The Front Page Cover
The Events of the Week -- Featuring:
If We Say We Want Inclusiveness,
Let's Mean It and Practice It
by David Limbaugh
.
Rep Ellison, Leading DNC Replacement Candidate – Caliphate Party Change Agent
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Demonstrating that their thick-headed adherence to the principles of Saul Alinsky and Karl Marx are not tethered in any way to political realities, Democrats are looking to their most extreme figures as possible replacements for their corrupt and radical DNC leadership... Debbie Wasserman Schultz was exposed as an agent of the corrupt liar-Hillary Clinton, as was interim Chairperson Donna Brazile. On the heels of that corruption, exposed by a hero to freedom, Julian Assange through WikiLeaks, the Democrats are seeking leadership which might be less corrupt, or at least better at hiding it, but is much more radical, to the point of being anti-American by design. Any Democrat would be a threat to our Constitution and our Republic, but some threats are greater than others...
.
Liberals Rediscover
Their Love for the Constitution
{fixthisnation.com} ~ Liberals, on the streets and in the media, are going through something we might generously call a “public freakout” in the wake of Donald Trump’s election... Even the rare prognosticators who warned that liar-Hillary Clinton’s victory was not as inevitable as her supporters thought had to admit they were shocked by the outcome. Almost no one within mainstream political circles thought this would happen, and now they’re writing opinion pieces warning of the collapse of the United States. Remarkably, Trump has awoken something in liberals that has been dormant for the last eight years: Respect for the Constitution. After smiling their way through President liar-nObama’s gleeful disdain for the restraints on executive power, they are now trembling at the idea of Trump turning the presidency into a dictatorship. At the Washington Post, Charles Lane wrote that Trump possessed something known in sociological terms as “charismatic authority,” which imbued him with power that would be difficult to block:... http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/liberals-rediscover-their-love-for-the-constitution/
.
Judge Jeanine Emotional Open – The Revolution
And Election Of Donald J Trump
by Rick Wells
htt{rickwells.us} ~ Judge Jeanine Pirro tells us about a phone call she got earlier in the day from President-elect Donald Trump, thanking her and her viewers for all of their support... She reminds her audience that she told them to strap themselves in, that we were embarking on a revolution, to which she adds, “indeed it was,” rolling a few clips to illustrate the point. She then notes how “elegant” Donald Trump was in congratulating liar-Hillary Clinton. Some might argue wily, in disarming his opposition, as he was on his visit to the White House. Trump said “we owe her a major debt of gratitude for her service to our country, I mean that very sincerely” a statement that could only have been made in the interest of political expediency. She also notes that he reached out to Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush and John Kasich, all establishment “Republicans who worked hard against him,” as well as offering to be a president to all, even those who violently opposed him...
.
Commies, Thugs and
Illegals Proclaim The Obvious – Law And
Order Trump Not Their President
by Rick Wells
{rickwells.us} ~ Democrat operatives and paid agitators are out in the streets of many American cities becoming de facto mascots for their party by making complete asses of themselves... Their candidate lost the election by a landslide. It wasn’t even close and the results are not being contested by the losing candidate, liar-Hillary Clinton. Some of the agitation, much of its organization, originates with anti-American groups. The angry Latino woman in black being interviewed as they walk down the street has a shirt on that reads “Revolution Nothing Less!” and has the link below of revcom.us, the site of the Revolutionary Communist Party. They actively promote the riots and advocate for the overthrow of the US government. As to the useful idiots who aren’t out to fundamentally transform the US into a communist society, those who aren’t shills for the liar-nObama and liar-Clinton agendas, do they not understand the difference between an election and a coronation? Or is it just that, as spoiled brat liberals, they simply demand to have their way, and will manipulate, distort and tweak the justification to fit the situation to their desired outcome?...
.
liar-nObama, liar-Clinton, and Sanders
Could Stop the Riots But They Just Watch
by Daisy Luther
{activistpost.com} ~ Is it just me or have you also noticed that liar-Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and President liar-nObama have been silent about the protests?... The very people who have the power to stop these protests and riots with just a few well-spoken words have been completely silent on the issue. liar-Hillary Clinton could have asked her followers to stop this nonsense, and they probably would have listened out of respect for her. Misplaced respect but that’s a whole different article. Instead, her silence makes me think that she is hidden away, relishing the chaos. That she has done nothing to attempt to calm the situation underlines the fact that she was not fit to govern. A leader would look out for the best interests of a country they love, rather than watching from afar to apply balm to her wounded ego...
.
.
