FEMA: Executive Orders & The National Defense
Authorization Act of 2012
We all have witnessed the glowing reports of the fiasco's of the infamous FEMA escapades!
And how we have seen demonstrated the obvious evidence of bureaucracy over planning and
total disorganized; and ill-equipped implementation of their programs! From the allowance of
formaldehyde-laced mobile-homes; the unprepared distribution of supplies; and flagrant over
spending abuse; and lack of fiscal over-site.
At issue: FEMA, and the Executive Orders(listed below) that have the potential to impact your
life (legally) in ways that you cannot begin to imagine. Given world events, economic crisis,
shortage of natural resources and a general media 'blackout' resulting from unparalleled media
bias_this information is extremely relavant.
FEMA's enormous powers can be triggered easily. In any form of domestic or foreign problem,
percieved and not always actual, emergency powers can be enacted. The President of the United
States now has broader powers to declare 'martial law', which activates FEMA's extraordinary
powers. Martial law can be declared during times of increased tension overseas, economic
problems within the United States: such as depression, civil unrest, demonstrations of scenes
like 'the Los Angeles riots', or in a drug war crisis.
Here are just a few examples of Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend
the 'Constitution' and 'The Bill of Rights'. These Executive Orders have been on record for
nearly (30) thirty years and could be enacted by the stoke of a Presidential pen:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of
transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the
communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical
power utilities, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to seize all means of
transportation, including personal autos, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total
control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999 allows the government to take over all food resources
and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work
brigades under governmental supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education
and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national
registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate
entire communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be
abandoned, and establish new locations of populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over control of the
railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility the Office of Emergency
Planning, and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect during times
of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce
the plans set out in all the Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish
judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate all penal and correctional
institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal
department and agencies, consolidating (21) twenty-one operative Executive Orders
issued over a fifteen month period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency
to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution,
of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in the U.S. Financial
Institutions in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state
of emergency is declared by the President, that Congress cannot review the action for
six months.
All these Executive Orders are available as public record, and all can(and should) be researched
and verified. Make sure your “Google Privacy Setting” have been set to not collect your web
search history.
THREE TIMES FEMA STOOD BY READY FOR EMERGENCY
There have been three times since 1984, FEMA stood on the threshold of taking control of the
nation. Once under President Reagan in 1984, and twice under President George H. Bush(Sr)
in 1990 an 1992. But under all of those three scenarios, there was not a sufficient crisis to warrant
the risking of 'martial law'! Most experts on the subject of FEMA and Martial Law have insisted
that any crisis has to appear dangerous enough for the people of the United States before they would
tolerate or accept complete government takeover.
The typical crisis requires the threat of imminent nuclear war, rioting in several U.S. Cities
simultaneously, a series of national disasters that effect widespread danger to the populous,
massive terrorist attacks, a depression in which ten's of millions are unemployed and without
financial resources, or a major environmental disaster.
In April 1984, President Reagan signed Presidential Directive No. 54, that allowed FEMA to
engage in a secret national 'readiness exercise' under the code name of 'Rex 84'! The exercise
was to test FEMA's readiness to assume military authority in the event of a “State of Domestic
National Emergency” concurrent with the launching of a direct United States Military operation
in Central America.
The plan called for the deputation of U.S. Military and National Guard units so that they could
legally be used for domestic law enforcement. These units would be assigned to conduct sweeps
and take custody of an estimated 400,000 undocumented Central American immigrants in the
United States. These immigrants would be interned at (10) ten detention centers to be set up at
military bases throughout the country.
REX 84 was so highly guarded, that special metal security doors were placed on the fifth floor
of the FEMA Building, in Washington D.C. Even long-standing employees of the Civil Defense
of the Federal Executive Department possessing the highest security clearances would be
used for the preparation for drawing up the emergency plan, which U.S. Attorney General
William French Smith vehemently opposed.
