Thursday PM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~  
'Sanctuary' Politics vs. Law and Order
O1VjaytAPuCWL4G-vlFLgox9f1IiB4wB1PHv1Impshnd0nXcEsvIqSaDvnQiMWulXyJAOITcelWqNoIqPmUFT4cEqEf0VTU0C5AuCkbF7BZ0wrMfwOsF035BsGcTyEy-HExx0vI7flKHc_JLQHCixWPkQqOYHda7IBnU54U=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Political Editors  
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Pulosi and the Caucus of Crazy
fc2Z7CL-uIcEiaCDaOkBv5nbbGZeke8XQoAJETdXTKcfGwfFQDx6uLze54wYKyeQSn7akcSSIY7-G1NAo-Q5FHGhEFRFUsSh_bk1cik1EcFHe52YqvZYmvVKy6xzPCAacdwatrGi2OByK4B6Ewn8PGzhW0O0m3giCXk=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby DAVID CATRON
{spectator.org} ~ Less than a month after regaining their majority in the House of Representatives, the Democrats have already demonstrated why they can no longer be trusted with power... They are so in thrall to their special interest financiers and extremist base that they can’t accept a compromise favored by 70 percent of the voters on the government shutdown. House Speaker Nancy Pulosi’s arbitrary dismissal of President Trump’s latest offer as “a non-starter” is not merely unreasonable — it does genuine harm to millions of her own party’s most loyal constituents. Even the Washington Post editorial board urged her to take the deal: Unquestionably a deal would contain galling elements for both sides; that’s the nature of compromise. But a measure of statesmanship for a member of Congress now is the ability to accept some disappointments, and shrug off the inevitable attacks from purists, if it means rescuing the lives of thousands of deserving people living among us. Pulosi’s predecessors — legendary Democratic Speaker Tip O’Neil for example — would have grabbed Trump’s compromise offer, loudly declared victory, and proceeded to run like Hell. But the caucus over which Nancy Pulosi presides today has far more in common with the  Bloomingdale Lunatic Asylum than any viable political party. Her response to President Trump’s offer has been to cancel the State of the Union Address in an attempt to prevent the American people from hearing about the proposal directly from him unfiltered by the “news” media. In a letter dated Wednesday, she wrote the following: When I extended an invitation on January 3rd for you to deliver the State of the Union address… there was no thought that the government would still be shut down… I am writing to inform you that the House of Representatives will not consider a concurrent resolution authorizing the President’s State of the Union address in the House Chamber until government has opened...
Trump says he will give 
State of the Union after shutdown is over
iazvlSYylnJO2qKeXp59FCdZkhV_F5vYOXNApNhlwu5jRutzO0qV4azz6gYp_mtbCJz7weDwfQnGyBbIhz6jlyNzJ6USEhQITYolKLdnq6aK7nJb2hliMhgrJ3v1pWN_0IZoDcs6zhorGQnev5UOjGakcinX5RalmFhN_1boTiCjTXeuFJMrpeSnJ3OS-LnG3J-mtAfGYAacjdVZAuwP8RICHg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Edmund DeMarche  
{foxnews.com} ~ President Trump announced on Twitter late Wednesday  that he will deliver a "great" State of the Union address after the partial government shutdown is over... ending a tense day in Washington where Republicans criticized House Speaker Nancy Pulosi for blocking the president  from giving the speech. Pulosi told Trump that the House won’t approve a resolution allowing him to come to Capitol Hill until the government reopens. U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a close Trump ally, said Pulosi’s action “sets a new low for American politics.” He called Pulosi’s decision “absurd, petty and shameful,” adding: “The judgment of history will not be kind.”Trump said he is not going to look for an alternative venue due to the long tradition of the speech being delivered in the chamber of the House of Representatives. Pulosi told Trump in a letter Wednesday that the Democratic-controlled House would turn down a measure for him to deliver the speech. Trump slammed Pulosi and called the decision a "great blotch on the country that we all love."...
.
China, Russia Building Super-EMP 
Bombs for ‘Blackout Warfare’
iysSB-hfMC0vzebvxENoHUZIcdrf2B0LsGEOMAb4vIbjCpoR-eR8yTglWeQoqipxzCxXguydGIYqf-JnKvmzDSwBY34F=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Bill Gertz
{freebeacon.com} ~ Several nations, including China and Russia, are building powerful nuclear bombs designed to produce super-electromagnetic pulse (EMP) waves capable of devastating all electronics... from computers to electric grids—for hundreds of miles, according to a newly-released congressional study. A report by the now-defunct Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from EMP Attack, for the first time reveals details on how nuclear EMP weapons are integrated into the military doctrines of China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran. The report discloses how those states could use EMP attacks in theaters of battle in the Middle East, Far East, Europe, and North America. "Nuclear EMP attack is part of the military doctrines, plans, and exercises of Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran for a revolutionary new way of warfare against military forces and civilian critical infrastructures by cyber, sabotage, and EMP," the report states. "This new way of warfare is called many things by many nations: In Russia, China, and Iran it is called Sixth Generation Warfare, Non-Contact Warfare, Electronic Warfare, Total Information Warfare, and Cyber Warfare." Nuclear-electronic warfare also is called "Blackout War" because of its effects on all electronic devices...
Twice Dems Voted Against 
Paying Federal Workers During the Shutdown
KrKO3ywkBZsgzxyHEfjCgOKB1k8hYl0M0lxhHDDeIOpHExOimyCTZb5FmkrudoD_81Pe-Z6erDhgfmyR6fkKshCCkEabdtllt0QG1rELKBxKTWWtniEz6StjHoJiXmv3vxpYZ1R8kzxIwyfIsziKO5li_IUfhNG_SuORDdw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby S.Noble
{independentsentinel.com} ~ Last week and today, Democrats voted against a measure that would pay federal workers during the partial shutdown... Republicans brought the bill to the floor. Democrats want Americans to suffer so they blame President Trump. Six Democrats broke with leadership and voted with Republicans last week, and ten this week. Did you even know this happened? I doubt it. The media is barely reporting it. Rep. Crenshaw reported it last week and every Republican should have been tweeting. Crenshaw wrote on Twitter: “Last week, House GOP voted to pay federal employees their 1st paycheck of 2019, despite the shutdown. Only 6 Dems voted with us. It failed. Dem priority is not paying workers or opening gov’t. It is opposing Trump.” He linked to the roll call on January 17. ---- YEAS  195 --- NAYS  222 ---...
.
Trump Admin Pressing Allies to Ban 
Iranian Airline Tied to Terrorism, Espionage
oY7i4XZdqA-vXrhRxLfF8Pzr4u3fVovVTcl_hUTCWPu9jdrIQ0IxjFEuXKiJ9newUHjAXoHoVfR4wLswXjTMxBxzaGxX6g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Adam Kredo
{freebeacon.com} ~ The Trump administration is locked in a diplomatic push to convince European allies to ban a major Iranian state-controlled airline known to be engaged in illicit transport and espionage operations... according to U.S. officials who spoke to the Washington Free Beacon. Germany's decision to ban Iran's Mahan Air—a state-controlled entity known to carry out clandestine military operations on the Islamic Republic's behalf—is being viewed as a diplomatic coup by the top U.S. official in Berlin and is said to be generating support for expanding this ban across the European Union, a move that would deal a severe blow to Tehran's international reach, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. The ban on Mahan has been in the works for months, according to senior U.S. officials, who told the Free Beacon the airline is complicit in the Iranian regime's spying and military operations. Efforts to crackdown on Mahan follow a similar pressure campaign by the Trump administration to prevent Iran from airlifting out of Germany millions of dollars. U.S. officials familiar with the ongoing diplomatic matter described Iran as trying to airlift several planeloads of cash out of Germany, a major cash influx that could have aided Iran's expansionist foreign policy goals, including its operations in Syria, Yemen, and other regional hotspots...
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
'Sanctuary' Politics vs. Law and Order
O1VjaytAPuCWL4G-vlFLgox9f1IiB4wB1PHv1Impshnd0nXcEsvIqSaDvnQiMWulXyJAOITcelWqNoIqPmUFT4cEqEf0VTU0C5AuCkbF7BZ0wrMfwOsF035BsGcTyEy-HExx0vI7flKHc_JLQHCixWPkQqOYHda7IBnU54U=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710x
by Political Editors:  One of the major reasons why House Speaker Nancy Pulosi (D-CA) and her fellow Democrats refuse to provide President Donald Trump with the $5.7 billion in border-wall funding to end the partial government shutdown is due to the growing so-called “sanctuary” movement. In response to Trump winning the presidency, Democrat-controlled cities and states have sought to frustrate his ability to crack down on the long-running and increasingly dangerous problem of illegal immigration by enacting “sanctuary” policies designed to limit the ability of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to track down and deport illegal aliens. Out of more than 300 “sanctuary” communities, four “super sanctuaries” have emerged.

