Thursday AM ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Desperate Democrats
xF6U7Hdynv1xqPcQI4yil-eeKVMrtTA-QfFQVlY1f48qDR8_LnkSnt_X3km5-xy5A7CDYv5GsXg-R1UktVs2cg2rDztfi2wSgmtavA23wE8_7T2q3T1EeRdihgQv8xwSFYEzRYB7Ddj9Kg4UnEmdSf7Vucl6NmA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Cal Thomas
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
At impeachment hearing, irrelevant opinions 
by Trump critics masquerade as facts
7E6bkQsn1g23GgTX-cWnv9gyfv2mU9EuIv1HNQNw6ws-v_aKSvJTZ1xJajzC5T9qDWdaC8-uRGzcKpp8cMVDDxEHbwxVDOfM9vVIfMy28ibTY8_E06o-GhEJrufRbWH-oKuqemHGj19RpGH2S-tYqoUOX8vvgkrQzQz5qZBfzqMM1_jbgQ0nFY2oFV-hCq2ycCGYXQwDS7kun4Ob4e72sQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By GREGG JARRETT
{ thegreggjarrett.com } ~ There is a stark difference between truth and opinion. Truth derives sustenance from facts, whereas opinion is a judgment influenced by prejudices... Leonardo da Vinci recognized the fallible nature of opinions when he observed: “The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions.” Deception was on full display Tuesday during the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment hearing, where opinions masqueraded as facts. Diplomatic witnesses offered their interpretations and judgments of a telephone conversation between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Democrats yearn to impeach Trump over a purported “quid pro quo” that is found nowhere in the transcript of the phone call. Bereft of facts, Intelligence Committee Chairman scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is determined to remove Trump from office based purely on the opinions of others who surmised or imagined that Trump demanded that Ukraine investigate former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden or the U.S. would withhold $391 million in military aid to Kiev. Ukraine never launched such an investigation, and the financial support was delivered. scumbag/liar-Schiff called four witnesses to render their gratuitous opinions that were conjured up from either a remarkable feat of telepathy or borne of prejudice. Anyone can read the transcript, as it is available online. It speaks for itself and is the best evidence that there is no evidence at all of a “quid pro quo.” This was corroborated by the statements of Zelensky, who confirmed that there was no demand, threat, condition or pressure applied by Trump. It was a “normal” conversation, he said...
.
House Case #3, McGahn Subpoena Ruling 
Will Be Delivered Monday November 25th
l7L24LBIBKrpucG8ovypjvRm7RoThUiHV43ST9kWcWymq28wkZJvxgnfi8KnaV13ma14Lr42tT1BlJZO9pN_WrEv-6YwG91TSKtMjuBT9gcBgK1ObX94vwUH7LocBYXEGEMJYiA-2_zWttUBnfUwTS_Xo7-mi4rKfBNysCmRT1YU9JXS4xpNKG-NYwlRHrncuTt3En_mCrwF4fNpBrrDsqouXImz3S6r=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
 by sundance
{ theconservativetreehouse.com } ~ There are three current court cases that touch upon whether the House “impeachment inquiry” is following a constitutional process... […] “The Judiciary Committee anticipates holding hearings after HPSCI’s public hearings have concluded and would aim to obtain Mr. McGahn’s testimony at that time,” the committee wrote, referring to the impeachment inquiry hearings led by the House Intelligence Committee. “Thus, there is an urgent need for final resolution of the matter now pending before this Court.” The House’s letter to federal Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson in Washington points out that it is considering impeaching Trump for obstruction of justice, for which McGahn would be a key witness since he spoke to special counsel Robert Mueller for the obstruction investigation, and for lying to Mueller, after testimony at Roger Stone’s criminal trial raised questions about Trump’s written answers to investigators about Russian interference in the 2016 election. Jackson said she will rule by the end of the day Monday...   https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/19/house-case-3-mcgahn-subpoena-ruling-will-be-delivered-monday-november-25th/ 
Must Watch Nunes Clip Might Show 
Vindman & scumbag/liar-Schiff as Liars
SqKIP7Aqd9YgoqdZq1uCOP-l80wCcK6Glp-d8weQFrsdWl5WCMtl6hh2rlJZmJ52VVY4LyW2uy4K9P-XQcvPCThQ8pcTE8rzoWfsTb4spGOMeayWYE-3lpGrCzBqpwrzAq_kDeSzsJNPd-fn86u32eI9ej8c_3HgBcLWdMn6=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
By M. Dowling
