All Posts (30874)
By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
So…it’s been an interesting week.
France, more than half a century after the end of WWII finally surrendered to Germany and President Trump finally fired FBI Director, James Comey.
The former has Islamists dancing on the Champs Elysées and Angela Merkel now running two countries without borders…while the latter has Hillary Clinton sweating like Britney Spears on Jeopardy.
Liberals, being the socialists that they are, are overjoyed at the prospect of an even more socialistic France crawling with assorted, but unvetted Islamists, but their heads are exploding over the firing of James Comey.
It’s the difference between Moulin le Boom…
ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton
The ACLU and its Muslim lawyer Omar Jadwat are not interested in enforcing the law, which grants the President the right to restrict immigration, and they have no interest in defending the United States. They just want to destroy President Trump. If the executive order is constitutional, it is constitutional no matter who enacts it.
“ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton,” NTK Network, May 8, 2017:
ACLU Lawyer Omar Jadwat, arguing against President Trump’s travel ban before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday, admitted that the same exact travel ban “could be” constitutional if it were enacted by Hillary Clinton.
Jadwat argued that Trump’s campaign animus motivated the order, making it illegitimate. This claim was challenged by the Fourth Circuit’s Judge Paul Niemeyer.
“If a different candidate had won the election and then issued this order, I gather you wouldn’t have any problem with that?” Niemeyer asked.
Jadwat dodged on directly answering the question at first, but Niemeyer persisted, asking the question again.
Jadwat again tried to avoid the question, asking for clarification on the hypothetical, but Niemeyer once again demanded an answer.
“We have a candidate who won the presidency, some candidate other than President Trump won the presidency and then chose to issue this particular order, with whatever counsel he took,” Niemeyer said. “Do I understand that just in that circumstance, the executive order should be honored?”
“Yes, your honor, I think in that case, it could be constitutional,” Jadwat admitted.
Jadwat also denied that presidents’ actions should be nullified by campaign statements, despite the fact that his entire argument seemed to rest on that claim….
TEXAS: Man faces criminal charges for angry anti-Muslim tirade directed at Muslims on a beach
SOUTH PADRE ISLAND: Man faces criminal charges after police say he went on an obscenity-packed anti-Muslim tirade directed at a Muslim family. Yes, he cursed at the family, but he didn’t threaten them with violence. There is still a First Amendment in this country that protects offensive speech. It does not give you the right NOT to be offended.
FOX61 South Padre Island police arrested Alexander Jennes Downing, 35, of Connecticut, after responding to reports of a disturbance on May 3rd, according to WTIC. Police took Downing into custody for public intoxication after deciding he was a danger to himself and others.
Video taken by the family that afternoon shows a man dressed in a green Under Armour tank top and blue shorts walk over to them and confront members of their group, yelling, “You’re a f****** Muslim, motherf*****.” As another beachgoer tries to push the man away, he shouts, “You will never ever, ever, stop me, my Christianity, from rising above your Sharia law. Your Sharia law don’t mean s*** to me.”
At one point the man can be heard hollering “Donald Trump will stop you. Donald Trump will stop you!” Before storming away, video shows him grabbing his crotch and yelling something obscene at the family, in front of several children.
THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM
Documenting the Islamization of the WEST
Australia: Muslim students wore ISIS shirts, threatened to behead teacher
( MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE, THEY INFILTRATE! )
It is easy to imagine what these young men will be like in another five or ten years. Do Australian authorities really believe that they will become stable and productive members of society?
“‘It was scary for me and the other students’: Sydney teacher says Muslim pupils as young as 10 wore ISIS shirts to school, waved terrorist flags and circled around her reciting the Koran,” by Stephen Johnson, Daily Mail Australia, May 12, 2017:
A primary school teacher in Sydney’s west has spoken of how radicalised Muslim boys wore ISIS shirts to class and circled around her menacingly reciting the Koran.
The woman, known by the pseudonym of Mrs A, told former federal Labor leader Mark Latham about the horror of being intimidated by students aged between 10 and 13.
‘I had students coming into class flying flags from overseas, be it the Syrian flag and possibly the ISIS flag. It looked to me like the ISIS flag,’ she told the Mark Latham Outsiders program.
‘There was one occasion where a couple of boys had come to school wearing T-shirts that appeared to have the ISIS flag wording.’
On another occasion, a group of students circled her against a wall and began reciting the Koran, she claimed.
‘That was quite scary and it wasn’t only scary for me but it was also quite intimidating for the other students,’ she said.
‘The other students were quite frightened, non-Islamic and Islamic students.’
The incidents, involving students in Years 5 and 6, occurred in 2014 as ISIS gained territory in Iraq and Syria.
The teacher, who has taught in the same area for the past decade, also endured students making threats to her with throat slitting gestures.
‘Sometimes they would even make comments, “I can do this to you”,’ she said, demonstrating the intimidating finger movement.
She added that some students would ‘constantly make threats to behead’ her in class.
A spokesman for the Department of Education confirmed to Daily Mail Australia on Thursday the incidents she described had taken place….
Comments
Lets kick-out the Traitors in We the People Government for "Dereliction of Duty".
Instead of doing their duty(SERVING AND PROTECTING) and running the People GOOD Government .
What The Hell Is Wrong With OUR Representatives Chasing Ghosts Stories(Russian Party Hackers) there is no credibility of Law to pursue. What are the Legal Charges to stem this Warlock Hunt ?
Therefore, WE the People PARTY and Tea Party must STAND-UP AND START-UP Petition DRIVES IN EVERY STATE OF THE UNION to Remove The Traitors from the People GOOD Government.
END THIS CIRCUS OF CLOWNS IN OFFICE.
Dartmouth Announces Linda Sarsour Lecture, Days After Refusing to Co-Sponsor Event Featuring Disabled Israeli Soldier
9 Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate )!
Colleges have declared for the enemy in the all-out war on truth and freedom. Why are American taxpayers forced to fund these hotbeds of anti-Americanism and antisemitism?
The pro-Israel community at Dartmouth College is still reeling following a decision by school leadership to appoint as their new head of faculty a leading supporter of the movement to boycott Israel and Jewish academics.
Now this.
Dartmouth College announced Wednesday evening that it will be hosting a lecture by virulently anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour, days after an office at the school declined to co-sponsor an event featuring a veteran of the Israel Defense Forces.
This, in the wake of the outrage that CUNY invited Sarsour to keynote their commencement ceremony. This is what the left does. No matter how wrong and evil, they hunker down. We never see this on the right. They don’t stand by their people; they run.
Stand up against the norming of evil. Join us in our protest against hatemonger Linda Sarsour on May 25th. RSVP here. Speakers include:
- Milo Yiannopoulos, free speech activist, “the most fabulous supervillain on the internet.”
- Assemblyman Dov Hikind, 48th Assembly District
- John Guandolo, Counter-Terror Expert, Founder of UnderstandingTheThreat.com.