1]The plan called for suspension of the 'Constitution', turning control of the government over
to FEMA, appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and the
declaration of Martial Law. The Presidential Executive Orders to support such a plan were
already in place. The plan also advocated the rounding up and transferring to “assembly
centers or relocation camps” of approximately (21) twenty-one million American Negro
citizens, in the event of massive rioting or disorder, not unlike the rounding of the Jews
in Nazi Germany in the 1930's. And any Native American, remember the 'Trail of Tears”,
initiated during President Andrew Jackson's Administration. Nor the round up of all the
Japaneze-American citizens, after the 'Declaration of War' on Japan, during WW II
2]The second know time that FEMA stood by, was in 1990, when 'Desert Storm' was enacted.
Prior to President Bush's invasion of Iraq, FEMA began draft new legislation to increase 'Its'
already formidable powers. One of the elements incorporated into the plan was to set up
operations within any state or locality without prior permission of any local or state authorities.
Such prior permission has always been required in the past, since the beginning of this nation.
Much of the mechanism being set into place, was in anticipation of the economic collapse of
the Western Civilization. The war with Iraq may have been conceived, as a ploy to boost the
bankrupt economy, but it only pushed the West, closer to a deeper recession.
3]The third scenario for FEMA, came with Los Angeles riots, after the 'Rodney King butality
verdict'! Had the rioting spread to other cities, FEMA would have been empowered to step
in. As it was, major rioting only occurred in the Los Angeles area, thus preventing a pretext
for a FEMA response. On July 5, 1987, the Miami Herald, published reports on FEMA's new
goals.
The goal was to suspend the 'Constitution' in the event of a nation crisis, such as a nuclear
war, violent and widespread internal dissent, or national opposition to a U.S. Military
invasion abroad. Lt. Col. North was the architect. National Security Directive No. 52,
issued in August 1982, pertains to the “Use of National Guard Troops to Quell Disturbances”!
The crux of the problem is that FEMA has the power to turn the United States into a police
state, in the time of a real crisis,(or a manufactured crisis?)........Colonel North virtually
established the apparatus for a dictatorship. Of course, the were many others standing around,
in the positions of power, that knew exactly what was being set into motion. They've been
managing to go unidentified, till NOW!!! Only the criticism of the Attorney General Smith
prevented these plans from being adopted. But intelligence reports indicate that FEMA has
folder with (22)twenty-two Executive Orders for the President to sign in the case of an
emergency. It is believed those Executive Orders contain the framework of North's concepts,
delayed by criticism, but never truly abandoned.
Crisis, as the government now see it, is civil unrest. For generations, the government was
concerned with nuclear war, but the violent and disruptive demonstrations that surrounded
the Vietnam War Era, prompted President Nixon to change the direction of the emergency
powers from war time, to time of domestic unrest.
Diana Raynolds, program director for the Edward R. Murrow Center, has summed up the
dangers of FEMA today, and the public reaction to Martial Law in a so-called drug crisis:
“It was President James Madison's worst nightmare, that a righteous faction would
someday be strong enough to sweep away the 'Constitution restraints', designed by
the framers to prevent the tyranny of centralized power, excessive privilege, an
arbitrary governmental authority over any individual.
These restraints, the balancing and checking of powers among branches and layers of
government, and the civil guarantees, would be the first casualties in a drug-induced
'national security state' with President Reagan's Civil Emergency Preparedness
unleashed. Nevertheless, there would be those who would welcome the NSC (National
Security Council) into the drug fray, believing that increasing state police powers to
emergency levels, is the only way left to fight American's enemy within.
In the short run, a national security state would probably be a relief to those whose personal
security and the quality of life has been diminished by drugs or drug related crime. And, as
the general public watches the progression of institutional chaos and social decay, they too
may be willing to pay the ultimate price, one drug free America for 200 years of
democracy.”
Comments
Mr. Cartier: You make more sense than anyone I've had the pleasure of chatting with.
