The Front Page Cover
~ Featuring ~
The Left Won’t Rest Until Someone Gets Killed
by Derek Hunter
.
{consjournal.com} ~ According to the latest from The Hill, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman said in an interview Sunday that the Russian ambassador who met with Trump campaign officials also met with “people working in think tanks advising liar-Hillary or advising people working for liar-Hillary.”... “Well, if you look at some people connected with liar-Hillary Clinton during her campaign, you would probably see that he had lots of meetings of that kind,” Dmitry Peskov told CNN “GPS” host Fareed Zakaria, implying it is the job of Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak to meet with officials on both sides to talk about “bilateral relations.” “But there were no meetings about elections — electoral process … So if you look at it with intention to demonize Russia, you would probably say that, yes, he was trying to interfere in liar-Hillary’s activities. But it would be nonsense, because this is not true,” Peskov said... http://consjournal.com/reveal-their-connection-to-hillarys-campaign-media-totally-silent/
. Jihadi Déjà Vu in London
Ramadan is the Islamic holiday during which an increasing number of jihadi terrorists murder "infidels" with whatever means available — and they do so in high-profile venues to foment greater fear. Last weekend there was a London replay of an increasingly common slaughter scene, on the heels of the bombing two weeks ago in Manchester, and a similar attack three months ago in London. (Five other attacks have been thwarted.) In the most recent attack, three men drove a van into a crowd on London Bridge, and then jumped out with knives to stab more people, killing seven and wounding scores more. It wasn't Catholic nuns or extremist Presbyterians; it was Islamists bent on establishing a worldwide caliphate and killing as many infidels as possible in the name of their "god."
British Prime Minister Theresa May, facing an election this Thursday, minced no words. "Enough is enough," she declared, insisting that there is "far too much tolerance for extremism in our country." She insisted, not a minute too soon, "Things need to change," and she identified by name the "evil ideology of Islamist extremism."
Two days before the attack, London Mayor Sadiq Khan, a Muslim sharia apologist, protested Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Paris "climate change" charade, claiming that global warming is "one of the biggest risks to humanity." We challenge him to name a single London citizen who has been murdered by climate change — although given the Left's "creative causation" claims, maybe he will come up with one.
After the attack, Khan announced, "Londoners will see an increased police presence today and over the course of the next few days. There is no reason to be alarmed by this." Trump responded, "At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is 'no reason to be alarmed!’" Indeed, UK citizens should be alarmed at the increased police presence because it is a visceral indicator of an increasing terrorist threat. The U.S. has already witnessed some of these vehicular attacks and there will be more to come in popular tourist venues. That is unless and until political leaders are willing to truly combat this rabid ideology. ~The Patriot Post
.
.
Russians Reveal Their Connection to liar-Hillary’s Campaign, Main Stream Media Totally Silent
by amorgan
Trey Gowdy Will Run House Overnight Committee
by Thomas | Featured Commentator
{thepoliticalinsider.com} ~ After weeks of speculation that Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) may be President Donald Trump’s new choice to run the FBI, we’re now getting top media outlets confirming Gowdy will instead run the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee... The reports claim Gowdy, who did not run for the position, will be selected by fellow members of the House due to his leadership abilities shown during investigations into liar-nObama White House scandals, including Benghazi and Fast and Furious. The committee, with broad subpoena powers, is tasked with rooting out government corruption and exposing it. Now, it looks like Gowdy will play a key role in helping President Trump drain the Washington, D.C. swamp!...http://thepoliticalinsider.com/trey-gowdy-will-run-house-overnight-committee-report/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=TPI-Newsletter-6-5-17-Afternoon&utm_campaign=TPI_Afternoon_060517_Newsletter&utm_content=4b4ea4948726422aa6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI
.