- ‘Lauri B. Regan, Endowment for Middle East Truth and National Women’s Committee of the Republican Jewish Coalition
- David Wood, Acts 17 Apologetics
Antisemitic bigot Sarsour is an outspoken critic of Israel who furiously supports the Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions (BDS) movement, a Hamas-inspired initiative that uses various forms of public protest, economic pressure, and lawsuits to advance the Hamas agenda of permanently destroying Israel as a Jewish nation-state.
Vis-a-vis the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict, Sarsour favors a one-state solution where an Arab majority and a Jewish minority would live together within the borders of a single country. In October 2012 she tweeted that “nothing is creepier than Zionism.”
In 2004, Sarsour acknowledged that a friend of hers, as well as a cousin, were both serving long sentences in Israeli jails because of their efforts to recruit jihadists to murder Jews. Moreover, she revealed that her brother-in-law was serving a 12-year prison term because of his affiliation with Hamas.
In October 2011, Linda Sarsour, who holds free-market economics in low regard, expressed, on behalf of “Muslim New Yorkers,” “solidarity and support” for the pro-communist Occupy Wall Street movement. In 2011 as well, the Obama Administration honored Sarsour as a “champion of change.” Not surprisingly, Sarsour visited the White House on at least seven different occasions during Obama’s tenure.
In May 2012 Sarsour tweeted that the so-called “underwear bomber,” an Al-Qaeda operative who in 2009 had tried to blow up a Detroit-bound passenger jet in mid-flight, was actually a CIA agent participating in America’s “war on Islam.”
In November 2012 in Baltimore, Sarsour—ever eager to peddle her woeful tale of Islamic victimhood—spoke at a Muslim Public Affairs Council conference titled “Facing Race: Xenophobic Hate Crimes.” This is the same Council that views the murderous Jew-haters of Hezbollah as members of “a liberation movement” that is “fighting for freedom.”
Sarsour was outraged when a police officer and an FBI agent shot and killed a young black Muslim named Usaama Rahim in Boston on June 2, 2015, when Rahim lunged at them with a military-style knife as they attempted to question him about suspected terrorism-related activities. Naturally, Sarsour’s assessment of the incident confidently traced everything back to race: “At the end of the day, a Black man was shot on a bus stop on his way to work and we should treat this like any other case of police violence.”
In August 2015 Sarsour spoke out in support of the incarcerated Palestinian Islamic Jihad member Muhammad Allan, a known recruiter of suicide bombers.
According to CounterJihad.com, Sarsour has attended and spoken at numerous rallies sponsored by Al-Awda, a group that views Israel as a terrorist, genocidal state whose very creation was a “catastrophe” for Arab peoples.
Sarsour has also solicited donations for the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund, which had worked with the Hamas-funding Holy Land Foundation.
There’s more. She also initially portrayed the killing of Shaima Alawadi by her husband as a racist-Islamophobic-anti-Muslim killing instead.
Dartmouth Announces Linda Sarsour Lecture, Days After Refusing to Co-Sponsor Event Featuring Israeli Soldier
Algemeiner, May 11, 2017:
Dartmouth College announced Wednesday evening that it will be hosting a lecture by virulently anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour, days after an office at the school declined to co-sponsor an event featuring a veteran of the Israel Defense Forces.
The Sarsour event — to be held Friday evening in honor of Asian Pacific American Heritage Month — is co-sponsored by the college’s Office of Pluralism and Leadership (OPAL) and Special Programs and Events Committee. According to a member of Dartmouth Students for Israel (DSI) — who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution by the administration — OPAL turned him down earlier this week when he approached them about co-hosting a program featuring Izzy Ezagui, the only soldier to ever return to battle after losing an arm in combat.
DSI was told by an OPAL representative that the Ezagui lecture “sounds like a great event, but it is felt that it does not meet the mission of OPAL.” The representative then suggested “more appropriate places to reach out to” for assistance, including the Student Accessibility Services, which the DSI member said is “generally not an organization that does events.”
On its website, OPAL describes its mission as “to foster a Dartmouth where all students can thrive, value difference, and contribute to the creation of a socially just world.”
The Ezagui event will go forward — with the co-sponsorship of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America on Campus, as well as the Dartmouth Chabad and Hillel centers — but the DSI member said he has asked OPAL to “kindly explain in more detail why the event does not meet the OPAL mission?”
In his follow-up email to OPAL, the DSI student wrote, “I looked at the OPAL mission prior to contacting the office and thought it was very compatible with a ‘comprehensive leadership development’ program, as well as representing historically under-represented groups (Izzy is a Jew, and is disabled, so both groups have been historically under represented at this college and nationally).”
Sarsour — who will be speaking on “how home and a sense of belonging is sometimes the result of our own personal advocacy,” according to the program description on Facebook — has been condemned by Democratic New York state Assemblyman Dov Hikind as “someone who associates with radical Islamists” and as a “bigot” by former national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman.
Sandor Farkas, the president of DSI, told The Algemeiner that he and his friends are “outraged” by the Sarsour program, especially in “light of the recent controversy” surrounding a professor with ties to the campaign to boycott Israel who has been promoted to the consequential role of Dean of Faculty.
“I think Dartmouth College has shown a remarkable disregard for the concerns of the Jewish community by inviting renowned BDS advocate and Israel-hater Linda Sarsour,” said Farkas, who will graduate this spring.
“Over my four years at Dartmouth, I have always felt that our campus conversation around Israel was reasoned and respectful, with only an occasional exception,” he added. “While I want to believe that this coincidence [of two anti-Israel incidents in one week] is nothing more than administrative incompetence, OPAL’s refusal to co-sponsor an event with an Israeli speaker demonstrates otherwise. I am deeply saddened to graduate knowing that my Jewish friends on campus may face real hatred and discrimination, not only from other students, but from the highest levels of the college administration.”
Farkas said pro-Israel students plan to “stage a silent protest during the [Sarsour] event, including flooding [her] with difficult questions.”
Dartmouth’s announcement comes as the City University of New York (CUNY) has come under fire for inviting Sarsour to give the commencement speech at the graduation exercises for CUNY’s Graduate School of Public Health.
Representatives for OPAL did not immediately respond to The Algemeiner‘s request for comment.
The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM! Documenting the Islamization of the WEST
Liberals Boo God and Natural Rights at GOP Town Hall
At a rambunctious town hall in his district, Rep. Dave Brat, R-Va., ran into something he probably never expected to see in his district: voters booing the concept of fundamental, God-given rights.
“As a seminary graduate, do you believe in the separation of church and state?” the questioner began. “Would it be acceptable for you for churches to support specific candidates?”
The question was in reference to the Johnson Amendment, which President Trump recently gutted somewhat with his lackluster order on religious liberty.
“Absolutely,” Brat initially answered, cautioning that he was asked “a loaded question.”
“It’s in the Constituiton. They got it pretty good,” Brat said amidst the crows of hecklers.