Larry A. Brown
If they do that then "We The People" have the right to institute a new government so says our famous Document! "The Declaration Of Independence"
Where is the Tea party in this election cycle we are not doing our part to stop Romney!!!!!!!!! I am totally frustrated, the only real conservatives Newt and Perry were ditched and left out to dry... WAKE UP EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!1
The bottom line; there is great potential for social networking regarding future generations. ACTA shows just how serious governments are to work together to control it to make it as useless as the alphabet channels. Look what they have accomplished over the decades controlling school and media; The majority of Americans today believe socialism is the answer to fix everything. The federal govt on behalf of the ruling class has conned the people to believe socialism is “the peoples” future. And they "believe" socialism is merely a large-scale reorganization of the economy where the govt takes over everything only for the public’s welfare. And that socialism is the only means left to re- finance a productive and innovative economy. And that Socialism will end terror and bring confidence and respect to the workplace. And that socialism will create productive employment, serve social welfare and protect our environment. And that socialism is the only sane means for transition from this capitalist economy to one under a carefree happy progressive government under democratic control. On top of that I fear the majority even today welcome, until it happens that is, the dictatorship that Obama is setting up!! The indoctrination is so ingrained into their minds that everything moral, good, true, life-affirming, and sovereign today is understood as evil, while everything unjust, false, malignant and totalitarian is good!
It seems the only venue for those awake to fight against this madness is Social media as dialog between "we the people" is in the beginning stages to overcome today’s traditional media constraints leading to a better informed citizen. As long as expertise and authority are hijacked by a corrupt media awake patriots won’t get to the masses. ACTA exists because those behind the curtain are threatened/exposed by an unregulated internet. In my opinion what we all do here is the beginning of what will someday rein in unchecked power, and it’s the beginning of the end of the people being oppressed by governments on behalf of a ruling class, who will no longer be able to remain hidden. Awakened people that are not part of government or the media ARE earning a reputation by other people and THAT threatens traditional media, government and their owners! Look what happened on MSNBC with Pat Buchanan and on Fox with Andrew Napolitano after both expressed the same opinions and views we the awake 3% are screaming from the sidelines through social media. Political institutions, Unconstitutional control, and goals of the power elite are being threatened!
ACTA has not been sent for Senate Ratification while Obama continues to prepare for his dictatorship. And as dictator in chief his strategy seems to not care about Senate ratification. To my knowledge he has declared ACTA to be an executive agreement between other executive authorities of the other countries that signed. It’s one part of the globalist agenda as ACTA is the beginning of international laws that will surely come. And when they do the government on behalf of the ruling class will be there to take control so history continues to repeat itself against the people.
ATTENTION VIRGINIANS
Can the various states make enforcement of National Defense
Authorization Act's (NDAA) indefinite detention provisions
(kidnapping!) a bit more difficult for the federal government? Can
they, on behalf of their citizens, withdraw consent from a blatantly
unconstitutional law that kidnaps persons and denies them due process
of law?
Last week, once again, DC Downsizers joined in an effort to partially
nullify that law. The bill, introduced by Delegate Bob Marshall, HAD
ALREADY PASSED THE VIRGINIA HOUSE:
Your calls and emails to State Senators tipped the scales, from a
20-20 vote, to a veto-proof 39-1 vote for a slightly amended version
the next day. But because the bill was amended, it had to go back to
the House.
Now, Congressman Frank Wolf (R-VA) is getting involved. He's
insinuating, through Delegate Barbara Comstock, that some forms of
federal cooperation will evaporate.
And Ms. Comstock is also arguing that, even though she and her
colleagues have sworn an oath to the Constitution, this is a federal
problem and none of their concern.
And here's my favorite part! Some members are bothered that many of
the people calling and writing are using the word "nullification."
We've been told it's a turn-off. Really?
Imagine that. Scared of a little word. There are two things to point
out here. First, as much as I wish it was, HB 1160 is NOT a true nullification
bill. It's a non-compliance or non-cooperation bill. The bill merely
suggests that state and local employees and facilities can NOT be used
to assist with an NDAA-style arrest or detention.
