Thursday Noon ~ thefrontpagecover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~    
The American Dream 
or an American Nightmare?
PGobY2FkjDSFDWaDD1jpdBG7hXgm6-lGeK8WrAlRfNx95psnbxko1f5Mp1PrClF64bOuy-TlXT8iaCaPRpRQxMs4W20RfNJHhm2creHngCHmxFS7tlRI7HBuxRFKSU6Ucl0LslsBrew4g1F7IogvmgCsYjznjEBEpoLz30Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Robin Smith  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Robert Mueller’s House Testimony a Bust: Impeachment is Over
oFONjKXjIMfllqeBfXStp6C3_VtR8GDLRR1hYb0B-LqL8PsBt55BdfzdG6I5Lr24VdhpaWFYkxNXOZBNJz6o891PZFaJgQaSeXNVfdyXfw4dJQ5NhOr4K7dzS1NNIcK8PWuy6tJmXiiw64U8uL5rJhzRtjbv=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by WARNER TODD HUSTON 
godfatherpolitics.com } ~ Democrats had high hopes that former special council Robert Mueller’s testimony would ring the bell for impeachment... but instead it has fizzled and led some in the media to pronounce the hopes of impeachment to be dead. Mueller’s testimony broadcast all across the country was very bad for Democrats. Mueller looked confused and ill-informed throughout the event. He stumbled over answers, repeatedly asked for questions to be asked a second time, and often seemed unaware of what was going on. And, according to CNN’s Jake Tapper, he refused to even answer a question over 155 times.The appearance before the House Judiciary Committee was so bad that NBC’s liberal newsman Chuck Todd said that the hearing had created a series of “narrative nightmares for Democrats.” During a break in the testimony, NBC shot over to Todd who said that the whole thing was not working well for Democrats. As Breitbart News reported, when asked if the testimony is bringing the report to life like a movie Todd said, “In no movie would the best actor, the lead person here has the fewest words spoken. And the problem here is you — basically the narrative that Democrats were hoping that Bob Mueller would be telling is essentially they are telling him and he is saying, ‘that’s true. yes, that’s correct.’ I wrote it down two narrative nightmares for the Democrats, one was ‘I stick with the language I have in front of you,’ or ‘whatever was said will appear in the report.’ He has no interest in helping to providing color, context and that does, I think take away some drama. Meanwhile over at ABC, the network’s Senior National Correspondent, Terry Moran, was also seen lamenting the loss of the Democrat narrative by insisting that Mueller’s latest testimony finally put an end to their hopes of impeaching Trump...  The video must be devastating to the Democrats.
VIDEO:  Video is private Can't Receive it. Go to the site to see it. 
.
 Jackie Spier Thinks Speaker 
liar-Pelosi’s Warming to Impeachment
w0iBLQwcksPYpSOAdDLlDIS_QpDCC8tHai3oaTLrBHkvfNL2B-DyD8DmUb1luxhPkhgKMVNd5JVVXZO73t8Ngm2rGz-6EKYHf400LopbKzbuAokFEcv5O7nzDnMn8RRdIHDpsoh4WQW5kZRKraEKCo8hzhnCRiEjZaPWt-_kN3fxUlDW=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=By S.Noble
independentsentinel.com } ~ Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi failed at her fishing expedition so she’s moving on to Trump’s finances. She wants more investigations... Surely Democrats have lost their collective minds.  SHE’S WARMING TO IMPEACHMENT. According to CNN correspondent Manu Raju, liar-Pelosi is open to impeachment if the members believe they must proceed. Did she watch the same hearings we watched? Is she going to call the befuddled Robert Mueller as a witness? Mueller didn’t come off as leading a fair investigation. He hates the President and his investigators hate Trump. Mueller’s performance was terrible. Mueller got paid for doing nothing. He didn’t draft the report, didn’t sit in on interviews, didn’t draft the letter to the AG, didn’t write his statement at the presser. We don’t think liar-Pelosi will okay impeachment, but she will continue her witch hunt. She gave a press conference tonight and she touted the success of those pathetic hearings. Raju asked liar-Pelosi about her previous concerns that Senate Republicans wouldn’t go along with convicting Trump if the House impeaches, and she shot back, “I have never long said that … The stronger our case is, the worse the Senate will look for just letting the president off the hook.” He wonders if that’s a shift towards impeachment. We don’t think so. She’s just playing everyone...
.
Puerto Rico's governor to resign amid protests 
over leaked obscene online chats
YiNa7cLkdvGlmDJ4dAkb18ley921yxe7vLDXsQbBFmGcXe2FRmjVN__8IuhfrH8avsm05eFOCFR-KZf39E8ipi1YcBBGL9APgvr1wWlPI_8JB07ELp-TKK8tZ5mi-XN5WFvfUDtjVslvN5bvqkihpNJClik_KljTMsbPe4nKOe6GgXLedT5qynPFnI8vdoFU1dzFWRtMugrlBnlRnD6AuKqlfg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Brie Stimson and Danielle Wallace  