If We Say We Want Inclusiveness,
Let's Mean It and Practice It
by David Limbaugh
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ I am uplifted by Tuesday's presidential election results because I believe we have a good chance to start turning things around in the country for the better, from economic issues to social issues and matters of national security and the rule of law.
There is one subject, however, I feel compelled to address above many others today, as I see it raised by so many Democratic leaders and many liberals throughout the country — inclusiveness.
In their postelection speeches, liar-Hillary Clinton and President liar-nObama both called for unity and inclusiveness. These are very nice-sounding words. But "inclusiveness," like so many other words of the left, is pregnant with implications and accusations. In reality, it has been not an appeal for unity, except in the most superficial sense, but a battle cry to liberals and an indictment of conservatives.
Those who typically preach inclusion practice the most exclusive form of politics. One's actions must validate the words, or they are nothing more than cynical tools to achieve political ends.
Just look at liar-Clinton's words. She wants a nation that is "hopeful, inclusive and bighearted." She laments that the nation is divided. Yet she — her team, her party — appeals to people not as individual Americans but as faceless members of groups, lumping people in terms of race, religion, gender and sexual orientation.
Liberals talk about unity, but President liar-nObama has been the most divisive president in modern American history. Admittedly, the country was deeply divided under President George W. Bush, as well, and we are always going to be divided politically and ideologically because liberals and conservatives have largely different worldviews and vastly different visions for America. So let's not pretend that we are going to come together in some historic wave of kumbaya. The best we should aspire to is civil discourse and mutual respect.
But Bush didn't try to divide us. He needed to unite the nation to fight a common enemy in Iraq and radical Islam. He tried to reach across the aisle on issues, such as making genuine overtures to Sen. Ted Kennedy on education, and Democrats rebuffed and ridiculed him and eventually slandered him as a war criminal.
President liar-nObama, by contrast, has tried to ignite passions in terms of race, gender, income, religion, policing, global warming and a host of other things. He hasn't sought consensus other than nominally. He said, "I won" and "I'm the president." And he crammed his agenda down our throats, from his deceitful legislative power plays on liar-nObamacare to his lawless executive orders on that, immigration and many other issues.
liar-nObama and liar-Clinton talk a good game about inclusiveness, but this nation couldn't be more fractured on so many levels. Race relations in some areas are arguably worse than they've been in my lifetime, including the 1960s. Tensions abound between many other groups.
The main reason is that the Democrats' political power wholly depends on dividing America into identity groups and alienating them from each other. If they didn't consistently garner some 90 percent of the African-American vote, they probably wouldn't be competitive in national races. They are striving for the same with the Hispanic vote.
liar-nObama irresponsibly uses inflammatory language about the disparate treatment of blacks in the criminal justice system and distorts the data to support his claim. He has directly appealed to minority groups to vote for him based on their racial and ethnic interests. He openly accuses "bitter clingers" of not being comfortable with people "who don't look like them."
Democrats also stir the pot on gender. In framing the abortion issue, they characterize pro-life advocates as being oppressive and callous toward women and their health rather than wanting to protect innocent babies. They similarly try to alienate women from Republicans in their demagogic campaigning for equal pay for equal work when they know that the differences in pay between men and women are based on not the law or discrimination but other factors and when, in any event, the institutions they control see similar disparities in pay.
Democrats divide us not only through identity politics but also with their policies. They say they want everyone in America to succeed, but they demonize businesses, individual entrepreneurs and corporations as greedy and evil. They punish the very activities that lead to prosperity for all people. That is, their policies have the effect of excluding a wide array of people from access to the American dream.
If you want all Americans to succeed, shouldn't you strive to get as many as possible in the workforce? To reduce the government dependency cycle so that people can support themselves and not rely on bribery from politicians to make ends meet? To ensure that the government level the playing field and not stack the deck against certain industries, such as coal? To quit pursuing policies that keep minorities trapped in inferior inner-city schools? To quit suppressing the conscience rights of Christians? To quit trying to convince minorities that the other half of the nation is racist and bigoted?
In his victory speech, Donald Trump also called for unity, but conservatives have a different idea about unity and inclusiveness. To them, those concepts are based on equal opportunity and equal justice for all. The general goal is to reduce the size and scope of government in areas it was never intended to intrude in and to promote policies that will allow people — irrespective of race, gender or religion — to thrive.
We've experienced eight years of unbridled liberal policies, and half the nation is not paying income tax and is on some form of government assistance. Record numbers of people are out of the labor force altogether. Health premiums are going through the roof. Incomes are down. And people are at each other's throat. Let's let freedom ring again and truly promote inclusiveness in the sense that all Americans are free and encouraged to achieve their dreams for a more prosperous nation for everyone.