“The politics shouldn’t establish any religion, right?” Brat added, to a response of claps and cheers. “But you should all, under the First Amendment, have the free expression thereof.”
But he took the argument deeper, asking an enthusiastic audience if they wanted a “total separation of state,” and cautioning that he did not think such an arrangement would be a good thing.
“Some of you have said that health care is a right,” the congressman explained. “And in the Western tradition, rights come from God. The role of government is to protect those rights.”
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6h1qnKLV7o
The hecklers responded with a chorus of sustained boos.
The question and its response came during a Tuesday night event – his first since the House’s most-recent health care vote – and was attended by hundreds, and fraught with jeers.
In an op-ed published the day after, the Richmond-Times Dispatch’s editorial board lauded the congressman for attempting to engage in civil discourse while excoriating the crowd’s “astonishing rudeness.”
“People have every right to rage at their congressmen, their president, or anybody else they care to,” the board stated. “After a while, though, the emotional vomiting gets old … when did banging on a high chair with a spoon ever lead to a solution?
Brat’s answer about rights was not wrong, of course. This republic was founded by men of different faiths who had a common understanding that their rights came from a transcendent, pre-political source, and established a system of government to ensure that these inalienable rights would be protected, rather than metered out by kings and demagogues.
Our denominationally neutral Declaration of Independence reflects this, appealing to the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” as the font from which our fundamental liberties and inherent equality spring.
Apparently, the concept of rights coming from God – or civil discourse in general – just wasn’t what Rep. Brat’s constituents showed up to hear that night. (For more fro/m the author of “Liberals Boo God and Natural Rights at GOP Town Hall” please click HERE) http://joemiller.us/2017/05/liberals-boo-god-natural-rights-gop-town-hall/
Comey Go Homey
By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
So…it’s been an interesting week.
France, more than half a century after the end of WWII finally surrendered to Germany and President Trump finally fired FBI Director, James Comey.
The former has Islamists dancing on the Champs Elysées and Angela Merkel now running two countries without borders…while the latter has Hillary Clinton sweating like Britney Spears on Jeopardy.
Liberals, being the socialists that they are, are overjoyed at the prospect of an even more socialistic France crawling with assorted, but unvetted Islamists, but their heads are exploding over the firing of James Comey.
It’s the difference between Moulin le Boom…
One by one, the liberal elite in Washington rushed to the nearest microphone to exclaim how wrong it was that Comey found out about his dismissal from news reports on TV. It’s WRONG the cried, and decried…to find out you’ve been fired from a TV report. He deserved to find out with a phone call, or some other, more official way…but NOT from a TELEVISION report they say.
Funny…they never had a problem when Obama claimed to have learned just about everything from television reports…but COMEY…that’s a different story.
Comey was in Unicoriforniafornia, addressing FBI agents when news of his ash-canning flashed across the TV screens in the room. As reported…he chuckled…and continued to address what were, by then, his former employees. After that, as reported, Comey went into a private room to, I suppose, find out if or not he had really been fired.
He was to have spoken to a room full of FBI recruits Tuesday evening…which never happened…so we can deduce that Comey by then had discovered that he was, in fact…unemployed.
News helicopters then followed the Comey job funeral procession down the L.A. Freeway system, as it was led…and followed…by Sheriff’s deputies, as it made its way to the airport where cameras caught the FORMER Director of the FBI shaking a few hands of deputies before boarding his private jet to fly back to DC…I’m sure to pick up the box of his stuff from his office which, by the time of his arrival, was probably packed for him.
Confirmed liberal/socialist congressman, Elijah Cummings is now demanding an investigation into the firing of James Comey…and John McCain, the so politically and ideologically confused senator that he doesn’t know which bathroom to use…the one with the elephant on the door or the one with the jackass…is calling for a special investigator.
Good grief…investigate the firing of a guy who gave incompetent boobs a bad name?
Really???
Let’s just have a look-loo at the expanded timeline in all of this, shall we? Hillary blamed
Comey for her losing the election…liberals demanded Comey be fired by Obama…Comey GETS fired by Trump…and liberals now demand an investigation INTO his firing.
Yep…that’s about it…so as far as I’m concerned, those liberals can save their fake crocodile tears over the draining of this particular corner of the swamp.
Liberals, of course, say it’s an attempt to cover up all the illegal shenanigans Trump was involved in with the Russians, of which during six months of official FBI investigations, Comey had found exactly zero evidence of…so that’s nothing but a smokescreen.
Want to know what’s really got the liberals panties wadded up?
Comey seemingly was the only brick wall preventing Hillary from being indicted…from Huma being indicted…from Loretta Lynch being indicted, from Susan Rice being indicted and possibly even keeping Obama from being indicted.
While Comey being told not to let the screen door at Quantico hit him in the ass on the way out slammed the door on that protective asset of the Obama regime…it opened
several other doors that could very well clear the way for said indictments to be handed down.
Ironically…the window-dressing letter outlining Comey’s firing made his treatment of Hillary last year the last straw…as in Comey acted against the scope of his office in releasing information about Hillary and the investigation into her illegal email activities.
While Comey’s release of facts surrounding Hillary may, or may not have affected the election, it’s fair to say it had a greater effect on the outcome than the Russians did, but Comey also refused to recommend prosecution, which meant in the end, he actually helped Hillary.
With one less snake in the swamp, Hillary, by now, must be on a bender. She’s got to be more nervous than a former Bill Clinton’s intern at a blue dress fashion show.
While Comey never floated the notion that Hillary didn’t break the law…what he did say was that he could find no INTENT on her part to break the law.
Well, there’s a crock-o-crap.
There is NO statute that says that there needs to be PROOF of INTENT before a pant-suited law breaker can be recommended for indictment…and Comey damn-well knew that, but he couldn’t find intent? Hillary INTENDED to get her own private email account, and she INTENDED to have it hosted on her own private server. Hillary INTENDED to hire he own private IT guy AND she INTENDED to get that guy a gig INSIDE the Department of State so he could watch over her private set-ups.
Hillary clearly INTENDED to use her private email account, on her private server, to conduct ALL of her official Department of State business…and she INTENDED to allow ACCESS to said private emails to just about anybody she had ever come into contact with, including a wad of people with absolutely NO clearance to even catch as much as a
GLIMPSE of classified documents.
Hillary most certainly INTENDED to erase more than 30 THOUSAND documents and emails from her private account…and she JUST as certainly INTENDED to have her private, government employed IT dude hose he hard drive with BLEACHBIT and SCRUB it clean of any incriminating evidence.
Hillary, without a doubt INTENDED to claim there were NEVER any CLASSIFIED documents ON her private email account or on her private server…she INTENDED to alter that false claim if she missed any…which she did…because she did…and Hillary INTENDED to make sure that she had Comey in the back pocket of whatever pant suit she fainted in at any particular time.