foxnews.com } ~ Ricardo Rosselló, the embattled governor of Puerto Rico, announced on Wednesday that he will resign on Aug. 2... after more than a week of massive protests calling for his ouster over leaked obscene, misogynistic online chats. Rosselló took to Facebook Wednesday to announce that his resignation will go into effect at 5 p.m. on Friday. Puerto Rico’s Department of Justice confirmed to Fox News Tuesday that search warrants had been issued in an investigation into the governor and 11 of his aides over whether they committed any crimes related to offensive, obscenity-laden online chats that were released. The leaked conversations reportedly showed the governor mocking women, homosexuals, political opponents and victims of Hurricane Maria. In one message, Rosselló reportedly called one New York female politician of Puerto Rican descent a “w---e” and described another as a “daughter of a b---h.” One chat included vulgar references to Latin pop star Ricky Martin’s homosexuality. On Monday, Rosselló told Fox News he took responsibility for allegations of corruption from his own people but said he would not resign. Over the weekend, he said he would not seek re-election. More than a dozen officials have already resigned since the chats were leaked.
.
Federal court blocks Trump asylum rules hours 
after judge ruled to keep restrictions in place
3QPGEy0DYOXB3KUt8dQFYgHSnBW7QWLpff-Ihxp18jff3cQNudf_-Ffvy3WmSua9cIbHmxHZaXsP0YHcvf3awXfHanEJgVn4h4wq8XkCUOQO8t_zXYiJYb2D0JZTBzjIiUnTSg4pBHBxyYuSISTKLVfF7EQNcoTvNevM67KdBz9rMWDnks67ntxtPvwTrtZobpB8y8-d8k84DDYtolYXH8SUXA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
By Bradford Betz and Ronn Blitzer  
foxnews.com } ~ A federal judge in California on Wednesday blocked the Trump administration from imposing restrictions on individuals seeking asylum in the United States... just hours after a judge in Washington had decided to let the rule stand while lawsuits play out in court. The rule, published in the Federal Register last week, required people seeking asylum to apply first in one of the countries they cross on their way to the U.S. -- with certain exceptions. It targeted tens of thousands of Central Americans who have crossed Mexico each month trying to enter the U.S. The rule was met quickly with a legal challenge from advocacy groups, who moved for a temporary restraining order blocking the rule. After a hearing in Washington, D.C. federal court, District Judge Timothy J. Kelly denied the motion. But hours later, U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco, an scumbag/liar-nObama appointee, blocked the enforcement of the rule. His ruling took effect immediately. "The court recognized, as it did with the first asylum ban, that the Trump administration was attempting an unlawful end run around asylum protections enacted by Congress," said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt in a statement. Melissa Crow, a senior supervising attorney with the Southern Poverty Law Center called Tigar's block, "an important victory for incredibly vulnerable individuals and families from besieged Central American countries seeking refuge in our country." The White House had earlier called the decision to uphold the Trump administration's rule "a victory for Americans concerned about the crisis at our southern border," adding, "Tens of thousands of migrants making opportunistic asylum claims have not only exacerbated the crisis at our southern border but also have harmed genuine asylum seekers, who are forced to wait years for relief because our system is clogged with meritless claims."... Asylum is not, not a right.  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-admin-scores-win-over-move-to-limit-asylum-claims  
.
Mueller Starts House Intel Hearing By 
Correcting Major Bombshell
AfC_16gXowk_PpEmw3r_XwVXGsL1P1lWUEirkpwX7dnKFKX8uATUe_oEYbQiNbtpU57WdvGTqOhno5Nj-Bl6soImP0CNzROkmsX9sULwbwJfMv11uao37bK-BQ6URfi12QnDKBUUAQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by CHUCK ROSS
dailycaller.com } ~ In his second round of testimony Wednesday, former special counsel Robert Mueller corrected what was initially seen as the biggest bombshell... from remarks he gave earlier in the day regarding his investigation into whether President Donald Trump attempted to obstruct the Russia probe. “Now before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning,” Mueller began at the outset of his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. Mueller corrects @TedLieu’s assertion that he “didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” Mueller reaffirms findings in his report and says the Special Counsel’s Office “did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.” pic.twitter.com/HvCnJw1a7u  He referred back to an exchange he had earlier Wednesday with Democratic California Rep. Ted Lieu during a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee. Mueller agreed with Lieu that the reason the special counsel’s office did not charge Trump with obstruction was because of Justice Department office of legal counsel policies against indicting sitting presidents. “The reason again that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of Office of Legal Counsel opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?” Lieu asked. “That is correct,” Mueller said...
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
The American Dream or an American Nightmare?
PGobY2FkjDSFDWaDD1jpdBG7hXgm6-lGeK8WrAlRfNx95psnbxko1f5Mp1PrClF64bOuy-TlXT8iaCaPRpRQxMs4W20RfNJHhm2creHngCHmxFS7tlRI7HBuxRFKSU6Ucl0LslsBrew4g1F7IogvmgCsYjznjEBEpoLz30Y=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
Robin Smith:  Did you know that your belief about the attainability of the American Dream is, apparently, closely tied to your partisan leanings? That’s a pitiful and depressing realty. But it reveals that what one believes constructs what you’re able to achieve.