Senate passes measure calling on
Trump to move US Embassy to Jerusalem
by Susan Ferrechio
{washingtonexaminer.com} ~ The Senate on Monday passed a resolution calling on President Trump to "abide by" provision of a 1995 law moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem... The provision was passed as part of a measure commemorating the 50th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem, which followed the Six Day War in 1967. The Senate passed it in a 90-0 vote. Trump promised during his campaign that he would move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, but in a reversal, signed an order on June 1 keeping the embassy in Tel Aviv, at least for now. The White House said it delayed the move to improve the chances of reaching a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinian Authority...There will never be peace with the Palestinians. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/senate-passes-measure-calling-on-trump-to-move-us-embassy-to-jerusalem/article/2625016.
NSA contractor accused of leaking
top secret report on Russian hacking efforts
by Samuel Chamberlain
{foxnews.com} ~ A federal contractor was arrested over the weekend and accused of leaking a classified report containing "Top Secret level" information on Russian hacking efforts during the 2016 presidential election... Reality Leigh Winner, 25, appeared in U.S. District Court in Augusta, Ga., to face one charge of removing classified material from a government facility and mailing it to a news outlet, the Justice Department said Monday. Winner's arrest was announced shortly after the Intercept website published a story detailing how Russian hackers attacked at least one U.S. voting software supplier and sent so-called "spear-phishing" emails to more than 100 local election officials at the end of October or beginning of November.... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/05/nsa-contractor-accused-leaking-top-secret-report-on-russian-hacking-efforts.html.
Grassroots Group Begins
Filing to Defund CA Sanctuary Cities
by Mark Tapson
{truthrevolt.org} ~ Local paperwork has been filed to begin the process of defunding California sanctuary cities one by one, beginning with Cudahy, a city located in southeastern Los Angeles County that is populated predominantly by Latino immigrants... The Cudahy city council voted on January 6, 2015 to adopt a resolution declaring Cudahy a “Sanctuary City for Immigrants.” Breitbart reports that Joseph Turner, founder of American Children First, filed the paperwork last week under Prop 218 as a utility tax repeal that could deprive the small city of 13.5 percent of their general revenue funds, as part of a larger effort to defund sanctuary cities. By filing under Prop 218, Turner needs to gather a mere 62 signatures from city voters. He plans to move on next to file in Huntington Park, California, whose city council made national news when it appointed illegal aliens to their city commissions in 2015. Turner said he would need only 176 signatures in Huntington Park, also in southeastern Los Angeles County but twice the size of Cudahy... http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/grassroots-group-begins-filing-defund-ca-sanctuary-cities.
.
by Derek Hunter
{townhall.com} ~ I’m old enough to remember when “violent rhetoric” was the root of all our problems, and crosshairs on a website no one ever saw was the reason for mass murder.
Of course, those were different times, times in which the president had a (D) after his name, not an evil (R). Since that important change happened, everything flipped – over-the-top rhetoric is no longer the domain of the fringe; it’s the currency of the mainstream media. Worse, it’s turned from heated political disagreement to paranoia and pure hatred, and it’s going to get someone killed.
The people on the political left didn’t just lose an election last November, they lost their minds. And their leadership has been exploiting that for power and profit ever since.
Immediately after their loss, Democrats did not turn introspective and try to discover why, after eight years of a personally popular president, voters across the country had rejected them in record numbers at every level of government. No, they turned in anger at those who beat them, and no one has had more of that anger directed at them than President Trump.
He’s the accidental president, in their minds, someone unworthy of even the basic respect for the office that used to be the norm in politics.
Worse, they are stoking fears to the point that even the casual observer is left with the impression they’re hoping someone “corrects” that accident.
How else can one interpret the left’s continual equating of the president to Adolf Hitler? What is implied in saying the man’s actions on an otherwise insignificant international agreement “is a grave threat to our planet?”
That last part was tweeted by none other than Nancy Pulosi to her more than 1 million followers.
Billionaire liberal financier and green energy profiteer Tom Steyer said pulling the US out of the Paris accord would “be committing a traitorous act of war against the American people.”