{ independentsentinel.com } ~ Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman snapped at ranking Rep. Devin Nunes after he referred to him as “Mr. Vindman.” He corrected him and told him he was “Lt. Col.”... He did serve his country and we honor his service, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t a slug in this situation. This man revealed things that did not need to be revealed. He’s pulling the military card and one of the Democrats made a point of it to insinuate he can’t be criticized since he has served. No one is going to him for policy issues, he’s a clerk, does schedules. We also found out today that he might have spoken with the whistleblower which makes him a perjurer. He said in last month’s testimony that he did not speak with the whistleblower and does not know who the whistleblower is. It looks like scumbag/liar-Schiff lied to. Mr. Vindman has never spoken with the President, as he admitted, and he is repeating gossip and his feelings about the President’s foreign policy. Lt. Col. Vindman admitted that he spoke to an unnamed individual in the intelligence community about Trump’s classified July 25 call. Nunes tried to ask what department the person was in since the whistleblower is in the CIA. scumbag/liar-Schiff immediately stepped in to “protect the whistleblower,” Eric Chiaramella. Basically, it looks like Rep. scumbag/liar-Schiff just essentially confirmed the person Vindman leaked to is the whistleblower. It seems pretty important to establish whether Vindman was a source for the whistleblower, especially since Democrats are holding Vindman out as independent corroboration of the whistleblower. This is circular reporting like that which took place during the Steele dossier. That has been the suspicion. Why did scumbag/liar-Schiff jump in when Vindman spoke about someone in intel if he claims he doesn’t know who the whistleblower is? There is a lie in here somewhere. If scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff and Mr. Vindman, the Army Official, don’t know who the “whistleblower” is, how would they know that naming the one person Vindman spoke to in the intelligence community would out the “whistleblower.” Eric Chiaramella...   https://www.independentsentinel.com/must-watch-nunes-clip-might-show-vindman-schiff-as-liars/   
Morrison, Volker undercut claims of
'quid pro quo,' 'bribery' and 'cover-up'
in pivotal day of testimony
2iJ2dW_2FOO5Vz8CCW4MO8XAyffufAYCGLI5ya70yNGbBG8dGFQ-WxtfE5EcmT_gh8Jl75uyMySw_fhe5XDqRutArP949m7G9B80MMznuZr7ZmYqnJUMqLHKN3u3RfIZlqCuXFL9uZjADmVDPsVfpIiRkMBw2vCRbSUkckp4K3uwAD40WZrbqnR_=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Gregg Re and Alex Pappas  
{ foxnews.com } ~ Republicans sounded a celebratory note as House Democrats' impeachment inquiry wrapped up another day of public hearings Tuesday evening... saying the day's witnesses had served only to highlight fundamental problems in the case against President Trump. “Did anyone ever ask you to bribe or extort anyone at any time during your time in the White House?" House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., asked at one point in Tuesday's afternoon hearing. Former National Security Council (NSC) aide Tim Morrison: "No." Former U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine Kurt Volker: “No." Later, Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., covered similar ground in asking the witnesses about Trump's fateful July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky: "Mr. Morrison, you were on that call, and there was no quid pro quo, correct? No bribery? No extortion?" "Correct," Morrison replied in response to each question. "And, Ambassador Volker, I presume you got a readout of the call. ... Was there any reference to withholding aid? Any reference to bribery? Any reference to quid pro quo? Any reference to extortion?" "No, there was not," Volker  replied, again and again. The answers underscored a problem facing House Democrats as their impeachment inquiry continued into its second week of public hearings: With more witnesses testifying, more soundbites have emerged that may help Republicans and the Trump campaign argue that the proceedings were politically motivated theater, long in the works and foreshadowed openly by Democrats for months, if not years. Morrison, in another key moment, testified Tuesday afternoon that he understood the transcript of Trump's call with Ukraine's leader wound up on a highly secured and classified computer system due to an "administrative error" -- not, as Democrats have alleged, because the president wanted to hide his conversation. And, Volker testified repeatedly that he never received any indications at all that there was an improper quid pro quo with Ukraine, in which the Trump administration allegedly sought a probe of former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden and his son Hunter in exchange for military aid...  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-ukraine-envoy-nsc-official-testify-in-second-round-of-impeachment-testimony  
.
Open Society Kept Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Updated on scumbag-George 
Soros’s Personal Ukraine Activities
rk2Z_kzJOF6rIKY8eAoK2z4Zzl2dNOEEYBHiIItq4mgPpLMeKXnljwknStTCFwSJ6X8QBx5sUy2Krx_0m3fWsVZP1P3rBA0buOhEuNRm=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by AARON KLEIN