There is one subject, however, I feel compelled to address above many others today, as I see it raised by so many Democratic leaders and many liberals throughout the country — inclusiveness.
In their postelection speeches, liar-Hillary Clinton and President liar-nObama both called for unity and inclusiveness. These are very nice-sounding words. But "inclusiveness," like so many other words of the left, is pregnant with implications and accusations. In reality, it has been not an appeal for unity, except in the most superficial sense, but a battle cry to liberals and an indictment of conservatives.
Those who typically preach inclusion practice the most exclusive form of politics. One's actions must validate the words, or they are nothing more than cynical tools to achieve political ends.
Just look at liar-Clinton's words. She wants a nation that is "hopeful, inclusive and bighearted." She laments that the nation is divided. Yet she — her team, her party — appeals to people not as individual Americans but as faceless members of groups, lumping people in terms of race, religion, gender and sexual orientation.
Liberals talk about unity, but President liar-nObama has been the most divisive president in modern American history. Admittedly, the country was deeply divided under President George W. Bush, as well, and we are always going to be divided politically and ideologically because liberals and conservatives have largely different worldviews and vastly different visions for America. So let's not pretend that we are going to come together in some historic wave of kumbaya. The best we should aspire to is civil discourse and mutual respect.
But Bush didn't try to divide us. He needed to unite the nation to fight a common enemy in Iraq and radical Islam. He tried to reach across the aisle on issues, such as making genuine overtures to Sen. Ted Kennedy on education, and Democrats rebuffed and ridiculed him and eventually slandered him as a war criminal.
President liar-nObama, by contrast, has tried to ignite passions in terms of race, gender, income, religion, policing, global warming and a host of other things. He hasn't sought consensus other than nominally. He said, "I won" and "I'm the president." And he crammed his agenda down our throats, from his deceitful legislative power plays on liar-nObamacare to his lawless executive orders on that, immigration and many other issues.
liar-nObama and liar-Clinton talk a good game about inclusiveness, but this nation couldn't be more fractured on so many levels. Race relations in some areas are arguably worse than they've been in my lifetime, including the 1960s. Tensions abound between many other groups.
The main reason is that the Democrats' political power wholly depends on dividing America into identity groups and alienating them from each other. If they didn't consistently garner some 90 percent of the African-American vote, they probably wouldn't be competitive in national races. They are striving for the same with the Hispanic vote.
liar-nObama irresponsibly uses inflammatory language about the disparate treatment of blacks in the criminal justice system and distorts the data to support his claim. He has directly appealed to minority groups to vote for him based on their racial and ethnic interests. He openly accuses "bitter clingers" of not being comfortable with people "who don't look like them."
Democrats also stir the pot on gender. In framing the abortion issue, they characterize pro-life advocates as being oppressive and callous toward women and their health rather than wanting to protect innocent babies. They similarly try to alienate women from Republicans in their demagogic campaigning for equal pay for equal work when they know that the differences in pay between men and women are based on not the law or discrimination but other factors and when, in any event, the institutions they control see similar disparities in pay.
Democrats divide us not only through identity politics but also with their policies. They say they want everyone in America to succeed, but they demonize businesses, individual entrepreneurs and corporations as greedy and evil. They punish the very activities that lead to prosperity for all people. That is, their policies have the effect of excluding a wide array of people from access to the American dream.
If you want all Americans to succeed, shouldn't you strive to get as many as possible in the workforce? To reduce the government dependency cycle so that people can support themselves and not rely on bribery from politicians to make ends meet? To ensure that the government level the playing field and not stack the deck against certain industries, such as coal? To quit pursuing policies that keep minorities trapped in inferior inner-city schools? To quit suppressing the conscience rights of Christians? To quit trying to convince minorities that the other half of the nation is racist and bigoted?
In his victory speech, Donald Trump also called for unity, but conservatives have a different idea about unity and inclusiveness. To them, those concepts are based on equal opportunity and equal justice for all. The general goal is to reduce the size and scope of government in areas it was never intended to intrude in and to promote policies that will allow people — irrespective of race, gender or religion — to thrive.
We've experienced eight years of unbridled liberal policies, and half the nation is not paying income tax and is on some form of government assistance. Record numbers of people are out of the labor force altogether. Health premiums are going through the roof. Incomes are down. And people are at each other's throat. Let's let freedom ring again and truly promote inclusiveness in the sense that all Americans are free and encouraged to achieve their dreams for a more prosperous nation for everyone.
Comments