Wednesday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

IYTaPFligsuOQnb3KpY6e8EIfbRYbxGaXEy74toCam53VAlK2BU_zHqHRZOoSXqHvoAdusjFGrHrr7jggO3_gsFWuxy7XukRwXf9bcAs3YgfszlMZ5kAoKRzg9juK5B8ZKCjMjU2Rw7J5SqGovNzWSBoxIHjawZYlz-CkMAHjWNMmMzLIpGPDtgQKYPEFUPU5PMAl7wF212LPdK0aDE=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
Happy New Years
From TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
2019? More Of The Same, Maybe Worse
by Tom McLaughlin
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Limbaugh: Trump can 
build border wall without Congress
dF2vEkhU_OxDeOWHMvj3DeeBQgGOpGPvsdZnFDR-xua4OkzI-cBNkJHKq2syOHdOrSpiQj4Xwca-UWHmtthxlx9ACMcDENlke7fwST9jlsmni3LdW8iQkDHxKqbu9GPdHQww7705=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by wnd.com  
{wnd.com} ~ Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh says there might be “hell to pay,” but he says the time has come for President Trump to “break” the Democrats and build the border wall using the executive power he already has... It’s all over the refusal of Democrat leaders to fund border security, or negotiate over those plans, and it comes down to a “showdown” of power between the executive branch and the legislative branch. “He is the executive. He does not have some of the executive power, he has all of it!” Limbaugh said on his Monday broadcast. “There are all kinds of departments and bureaucracies and areas of the executive branch with unspent money, and Trump can go get whatever he needs from any of those different departments and allocate it, and he can get started building the wall, and he can do it constitutionally on the premise that he is engaging in an act of national security!” Limbaugh explained: “There are many people who think the president has the executive power to start building this wall with money that’s already been allocated in budgets that exist in the executive branch and he can and he does. There will be hell to pay.” “I mean, if you think this is bad, the minute a wall’s construction has actually begun with money that Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer and his gang don’t think they participated in allocating or appropriate, they go nuts and they start shouting and yelling ‘impeachment.’ But the fact of the matter is – and the Washington swamp would be too.”...
.
Trump: Turkey And Saudi Arabia 
Will Step Up In Syria  
oKKc1UmH8LBVn6j8zqWbpbzcI9zSL11dZvUkZmS62Pk_5BcO5O2z81X0UKud7uEk56dl52iOrtEhwYRPAJjMrm_6XMRWyGsnOle3ipJ3XO_fG4Yj_iuhbD6c8dOuf4Gc_F3TBxERqDAJhxpoqVvfmvUbOBQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by Saagar Enjeti
{dailycaller.com} ~ President Donald Trump justified his decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria, noting Monday that Turkey and Saudi Arabia... would instead bear the brunt of the remaining anti-Islamic State effort.  Trump noted Sunday that he had a phone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan about the situation in Syria and his pledges to support anti-ISIS efforts.Trump has received  pointed criticism from several congressional Republicans and others for his Syria decision who warn that ISIS is not yet wholly defeated in Syria and that a withdrawal will abandon allies on the ground. U.S. strategy to defeat ISIS relied primarily on training, equipping, and supporting Syrian Kurdish forces on the ground. Turkey, however, is vehemently opposed to U.S. support for Syrian Kurdish forces and considers them a terrorist group intent on challenging the legitimacy of the Turkish state. Trump has  repeatedly said in recent days that the U.S. has no other role in Syria than to destroy ISIS and now that the vast majority of its caliphate is gone the nearly 2,000 troops on the ground are no longer necessary...
.
FDA Policies Kill
KGLfmUTxCCDpZIAh9hPsjtQFzjc0XYoz0hDb-mEjRjk2kjQckwKEg0Htza7t6PzbfAE3fkXpaEcsIBpvZZGGVGMOyB7Qdb1UuwDsPGtJdULm4gyhZtLV0Fp3hfYdxIGfQyL1YRxxDX_OKcHDrrcN=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400by Walter E. Williams
{townhall.com} ~ Among the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's responsibilities are approval and regulation of pharmaceutical drugs. In short, its responsibility is to ensure the safety and effectiveness of drugs... In the performance of this task, FDA officials can make two types of errors -- statistically known as the type I error and type II error. With respect to the FDA, a type I error is the rejection or delayed approval of a drug that is safe and effective -- erring on the side of over-caution -- and a type II error is the approval of a drug that has unanticipated dangerous side effects, or erring on the side of under-caution. Let's examine the incentives of FDA officials. If FDA officials err on the side of under-caution and approve a drug that has unanticipated dangerous side effects, the victims of their mistake will be highly visible. There may be congressional hearings, embarrassment to the agency and officials fired. It's an entirely different story if FDA officials err on the side of over-caution and either disapprove or delay the approval of a drug that is both safe and effective. In that case, the victims will be invisible. They will have no idea that their suffering could have been eliminated, or in the case of death, their loved ones will have no idea why they died. Their suffering and/or death will be chalked up to the state of medicine rather than the status of an FDA drug application. Their doctor will simply tell them there's nothing more that can be done to help them. The FDA officials go scot-free. Let's look at some of the history of the FDA's erring on the side of over-caution. Beta blockers reduce the risk of secondary heart attacks and were widely used in Europe during the mid-1970s. The FDA imposed a moratorium on approvals of beta blockers in the U.S. because of their carcinogenicity in animals. Finally, in 1981, the FDA approved the first such drug, boasting that it might save up to 17,000 lives per year. That means that as many as 100,000 people died from secondary heart attacks waiting for FDA approval. (http://tinyurl.com/ydxpvd54). Those people are in the "invisible graveyard," a term to describe people who would have lived but died because the cure that could have saved them was bottled up in the FDA's regulatory process...   https://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2018/12/19/fda-policies-kill-n2537571 
.
