The Front Page Cover
"I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened"
Featuring:
In the latest sex scandal
the Clinton and Prince Andrew
parts are believable, but Alan Dershowitz?
Kevin Coach Collins
"Know who you are standing with"
"Show me your friends and I'll show you your future"
~~~lll~~~
U.S. Denies Jihadist Motivation for Paris Attacks
The man who attacked a Kosher grocery store in Paris, killing four hostages and a policewoman in violent support of the jihadis who attacked the office of Charlie Hebdo, declared allegiance to ISIL. In a YouTube video, he said, "What we are doing is completely legitimate." With al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula allegedly funding and directing the attack on the Charlie Hebdo office, the Director General for MI5 (British intelligence) made a rare appearance to warn, "A group of core al-Qaida terrorists in Syria is planning mass casualty attacks against the West." The Canadian Prime Minister also didn't mince words about the threat of Muslims waging jihad against the West: "They have declared war on any country like ourselves that values freedom, openness and tolerance." But the United States, the home of the free and land of the brave, is still waffling on whether the Paris attacks were perpetrated by jihadis. U.S. State Department Spokeswoman Marie Harf said, "First, I think, again, there are a lot of unknowns here. We're certainly not jumping to conclusions." Heaven forbid she call a spade a spade. -The Patriot Post
Democrats Start Session by Filibustering Keystone
Even though Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has tried to work with Democrats in the upper chamber, the Democrat Party has dug in and started to filibuster the bipartisan bill authorizing the Keystone XL pipeline. "The proceedings represented a role-reversal from the last Congress," The Washington Times reports, "when Democrats tried to push bills to the floor only to face a GOP filibuster. In many of those cases, however, Republicans said they were filibustering because Democrats -- led by Sen. dinky Harry Reid -- blocked out all amendments. This time around, Mr. McConnell promised to allow amendments from all sides." It seems like Democrat senators are trying to defend Barack nObama from conservative legislation, which is puzzling. nObama has unsheathed the veto pen and he loses nothing politically by using it. Yet Democrats have decided this is the legislation on which to begin their campaign as obstructionists -- a term they used to label Republican lawmakers for years. Hypocrisy at its finest. At this point, the GOP is only four votes shy of being able to override a veto. More... -The Patriot Post
The Financial Planner You Should Avoid
"Don't buy something you can't afford." That was Barack nObama's advice to home buyers as he announced a plan to cut mortgage insurance rates through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. "That $900 can go toward grocery, gas [or] children's education. ... That's money back in the economy," he said. Of course, the irony of this president lecturing people on what they can't afford is rich. He began his presidency with a near-trillion dollar boondoggle called the "stimulus" that not only failed to boost the economy but jacked up federal spending and deficits to record highs. Translation: He bought something all of us put together couldn't afford, so don't take financial advice from him. More... -The Patriot Post
nObamaCare Takes Nearly 10% of Median Paycheck
nObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber said in 2009 the "Affordable" Care Act "really doesn't bend the cost curve." Today, skyrocketing prices are being felt by Americans who go to work, earn a paycheck and have health insurance (i.e., middle class America). The law is compelling millions of Americans to get more coverage, which in turn is taking a bigger bite out of paychecks. The Chicago Tribune reports, "Workers continue to be squeezed by rising insurance costs, eroding benefits and stagnant wages, the report from the nonprofit Commonwealth Fund found. Nationwide, the average contribution an employee made to an insurance premium in 2013 and the average deductible together represented 9.6% of the median income of American households with members under age 65." In 2003, Americans were spending 5.3% of their income on health insurance. Gruber was right. And while Americans are compelled to spend almost 10% on health care, the government still demands its share of earnings. More... -The Patriot Post
1.
CENTCOM sites hacked, publish pro-Islamic State propaganda
(Thomas Joscelyn) - The official Twitter feed and the YouTube page for US Central Command (CENTCOM) were hacked on Monday...The hacker(s) posted messages threatening CENTCOM staff and warning that "ISIS," an acronym commonly used in the West to describe the Islamic State, had infected CENTCOM's computers. US officials appear to have regained control of the accounts since they were initially compromised. As of this writing, however, CENTCOM's Twitter feed is inactive. CENTCOM uses its Twitter feed to regularly post updates on the airstrikes against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2015/01/centcom_sites_hacked.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LongWarJournalSiteWide+%28The+Long+War+Journal+%28Site-Wide%29%29
2.
