The Front Page Cover
The Events of the Week -- Featuring:
Prosecute Soros for sedition
by Eric Rush
.

The Truth About the 'Botched' Yemen Raid
There are accusations being fomented by the Leftmedia that claim President Donald Trump's first counterterrorism order resulted in a disastrous yet preventable episode in Yemen — the consequence, we're now being told, of sheer negligence. Tragically, the operation took the life of SEAL Team Six's Chief Petty Officer William "Ryan" Owens and other innocent bystanders. But the situation all came to a head when Reuters reported that "U.S. military officials [said] Trump approved his first covert counterterrorism operation without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations." This appears to be a blatant attempt to smear Trump's reputation and further portray him as unsuited for the role of commander in chief.
First, The New York Times says, "Barack liar-nObama's national security aides had reviewed the plans for a risky attack on a small, heavily guarded brick home of a senior Qaeda collaborator in a mountainous village in a remote part of central Yemen. But Mr. liar-nObama did not act because the Pentagon wanted to launch the attack on a moonless night and the next one would come after his term had ended." In other words, the attack was planned before Trump even entered the Oval Office. So it wasn't some hastily concocted operation.
Second, veteran David French. who has actual experience in combat, warns against buying the Leftmedia's narrative. He writes, "Absent truly extraordinary circumstances not outlined in the report, these officials seem to be relying on reporters' ignorance and willingness to believe anything about Trump ... to deflect criticism of a dangerous operation that turned out to be even more dangerous than anticipated. That happens in war. It happened all the time when I was in Iraq."
"People who haven't been exposed to war with jihadists tend to think of firefights as precise affairs," French continues. "Instead, they're extraordinarily destructive, and the battle is waged against an enemy who intentionally and flagrantly violates the laws of war." In conclusion: "None of this sounds unusual. ... [I]t's an impressive feat of arms to assault an alert enemy in a prepared defensive position, defeat that enemy, and leave with valuable intelligence. So, no, don't believe claims that Trump botched the raid in Yemen. He didn't plan the operation, and we don't want him planning operations. We want presidents to rely on professionals. But those same professionals will tell you that war is terrible by its very nature, and no president can guarantee victory without cost."
By the way, the media outlets peddling these dubious reports are the same outlets that did everything they could to avoid covering Benghazi. Which truly was a preventable disaster.
~The Patriot Post
.
.
liar-nObama Pentagon official says
anti-Trump military coup now possible
by Carlo Muñoz
{washingtontimes.com} ~ A former Defense Department official under the liar-nObama administration has raised the specter of a military coup to remove President Donald Trump from power... In an editorial penned for Foreign Policy, senior Pentagon policy official Rosa Brooks publicly suggested a military insurrection against the Trump administration may be the only option to oust one of the most divisive presidents in American history. “Donald Trump’s first week as president has made it all too clear: Yes, he is as crazy as everyone feared,” Ms. Brooks wrote. “One possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.”...I strongly believe Ms. Brooks is totally wrong. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/2/rosa-brooks-obama-pentagon-official-says-anti-trum/
.
Appeals court denies Trump request
to immediately reinstate travel ban
by FoxNews.com
{foxnews.com} ~ Early Sunday morning a federal appeals court denied the Justice Department's request for an immediate reinstatement of President Donald Trump's ban on accepting certain travelers and refugees... The DOJ filed an appeal of a judge’s order temporarily stopping Trump’s travel ban on Saturday night, saying it’s the “sovereign prerogative" of a president to admit or exclude aliens. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco instead asked for the Justice Department to file a counter-response by Monday afternoon. The higher court's denial of an immediate stay means the legal battles will continue for days at least... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/05/appeals-court-denies-trump-request-to-immediately-reinstate-travel-ban.html
Mattis Ruffles China Feathers With
Comments Over Island Jacking, Japan
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ China is responding to the refusal of the United States under President Trump to allow them cherry pick the territory of other nations and claim it as their own... a practice they began in earnest under the liar-nObama regime, dredging coral reefs into islands and then making those islands Chinese military installations, complete with air strips, big guns and missiles and port facilities. On Saturday Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang urged the US to avoid discussion of the issue of Chinese aggression as it pertains to Japanese territory, reiterating China’s claim of sovereignty over tiny, uninhabited islands known in Japanese as the Senkaku and Chinese as Diaoyu. In Secretary of Defense Mattis first trip to Asia in his new position, he explicitly stated in comments made in Tokyo that the Trump Administration will adhere to the previous US position that the US – Japan security treaty includes defending Japan in their continued administration of the Senkaku islands... http://rickwells.us/mattis-ruffles-china-feathers-comments-island-jacking-japan/
.