North Korea must pay $501 million to 
Otto Warmbier’s parents, judge rules
SCxKCH_QVTjsash1GJ6UtQJz7e2PQ_r9rtBkPaC11MFh68Htw2415Z4exK9X0EdpItBWwP6XPgK0aMablZFCS9otyft8F-1U1x1M7mFqDYw-R5IksqZbYXrjKYZOdmS0nBj5xy4hXdOiQM6kdjT-FvpgZiriKE-UNme8cfew4a5SD6B_X8irHJ4FcdRvwtX4Ntcc4Kj75XUei2LMDPvNZlEiLA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by Greg Norman 
{foxnews.com} ~  An American judge has ruled that Kim Jong Un’s North Korean regime must pay $501 million to the parents of Otto Warmbier after their son died... following his time spent in captivity there. The ruling Monday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is largely symbolic, though, as it is unlikely North Korea hands over any cash. It comes after Warmbier’s parents sued the Hermit Kingdom for more than $1 billion. “North Korea is liable for the torture, hostage taking, and extrajudicial killing of Otto Warmbier, and the injuries to his mother and father, Fred and Cindy Warmbier,” Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell wrote in the ruling. The college student from Ohio was on a tour in North Korea when he allegedly stole a propaganda sign from a hotel. He was arrested in January 2016 and held captive for more than 17 months. Warmbier died from severe brain damage after he was repatriated to the U.S. in June 2017. He was 22. North Korea has repeatedly denied accusations Warmbier was tortured and officials told their U.S. counterparts at the time that he had suffered from botulism and then slipped into a coma after taking a sleeping pill. But doctors in Cincinnati said their examination showed no evidence of botulism, the strong neurotoxin produced by a bacterium...
.
Social Security Admin Stole Thousands from Dead Woman, Family Still Waiting for Repayment
EV79G8h82OEkP_MSaUVZGZBOUtxPpiNk7bfdLNRxjLhu037amqXNLKzNoHthaP4hEYxOllMsrms3UPxh1AXpHc76qpGWDuxX6Ftuy9aBOFoXl16mtU2hgXN45-bXUapVZKU-_gigmtJhbC37GgN42mc7sQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=400
by CILLIAN ZEAL
{westernjournal.com} ~ The family of a recently deceased woman is fighting the Social Security Administration for thousands of dollars illegitimately taken from her bank account... and the government doesn’t seem particularly keen on doing anything about it. “Days after a suburban man’s mother died, he noticed large withdrawals from her bank account,” Chicago’s WBBM-TV reported. “Tim Carlberg feels beaten down by his almost four-month battle with the Social Security Administration. “Less than 10 days after his 89-year-old mother died in August, someone from the Social Security office electronically swooped in and withdrew five payments from her bank account. The problem is, they were only supposed to take back one payment, from the month she died.” In just three days, the overzealous bureaucrats at the SSA took $7,028 more than they were entitled to. To most people, that means the agency stole it. When Carlberg called Social Security, according to WBBM, he was told the agency had the wrong date of death in the system. While Dorothy Carlberg, a resident of suburban Chicago, died on Aug. 21, the administration had it entered as March 21. The fact that the mistake was acknowledged, Carlberg figured, was a sign it would soon be fixed...
.
Trump the Nationalist and 
the Role of the Modern USA
by Michael Curtis

{americanthinker.com} ~ The decision of President Donald Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria and Afghanistan led to the announced departure on December 20, 2018 of secretary of defense James Mattis, four-star general...
 often regarded as a force for stability in the administration.  Policy differences between Mattis and the president already existed over a number of issues: NATO, Korea, Afghanistan, Syria, the Iran nuclear deal, proposal for a military Space Force, American attitudes to allies.  Irrespective of the controversy over Mattis's departure, more important is the issue of the desirable role of the United States in world affairs: should the U.S. continue or expand its overseas activities and be the leader of the global order, or should it reduce its commitments and withdraw from certain areas? President George Washington in his Farewell Address on September 19, 1796 spoke of the need for the new U.S to "pursue a different course." It is, he argued, true U.S. policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world. Instead, the U.S. may safely trust in temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies. The great rule of conduct for the U.S. in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. Differences on the U.S.'s role varied throughout its history. The country and President Woodrow Wilson were divided over U.S. policy toward World War I until the German submarine attacks on U.S. ships and the sinking of the British Lusitania in 1917. Similarly, strong differences were expressed over both participation in the conflict and the conduct of that war unconditional surrender or early armistice and on postwar policy; the Versailles treaty; the League of Nations, which was rejected by isolationists in the Senate; and reconstruction of Europe after the war. The crucial issue was the same in 1918 as it remains today: the nature of the role and global reach of the U.S. ...   https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/12/trump_the_nationalist_and_the_role_of_the_modern_usa.html
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
. 