Supposed journalists stripped clear all standards to proclaim their outrage. “Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Rick Perry & Steve Bannon walk into a bar & the bar is the earth & it overheats & we all die,” was but one example of their calm “analysis.”
Celebrities and politicians all pronounced the president to be an enemy of the planet, of the people; a threat to life itself.
The Huffington Post declared, “Trump To Planet: Drop Dead.”
All this was made more ironic by the fact this gaggle of pearl clutchers had, just a few years ago, accused Sarah Palin of inciting the deadly shooting in Tucson that gravely injured former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords.
HuffPo itself ran a piece entitled, “Words Have Consequences,” which preached on the dangers of over-the-top rhetoric. It read:
Today we have seen the results of this rhetoric. Those with a megaphone, whether provided by public office or a media outlet, have responsibilities. They cannot avoid the consequences of their blatant efforts to inflame, anger, and outrage. We all know that there are unstable and potentially dangerous people among us. To repeatedly appeal to their basest instincts is to invite and welcome their predictable violence.
Of course, we hadn’t “seen the results” of anything of the sort. The killer was a left-wing rabid hater of President George W. Bush who’d never seen the “crosshairs” on Palin’s website and most likely hated her just as much.
But if liberals believed what they were saying back then, what does it tell us about what they’re hoping for now? There’s really only one conclusion to draw: They want blood, literal blood.
Be it declaring the president a traitor, equating him with history’s greatest monster, or a danger to the continued existence of our species, the political left clearly wishes him and anyone who agrees with him on any issue to be a threat. And, in the mind of the unstable, threats, especially on that scale, must be eliminated.
Maybe they aren’t doing it consciously – though that I find somewhat difficult to believe given their insistence on the risk of heated rhetoric in the past. No, they want blood.
When Kathy Griffin made a sick video of her holding the fake severed head of President Trump, Secret Service agents didn’t reach out to her because they feared she was on the verge of scaling the White House gates to murder the president. They had to convey to her that her video could set off an unstable person believing it was a message to them, a call to arms.
After all, the head of the greatest threat to humanity, dripping with blood in a video straight out of the ISIS playbook, isn’t exactly a subtle message on its own. When marinated in the toxic media, rabid college campus and progressive political culture, it’s a dare. It’s a challenge. It’s a plea.
Leftists will say this is crazy, that their disagreements are genuine and their rhetoric is simply a reflection of the times and the president’s own words. That Trump ratcheted up the tone, not them. They have short memories for their own hypocrisy and their attempts to smear blood on their opponents’ hands after every tragedy. Or at least they hope the American people do.
Maybe they do. But that won’t absolve them if their chickens come home to roost.
It may not be an attack on the president they inspire. Maybe it’ll be a speaker on a college campus, or a member of Congress, or a local city council. Whatever the case, the hatred they’re stoking is boiling, and for the sake of fundraising and to appease their base, they’re more than happy to turn up the heat.
If they don’t mean for something awful to happen, let’s hope they find a piece of whatever conscience they have left and dial it down before someone gets hurt. That is, of course, dependent upon something awful happening not being part of their plan.
The Left Won’t Rest Until Someone Gets Killed
{townhall.com} ~ I’m old enough to remember when “violent rhetoric” was the root of all our problems, and crosshairs on a website no one ever saw was the reason for mass murder.
Of course, those were different times, times in which the president had a (D) after his name, not an evil (R). Since that important change happened, everything flipped – over-the-top rhetoric is no longer the domain of the fringe; it’s the currency of the mainstream media. Worse, it’s turned from heated political disagreement to paranoia and pure hatred, and it’s going to get someone killed.
The people on the political left didn’t just lose an election last November, they lost their minds. And their leadership has been exploiting that for power and profit ever since.