Don’t even get me started on what she INTENDED to do regarding her pay to play Clinton Foundation/Department of State illegal activities or the fact that Comey gave everybody involved with Hillary’s illegal activities immunity from prosecution.
So Comey couldn’t find any intent in what Hillary did?
Even a blind squirrel can find a nut every once in a while…which means Comey was worse off…perhaps akin to a blind, quadriplegic, brain-dead squirrel who wouldn’t have been able to locate his OWN nuts if they were hanging from the middle of his furry little forehead.
Now THAT’S a mental image for ya right there.
But liberals are hoppin’ mad. They’re all waded up to the point where they don’t know whether to play in the street to try and stop traffic, or dust off their vagina costumes and parade up and down the sidewalk over the firing of James Comey. How DARE Trump do such a thing.
Of course…I don’t remember a single liberal, whether in Washington, or inhabiting the mainstream media getting in any kind of a snit when Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions back in 1993. Nope…they were as quite as a mushroom in a bucket of bullcrap when that happened.
There is one liberal who isn’t making a big stink over the firing of James Comey…
Bill Clinton.
Think about it…He’s been cooped up in the same house with Hillary for the past six months…watching her swill gin and pretending to be the president…holding news briefings in the kitchen and butt dialing Angela Merkel. Six long months of having to make believe he’s the First Lady and listening to Hillary moan and cry in the guest room while assuring her than Lincoln did once sleep there.
With Comey gone, Bill knows the path is now clear for a possible indictment of the Hildabeast that is cramping his style, and he’s got to be secretly thrilled at the prospect because six mo
nths is a long, long…LONG time for a horny old goat like Billy boy to go with a barrel full of dry cigars.
Look…I have no idea who will become the next Director of the FBI as there are a bunch of great manes in the nomination hat, and frankly, I don’t really care, so long as whoever it is can accomplish two things…
Indict Hillary…
And find their own nuts.
Copyright © 2017 Craig Andresen / thenationalpatriot.com
REMINDER!!!
Today, Friday, May 12th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori both take on the James Comey firing from introspection to snark, plus important news of the week.
By Oscar Y Harward
Capitol Hill Democrats and the ‘Main-stream’ Medias are criticizing President Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey. Most Americans are pleased with Comey’s dismissal.
- 1. Evidence shows Hillary Clinton used her own person smartphones to communicate ‘TOP SECURITY’ information with; allowing war enemies, and all others, to know exactly what the American US Military was doing.
- 2. Evidence shows Hillary Clinton destroyed or may have had the evidence destroying her personal smartphones used to communicate ‘TOP SECURITY’ information.
- 3. Evidence shows Hillary Clinton destroyed or had the evidence destroyed of many thousands of E-mails associated with her government work as Secretary of State.
- 4. Evidence shows Hillary Clinton shows that while enemy terrorists were on the way to Benghazi, Lydia. Ambassador, Christopher Stevens and others were calling out for military assistance for their protection. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton denied this military backup support.
- 5. Evidence shows that Ambassador, Christopher Stevens, State Information Officer Sean Smith, and Navy Seals Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods most likely would have survived had Sec. Clinton provided the requested military support; that was waiting for State Department clearance to protect the Benghazi compound.
- 6. Evidence shows Hillary Clinton with her husband, former President Bill Clinton may have used a quid pro quo system for otherwise, illegally covering huge personal donations.
Other questions must be answered. Although Director James Comey stated he questioned Hillary Clinton in investigating her. Director Comey, says he found no reason in seeking an indictment.
Even worse, While Director Comey says he ‘NEVER’ questioned Hillary Clinton under oath.
The exchange between Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and Director Comey requires President Trump’s termination of Director Comey as draining of the swamp http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/07/watch-rep-trey-gowdy-rip-apart-fbi-director-james-comey-about-hillary-clinton/.
{jewishworldreview.com} ~ President Trump is about to score a religious trifecta, visiting Saudi Arabia, Israel and Rome, the "home" of three monotheistic religions. The president has said he wants to make the ultimate deal and achieve peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
While the goal is similar to a high school kid attempting to hit a curve ball from an all-star pitcher, the scenario cannot end well for Israel. How do I know this? One has only to look at history. There has never -- never -- been a time when an American president has sought to lessen tensions in the region that Israel has not been smeared as the main impediment and required to "do more" to make peace happen. Israel is not an impediment to peace. Her enemies are.
Here's the danger for President Trump. The Koran allows Muslims to lie to "nonbelievers" in pursuit of Islam's goal of an earthly kingdom ruled by their religion. An example occurred last week when Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas met at the White House with President Trump. Abbas said, "Mr. President, I affirm to you that we are raising our youth, our children and grandchildren, in a culture of peace."
That is a flat-out lie, as even a cursory Google search or visit to the Palestinian Media Watch website proves. President Trump correctly saw the problem in a campaign speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee: "In Palestinian textbooks and mosques, you've got a culture of hatred that has been fomenting there for years. And if we want to achieve peace, they've got to go out and they've got to start this educational process. They have to end education of hatred."
Which country promotes the most extreme form of Islam in children's textbooks, mosques and their media?
It is Saudi Arabia.
If a person, or nation, believes they have a mandate from their "god" to lie to achieve their goals, how likely is it that even a president is not regarded as an "infidel" whose desire for peace can be used to damage Israel's best interests?
As Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick, who's column appears on JWR, correctly noted last week: "Israel is the most immediate casualty of Trump's decision to embrace Abbas and the PLO, because the PLO is Israel's enemy. Abbas is an anti-Semite. His doctoral dissertation, which he later published as a book, is a Holocaust denying screed.
"Abbas engages in anti-Semitic incitement on a daily basis, both directly and indirectly. It was Abbas who called for his people to kill Jews claiming that we pollute Judaism's most sacred site, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, with our 'filthy feet.' The Palestinian media and school system which he controls with an iron fist both regularly portray Jews as evil monsters, deserving of physical annihilation."
This is not the attitude of one with whom a president or prime minister of Israel can make peace.
A virus of hatred toward Israel and Jews is epidemic throughout the region. One is as likely to change the minds of such people as persuade a serious Christian to deny the resurrection of Jesus, or an Orthodox Jew to accept Him as Messiah.
The difference is that Christians and Jews do not have world domination as their goal and violence as their method.
President Trump should re-read his AIPAC speech, because he was right to say what he said then.
Abbas lied to the president during his visit. Mr. Trump can expect more lies on his trip to Saudi Arabia, whose leaders may promise all sorts of things and tell the president what he wants to hear, but won't mean it.
The proof is in their interpretation of their religion. As always, the West must pay less attention to what the enemies of Israel say and more attention to what they do.
by BEN SHAPIRO
TUCKER: Former US Attorney: "James Comey Is a Danger to the Country" (May 3)
VIDEO: http://video.insider.foxnews.com/v/5420988831001
VIDEO: http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/5426573806001
He has good news: You are as rich as John D. Rockefeller. Richer, actually.
