notes of the interrogation recount that liar-Clinton professed serious memory lapses 39 times. She also professed ignorance over what "C" means in the margin of a government document. "C" in the margin means "confidential," which is one of the three levels of federal state secrets. The other two levels are "secret" and "top secret." Under federal law, liar-Clinton was required to keep in secure government venues all documents in those three categories. The FBI found that she had failed to do so hundreds of times.
By denying that she had paid attention to notes in margins designating the presence of secrets, by denying that she recognized a secret when she saw one and by denying that the location of planned drone strikes is secret an obvious secret with which FBI agents confronted her, she succeeded in avoiding incriminating herself.
But by saving herself from indictment, she may have doomed her campaign for president. In this dangerous world, how can a person seeking the presidency be so dumb or ignorant or indifferent or reckless or deceptive about what is a secret and what is not?
The records released last week also reveal that the FBI must have been restrained from the outset from conducting an aggressive investigation. It did not present any evidence to a grand jury. It did not ask a grand jury for any subpoenas, and hence it didn't serve any. It did not ask a judge for any search warrants, and hence it didn't serve any. The data and hardware it gathered in the case were given to it in response to simple requests it made.
I counted five times in the report where the FBI lamented that it did not have what it needed. This is the FBI's own fault. This tepid FBI behavior is novel in modern federal law enforcement. It is inimical to public safety and the rule of law. It is close to misconduct in office by high-ranking FBI officials.
Someone restrained the FBI.
The FBI did not ask liar-Clinton aggressive follow-up questions. Her interrogators just blithely accepted her answers. They failed to present her with documents she had signed that would have contradicted what she was telling them -- particularly, an oath she signed on her first day in office promising to recognize state secrets when she came upon them and to keep them in secure venues. And agents violated Department of Justice policy by not recording her interrogation when her lawyers told them she would not answer questions if her answers were recorded.
Now the FBI has interjected itself into the presidential campaign by releasing these documents. Notwithstanding the mountain of evidence pointing to liar-Clinton's guilt, it is highly improper and grossly unfair to release evidence gathered against a person who will not be prosecuted. Moreover, it is tendentious to release only part of the evidence -- only what agents want the public to see -- rather than the complete file. Yet all this evidence is secret under DOJ regulations. Had any of it been intended for or presented to a grand jury, the release of it would have been criminal.
What happened here? The FBI seriously dropped the ball, and liar-Clinton was more concerned about being indicted than she was about losing the race for the presidency.
It is apparent that some in FBI management blindly followed what they were told to do -- exonerate liar-Hillary Clinton. There is no other explanation for the FBI's failure from the outset to use ordinary law enforcement tools available to it. Yet some in the FBI are not professionally satisfied by this outcome. They know that a strong case for prosecution and for guilt is being ignored for political reasons.
What else do they know?
Comments
Luis
That is so true...like a gangers
Rudy, I truly believe that "Bonnie and Clyde" Clinton have gotten away w/ murder for several decades now. And they are as admired as Marx, Mao, Alinsky, Che Guevara and Bill Ayers are today.
Luis
As you have seen yesterday at the 9/11 Memorial she is showing the world she is really sick and its not from pneumonia. She has also has mention that no one dead in Benghazi which is a slap on the face of the families. Which everyone knows she is lying big time. I wonder who is voting for this liar who also has lied about not knowing what a security code is. She is getting away with murder.
Rudy, there are those that ponder if it's all staged to gain sympathy; to perhaps even keep her out of a courtroom. Nope.
Some even question "why" she doesn't have an md w/ her at all times. I am sure that she does. BUT, if not, I really don't really give a rat's ass! I am as concerned for her as she's been for the families of the victims of BENGHAZI.
Btw, going back to my "courtroom comment". The Hillary will be seeing a hospital's Critical Care Unit waaaay before she'd EVER be indicted for her emails or the Clinton crim efamily foundation.
For the record: I don't wish her death. I want her alive and lucid -- to SEE just how close she got to the WH . . .for the SECOND time . . .and the LAST time at that!
Luis
I agree with you she is totally a liar and a fake.
Hillary, pneumonia? Nuh-uh. I say the pathological lieing crook is about to croak. Let just hope that she gets what she deserves.
Btw, I trust her doc's diagnosis as much as I do anyone that has any connection to her or the entire Obama administration.