These “super sanctuaries” are defined by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) in a report as “jurisdictions, often major cities” that “are now using taxpayer funds to actively support and assist illegal aliens living there. Some of these cities provide free legal advice to illegal aliens fighting to stay in the country. Others provide discounted housing specifically for illegal aliens. Alarmingly, some dole out voting rights to their illegal residents.”

The CIS has determined that there are currently four “super sanctuaries,” which include Washington, DC, with its surrounding suburbs, New York City, Chicago, and the entire state of California.

Much of the Democrats’ #Resistance to Trump’s border wall is tied inextricably to a calculation that these “sanctuaries” are not merely reactionary against Trump but are indicative of a new and emerging political force. Therefore, Democrats are tailoring their political agenda to cater to these illegal aliens. As CIS observes, “The new and creative ways [Democrats] have accommodated their illegal residents indicate their willingness to continue the political battle over the illegal population.”

Democrats are changing their rhetoric on the border wall, calling it immoral in a deliberate effort to dupe Americans into believing the false narrative that Trump’s “real” agenda for tackling illegal immigration and enforcing our nation’s laws is in fact an expression of his racist, white-nationalist instincts. They along with their cohorts in the Leftmedia foment this absurd and false narrative incessantly in an effort to obfuscate from the fact that their lawless agenda of creating an unending pipeline of illegal Democrat voters is causing American citizens real and unnecessary suffering.

Declaring a once-universally accepted law to be immoral simply because one views it as a hindrance to attainment of greater power is neither just nor moral, and it is in fact the very tactic so often employed by the self-righteous authoritarian despots.  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/60704?mailing_id=4030&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.4030&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center