2019? More Of The Same, Maybe Worse
by Tom McLaughlin
therefore-do-not-worry-about-tomorrow-for-tomorrow-will-worry-about-itself-each-day-has-enough-trouble-of-its-own1.jpg
{tommclaughlin.blogspot.com} ~ This is the week many writers make predictions for next year. There was a time when I wanted to know what would happen tomorrow, next week, next year, but not anymore. It’s one day at a time for me now. Worrying about the future increased my anxiety so much that it interfered with daily functioning. The bumper sticker proclamation: “One Day At A Time” is good advice. The Creator divided our existence into day and night and designed us to require sleep every evening, then instructed: “Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.” He taught us to pray by saying, “Give us this day our daily bread,” and not, “Make everything okay next year.”  
56d61b998d3eae6b18ff31ca.jpg
If I continue sucking oxygen throughout 2019 I think we can expect times of joy and sorrow, sunny days and rainy days, restful nights, and sleepless nights. That’s how life has been for me so far and it will likely continue. If I knew of tragedies to come I would start dreading them now and that would diminish my enjoyment of today.  
180510100211-controversial-sign-1-exlarge-169.jpg
In 2018 there was plenty of consternation. Division between Donald Trump’s “deplorable” base and virtually everyone else in America deepened considerably. Would anyone be surprised if that continued? The stock market plummeted through December. Will it go lower still? There are lots of predictions but no one knows, really. How many times over the past two years did our mainstream media tell us that something President Trump said, did, tweeted, was suspected of, or was accused of was the last straw — that he’d really sunk himself this time and the American people would not tolerate him any further? Every week at least, every day at times, even several times a day. Should we expect that to continue? I don’t know why it wouldn’t.  
quote-let-s-start-off-with-my-father-being-a-mailman-john-kasich-139-96-90.jpg
There are over twenty Democrats and a few Republicans playing coy about running against President Trump in 2020. So far, only one Democrat has unequivocally announced his candidacy and his name is Castro. All will be guests on the Sunday morning talk shows and cable channels throughout 2019. All will express how horrified and appalled they are with Trump and offer themselves as alternatives. Expect Republicans like soon-to-be-former Ohio Governor John — my-father-was-a-mailman — Kasich, and soon-to-be-former Senator and aptly-named Jeff Flake, to continually repeat that they are not Donald Trump and do not resemble him in the least.  
42392363_357321851676152_7136052721530990010_n.jpg
Will anyone be surprised if all the Democrats repeatedly call Trump a racist, xenophobic, transphobic, sexist liar? I won’t. Although nearly all criticized every president who ever sent the US soldiers into a Middle Eastern country, will they criticize Trump for pulling them out? That’s already started. How many will promise to abolish ICE? Most? Some have already, but will more make the pledge? When they’re subsequently asked if they support open borders, will they deny it? Of course, but only half of America will believe them. They’ll all promise to deport illegal alien criminals, but will any of them come out against sanctuary cities and states that harbor them? I doubt it.  
MALONE_1542754468413_103752809_ver1.0.jpg
Former Portland, Maine Bishop Malone  
Catholics were shocked again and again through 2018 at the extent of corruption among US bishops and cardinals accused of covering up and/or perpetrating sexual abuse of altar boys and seminarians. Will there be more such reports in 2019? It’s very likely, considering that over a dozen state attorneys general are investigating hundreds of dioceses around the country. That’s in addition to federal RICO investigations going on nearly everywhere. FBI agents have been asking questions at my Portland, Maine diocese. Have they been to yours too? Just last week Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan found sexual abuse allegations against five hundred more Catholic clergy than what the Chicago Diocese had reported.  
648cedeb1f9039827c51528b6d2f0bbf_XL.jpg
Cupich and McCarrick  
Chicago Cardinal Archbishop Blase Cupich was appointed to the job upon recommendation by disgraced former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick according to testimony last summer by Italian Archbishop Vigano. “Regarding Cupich,” Vigano wrote, “one cannot fail to note his ostentatious arrogance, and the insolence with which he denies the evidence that is now obvious to all: that 80% of the abuses found were committed against young adults by homosexuals who were in a relationship of authority over their victims.” Following that bombshell, Pope Francis appointed Cupich to run the worldwide meeting of bishops in Rome in February to investigate clerical sex abuse! That should be interesting. Archbishop Vigano has called for Pope Francis to resign. Will he? No one knows.  
mag_11132017_1230x1591.jpg
As if all that weren’t bad enough, Patriots fans have to watch legendary quarterback Tom Brady show his age while realizing there’s no one on the bench capable of filling his shoes. Will 2019 see the Patriot dynasty coming to an end? The horror! I don't want to think about it.  
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center