The West's Real Bigotry:
Rejecting Persecuted Christians
by Uzay Bulut
by Uzay Bulut
Representatives of the NGO Open Doors, along with other NGOs
{gatestoneinstitute.org} ~ Finally, after years of apathy and inaction, Washington is extending a much-needed helping hand to Middle Eastern Christians... U.S. President Donald Trump recently announced that persecuted Christians will be given priority when it comes to applying for refugee status in the United States. Christians and Yazidis are being exposed to genocide at the hands of ISIS and other Islamist groups, who have engaged in a massive campaign to enslave the remnant non-Muslim minorities and to destroy their cultural heritage. Then, the so-called liberals in the West -- and even Christians -- started pushing back against the move. Indigenous Christians in Iraq and Syria have not only been exposed to genocide at the hands of the Islamic State (ISIS) and other Islamist groups but also their applications for immigration to Western countries have been put on the back burner by, shamefully but not surprisingly, the UN... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9888/persecuted-chris
.
Look Who Funds The Group Behind The Call
To Arms At Milo’s Berkeley Event
by Chuck Ross
{dailycaller.com} ~ The left-wing group that helped organize the violent shut down of the Milo Yiannopoulos event at the University of California, Berkeley on Wednesday is backed by a progressive charity that is in turn funded by George Soros... the city of Tucson, a major labor union and several large companies. The Alliance for Global Justice, based in Tucson, is listed as an organizer and fiscal sponsor for Refuse Fascism, a communist group that encouraged left-wingers to shut down the Yiannopoulos event. The call to arms succeeded. Yiannopoulos’ talk was cancelled after demonstrators lit fires, vandalized businesses, and assaulted Donald Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters. Refuse Fascism, which includes Princeton professor Cornel West as one of its founding “initiators,” defended the response...There should be a law against fundraisers like Soros to be fine and pay for the damages. http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/03/look-who-funds-the-group-behind-the-call-to-arms-at-milos-berkeley-event/?utm_source=WhatCountsEmail&utm_medium=TheDC%20Morning&utm_campaign=TheDC%20Weekend
.
.
Prosecute Soros for sedition
by Eric Rush
{wnd.com} ~ The recent protests against President Donald Trump and his policies pertaining to Muslim-nation émigrés present a valuable object lesson regarding contrived popular misrepresentations of First Amendment liberties. Here, we are able to see examples of individuals and organizations engaging in seditious behavior that is commonly tolerated due to fallacious interpretations of the First Amendment advanced by American socialists.
Aspects of these interpretations have become conventional wisdom among our citizenry; disingenuously ignoring the error of such versions of constitutional law has been the job of agenda-driven legal experts and the press. Such things as court cases that successfully argued for the right to burn the American flag as a form of protected political expression legitimized the “America Sucks” culture, thereby paving the way for open sedition as an acceptable activity.
Peaceful protests on a large scale were employed to give rise to certain changes that needed to come about during the civil rights movement. Since then, leftists have attempted to use them in their attempts to bring about all manner of malignant social and political change, hoping in each case to capture the same flavor of the 1960s protests and ascribe legitimacy to their causes. This is precisely what we are seeing at present, although the protests seldom remain peaceful.
We have learned that organizations tied to uber-socialist billionaire activist George Soros have had a hand in driving anti-Trump protests since his election, as have certain Islamist groups. The latter is certainly no surprise, since it reflects the 1,400-year-old Islamic tradition of insidiously ingratiating Islam to host nations with one hand whilst preparing to slide the scimitar in with the other. All we need do is look to Europe to see how this develops just a little further down the road we’re on, with riots, no-go zones, mass rapes and demands for conversion to Islam having become commonplace.
Recently, the terrorism-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), helped launch demonstrations protesting Trump’s recent executive orders concerning the entry of refugees from some Islamic nations into the United States. Leftists and the press have supported these efforts in their hyperbolic criticism of Trump’s “Muslim ban,” despite the fact that the president has only temporarily suspended unfettered access to the U.S. for citizens from seven highly destabilized Islamic nations.
During the presidency of Barack Hussein liar-nObama, Islamists had the most powerful friends in Washington and made great headway in their efforts to establish policy and insinuate their operatives within our political infrastructure. In cases such as this, our tradition of religious tolerance has worked against us. Because Islam is considered a religion, it has enjoyed the benefits of a religion under the Constitution despite being diametrically opposed to the Constitution, as well as being at odds with Western civilization in general.
Factor in the fallacious belief held by some of our leaders that Islam is inherently peaceful, and we have the situation at hand. Prominent opponents of Trump’s measures (Sen. Chuck Schumer and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright spring to mind) are currently proffering the same pro-Islam propaganda as did Barack liar-nObama and his collaborators during the last administration.
As we have seen, this mass brainwashing can prove quite effective. There are Britons, Scandinavians and European natives who continue to defend Islam in the manner of its American supporters despite the fact that Muslims have already transformed their nations into manifestly dangerous places.