Some historians estimate that Sept. 29, 1916, a surge in the price of Rockefeller’s shares of the Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey made him America’s first billionaire. Others say he never reached this milestone and that Henry Ford was the first. Never mind. If Rockefeller was the first, his billion was worth $23 billion in today’s dollars. Boudreaux asks if you would accept this bargain: You can be as rich as Rockefeller was in 1916 if you consent to live in 1916.
Boudreaux says that if you had Rockefeller’s riches back then, you could have had a palatial home on Fifth Avenue, another overlooking the Pacific, and a private island if you wished. Of course, going to and from the coasts in your private but unairconditioned railroad car would be time-consuming and less than pleasant. And communicating with someone on the other coast would be a time-consuming chore.
Commercial radio did not arrive until 1920, and 1916 phonographs would lacerate 2017 sensibilities, as would 1916’s silent movies. If in 1916 you wanted Thai curry, chicken vindaloo or Vietnamese pho, you could go to the phone hanging on your wall and ask the operator (direct dialing began in the 1920s) to connect you to restaurants serving those dishes. The fact that there were no such restaurants would not bother you because in 1916 you had never heard of those dishes, so you would not know what you were missing.
If in 1916 you suffered from depression, bipolar disorder, a sexually transmitted disease or innumerable other ailments treatable in 2017, you also would not know that you were missing antibiotics and the rest of modern pharmacology. And don’t even think about getting a 1916 toothache. You can afford state-of-the-art 1916 dentures, and probably will need them. Your arthritic hips and knees? Hobble along until you cannot hobble any more, then buy a wheelchair. Birth control in 1916 will be primitive, unreliable and not conducive to pleasure.
You could enjoy a smattering of early jazz, but rock ’n’ roll is decades distant, and Netflix and Google even more so. Your pastimes would be limited, but you could measure the passage of time on the finest Swiss watch. It, however, would be less accurate than today’s Timex or smartphone.
As a 1916 billionaire, you would be materially worse off than a 2017 middle- class American; an unhealthy 1916 billionaire would be much worse off than an unhealthy 2017 American of any means. Intellectually, your 1916 range of cultural choices would be paltry compared with today’s. And your moral tranquility might be disturbed by the contrast between your billionaire’s life and that of the normal American.
In 2015, a Bureau of Labor Statistics paper described the life of workers in 1915. More than half (52.4 percent) of the 100 million Americans were younger than 25, life expectancy at birth was 54.5 years (today, 78.8) and fewer than 5 percent of Americans were 65 or older. One in 10 babies died in the first year of life (today, one in 168). A large majority of births were not in hospitals (today, fewer than 1 percent).
In 1915, only about 14 percent of people ages 14-17 were in high school, an estimated 18 percent ages 25 and older had completed high school, and nearly 75 percent of women working in factories had left school before eighth grade. There were four renters for every homeowner, partly because mortgages (usually for just five to seven years) required down payments of 40 to 50 percent of the purchase price.
Fewer than one-third of homes had electric lights. Small electric motors – the first Hoover vacuum cleaner appeared in 1915 – were not yet lightening housework. Iceboxes, which were the norm until after World War II, were all that 1915 had: General Motors’ Frigidaire debuted in 1918.
So, thank Boudreaux for making you think about this: How large would your net worth have to be to get you to swap the life you are living in “hellhole” America for what that money could buy in 1916?
By Oscar Y. Harward
How blinding for Democrat Party leaders, other anti-Americans followers, ‘Main-steam’ Medias, and/or others who continue supporting additional Islamic immigration, their Quran, Sharia Law, and other anti-Christian teachings?
Many left-wing teachings and other anti-Judeo-Christian instructions start from within the Department of Education.
Islamic Muslims’ doctrines consistently persist they will take over the world; destroying and killing Americans, Israelis, and other members of the Judeo-Christian communities.
It has become strenuous for ‘Main-steam’ Medias to ever identify these killers as Islamic Muslims.
Free loving Americans are enraged of seeing and hearing the beheading massacres created by Islamic Muslims; all around the world. Democrat Party leaders and ‘Main-steam’ Medias report these atrocious crimes as rare radical Muslims.
The facts will prove differently: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/.
America and the free world are at war with Islamic Muslims; and have been for hundreds of years. Democrat leaders may be lining their own pockets with Islamic oil-rich nations’ money.
Democrat Party leaders and many members of the ‘Mail-stream’ Medias knowingly support terrorists with their words. It is a matter of time before Islamic Muslims’ terrorisms arrival on (y)our streets and communities.
Those who depend on ‘Mail-stream’ Medias may be teaching more anti-Americans by reporting left-wing news versions, rather than Constitutional freedoms. President Trump, and Capitol Hill’s GOP legislators are attempting to reverse these anti-American actions.
Supporters of the Democrat Party, ‘Main-steam’ Medias, and others in refusing to openly condemn Islamic Muslim terrorism, are supporting violence in the USA.
Muslim Interfaith Panelist @Portland_State Univ: “Being an infidel is not allowed” in a Muslim Country
An interfaith panel held on April 26, 2017, at Portland State University hosted a variety of individuals who discussed various religious stances. One panelist, a Muslim, stated that apostates and infidels are to be killed or “banished” from a Muslim country.
The student’s statement has been transcribed here:
“And some of this, that you’re referring to, like killing non-Muslims,” he takes a long pause and then looks out at the audience with a grin, “that is only considered a crime when the country’s the law– if the country’s based on Koranic law, that means there is no other law than the Koran, so, in that case you’re giving the liberty to like . . . leave the country. You can go to a different country, I’m not gonna sugarcoat it. So, you can go on [sic] a different country, but in a Muslim country, a country based on the Koranic laws, disbelieving, or being an infidel is not allowed. So you will be given the choice.”
You can watch the video below:Video https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/muslim-panelist-infidel-not-allowed-koran/
The Muslim panelist – who spoke the truth about Islam – was quickly aided by another Muslim from the audience who had to do damage control.
Muslims and their apologists who refer to non-Muslim minorities living in lands conquered by Muslims hope you won’t see the irony: that non-Muslims weren’t always the minority and that is was Muslims waging jihad who slaughtered the majority of them or forced them out causing them to become a minority. 1,400 years ago there were no Muslim countries.
Texas: Muslim candidate plays victim, on verge of being first elected in Pearland County
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
...
Source: Muslim city council candidate feels targeted online | khou.com
PEARLAND, Texas — A woman running for city council in Pearland believes she is being targeted online because she’s a Muslim.
That woman is Dalia Kasseb, who went block by block Tuesday afternoon to try and pick up last minute supporters.
“We’re a very diverse community, and that diversity needs to show up in our community,” Kasseb said.
For example, an article from The Atlantic titled “How American Muslims Are Trying to Take Back Their Government” was shared on Facebook by Pealand ISD trustee Rusty Deborde days ago.