Last week, Gallup published its findings in a phone survey of 1,018 adults conducted in June. Just over 70% of those surveyed acknowledged their stance on the following statement: “If you work hard and play by the rules, you will be able to achieve the American dream in your lifetime.” Looking at the demographics of those surveyed, the very clear defining identifier that’s notable is partisan label.

Those claiming Center-Right or Republican partisan status answered to the affirmative 88% of the time that they could pursue opportunity to accomplish the aspirations they hold and envision in our nation that gives equal opportunity based on Liberty and authentic freedom. Men and women of the “independent” voter category dropped precipitously with 66% of respondents standing by that position, while only 60% of self-identified Democrats believe that the American Dream is attainable.

Within those partisan divisions, 84% of conservatives, held the more hopeful view of their futures than liberals, who dropped to just 54% expressing a positive prognosis for the days ahead.

But even further dissection reveals that women, particularly younger females — 18-49-year-olds — expect dimmer, less hopeful futures versus their senior sisters of the 50+ age range.

Is this a sudden trend? Why is this happening? Why are younger women of the most pessimistic view of their own destinies?

Interestingly, back in 2015, according to The Washington Post citing a survey by the Public Religion Research Institute, Republicans were less optimistic than Democrats and said our best days were behind us. But, looking at the Gallup historical snapshot that accompanies their recent review, optimism of Americans was greatest from 1999-2003 with the belief that up to 72% of respondents would have a better life than their parents versus just 60% today.

Clearly, the fluctuation in sentiment aligns with the leadership of our nation. That seems to be a factor. But why are we seeing a decline in hope in our younger generation?

It’s no longer a hypothesis but instead a correlating factor that those on the political Left have a different worldview that removes or at least diminishes faith from its foundations. The removal of God from the Democrat platform back in 2012 or the more inflammatory rhetoric that mocks those who dare to believe in God are certainly contributing factors. This also serves as part of the growing dependency upon government for state-awarded rights versus those “endowed by our Creator.” Doubt that?

What are the key conflicts in our world of politics right now? Abortion is the absolute litmus test of the militant “progressive” Left. Abortion viewed as a right completely dismisses the value of life and its purpose. Rather, abortion is about control awarded by a government to women, not an empowering appreciation of life rooted in faith.

A second conflict is about citizenship. Individuals of the Christian faith believe that our final citizenship is granted into Heaven. Those who reject the tenets of that faith are denied entry. Those of the Christian faith read from God’s Word that individuals are not granted access to Heaven via a familial tie to a religion or the faith of another.

The uncomfortable nature of faith is that we’re individually confronted with our own behavior, thoughts, choices, and destiny with personal accountability. Too many opt for groupthink and the embrace of rights given by man via an agency like government versus those from God. If you embrace the latter, your accounting is not just to yourself or man.

So, while we point to politics and the differences among Democrats, Republicans, and Independents, the root grows deeper into that which influences our culture and our politics.

Currently, so many of the institutions of our society are controlled by those who subscribe to the worldview of the Left absent of optimism, focused on failure, and fueled by anger. Faith is less a factor and influence with the sliding scale of values that are secular to ensure acceptance, approval, and even the glorification of victimhood. Our universities, our media, and much of the entertainment that control what we see, consume into our minds, and impact our reasoning are driven by a worldview from the secular Left.

It’s easiest to fixate on Donald Trump and the flood of images pouring into our life of screens — handheld, desktop, and wall-mounted — that scream of the political decay and divide, but the reality is that our optimism or lack thereof is rooted in something other than the personalities and power of politics. The hatred of President Donald J. Trump is unquestionably a factor, but appreciate that the principles on which he’s governing, as a very imperfect man, are more aligned with the beliefs that each is, indeed, endowed by our Creator and that government, framed on the respect of individual rights coupled with responsibilities serves as the best path and offers the greatest opportunities.

Republicans are running to lead America from a position of hope. Democrats, sadly, are running it down.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/64425?mailing_id=4434&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4434&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center