It is highly unlikely that a real ban on Islam will become a reality anytime soon, but considering history and the empirical evidence at hand, President Trump could get away with criminalizing organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as some prudent nations have done, pointing to their actions and such phenomena as the jihadi training camps on our soil, which the federal government has chosen to ignore to date, and of which the left and the establishment press simply deny existence.
In the case of George Soros, there are ample devices under the law that could be used to neutralize him if we moved away from the paradigm of tolerating the “America Sucks” culture. He has used his billions to institutionalize sedition on a variety of fronts, was instrumental in getting liar-nObama elected to the presidency and tried his level best to do the same for liar-Hillary Clinton.
Soros became an American citizen in December of 1961, but the Hungarian-born former World War II Nazi collaborator could easily be stripped of his citizenship on any number of grounds and unceremoniously deposited back on Hungarian soil if our leaders found sufficient vertebral fortitude to initiate the requisite proceedings. Tying up his financial holdings and confounding the efforts of his shell organizations would put a stop to many detrimental processes Soros has in place.
Rather than consciously engaging in sedition, a certain number of the protesters currently being engaged in these Islamophilic rallies are simply well-intentioned if profoundly ignorant and unaware of their own exploitation. Many more have been bought and paid for by the organizers, however, who can and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Aspects of these interpretations have become conventional wisdom among our citizenry; disingenuously ignoring the error of such versions of constitutional law has been the job of agenda-driven legal experts and the press. Such things as court cases that successfully argued for the right to burn the American flag as a form of protected political expression legitimized the “America Sucks” culture, thereby paving the way for open sedition as an acceptable activity.
Peaceful protests on a large scale were employed to give rise to certain changes that needed to come about during the civil rights movement. Since then, leftists have attempted to use them in their attempts to bring about all manner of malignant social and political change, hoping in each case to capture the same flavor of the 1960s protests and ascribe legitimacy to their causes. This is precisely what we are seeing at present, although the protests seldom remain peaceful.
We have learned that organizations tied to uber-socialist billionaire activist George Soros have had a hand in driving anti-Trump protests since his election, as have certain Islamist groups. The latter is certainly no surprise, since it reflects the 1,400-year-old Islamic tradition of insidiously ingratiating Islam to host nations with one hand whilst preparing to slide the scimitar in with the other. All we need do is look to Europe to see how this develops just a little further down the road we’re on, with riots, no-go zones, mass rapes and demands for conversion to Islam having become commonplace.
Recently, the terrorism-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), helped launch demonstrations protesting Trump’s recent executive orders concerning the entry of refugees from some Islamic nations into the United States. Leftists and the press have supported these efforts in their hyperbolic criticism of Trump’s “Muslim ban,” despite the fact that the president has only temporarily suspended unfettered access to the U.S. for citizens from seven highly destabilized Islamic nations.
During the presidency of Barack Hussein liar-nObama, Islamists had the most powerful friends in Washington and made great headway in their efforts to establish policy and insinuate their operatives within our political infrastructure. In cases such as this, our tradition of religious tolerance has worked against us. Because Islam is considered a religion, it has enjoyed the benefits of a religion under the Constitution despite being diametrically opposed to the Constitution, as well as being at odds with Western civilization in general.
Factor in the fallacious belief held by some of our leaders that Islam is inherently peaceful, and we have the situation at hand. Prominent opponents of Trump’s measures (Sen. Chuck Schumer and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright spring to mind) are currently proffering the same pro-Islam propaganda as did Barack liar-nObama and his collaborators during the last administration.
As we have seen, this mass brainwashing can prove quite effective. There are Britons, Scandinavians and European natives who continue to defend Islam in the manner of its American supporters despite the fact that Muslims have already transformed their nations into manifestly dangerous places.
It is highly unlikely that a real ban on Islam will become a reality anytime soon, but considering history and the empirical evidence at hand, President Trump could get away with criminalizing organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as some prudent nations have done, pointing to their actions and such phenomena as the jihadi training camps on our soil, which the federal government has chosen to ignore to date, and of which the left and the establishment press simply deny existence.
In the case of George Soros, there are ample devices under the law that could be used to neutralize him if we moved away from the paradigm of tolerating the “America Sucks” culture. He has used his billions to institutionalize sedition on a variety of fronts, was instrumental in getting liar-nObama elected to the presidency and tried his level best to do the same for liar-Hillary Clinton.
Soros became an American citizen in December of 1961, but the Hungarian-born former World War II Nazi collaborator could easily be stripped of his citizenship on any number of grounds and unceremoniously deposited back on Hungarian soil if our leaders found sufficient vertebral fortitude to initiate the requisite proceedings. Tying up his financial holdings and confounding the efforts of his shell organizations would put a stop to many detrimental processes Soros has in place.
Rather than consciously engaging in sedition, a certain number of the protesters currently being engaged in these Islamophilic rallies are simply well-intentioned if profoundly ignorant and unaware of their own exploitation. Many more have been bought and paid for by the organizers, however, who can and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Comments