Deborde also posted the comment, “Please spread the word. This is happening this election cycle right here in Pearland.”
Deborde declined KHOU 11’s repeated requests for comment.
Ex-city councilman Kevin Cole shared the same article, echoing similar thoughts to Deborde. Cole tells KHOU 11 News it’s not an issue of “religion, race or gender with anyone that decides to run for political office in Pearland or anywhere else.”
He says his concern is with the Islamic Society of North America, who he believes is targeting this and other political races around Texas.
Kasseb in the meantime is pushing forward.
“Muslims are a huge part of the community,” she said. “We are your doctors, we are your healthcare professionals, we are the engineers and the business owners and we are here because we love America and we love our community.
Kasseb decided to run a few months back for the position. She says it’s being created because of the expansion of the west side of town.
More via May 6 election results
The most contested race of the election cycle is Pearland City Council position No. 7, which had six contestants running for the newly created council position. Because no contestant secured at least 50 percent of the vote, a run-off election will be held in June.
Shadow Creek Ranch resident Dalia Kasseb secured 40.78 percent percent of the vote. Kasseb will run against Woody Owens who received 21.05 percent of the vote.
“We’re going to keep at it keep sending our positive messages, keep talking to people and hearing their voices. We’re going to keep talking about the real issues and keep everything positive. That’s the main thing I want my campaign to be,” Kasseb said. “People in Pearland want diversity; they see that change coming in the future, and I’m going to keep fighting to make sure the voices of Pearland are going to be represented in council.”
If elected in a run-off, Kasseb would be the first Muslim elected to public office in Pearland and Brazoria County.
Wiltz and Jones were Project LIFT candidates. Dalia Kasseb was not, but as that second story notes she received support from the Brazoria County Democratic Party and had done a lot of campaigning in tandem with Wiltz. My guess is there was at least one other Democrat in that race, and I won’t be surprised if she gets a TDP nod for the runoff.
They say everything is bigger in Texas and that includes the Muslim invasion and infiltration. Texas is a leading destination for Muslim refugees, legal invaders and illegals.
Muslims are taking over government positions across the country, bringing their sharia tendencies and Islamization to elected office. See recent posts in California, Texas, Michigan, New Jersey, Minnesota here and here, California again and Arizona to cite a few recent
The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM! Documenting the Islamization of the WEST!
N.Y. promoted, covered up lesson plan teaching students to sympathize with Islamic suicide bombers
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )...
Video https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/ny-coverup-teaching-islamic-suicide-bom
On April 12, The Blaze reported the Public Broadcasting Service has been for more than decade featuring a lesson plan that instructs students to be more sympathetic to the plight of Islamic terrorists in Palestine. The plan, titled “Dying to be a Martyr,” features, among other things, video interviews with Islamic terrorists who tell viewers why their attacks on Israelis are justified. There are no instructions in the lesson plan for teachers to denounce these views and no videos are featured showing the Israeli response.
Among the other biased aspects of the lesson plan are instructions for teachers to “Check for understanding by asking students to respond to the focus question. (Mohanned, feels he would rather die and by a martyr than live his life, sees his life as hollow—in contrast he sees Israelis as happy, going out, having fun, traveling.) Ask your students why Mohanned may feel that way (Answers may include: Palestinians have less land, fewer privileges, cannot come and go as they please.)”
A new investigation into the lesson plan and its origins show the plan was developed in New York state and was, until just a couple of weeks ago, promoted by the New York State Education Department. Following a request for comment from state officials, NYSED abruptly altered its website without a comment, essentially covering up the fact the website ever contained the “Dying to be a Martyr” material.
On a taxpayer-funded NYSED website for public school history and geography teachers, NYSED lists numerous videos and books in a section titled “Resources for Teachers.” Among those items listed is a video titled “Story of Islam: A History of the World’s Most Misunderstood Faith.” The “Dying to be a Martyr” lesson plan was also listed, and it appears it was the only full lesson plan listed in that section, which contains 40 items.
The lesson plan is also featured by Thirteen.org, a website belonging to the WNET-TV network, the PBS affiliate for New York City and the areas immediately surrounding the city. It appears the New York PBS affiliate is the producer of the lesson plan. The author of the plan is a long-time public school teacher in upstate New York.
An investigation by The Blaze reveals the teacher who authored “Dying to be a Martyr” is still teaching at Ballston Spa High School, a public school in Ballston Spa, New York, located in Saratoga County. At Ballston Spa, the teacher leads courses covering world history for 9th and 10th graders. A review of classroom notes posted to the teacher’s website shows she covers the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in great deal in her course. Among the many questions students are asked to answer are “What is Hammas’ view ?” and “How were Palestinian refugees treated?”
The Blaze sent multiple e-mails requesting comments from the teacher who authored “Dying to be a Martyr” and to Ballston Spa High School’s vice principal and principal, Kristi Jensen. The Blaze also sent e-mails to the New York State Department of Education for comment. Among the questions asked was whether “Dying to be a Martyr” or similar views are being taught in New York public schools
THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL SOUNDING THE ALARM! DOCUMENTING THE ISLAMIZATION OF THE WEST! .
Islamic
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )Hate, Not Islamic State
A lie conceals the truth. And ugly but hidden truths never have a chance of being acknowledged, addressed, and ameliorated. Because of this simple truism, one of the greatest lies of our age — that violence committed in the name of Islam has nothing to do with Islam — has made an intrinsically weak Islam the scourge of the modern world, with no signs of relief on the horizon.
It is, therefore, useful to expose the main strategy used by liars in government, media, and academia: 1) to ignore the generic but chronic everyday reports of Muslim violence against non-Muslims around the world; 2) to address only spectacular Muslim violence, which, because it is almost always committed by professional jihadi groups can be portrayed as a finite, temporal, localized problem: defeat that particular “terrorist group” and the problem vanishes.
By way of example, consider the Islamic targeting of Christian churches. Last month, after two Egyptian churches were bombed, leaving 51 worshippers dead, everyone was quick to point out that something called “ISIS” — which of course “has nothing to do with Islam” — was responsible.
On Easter Sunday, 2016, more than 3,000 miles away from Egypt, in Pakistan, approximately 70 Christians were killed in a bomb attack, also specifically targeting Easter celebrations. Then we were told that something called “Taliban” — also “nothing to do with Islam” — was responsible.
Meanwhile, some 3,000 miles west of Egypt, in Nigeria, Christians are also under attack. There, 11,500 Christians have been killed and 13,000 churches destroyed. According to the official narrative, something called “Boko Haram” is responsible. This is another group that habitually bombs churches during Christmas and Easter; another group that, we are told, “has nothing to do with Islam,” but rather is a finite, temporal, localized problem: defeat it, and the problem vanishes.