Michigan Public School Board Allows Muslims to Pray
(Frank Camp) - We—as a society—hate being negatively labeled. We hate it because we’ve learned that once a label is uttered, it usually sticks. Think of any high-profile political personality and certain words will immediately come to mind...Mitt Romney: rich, robotic, flip-flopper. Sarah Palin: dumb, crazy, hick. Ann Coulter: mean, insane, liar. These are the negative labels that have come to define these people in the public consciousness. Though the truth may be entirely different, it doesn’t matter, because the labels have been woven into the fabric of our perception. According to an article from The Christian Post, certain public schools in Michigan have begun to allow prayer in school. I know what you’re thinking. This is outrageous! Isn’t that against the law?! Keep calm, ye separation of church, and state crusaders, for it is not Christians or Jews who are being allowed to pray, but Muslims. Whew! You can all go back to watching today’s Daily Show. This doesn’t surprise me in the slightest. I can pretty much guarantee that the Michigan school board capitulated to CAIR’s requests because they are afraid. Afraid of what? Being labeled a racist, or an Islamophobe. http://lastresistance.com/9546/michigan-public-school-board-allows-muslims-pray/
(Frank Camp) - We—as a society—hate being negatively labeled. We hate it because we’ve learned that once a label is uttered, it usually sticks. Think of any high-profile political personality and certain words will immediately come to mind...Mitt Romney: rich, robotic, flip-flopper. Sarah Palin: dumb, crazy, hick. Ann Coulter: mean, insane, liar. These are the negative labels that have come to define these people in the public consciousness. Though the truth may be entirely different, it doesn’t matter, because the labels have been woven into the fabric of our perception. According to an article from The Christian Post, certain public schools in Michigan have begun to allow prayer in school. I know what you’re thinking. This is outrageous! Isn’t that against the law?! Keep calm, ye separation of church, and state crusaders, for it is not Christians or Jews who are being allowed to pray, but Muslims. Whew! You can all go back to watching today’s Daily Show. This doesn’t surprise me in the slightest. I can pretty much guarantee that the Michigan school board capitulated to CAIR’s requests because they are afraid. Afraid of what? Being labeled a racist, or an Islamophobe. http://lastresistance.com/9546/michigan-public-school-board-allows-muslims-pray/
3.
Fox News Video
Peters: 'President nObama chose the side of the terrorists'. Fox News strategist analysts blasts president for skipping Paris unity rally... http://video.foxnews.com/v/3984196014001/peters-president-obama-chose-the-side-of-the-terrorists/?cmpid=NL_fntop#sp=show-clips
4. Paris march and the continuing rise of the nObama police state
(Sher Zieve) - Along with millions of others, I watched almost all the Western world's leaders – save one – standing in Paris against Islamists and for the right to free speech after the malevolent and bloody onslaught...I thought it interesting and potentially stalwart but, then asked myself why didn't these leaders stop the influx of ravenous and unrelenting Islam into their countries earlier? I also thought – as I suspect most if not all of the world leaders did – that nObama stands with the Islamic terrorists...not with the humans...and he always has. I hope all of the aforementioned leaders know that now. Because he support the Islamic bloodlusters and the march didn't glorify him, nObama was a no-show and instead sent lackey Eric Holder – who made the statement that the nObama regime (aka syndicate) is "at war with lone wolf terrorists." I guess that means they didn't really care about the multiple terrorists performing attacks in Paris. Eric Holder looked bored and not at all pleased to be there. The nObama syndicate will not be swayed by what Big Boss nObama considers to be unimportant and petty attacks on our neighbors and allies while he is working to totally destroy the USA and subjugate its people with his growing Police State. Besides, as mentioned before, it wasn't about him anyway and he wouldn't be able to take his "selfies" with world leaders. Darn!
5.