But more to the point, last week one of our helpful allies was the
Japanese American Citizens League. They wrote a passionate, open
letter to the members of the Virginia Senate endorsing HB 1160. So I
ask this next question, not with hyperbole, but with respect. I wonder if the
Virginia Delegates had a chance, KNOWING WHAT THEY
KNOW NOW, to stop the "internment" (kidnapping) of Japanese Americans,
would they believe nullification was just and proper? Or would they...
Cower to a Washington politician, like Frank Wolf, who threatens them
like a mafia don? Echo the do-nothing attitude of Ms. Comstock, who says the civil
liberties of people in Virginia is none of our business?
What a bunch of wimps! The opposition to this bill is unworthy of the
oaths they've sworn. But our concerns don't end there. The Governor,
Bob McDonnell, has his eye on the Vice Presidency. Through back channels
he's letting it be known that he doesn't want to have to sign or veto this bill this
year. And this is where things get really pathetic.
96-4. That was the vote tally when HB 1160 passed the Virginia House
the first time. But believe it or not, the bill is now in danger of
being defeated!
In other words, perhaps as many as 47 could flip-flop, whether it be
in support of their governor's political future, or under the threats
of Frank Wolf, or the policy of benign neglect of the Constitution as
suggested by Barbara Comstock.
Yes Virginians, it appears that at this late hour many legislators
need a spine-infusion from YOU. If you're not from Virginia, please
pass this on to someone you know
in Virginia. But if you are a citizen of the Commonwealth, please act NOW!
Here's the action to take...
1. Visit the link below for contact information for your Delegate:
http://dela.state.va.us/dela/MemBios.nsf/MWebsiteTL?OpenView
2. Click on your Delegateâs name to get their email address and TWO
phone numbers â capitol and district offices.
3. CALL them. Best option â respectfully, yet firmly â urge them
to pass this bill. Let them
They're aren't out of the woods yet!
WE DO HAVE SOME, THAT ARE TRYING!
Del. Bob Marshall, of Virginia, called last night. The reason will
excite you. He wanted to give thanks for the role DownsizeDC.org played
in achieving a major victory.
Mr. Marshall's bill, HB 1160, has passed BOTH houses of the Virginia
legislature, including a 39-to-1 vote in the Senate this past Tuesday.
This bill prohibits the state of Virginia from assisting the federal
government in the unlawful detention of United States citizens.
Remember . . .
The Executive Branch gained this power of "kidnapping" as a result of
a confusing provision in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA). That criminal statue contained tricky language that has fooled
many reporters, citizens, and even members of Congress. The measure
was deceitfully written to make people think it exempts U.S. citizens
when it does NOT! This linguistic deceit was likely intentional. But
it's even more important to defend the principle that citizenship is
morally irrelevant, because . . .
The rights that this criminal edict violates are Pre-Constitutional.
These rights must be honored for ALL people, NOT just citizens.
<http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/blog/our-lexicon-preconstitutio...;
DownsizeDC.org has been fighting this bill since before it was
enacted. Now, we are helping Delegate Marshall with a vital tactic --
non-cooperation by the states!
Delegate Marshall not only thanked me for our support on the phone, he
also acknowledged our help in the news release announcing this
victory.
If you want to thank Delegate Marshall for HB 1160 you can do so at
his Facebook page.
<http://www.facebook.com/DelegateBobMarshall?sk=wall>
In addition, if you live in Virginia, please call the Governor and
tell him to sign HB 1160 into law. The phone number is: 804-786-2211
We are working with other groups, like the Tenth Amendment Center, to
achieve similar victories in other states. An even stronger bill is
already pending in Tennessee, and we'll be encouraging you to support
it when the time comes. Meanwhile . . .
DownsizeDC.org has influenced this fight in yet another crucial way.
We've been encouraging people to start using precise language to
describe this issue. What the Feds have done is criminal. It is NOT
merely unlawful detention; it IS actually the crime of kidnapping. We
should call it that. I'm happy to report that other groups AND state
legislators are following our lead in this regard.
We're fighting organized crime, otherwise known as statism. Getting
the language right is a big part of our battle. You should be pleased
to learn that both the Downsize DC Foundation and DownsizeDC.org
continue to provide strategic leadership in this area.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next