About 5,000 miles west of Nigeria, in the U.S., Americans were told that something called “al-Qaeda” attacked and killed 3,000 of their countrymen on 9/11; defeating that finite group would cease the terror. Its leader, Osama bin Laden, was reportedly killed, and victory loudly proclaimed — until, that is, an even more savage manifestation called the “Islamic State” came on the scene and went further than al-Qaeda could’ve ever dreamed.
The problem is not merely that the liars in media, government, and academia refuse to connect the dots and insist on treating each of the aforementioned groups as disparate, finite groups with different “political” or “territorial” motivations — none of which has anything to do with Islam. The greater issue is that regular Muslims who are not called “ISIS,” “Taliban,” “Boko Haram,” or “al-Qaeda,” commit similar acts — and much more frequently — though this is rarely mentioned by big media lest people begin to connect the dots.
Thus, although ISIS claimed the Egyptian church bombing before Easter, it is everyday Egyptian imams who “preach hatred and violence against Christians to the public over loudspeakers”; it is everyday Muslims who persecute Christians “every two or three days”; every day Muslims who riot and kill whenever a rumor surfaces that a church is going to be built, or that a Coptic kid “blasphemed” against Muhammad, or that a Christian man is dating a Muslim woman. In short, it is every day Muslims — not “ISIS” — who cause Egypt to be the 21st worst nation in the world in which to be Christian.
Similarly, though the Taliban claimed 2016’s Easter bombing, it is everyday Muslims who discriminate against, persecute, enslave, rape and murder Christians almost every day in Pakistan, making it the fourth worst nation in the world in which to be Christian. And though Boko Haram is always blamed for the more spectacular attacks on Christians and their churches, it is everyday Muslims, including the Muslim Fulani herdsmen, who make Nigeria the 12th worst nation in which to be Christian.
This is the real issue. While the media may name the terrorist groups responsible for especially spectacular attacks, few dare acknowledge that Muslims in general engage in similar acts of violence and intolerance against non-Muslims all around the world. Indeed, Muslims — of all races, nationalities, languages, and socio-political and economic circumstances, hardly just “terror groups” — are responsible for persecuting Christians in 40 of the world’s 50 worst nations in which to be Christian. Accordingly, what “extremist” “terrorist” and “militant” groups are doing is only the notable tip of the iceberg of what Muslims are doing all around the world. (See “Muslim Persecution of Christians,” reports which I’ve been compiling every month since July 2011 and witness the nonstop discrimination, persecution, and carnage committed by “everyday” Muslims against Christians. Each monthly report contains dozens of atrocities, most of which if committed by Christians against Muslims would receive 24/7 blanket coverage.)
It bears repeating: media aren’t just covering up for Islam by pretending that the spectacular attacks committed by Islamic groups on non-Muslims are finite, localized, and most importantly, “have nothing to do with Islam.” They are covering up for Islam by failing to report the everyday persecution non-Muslims experience at the hands of everyday Muslims — Muslim individuals, Muslim mobs, Muslim police, and Muslim governments (including America’s closest “friends and allies”) — and hardly just Muslim “terrorists.” They dare not connect the dots and offer a holistic picture which doesn’t merely implicate this or that group but Islam in general.
Accordingly, the world must continue to suffer from Islamic aggression. Not only have these lies allowed countless innocents to be persecuted into oblivion in the Muslim world, but they have allowed the same persecution to enter America and Europe, most recently via mass immigration.
The fact remains: an ugly truth must first be acknowledged before it can be remedied. It may be hard to acknowledge an ugly truth — that Islam, not “radical Islam,” promotes hate for and violence against non-Muslims — but anything less will just continue to feed the lie, that is, continue to feed the jihad and terror.
In short, the problem is not so much the “Islamic State”; it is Islamic hate. The former is but one of many temporal and historical manifestations of the latter, which, as an integral part of Islam, transcends time and space.
The watchman on the wall sounding the ALARM! Documenting the Islamization of the WEST!
Saudi Muslim cleric demands FIFA ban players from making sign of the cross
( Muslims do not assimilate, they infiltrate! )
Muhammad Alarefe, a prominent Saudi religious leader, has demanded that FIFA, the international soccer governing body, instruct players to stop making the Christian sign of the cross.
For many Christians, their deep, personal and peaceful faith is inextricable from every aspect of their life. Making the sign of the cross — or any other religious gesture — should not pose a problem or threat to anyone, but to the Islamic supremacist leader Muhammad Alarefe and his ilk, any religious expression outside of Islam represents a threat, especially since FIFA is so prestigious. Let’s hope FIFA honors the religious freedoms of their talented players and rejects the demands of Muhammad Alarefe. If FIFA bows to the demand of Alarefe, it should also ban Muslim prayer on the field and outskirts, too.
Back in February, Real Madrid soccer team removed the cross from its logo to avoid offending Muslims
Discriminating against Christian values and attempting to stifle Christianity — a foundational faith in the evolution of modern understandings of human rights and the formation of Western democratic principles — is nothing new. Most troubling is that discrimination against Christians while kowtowing to Muslims is being presented as the norm to the next generation.
The American Center for Law and Justice reported in 2015 that:
Public colleges and universities are taking the gloves off when it comes to Christian students on their campuses. Gone are the days of surreptitious slights against Christians; now it is open season on faith. Blatant, in-your-face anti-Christian discrimination is the new norm.
Correction: not “an open season on faith,” but specifically on Christian faith.
Also, Islamic indoctrination in public schools is in full swing, with eager collaboration and help from the Hamas-linked group CAIR.
“Saudi Cleric Demands FIFA Ban Players From Making Sign Of The Cross”, by Ali Waked, Breitbart, May 9, 2017:
TEL AVIV – Muhammad Alarefe, a prominent Saudi religious leader, has demanded that FIFA, the international soccer governing body, instruct players to stop making the Christian sign of the cross.
Alarefe wrote on his Twitter account, “I’ve seen video clips of athletes, soccer players running, shooting and when they win they make the symbol of the cross on their chests and my question is if FIFA’s rules forbid this.”
Follow
د. محمد #العريفي @MohamadAlarefe
رأيت مقاطع لرياضيين ” كرة قدم، سباق جري، رمي سهام، .. ”
إذا فاز أحدهم أشار لصدره إشارة الصليب!
سؤالي:
أليس نظام فيفا يمنع الإشارات الدينية؟
9:46 AM – 5 May 2017
993 993 Retweets 2,015 2,015 likes
Social media users were divided on the question, with some supporting Alarefe’s comment and others laughing and saying they wondered why he has taken no stance against Muslim soccer players who kneel to pray when they win or score a goal.
Sultan Alhusni wrote, “I can’t lie. Mohamed Salah (an Egyptian soccer player who plays in Europe) and others kneel to pray when they score a goal and no one punishes them. Leave the sport to those who deal with it.”