Defending Islam from free speech
(Robert C. Blitt) - The OIC, whose member states range from moderate U.S. allies such as Jordan to adversaries such as Iran, describes itself as the world's largest international body after the United Nations...For more than a decade, "the collective voice of the Muslim world" has spread the belief that any insult directed against the Muslim faith or its prophet demands absolute suppression. Quashing "defamation of Islam" is enshrined as a chief objective in the organization's charter. With countless internal resolutions, relentless lobbying of the international community and block voting on resolutions advocating a prohibition on defamation of religion at the U.N., the OIC continuously pushes to silence criticism of Islam. Translated into practice inside Islamic nations and increasingly elsewhere, this toxic vision breeds contempt for freedom of religion and expression, justifies the killing of Muslims and non-Muslims alike, and casts a pall of self-censorship over academia and the arts. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/11/defending-islam-free-speech-muslim-oic-un-hate-speech-criticism-column/21609273/
6.
Muslim Leaders to Hold ‘Stand with the Prophet’ Rally in Texas
(Adam Kredo) - Muslim leaders from across America will gather in Texas this weekend to hold the annual Stand With the Prophet in Honor and Respect conference...a weekend forum that is being billed as a “movement to defend Prophet Muhammad, his person, and his message,” according to event information. The Saturday event, which seeks to combat “Islamophobes in America” who have turned the Islamic Prophet Muhammad “into an object of hate,” according to organizers, comes just a week after radicalized Islamists in France killed 17 people. The victims died in events that began with the shooting attack on French newspaper Charlie Hebdo for its satirical cartoons that skewered the prophet. http://freebeacon.com/issues/muslim-leaders-to-hold-stand-with-the-prophet-rally-in-texas/
7.
State Depart Refuses, Terror Threat is To Islamic Extremism
(The Last Refuge) - People keep asking: why won’t the nObama administration admit the terror threat is specifically from Islamic extremists? The reason is simple...They won’t admit it because once the problem is defined, they become responsible for an action plan to address it. The administration does not want to address it, ergo as long as the threat can be obfuscated, no-one will be expected to do anything specific. Hence, when Kelly File guest host Martha MacCallum confronts State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf about why the White House won’t openly say that radical Islam specifically is a major threat to the world – Harf avoids the specifics. http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/01/13/state-department-refuses-to-say-current-terror-threat-specific-to-islamic-extremism/
8.
Ex-Muslim’s Letter: “What else has to happen so you wake up?”
(Robert Spencer) - Meet Mark Christian, a brave man who has dedicated his life to exposing what Islam truly is all about...After leaving Islam a decade ago to convert to Christianity, Mark pulls no punches when speaking out about his former religion, frequently calling out the Muslims who choose to murder in the name of their god. The following is an open letter from Mark, not just to Americans, but to those professing to be “peaceful” Muslims. In the light of the recent terror attacks in Paris, this message needs to be heeded and applied before it is too late! http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/ex-muslims-open-letter-to-america-what-else-has-to-happen-so-you-wake-up?utm_source=Jihad+Watch+Daily+Digest&utm_campaign=008e605177-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_ffcbf57bbb-008e605177-123451509
9. America Paying Salaries of Afghan Cops That Don’t Exist
(Adam Kredo) - The United States continues to pay more than $300 million annually to the Afghan National Police (ANP), and some of that money is going to officers who do not actually exist, according to government officials who warn that fraud and a lack of oversight are causing U.S. taxpayer dollars to be wasted on the force...The United States continues to pay the salaries of ANP officers despite a lack of supervision over the funds and the fact that fraud is rampant among the force, according to a new report by the Special Investigator General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). A U.S. government official familiar with the issue further confirmed to the Washington Free Beacon that American tax dollars are in fact being paid to Afghan police officers who do not actually exist. What the heck is going on State Depart.? http://freebeacon.com/national-security/u-s-official-america-paying-salaries-of-afghan-cops-that-dont-exist/
10. nObama's moral confusion handcuffs America
(David Limbaugh) - In the wake of President nObama’s pathetic disengagement over the Islamic jihadist attacks on Paris, people are once again decrying his lack of leadership, but the problem is something more fundamental than leadership...Even if nObama were a gifted leader, when it comes to many issues, especially confronting radical Islam, he wouldn’t know where to lead us. If you misapprehend a problem, you can’t possibly navigate, much less lead, toward a solution. http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/obamas-moral-confusion-handcuffs-america/
In the latest sex scandal
the Clinton and Prince Andrew
parts are believable, but Alan Dershowitz?