Immediately after their loss, Democrats did not turn introspective and try to discover why, after eight years of a personally popular president, voters across the country had rejected them in record numbers at every level of government. No, they turned in anger at those who beat them, and no one has had more of that anger directed at them than President Trump.
He’s the accidental president, in their minds, someone unworthy of even the basic respect for the office that used to be the norm in politics.
Worse, they are stoking fears to the point that even the casual observer is left with the impression they’re hoping someone “corrects” that accident.
How else can one interpret the left’s continual equating of the president to Adolf Hitler? What is implied in saying the man’s actions on an otherwise insignificant international agreement “is a grave threat to our planet?”
That last part was tweeted by none other than Nancy Pulosi to her more than 1 million followers.
Billionaire liberal financier and green energy profiteer Tom Steyer said pulling the US out of the Paris accord would “be committing a traitorous act of war against the American people.”
Supposed journalists stripped clear all standards to proclaim their outrage. “Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Rick Perry & Steve Bannon walk into a bar & the bar is the earth & it overheats & we all die,” was but one example of their calm “analysis.”
Celebrities and politicians all pronounced the president to be an enemy of the planet, of the people; a threat to life itself.
The Huffington Post declared, “Trump To Planet: Drop Dead.”
All this was made more ironic by the fact this gaggle of pearl clutchers had, just a few years ago, accused Sarah Palin of inciting the deadly shooting in Tucson that gravely injured former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords.
HuffPo itself ran a piece entitled, “Words Have Consequences,” which preached on the dangers of over-the-top rhetoric. It read:
Today we have seen the results of this rhetoric. Those with a megaphone, whether provided by public office or a media outlet, have responsibilities. They cannot avoid the consequences of their blatant efforts to inflame, anger, and outrage. We all know that there are unstable and potentially dangerous people among us. To repeatedly appeal to their basest instincts is to invite and welcome their predictable violence.
Of course, we hadn’t “seen the results” of anything of the sort. The killer was a left-wing rabid hater of President George W. Bush who’d never seen the “crosshairs” on Palin’s website and most likely hated her just as much.
But if liberals believed what they were saying back then, what does it tell us about what they’re hoping for now? There’s really only one conclusion to draw: They want blood, literal blood.
Be it declaring the president a traitor, equating him with history’s greatest monster, or a danger to the continued existence of our species, the political left clearly wishes him and anyone who agrees with him on any issue to be a threat. And, in the mind of the unstable, threats, especially on that scale, must be eliminated.
Maybe they aren’t doing it consciously – though that I find somewhat difficult to believe given their insistence on the risk of heated rhetoric in the past. No, they want blood.
When Kathy Griffin made a sick video of her holding the fake severed head of President Trump, Secret Service agents didn’t reach out to her because they feared she was on the verge of scaling the White House gates to murder the president. They had to convey to her that her video could set off an unstable person believing it was a message to them, a call to arms.
After all, the head of the greatest threat to humanity, dripping with blood in a video straight out of the ISIS playbook, isn’t exactly a subtle message on its own. When marinated in the toxic media, rabid college campus and progressive political culture, it’s a dare. It’s a challenge. It’s a plea.
Leftists will say this is crazy, that their disagreements are genuine and their rhetoric is simply a reflection of the times and the president’s own words. That Trump ratcheted up the tone, not them. They have short memories for their own hypocrisy and their attempts to smear blood on their opponents’ hands after every tragedy. Or at least they hope the American people do.
Maybe they do. But that won’t absolve them if their chickens come home to roost.
It may not be an attack on the president they inspire. Maybe it’ll be a speaker on a college campus, or a member of Congress, or a local city council. Whatever the case, the hatred they’re stoking is boiling, and for the sake of fundraising and to appease their base, they’re more than happy to turn up the heat.
If they don’t mean for something awful to happen, let’s hope they find a piece of whatever conscience they have left and dial it down before someone gets hurt. That is, of course, dependent upon something awful happening not being part of their plan.
Comments