Choo-choo!And the railroad comes roaring through."Sixty-three senators are going to have to answer to their constituents why they put on the U.S. Supreme Court a woman who altered a report by physicians that said -- and I'll sum it up -- that there really aren't any circumstances to justify a partial-birth abortion," Knight explains. "She made it say in some circumstances it may be the best single way to save a life of a mother."That modified report, according to Knight's column on Thursday -- "The Kagan moral train wreck" -- was used as "falsified evidence" in a Supreme Court case and amounts to "fraud, plain and simple" on the part of the nominee."Then she threw the case in the Defense of Marriage Act trial in Massachusetts," he continues. "She presented no evidence that marriage had anything to do with the well-being of children. I mean, come on -- that's a very big reason for [traditional] marriage.""But Elena Kagan is a very dangerous appointee because she's already shown as solicitor general of the United States [under Barack Obama] that she's willing to let her activist agenda get in the way of the law."Senator Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska) joined 36 Republicans as the lone Democrat voting against Kagan. Five Republican senators joined 58 Democrats in voting for Kagan -- Lindsey Graham (South Carolina), Susan Collins (Maine), Olympia Snowe (Maine), Richard Lugar (Indiana), and Judd Gregg (New Hampshire).It’s easy. If your senator is a democrat, vote them out of office. If your senator is any of the above five Republicans, vote them out of office.I believe Ben Nelson is trying to make up for the fact he took the bribe Obama gave him to vote for the Healthcare bill. Vote him out as well.
Comments