Kevin Coach Collins
(coachisright.com) - Throughout his political life former president Bill Clinton has been involved in one sex scandal after another. The guy is horny as a toad. From Gennifer Flowers to Kathleen Willey, from Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick to Monica Lewinsky, Clinton has either wooed his women into bed or just forced himself on them – sometimes violently as in the Broadderick case.
Now the depraved ex-president’s name has surfaced in a new sex scandal that seems to have “legs.” Recently released court documents show that a woman named Virginia Roberts has alleged that, while she was a minor, she was pimped by Jeffrey Epstein a millionaire financier and forced to have sex with various friends of his including Prince Andrew of the United Kingdom. Among the other names that have surfaced is Bill Clinton and most surprisingly Alan Dershowitz, the famous attorney and former Harvard law professor. Though there is no proof that Clinton had sex with Ms. Roberts or any of the other underage girls under Epstein’s control, it is hard to imagine a horny bee like Clinton not dipping his stinger into a pile of honey someone else had bought for him.
Nevertheless, it is the mention of Dershowitz that makes this case so unique. It is Mister Dershowitz’ contention that not only did he never have sex with Ms. Roberts, he never even met her and that the allegations against him are total fabrications.
Dershowitz has a strong reputation for honesty and fairness as he sees it. He maintains Virginia Roberts’ story is demonstrably false. He says a review of passenger manifests and his own personal travel itinerary for the period in question 1999 to 2002 will show he was nowhere near this situation. This is a very strong defense; so strong in fact that is raises the question of why the allegation should even include him.
Could it be that Ms. Roberts is being sold out by someone? Could the answer here be that the name Alan Dershowitz has been injected into this scandal to actually make it look ridiculous? Maybe Ms. Roberts is naïve enough to believe someone telling her that the addition of Dershowitz’s name would fatten her pay day in an “out of court” settlement with the famed attorney and the other friends of Epstein.
We will eventually get the truth but it won’t be from the American mainstream media. The truth will come from the National Enquirer and British newspapers. Stand by.
Now the depraved ex-president’s name has surfaced in a new sex scandal that seems to have “legs.” Recently released court documents show that a woman named Virginia Roberts has alleged that, while she was a minor, she was pimped by Jeffrey Epstein a millionaire financier and forced to have sex with various friends of his including Prince Andrew of the United Kingdom. Among the other names that have surfaced is Bill Clinton and most surprisingly Alan Dershowitz, the famous attorney and former Harvard law professor. Though there is no proof that Clinton had sex with Ms. Roberts or any of the other underage girls under Epstein’s control, it is hard to imagine a horny bee like Clinton not dipping his stinger into a pile of honey someone else had bought for him.
Nevertheless, it is the mention of Dershowitz that makes this case so unique. It is Mister Dershowitz’ contention that not only did he never have sex with Ms. Roberts, he never even met her and that the allegations against him are total fabrications.
Dershowitz has a strong reputation for honesty and fairness as he sees it. He maintains Virginia Roberts’ story is demonstrably false. He says a review of passenger manifests and his own personal travel itinerary for the period in question 1999 to 2002 will show he was nowhere near this situation. This is a very strong defense; so strong in fact that is raises the question of why the allegation should even include him.
Could it be that Ms. Roberts is being sold out by someone? Could the answer here be that the name Alan Dershowitz has been injected into this scandal to actually make it look ridiculous? Maybe Ms. Roberts is naïve enough to believe someone telling her that the addition of Dershowitz’s name would fatten her pay day in an “out of court” settlement with the famed attorney and the other friends of Epstein.
We will eventually get the truth but it won’t be from the American mainstream media. The truth will come from the National Enquirer and British newspapers. Stand by.
(As I side note: Seek out Mr Kevin book 'Crooks Thugs and Bigots: the lost hidden and changed history of the Democrat Party?' and others of his books.)
Comments