5 May
حصه العون بنت الوطن @hesshalown
@MohamadAlarefeنعم شيخنا الجليل لكن انظمتهم لا تطبق الا على المسلمين فقط وللاسف لم نجد من يحتج على هذا التمييز والكل صامت صمت القبور
Follow
سلطان الحسني @dremer_88
@hesshalown @MohamadAlarefe ما يجوز الكذب .. محمد صلاح وغيره من المسلمين في الملاعب الاروبية يحتفلون بالسجود بعد تسجيلهم الاهداف ولم يعاقبوا .. اقول خلوا الرياضه لاهلها
10:39 AM – 5 May 2017
21 21 Retweets 42 42 likes
Sam, another social media user, wrote, “The cross is one of the symbols of the vehicles we travel in, so what’s the problem if it appears on the pitch, or is what’s allowed in one place forbidden in another? Weird.”
5 May
صحيفة تواصل @twasulnews
«العريفي»: لماذا لا يمنع «فيفا» إشارات التصليب في الملاعب؟http://twasul.info/793102 #محمد_العريفي #العريفي #الملاعب #السعودية pic.twitter.com/657wwIIr6p
Follow
ɑ̷̜Lм̷̤̜̈ Al @sam147147
@twasulnews الصليب موجود بسيارات الي نركبها وش مشكله الملاعب ولا حلل وحرم بمكان ومكان لا عجيب
1:40 AM – 6 May 2017
Retweets likes
Fahd Alarawi wrote, “Great, Alarefe has become a sports commentator. When there’s free time, we get involved in things we don’t understand.”
5 May
صحيفة تواصل @twasulnews
«العريفي»: لماذا لا يمنع «فيفا» إشارات التصليب في الملاعب؟http://twasul.info/793102 #محمد_العريفي #العريفي #الملاعب #السعودية pic.twitter.com/657wwIIr6p
Follow
فهد العروي @tvip_f
@twasulnews احلى يالعريفي صاير محلل رياضي
الفاضي يعمل قاضي#محمد_العريفي
12:26 AM – 6 May 2017
Retweets likes
Another social media user wrote, “Respected Sheikh, unfortunately their rules are only applied to Muslims and unfortunately no one protests that – on the contrary, the go quieter than the grave.”
5 May
د. محمد #العريفي @MohamadAlarefe
رأيت مقاطع لرياضيين ” كرة قدم، سباق جري، رمي سهام، .. ”
إذا فاز أحدهم أشار لصدره إشارة الصليب!
سؤالي:
أليس نظام فيفا يمنع الإشارات الدينية؟
Follow
حصه العون بنت الوطن @hesshalown
@MohamadAlarefeنعم شيخنا الجليل لكن انظمتهم لا تطبق الا على المسلمين فقط وللاسف لم نجد من يحتج على هذا التمييز والكل صامت صمت القبور
10:35 AM – 5 May 2017
5 5 Retweets 19 19 likes
Win Al Fahad wrote the sheikh that, “It’s like you’re now calling on FIFA to forbid Muslim players from bowing to Allah and raising their hands in prayer to the sky. FIFA prohibits the use of religion, politics and racism in sports.”
5 May
ابراهيم العطوي @ibraheam202
@MohamadAlarefe حتى المسلمين لما يسجلو او يفوزو يسجدو شكر لله
Follow
فهد محمد العوين @alowinfahad
@ibraheam202 @MohamadAlarefe كأنك بهذا تدعو الفيفا لمنع اللاعبين المسلمين من السجود لله ورفع أيديهم لله شكرا
الفيفا يمنع توظيف الدين والعنصرية والسياسة في الرياضة.
1:01 PM – 5 May 2017
Retweets 2 2 likes
Ibrahim Alatwi responded to Al Fahad, saying, “And no one says a thing (to Muslim players who pray) so the Christians are allowed to mark the cross on their chests. FIFA doesn’t distinguish between one player and another.”
6 May
ابراهيم العطوي @ibraheam202
@turki3nzi @alowinfahad @MohamadAlarefe انا احدثك على نظام عالمي اللي هو الفيفا
نظام لا يفرق بين مسلم وكافر من ناحية القوانين مثل ما احنا المسلمين نسجد عند الفرح
Follow
ابراهيم العطوي @ibraheam202
@turki3nzi @alowinfahad @MohamadAlarefe ولا يتكلم علينا احد فيحق للنصارى ايضا الشارة الى صدورهم باشارة الصليب
فالفيفا لا يفرق بين هذا وذاك
10:54 AM – 6 May 2017
Retweets 1 1 like
Abu Lil scolded the religious scholar, writing, “Get out of our sport that unites Christians, Sunni and Shia on one team with their hearts one on the other. Everyone should deal with his religion and let us be. May FIFA be blessed.”
5 May
د. محمد #العريفي @MohamadAlarefe
رأيت مقاطع لرياضيين ” كرة قدم، سباق جري، رمي سهام، .. ”
إذا فاز أحدهم أشار لصدره إشارة الصليب!
سؤالي:
أليس نظام فيفا يمنع الإشارات الدينية؟
Follow
اٍّبّْوّ لَّيٌّلَّ☞ @M0503996767
@MohamadAlarefe @hesshalown انتم اطلعوا من رياضتنا الي تجمع المسيحي والسني والشيعي بفريق واحد على قلب واحد اتمنى كل واحد يهتم بدينه وفكونا الله يسعد نظام الفيفا️
10:42 AM – 5 May 2017
7 7 Retweets 15 15 likes
Another social media user, Capitano, responded to the sheikh with sarcasm, saying, “The ISIS regime forbids crossing oneself; when al-Baghdadi is elected president of FIFA, we’ll discuss the respected sheikh’s request.”
5 May
د. محمد #العريفي @MohamadAlarefe….
The watchman on the wqall sounding the ALARM! Documenting the Islamization of the WEST!














eur says
May 12, 2017 at 8:55 am
Islam = mafia, nationalist bullies, racism, xenophobia, inculturation, supremacism, dogmatism …..
Dave says
May 12, 2017 at 9:20 am
Australians are run by dumb Left/liberal Loons. If you do not jail these scums for 1 year at least and written commitment to not repeat it , they should not be allowed into school. Anything less will encourage others to follow him.
And we have Left/Liberal Pro-jihadi media that bans any real news , truth about Islamic jihad.
And besides facebook, twitter even Google has joined the Islamofascist gang to suppress facts, truths, real news http://tinyurl.com/lgp28rs
Andrew Swallow says
May 12, 2017 at 9:02 am
The school needs to expel them.
Note to the Immigration authorities: School boys do not have any money so their parents bought the shirts. Strong sign that these people are not loyal to the Queen and Australia.
The left & Muslim alliance says
May 12, 2017 at 9:19 am
It is destined to get worse in Australia.
The pro-Muslim left-wing Australian Labor Party (ALP) is on track to win the next Federal election, which must be held by 2019.
Buford says
May 12, 2017 at 9:27 am
Why was this Muslim P O S allowed to wear an ISIS shirt in the first place pandering to these creatures will only make it harder to put a lid on there Demonic activity.