The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
.
Wednesday Top Headlines.
GOP targets liar-nObamaCare mandate repeal in Senate tax bill (The Hill) .
Sessions: Not enough basis to appoint a second special counsel to investigate liar-Hillary Clinton (CNS News) .
Sessions testifies again on Capitol Hill (Fox News) .
Thanks SPLC hate map? Wrong North Carolina church burned by leftist hate group (PJ Media) .
.
RNC cuts ties with Roy Moore campaign (Roll Call) .
Just in time… House to adopt mandatory anti-sexual harassment training (Associated Press) .
Democrat governors outsource climate campaigns to activist groups, emails reveal (The Washington Times) .
.
Policy: The data show the liar-nObamaCare mandate is a dismal failure (The Daily Signal) .
Policy: Do states have a role in making climate policy? No (Manhattan Institute) ~The Patriot Post .
scum-Schiff Claims Clapper, Brennan
Aren’t Hacks Like Him – Distorts Trump’s Words
{rickwells.us} ~ Globalist queen Andrea Greenspan distorts President Trump’s comments in order to provide the basis for the House Intelligence Committee’s Rankest member... Adam scum-Schiff (D-CA), to build upon with his own false and misleading remarks. Along with besmirching President Trump, they dismiss the value and importance of the various forms of the verb “to be” in crafting one’s words into a sentence with the proper meaning. scum-Shifty the Bobble-Head begins his lying from the outset. He said, “Well this is exactly right, Andrea, President Trump is saying basically the intelligence agencies are just political agencies and I couldn’t believe them because those career professionals like Clapper and Brennan who served the country for thirty or fifty years respectively, well, you just can’t trust them because they’re part of a political establishment.”... https://rickwells.us/schiff-claims-clapper-brennan-arent-hacks-like-him-distorts-trumps-words/.
.
Supreme Court Justices Keep Discovering
Conflicts Of Interest After Arguments
by KEVIN DALEY
{dailycaller.com} ~ Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan recused herself Friday from a divisive immigration case that was argued in October... after her chambers identified a conflict of interest they inadvertently missed during the pre-argument conflicts audit. The case, Jennings v. Rodriguez, asks whether illegal aliens have the right to a bond hearing when held by federal authorities for longer than six months. It was originally argued Nov. 30, 2016, when the Court had just eight justices. The case appears to have resulted in an even split, as it was scheduled for re-argument after Justice Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation returned the court to its full complement of nine. Now it appears the case may again result in a four-four split. Clerk of the Court Scott Harris released a letter Friday informing the parties that Kagan discovered she had authorized a filing at an earlier stage of the case while serving as solicitor general in the liar-nObama administration. As a general rule, the justices recuse themselves from cases they were involved with at an earlier stage of their career. Harris explained that the filing eluded notice during the conflicts check conducted by her chambers... http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/13/supreme-court-justices-keep-missing-conflicts-of-interest/.
Hollywood? What about male Muslims' sex abuse?
by LT. COLONEL JAMES G. ZUMWALT, USMC (RET)
{familysecuritymatters.org} ~ Hollywood's elites use their fame and fortune to push one progressive cause or liberal political candidate after another... But with recent public revelations concerning acts of sexual abuse and harassment by their own, coupled with their community's silence about it, Hollywood's moral high ground has been abandoned. It is disturbing so many remained silent, not for fear of physical harm, but of adverse material harm. Actors feared reporting an influential personality's egregious sexual misbehavior could end their career and politicians doing so feared losing the accused's flow of donations to a leftist cause. But this sexual misbehavior gives rise to a question with much more serious consequences for America. Underneath these Hollywood revelations lies buried a deeper, darker issue. It should give us pause for reflection, as the answer to "The Question" has national security implications... http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/hollywood-what-about-male-muslims-sex-abuse?f=must_reads.
.
Moore to Be Saidby Nate Jackson: Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore, still feeling the heat from the allegations of sexual misconduct 40 years ago, pledges to press on in his race. The special election is Dec. 12. On Friday afternoon, Moore interviewed with Sean Hannity to defend himself. He not only denied the story of Leigh Corfman, the primary accuser in The Washington Post’s exposé, he denied even knowing her. “I don’t know Ms. Corfman from anybody,” Moore said. “The allegations of sexual misconduct with her are completely false.”
Three other women claim Moore either had or attempted to have a dating relationship with them when he was in his 30s and they were teens (above Alabama’s age of consent, 16). When Hannity asked about these or similar relationships, Moore was ambiguous: “No, not generally. … I’m not going to dispute anything. … It would have been out of my customary behavior. … I don’t remember going out on dates. I knew her as a friend. If we did go out on dates then we did. But I do not remember that. … I don’t remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother.”
The problem with his denial of Corfman’s story is that witnesses at the time — including her mother — corroborate the story. And according to former deputy district attorney Teresa Jones, a prosecutor who worked with Moore in the early 1980s, “It was common knowledge that Roy dated high school girls. Everyone we knew thought it was weird. We wondered why someone his age would hang out at high school football games and the mall … but you really wouldn’t say anything to someone like that.”
Other women who experienced sexual abuse say that Corfman’s story — and especially her reasons for taking so long to tell it — resonate with them.
Gloria Allred, feminist extraordinaire, will hold a press conference today with a new accuser. Horrible that it’s a new accuser; dismissible because Allred’s involved.
Even Moore’s defenders are either not denying his odd relationships or they’re bizarrely using Scripture to justify the behavior.
All of this is to say the allegations are hard to dismiss as unbelievable … except for the timing of what was an obvious smear by the Democrats’ favorite paper, The Washington Post. In fact, Moore has threatened to sue the Post. Furthermore, one of the women talking about her dating relationship with Moore, Deborah Gibson, was a liar-Clinton campaign volunteer, though Corfman says she’s a Republican.
In any case, as we said Friday, things don’t look good for Moore. He’s losing both endorsements and money from fellow Republicans. Recent polling shows the gap closing between him and Democrat opponent Doug Jones, and it’s too late to remove his name from the ballot. That, of course, was the point of the Post running the story when it did.
As Mark Alexander puts it, “It is prudent to leave the door open for an ounce of doubt when The Washington Post runs a story with 40-year-old allegations of sex abuse a month ahead of an election, against a candidate who has been a public figure for most of those 40 years with not a (public) peep about these allegations previously. At best the allegations are totally unprovable and false, but the Post colluded with his accusers and timed the release of the story to affect the outcome of the election. At worst the allegations remain unprovable and true, but the Post colluded with his accusers and timed the release of the story to affect the outcome of the election.”
~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/52393
Comments