{ breitbart.com } ~ Eric Ciaramella, whom Real Clear Investigations suggests is the likely so-called whistleblower, received emails about Ukraine policy from a top director at scumbag-George Soros’s Open Society Foundations... The emails informed Ciaramella and a handful of other scumbag/liar-nObama administration foreign policy officials about scumbag-Soros’s whereabouts, the contents of scumbag-Soros’s private meetings about Ukraine and a future meeting the billionaire activist was holding with the prime minister of Ukraine. A primary recipient of the Open Society emails along with Ciaramella was then-Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland, who played a central role in the anti-Trump dossier affair. Nuland, with whom Ciaramella worked closely, received updates on Ukraine issues from dossier author Christopher Steele in addition to her direct role in facilitating the dossier within the scumbag/liar-nObama administration. The emails spotlight scumbag-Soros’s access to national security officials under the scumbag/liar-nObama administration on the matter of Ukraine. In one instance, Jeff Goldstein, senior policy analyst for Eurasia at the Open Society Foundations, sent a June 9, 2016 email to Nuland and Ciaramella, who were the missive’s primary recipients. CC’d were three other State Department officials involved in European affairs, including Alexander Kasanof who worked at the U.S. embassy in Kiev. The message read: I wanted to let you know that Mr. scumbag-Soros met with Johannes Hahn in Brussels earlier today. One of the issues he raised was concern over the decision to delay the visa liberalization for Georgia and the implications for Ukraine. The email revealed that “scumbag-GS” – meaning scumbag-Soros – “is also meeting Georgian President Giorgi Margvelashvili today and speaking with PM Groyman,” referring to Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman. The email stated that scumbag-Soros told Hahn “that Ukrainian civil society is concerned that without reciprocity from the EU for steps Ukraine has taken to put in place sensitive anti-corruption and anti-discrimination legislation and institutions it will not be possible to continue to use the leverage of EU instruments and policies to maintain pressure for reforms in the future.”...  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/17/emails-open-society-kept-alleged-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-updated-on-george-soross-personal-ukraine-activities/  
.
Lt. Col. Vindman Appears To Have Outed 
Himself as Perjurer During Impeachment Inquiry
OZxqhH8GKlswX3LI5xkveKAFUcBpLx-P_SpHgopwoPcFs34hMCG6hJwb4EYGCn-PQ2bL2sBE6L0UmdzEt6WtLP8ObJfmj-HqsvipvJ0OKLKYY-gqhw1AgdEsOXzv9sqY4CE78RR37cwRWcPEjLVR84kwTxrZg7BaEzE-DQZo=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Joe Saunders
{ westernjournal.com } ~ It could have been one of the funnier cold opens on “Saturday Night Live,” but it was deadly serious. The organized farce that is the “impeachment inquiry” in the House of Representatives descended even further... Tuesday when Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff interrupted questioning of a star Democratic witness out of an alleged fear that the “whistleblower” behind the latest attack on President Donald Trump was about to be identified. The problem with scumbag/liar-Schiff’s objection, though, is that both he and the witness, Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, have said they don’t know the identity of the “whistleblower.” So, how could Vindman out the “whistleblower” even if he did use his name? And how would scumbag/liar-Schiff know it if he did? For scumbag/liar-Schiff, the moment could pass — since his word isn’t worth much to Republicans anyway. But for Vindman, a slip like that indicates the potential for perjury. The issue arose when Vindman was questioned by both California Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking Republican on the committee, and Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, who was named to the Intelligence Committee  specifically to help Republicans defend Trump. The Nunes questioning, with its moments of sardonic humor, was an educational experience alone. But for a moment to laugh out loud at the sheer lunacy of the proceedings, check out Jordan’s questioning of Vindman here, just as scumbag/liar-Schiff and Vindman’s attorney stepped in to interrupt:“This committee will not be used to out the whistleblower,” scumbag/liar-Schiff said. “Mr. Chairman, I don’t see how this is outing the whistleblower,” Jordan replied. “The witness has testified in his deposition that he doesn’t know who the whistleblower is.” “You have said — even though no one believes you — you have said you don’t know who the whistleblower is. So how is this outing the whistleblower to find out who this individual is?” scumbag/liar-Schiff,  who denied knowing the identity of the “whistleblower” last week, put on a display of dignity, but never answered Jordan’s question. The logic of the points raised by Nunes and Jordan is unassailable. Neither Vindman nor scumbag/liar-Schiff would have any idea whether Vindman had used the name of the “whistleblower” if, in fact, they weren’t aware of his identity...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Desperate Democrats
xF6U7Hdynv1xqPcQI4yil-eeKVMrtTA-QfFQVlY1f48qDR8_LnkSnt_X3km5-xy5A7CDYv5GsXg-R1UktVs2cg2rDztfi2wSgmtavA23wE8_7T2q3T1EeRdihgQv8xwSFYEzRYB7Ddj9Kg4UnEmdSf7Vucl6NmA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href= Cal Thomas
 

If you are in need of more evidence as to why so many Americans are cynical about politics in general and Washington in particular (and isn’t current evidence sufficient?), you need look no further than the etymological shift taken by Democrats during the House impeachment hearings.

As The Washington Post first reported, the decision to replace “quid pro quo” with “bribery” when speaking of President Trump’s phone call to Ukraine’s president came from focus groups conducted in key battleground states. Among the questions asked of people was whether “quid pro quo,” “extortion” or “bribery” was the best description of the president’s alleged conduct. The groups found “bribery” to be the most descriptive and “damning.”

Armed with their talking points, Democrats at the House Intelligence Committee hearing, across the country and on TV programs, began using the word bribery. Listening to some of the montages compiled by conservative media is hilarious. It is straight out of “newspeak” in George Orwell’s novel, “1984,” which the author said was “designed to diminish the range of thought.”

This represents the death rattle of a party once known for promoting big ideas. Last week, the stock market achieved another record high, the Dow Jones Industrial Average topping 28,000, fattening the savings of current and future retirees. While not everyone is invested in the market, when companies make money, they tend to hire more people. It is why unemployment is at record, or near record, lows and the number of employed at record highs. Anyone wanting a job can find one, if they are willing to accept an entry-level position and work hard to move up. Many companies offer education benefits to their employees.

Democrats are desperate to get rid of the president (though the Senate will never convict him), because one more term of prosperity, especially for minorities, who have mostly been tied to their party, could mean a shift in loyalty. If that shift in African-American voters from Democrat to Republican is even as small as 10 percent, Democrats would be doomed in 2020 and possibly beyond.

Success is a better and more motivating theme than envy, greed and entitlement, as promoted by Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren and commie-Bernie Sanders. The Wall Street Journal reported that under Warren’s Medicare-for-all scheme, some would be taxed above 100 percent and that her proposals are so grandiose her “wealth tax” would fall far short of paying for it all.

Given the poor stewardship of the federal government with the record amounts of tax dollars it already receives, why does anyone believe sending more money to Washington and placing additional tax penalties on successful people would suddenly mean politicians might become fiscally responsible?

If government is the solution, how much more money does it need to solve problems and why haven’t those problems been solved by now?

It’s all a sham and a scam. We hear the same rhetoric every four years, especially about the wealthy and successful needing to pay their “fair share.” Democrats never tell us what they mean by fair, but it appeals to the envy and class warfare their party promotes.

America is a land of opportunity, not guaranteed outcome. There are more opportunities than ever for a good education, good jobs and so many other things that make the country unique.

Republicans have the better message. What they need is a better and more courageous way of promoting it. Desperation worked for Democrats during the Great Depression, but they have been living off inertia for more than seven decades. Desperation is not a policy, especially at a time when America is better off than it has been in decades.

If impeachment is all Democrats have, it won’t be enough.  

~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/66858?mailing_id=4670&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4670&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center